Cardiac output and oxygen release during very high-intensity exercise performed until exhaustion

Our objectives were firstly, to study the patterns of the cardiac output (Q(.)) and the arteriovenous oxygen difference [(a-nu(-))O(2)] responses to oxygen uptake (V(.)O(2)) during constant workload exercise (CWE) performed above the respiratory compensation point (RCP), and secondly, to establish t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of applied physiology 2004-10, Vol.93 (1-2), p.9-18
Hauptverfasser: Richard, Ruddy, Lonsdorfer-Wolf, Evelyne, Dufour, Stéphane, Doutreleau, Stéphane, Oswald-Mammosser, Monique, Billat, Véronique L, Lonsdorfer, Jean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Our objectives were firstly, to study the patterns of the cardiac output (Q(.)) and the arteriovenous oxygen difference [(a-nu(-))O(2)] responses to oxygen uptake (V(.)O(2)) during constant workload exercise (CWE) performed above the respiratory compensation point (RCP), and secondly, to establish the relationships between their kinetics and the time to exhaustion. Nine subjects performed two tests: a maximal incremental exercise test (IET) to determine the maximal V(.)O(2) (V(.)O(2)peak), and a CWE test to exhaustion, performed at p Delta50 (intermediate power between RCP and V(.)O(2)peak). During CWE, V(.)O(2) was measured breath-by-breath, Q(.) was measured beat-by-beat with an impedance device, and blood lactate (LA) was sampled each minute. To calculate ( a-nu(-)O(2), the values of V(.)O(2) and Q(.) were synchronised over 10 s intervals. A fitting method was used to describe the V(.)O(2), Q(.) and ( a-nu(-))O(2) kinetics. The ( a-nu(-)O(2) difference followed a rapid monoexponential function, whereas both V(.)O(2) and Q(.) were best fitted by a single exponential plus linear increase: the time constant (tau) V(.)O(2) [57 (20 s)] was similar to tau ( a-nu(-)O(2), whereas tau for Q(.) was significantly higher [89 (34) s, P
ISSN:1439-6319
1439-6327
DOI:10.1007/s00421-004-1149-7