Comparison of Effect of Vacuum-Condensed and Ultrafiltered Milk on Cheddar Cheese

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of vacuum-condensed (CM) and ultrafiltered (UF) milk on some compositional and functional properties of Cheddar cheese. Five treatments were designed to have 2 levels of concentration (4.5 and 6.0% protein) from vacuum-condensed milk (CM1 and CM...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 2004-12, Vol.87 (12), p.4004-4012
Hauptverfasser: Acharya, M.R., Mistry, V.V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4012
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4004
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 87
creator Acharya, M.R.
Mistry, V.V.
description The objective of this study was to compare the effects of vacuum-condensed (CM) and ultrafiltered (UF) milk on some compositional and functional properties of Cheddar cheese. Five treatments were designed to have 2 levels of concentration (4.5 and 6.0% protein) from vacuum-condensed milk (CM1 and CM2) and ultrafiltered milk (UF1 and UF2) along with a 3.2% protein control. The samples were analyzed for fat, protein, ash, calcium, and salt contents at 1wk. Moisture content, soluble protein, meltability, sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE, and counts of lactic acid bacteria and nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were performed on samples at 1, 18, and 30wk. At 1wk, the moisture content ranged from 39.2 (control) to 36.5% (UF2). Fat content ranged from 31.5 to 32.4% with no significant differences among treatments, and salt content ranged from 1.38 to 1.83% with significant differences. Calcium content was higher in UF cheeses than in CM cheeses followed by control, and it increased with protein content in cheese milk. Ultrafiltered milk produced cheese with higher protein content than CM milk. The soluble protein content of all cheeses increased during 30wk of ripening. Condensed milk cheeses exhibited a higher level of proteolysis than UF cheeses. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE showed retarded proteolysis with increase in level of concentration. The breakdown of αs1- casein and αs1-I-casein fractions was highest in the control and decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk, with UF2 being the lowest. There was no significant degradation of β-casein. Overall increase in proteolytic products was the highest in control, and it decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk. No significant differences in the counts of lactic starters or nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were observed. Extent as well as method of concentration influenced the melting characteristics of the cheeses. Melting was greatest in the control cheeses and least in cheese made from condensed milk and decreased with increasing level of milk protein concentration. Vacuum condensing and ultrafiltration resulted in Cheddar cheeses of distinctly different quality. Although both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, the selection of the right method would depend upon the objective of the manufacturer and intended use of the cheese.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73541-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67077894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030204735419</els_id><sourcerecordid>764546071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-f62994d21e347995b6af7c7dd6a8d0379143994d9c699bad983dbdf24c64f8df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVtv1DAQhS0EotvCX4AFidtDiu-JH1FULlIRQmV5tby-dL0k8WInVPx7JmRFJV7gaWzrmzOecxB6QvA5I7J5vXflvGBMaYUZpi8xf1UzwUml7qAVEVRUjKjmLlr9QU7QaSl7uBKKxX10QoTggkm8Qp_b1B9MjiUN6xTWFyF4O86nr8ZOU1-1aXB-KN6tzeDWm27MJsRu9BlePsbu2xr62p13zuS5-uIfoHvBdMU_PNYztHl78aV9X11-evehfXNZWcnkWAVJleKOEs94rZTYShNqWzsnTeMwqxXhbAaUlUptjVMNc1sXKLeSh8YFdoaeL7qHnL5Pvoy6j8X6rjODT1PRssZ13Sj-TxC8AlOJAvDpX-A-TXmAJYARDaHwcYDUAtmcSsk-6EOOvck_NcF6TkdDOvpqtl7P1mvM9e909Dzg0XHAtO29u-08xgHAsyNgijVdyGawsdxyEgQxE8C9WLhdvN7dxOx16U3XgSyZxze1JlRzjOflHy9kMEmbawhab64oJgxjJTlhDRDtQngI60f0WRcb_WC9A107apfif6z2CxMsw40</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195812636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Effect of Vacuum-Condensed and Ultrafiltered Milk on Cheddar Cheese</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Acharya, M.R. ; Mistry, V.V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Acharya, M.R. ; Mistry, V.V.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to compare the effects of vacuum-condensed (CM) and ultrafiltered (UF) milk on some compositional and functional properties of Cheddar cheese. Five treatments were designed to have 2 levels of concentration (4.5 and 6.0% protein) from vacuum-condensed milk (CM1 and CM2) and ultrafiltered milk (UF1 and UF2) along with a 3.2% protein control. The samples were analyzed for fat, protein, ash, calcium, and salt contents at 1wk. Moisture content, soluble protein, meltability, sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE, and counts of lactic acid bacteria and nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were performed on samples at 1, 18, and 30wk. At 1wk, the moisture content ranged from 39.2 (control) to 36.5% (UF2). Fat content ranged from 31.5 to 32.4% with no significant differences among treatments, and salt content ranged from 1.38 to 1.83% with significant differences. Calcium content was higher in UF cheeses than in CM cheeses followed by control, and it increased with protein content in cheese milk. Ultrafiltered milk produced cheese with higher protein content than CM milk. The soluble protein content of all cheeses increased during 30wk of ripening. Condensed milk cheeses exhibited a higher level of proteolysis than UF cheeses. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE showed retarded proteolysis with increase in level of concentration. The breakdown of αs1- casein and αs1-I-casein fractions was highest in the control and decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk, with UF2 being the lowest. There was no significant degradation of β-casein. Overall increase in proteolytic products was the highest in control, and it decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk. No significant differences in the counts of lactic starters or nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were observed. Extent as well as method of concentration influenced the melting characteristics of the cheeses. Melting was greatest in the control cheeses and least in cheese made from condensed milk and decreased with increasing level of milk protein concentration. Vacuum condensing and ultrafiltration resulted in Cheddar cheeses of distinctly different quality. Although both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, the selection of the right method would depend upon the objective of the manufacturer and intended use of the cheese.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73541-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15545360</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Caseins - analysis ; Caseins - chemistry ; Cheddar cheese ; Cheese - analysis ; Cheese - microbiology ; Cheese - standards ; cheese milk ; cheesemaking ; condensing ; Fermentation ; Food Handling - methods ; Food industries ; Food Technology - methods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Lactobacillus - metabolism ; Lipids - analysis ; Milk - chemistry ; Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams ; milk protein percentage ; Milk Proteins - analysis ; Milk Proteins - chemistry ; Rheology ; Sodium Chloride - analysis ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Time Factors ; ultrafiltration ; Ultrafiltration - methods ; Vacuum ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2004-12, Vol.87 (12), p.4004-4012</ispartof><rights>2004 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Dairy Science Association Dec 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-f62994d21e347995b6af7c7dd6a8d0379143994d9c699bad983dbdf24c64f8df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-f62994d21e347995b6af7c7dd6a8d0379143994d9c699bad983dbdf24c64f8df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030204735419$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16302035$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15545360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Acharya, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mistry, V.V.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Effect of Vacuum-Condensed and Ultrafiltered Milk on Cheddar Cheese</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to compare the effects of vacuum-condensed (CM) and ultrafiltered (UF) milk on some compositional and functional properties of Cheddar cheese. Five treatments were designed to have 2 levels of concentration (4.5 and 6.0% protein) from vacuum-condensed milk (CM1 and CM2) and ultrafiltered milk (UF1 and UF2) along with a 3.2% protein control. The samples were analyzed for fat, protein, ash, calcium, and salt contents at 1wk. Moisture content, soluble protein, meltability, sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE, and counts of lactic acid bacteria and nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were performed on samples at 1, 18, and 30wk. At 1wk, the moisture content ranged from 39.2 (control) to 36.5% (UF2). Fat content ranged from 31.5 to 32.4% with no significant differences among treatments, and salt content ranged from 1.38 to 1.83% with significant differences. Calcium content was higher in UF cheeses than in CM cheeses followed by control, and it increased with protein content in cheese milk. Ultrafiltered milk produced cheese with higher protein content than CM milk. The soluble protein content of all cheeses increased during 30wk of ripening. Condensed milk cheeses exhibited a higher level of proteolysis than UF cheeses. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE showed retarded proteolysis with increase in level of concentration. The breakdown of αs1- casein and αs1-I-casein fractions was highest in the control and decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk, with UF2 being the lowest. There was no significant degradation of β-casein. Overall increase in proteolytic products was the highest in control, and it decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk. No significant differences in the counts of lactic starters or nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were observed. Extent as well as method of concentration influenced the melting characteristics of the cheeses. Melting was greatest in the control cheeses and least in cheese made from condensed milk and decreased with increasing level of milk protein concentration. Vacuum condensing and ultrafiltration resulted in Cheddar cheeses of distinctly different quality. Although both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, the selection of the right method would depend upon the objective of the manufacturer and intended use of the cheese.</description><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Caseins - analysis</subject><subject>Caseins - chemistry</subject><subject>Cheddar cheese</subject><subject>Cheese - analysis</subject><subject>Cheese - microbiology</subject><subject>Cheese - standards</subject><subject>cheese milk</subject><subject>cheesemaking</subject><subject>condensing</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food Technology - methods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - metabolism</subject><subject>Lipids - analysis</subject><subject>Milk - chemistry</subject><subject>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</subject><subject>milk protein percentage</subject><subject>Milk Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Milk Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Sodium Chloride - analysis</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration - methods</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVtv1DAQhS0EotvCX4AFidtDiu-JH1FULlIRQmV5tby-dL0k8WInVPx7JmRFJV7gaWzrmzOecxB6QvA5I7J5vXflvGBMaYUZpi8xf1UzwUml7qAVEVRUjKjmLlr9QU7QaSl7uBKKxX10QoTggkm8Qp_b1B9MjiUN6xTWFyF4O86nr8ZOU1-1aXB-KN6tzeDWm27MJsRu9BlePsbu2xr62p13zuS5-uIfoHvBdMU_PNYztHl78aV9X11-evehfXNZWcnkWAVJleKOEs94rZTYShNqWzsnTeMwqxXhbAaUlUptjVMNc1sXKLeSh8YFdoaeL7qHnL5Pvoy6j8X6rjODT1PRssZ13Sj-TxC8AlOJAvDpX-A-TXmAJYARDaHwcYDUAtmcSsk-6EOOvck_NcF6TkdDOvpqtl7P1mvM9e909Dzg0XHAtO29u-08xgHAsyNgijVdyGawsdxyEgQxE8C9WLhdvN7dxOx16U3XgSyZxze1JlRzjOflHy9kMEmbawhab64oJgxjJTlhDRDtQngI60f0WRcb_WC9A107apfif6z2CxMsw40</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>Acharya, M.R.</creator><creator>Mistry, V.V.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Effect of Vacuum-Condensed and Ultrafiltered Milk on Cheddar Cheese</title><author>Acharya, M.R. ; Mistry, V.V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-f62994d21e347995b6af7c7dd6a8d0379143994d9c699bad983dbdf24c64f8df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Caseins - analysis</topic><topic>Caseins - chemistry</topic><topic>Cheddar cheese</topic><topic>Cheese - analysis</topic><topic>Cheese - microbiology</topic><topic>Cheese - standards</topic><topic>cheese milk</topic><topic>cheesemaking</topic><topic>condensing</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food Technology - methods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - metabolism</topic><topic>Lipids - analysis</topic><topic>Milk - chemistry</topic><topic>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</topic><topic>milk protein percentage</topic><topic>Milk Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Milk Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Sodium Chloride - analysis</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration - methods</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Acharya, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mistry, V.V.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Acharya, M.R.</au><au>Mistry, V.V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Effect of Vacuum-Condensed and Ultrafiltered Milk on Cheddar Cheese</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4004</spage><epage>4012</epage><pages>4004-4012</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>The objective of this study was to compare the effects of vacuum-condensed (CM) and ultrafiltered (UF) milk on some compositional and functional properties of Cheddar cheese. Five treatments were designed to have 2 levels of concentration (4.5 and 6.0% protein) from vacuum-condensed milk (CM1 and CM2) and ultrafiltered milk (UF1 and UF2) along with a 3.2% protein control. The samples were analyzed for fat, protein, ash, calcium, and salt contents at 1wk. Moisture content, soluble protein, meltability, sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE, and counts of lactic acid bacteria and nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were performed on samples at 1, 18, and 30wk. At 1wk, the moisture content ranged from 39.2 (control) to 36.5% (UF2). Fat content ranged from 31.5 to 32.4% with no significant differences among treatments, and salt content ranged from 1.38 to 1.83% with significant differences. Calcium content was higher in UF cheeses than in CM cheeses followed by control, and it increased with protein content in cheese milk. Ultrafiltered milk produced cheese with higher protein content than CM milk. The soluble protein content of all cheeses increased during 30wk of ripening. Condensed milk cheeses exhibited a higher level of proteolysis than UF cheeses. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE showed retarded proteolysis with increase in level of concentration. The breakdown of αs1- casein and αs1-I-casein fractions was highest in the control and decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk, with UF2 being the lowest. There was no significant degradation of β-casein. Overall increase in proteolytic products was the highest in control, and it decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk. No significant differences in the counts of lactic starters or nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were observed. Extent as well as method of concentration influenced the melting characteristics of the cheeses. Melting was greatest in the control cheeses and least in cheese made from condensed milk and decreased with increasing level of milk protein concentration. Vacuum condensing and ultrafiltration resulted in Cheddar cheeses of distinctly different quality. Although both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, the selection of the right method would depend upon the objective of the manufacturer and intended use of the cheese.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15545360</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73541-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2004-12, Vol.87 (12), p.4004-4012
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67077894
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animal productions
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Caseins - analysis
Caseins - chemistry
Cheddar cheese
Cheese - analysis
Cheese - microbiology
Cheese - standards
cheese milk
cheesemaking
condensing
Fermentation
Food Handling - methods
Food industries
Food Technology - methods
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Lactobacillus - metabolism
Lipids - analysis
Milk - chemistry
Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams
milk protein percentage
Milk Proteins - analysis
Milk Proteins - chemistry
Rheology
Sodium Chloride - analysis
Terrestrial animal productions
Time Factors
ultrafiltration
Ultrafiltration - methods
Vacuum
Vertebrates
title Comparison of Effect of Vacuum-Condensed and Ultrafiltered Milk on Cheddar Cheese
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A31%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Effect%20of%20Vacuum-Condensed%20and%20Ultrafiltered%20Milk%20on%20Cheddar%20Cheese&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Acharya,%20M.R.&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4004&rft.epage=4012&rft.pages=4004-4012&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73541-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764546071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195812636&rft_id=info:pmid/15545360&rft_els_id=S0022030204735419&rfr_iscdi=true