Computed tomographic confirmation of distally placed Essure∗ microinsert
Objective To highlight the use of CT scan to confirm proper placement of the Essure microinsert tubal occlusion device. Design Case report. Setting Community-based, outpatient setting. Patient(s) A 37-year-old woman (G2P2002) who desired permanent sterilization. Intervention(s) The patient underwent...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2009-04, Vol.91 (4), p.1294.e5-1294.e7 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1294.e7 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1294.e5 |
| container_title | Fertility and sterility |
| container_volume | 91 |
| creator | Palmer, Andrea B., M.D Siegle, John C., M.D |
| description | Objective To highlight the use of CT scan to confirm proper placement of the Essure microinsert tubal occlusion device. Design Case report. Setting Community-based, outpatient setting. Patient(s) A 37-year-old woman (G2P2002) who desired permanent sterilization. Intervention(s) The patient underwent hysteroscopic placement of Essure microinserts, which was complicated by inability to confirm intraluminal placement of the left implant by hysteroscopic visualization. A CT scan performed that day confirmed intraluminal placement and ruled out intraperitoneal placement of the insert. Main Outcome Measure(s) Confirmation of correct insert placement. Result(s) A CT scan confirmed the placement of the Essure insert within the fallopian tube lumen and excluded perforation into the peritoneal cavity. Conclusion(s) Computed tomography is a reliable way to determine whether Essure microinserts are properly placed when this cannot be determined by hysteroscopic visualization. Follow-up hysterosalpingography continues to be required to confirm tissue ingrowth at 3 months' time. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.041 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67076339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001502820804750X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67076339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-af53aef89670f6c4ef24fb79ca1a95ecb43d84f4241ec79b8dddf79dde612a103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2O1DAQhS0EYpqBK6Cs2CWUHTtONkjQGv40EosZJHaW2y6DmyQOtoPUN5gbzP04CW51SyOxYlO1ee9V1VeEVBQaCrR7vW8cxjynXGrDAPqGsgY4fUQ2VIiuFp1oH5MNABU1sJ5dkGcp7QGgo5I9JRd0KKZBtBvyeRumZc1oqxym8D3q5Yc3lQmz83HS2Ye5Cq6yPmU9jodqGbUp2quU1oh_7u6ryZsY_JzKIs_JE6fHhC_O_ZJ8fX91u_1YX3_58Gn79ro2XMpcaydaja4fOgmuMxwd424nB6OpHgSaHW9tzx1nnKKRw6631jo5WIsdZZpCe0lenXKXGH6tmLKafDI4jnrGsCZVcmXXtkMR9idhWTGliE4t0U86HhQFdeSo9uqBozpyVJSpwrFYX55nrLsJ7YPxDK4I3p0EWC797TGqZDzOBY6PaLKywf_PlDf_hJjRz97o8SceMO3DGudCUlGVikHdHP95fCf0wKWAb-1feWWhxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67076339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computed tomographic confirmation of distally placed Essure∗ microinsert</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Palmer, Andrea B., M.D ; Siegle, John C., M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Andrea B., M.D ; Siegle, John C., M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To highlight the use of CT scan to confirm proper placement of the Essure microinsert tubal occlusion device. Design Case report. Setting Community-based, outpatient setting. Patient(s) A 37-year-old woman (G2P2002) who desired permanent sterilization. Intervention(s) The patient underwent hysteroscopic placement of Essure microinserts, which was complicated by inability to confirm intraluminal placement of the left implant by hysteroscopic visualization. A CT scan performed that day confirmed intraluminal placement and ruled out intraperitoneal placement of the insert. Main Outcome Measure(s) Confirmation of correct insert placement. Result(s) A CT scan confirmed the placement of the Essure insert within the fallopian tube lumen and excluded perforation into the peritoneal cavity. Conclusion(s) Computed tomography is a reliable way to determine whether Essure microinserts are properly placed when this cannot be determined by hysteroscopic visualization. Follow-up hysterosalpingography continues to be required to confirm tissue ingrowth at 3 months' time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19200953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; complications ; Essure ; Female ; Foreign-Body Migration - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Hysterosalpingography - methods ; Internal Medicine ; Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Sterilization ; Sterilization, Reproductive - instrumentation ; Sterilization, Reproductive - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2009-04, Vol.91 (4), p.1294.e5-1294.e7</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2009 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-af53aef89670f6c4ef24fb79ca1a95ecb43d84f4241ec79b8dddf79dde612a103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-af53aef89670f6c4ef24fb79ca1a95ecb43d84f4241ec79b8dddf79dde612a103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001502820804750X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19200953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Andrea B., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegle, John C., M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Computed tomographic confirmation of distally placed Essure∗ microinsert</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To highlight the use of CT scan to confirm proper placement of the Essure microinsert tubal occlusion device. Design Case report. Setting Community-based, outpatient setting. Patient(s) A 37-year-old woman (G2P2002) who desired permanent sterilization. Intervention(s) The patient underwent hysteroscopic placement of Essure microinserts, which was complicated by inability to confirm intraluminal placement of the left implant by hysteroscopic visualization. A CT scan performed that day confirmed intraluminal placement and ruled out intraperitoneal placement of the insert. Main Outcome Measure(s) Confirmation of correct insert placement. Result(s) A CT scan confirmed the placement of the Essure insert within the fallopian tube lumen and excluded perforation into the peritoneal cavity. Conclusion(s) Computed tomography is a reliable way to determine whether Essure microinserts are properly placed when this cannot be determined by hysteroscopic visualization. Follow-up hysterosalpingography continues to be required to confirm tissue ingrowth at 3 months' time.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>Essure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterosalpingography - methods</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><subject>Sterilization, Reproductive - instrumentation</subject><subject>Sterilization, Reproductive - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2O1DAQhS0EYpqBK6Cs2CWUHTtONkjQGv40EosZJHaW2y6DmyQOtoPUN5gbzP04CW51SyOxYlO1ee9V1VeEVBQaCrR7vW8cxjynXGrDAPqGsgY4fUQ2VIiuFp1oH5MNABU1sJ5dkGcp7QGgo5I9JRd0KKZBtBvyeRumZc1oqxym8D3q5Yc3lQmz83HS2Ye5Cq6yPmU9jodqGbUp2quU1oh_7u6ryZsY_JzKIs_JE6fHhC_O_ZJ8fX91u_1YX3_58Gn79ro2XMpcaydaja4fOgmuMxwd424nB6OpHgSaHW9tzx1nnKKRw6631jo5WIsdZZpCe0lenXKXGH6tmLKafDI4jnrGsCZVcmXXtkMR9idhWTGliE4t0U86HhQFdeSo9uqBozpyVJSpwrFYX55nrLsJ7YPxDK4I3p0EWC797TGqZDzOBY6PaLKywf_PlDf_hJjRz97o8SceMO3DGudCUlGVikHdHP95fCf0wKWAb-1feWWhxw</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Palmer, Andrea B., M.D</creator><creator>Siegle, John C., M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Computed tomographic confirmation of distally placed Essure∗ microinsert</title><author>Palmer, Andrea B., M.D ; Siegle, John C., M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-af53aef89670f6c4ef24fb79ca1a95ecb43d84f4241ec79b8dddf79dde612a103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>Essure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterosalpingography - methods</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><topic>Sterilization, Reproductive - instrumentation</topic><topic>Sterilization, Reproductive - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Andrea B., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegle, John C., M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palmer, Andrea B., M.D</au><au>Siegle, John C., M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computed tomographic confirmation of distally placed Essure∗ microinsert</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1294.e5</spage><epage>1294.e7</epage><pages>1294.e5-1294.e7</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><abstract>Objective To highlight the use of CT scan to confirm proper placement of the Essure microinsert tubal occlusion device. Design Case report. Setting Community-based, outpatient setting. Patient(s) A 37-year-old woman (G2P2002) who desired permanent sterilization. Intervention(s) The patient underwent hysteroscopic placement of Essure microinserts, which was complicated by inability to confirm intraluminal placement of the left implant by hysteroscopic visualization. A CT scan performed that day confirmed intraluminal placement and ruled out intraperitoneal placement of the insert. Main Outcome Measure(s) Confirmation of correct insert placement. Result(s) A CT scan confirmed the placement of the Essure insert within the fallopian tube lumen and excluded perforation into the peritoneal cavity. Conclusion(s) Computed tomography is a reliable way to determine whether Essure microinserts are properly placed when this cannot be determined by hysteroscopic visualization. Follow-up hysterosalpingography continues to be required to confirm tissue ingrowth at 3 months' time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19200953</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.041</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
| ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 2009-04, Vol.91 (4), p.1294.e5-1294.e7 |
| issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67076339 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult complications Essure Female Foreign-Body Migration - diagnostic imaging Humans Hysterosalpingography - methods Internal Medicine Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects Obstetrics and Gynecology Sterilization Sterilization, Reproductive - instrumentation Sterilization, Reproductive - methods Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
| title | Computed tomographic confirmation of distally placed Essure∗ microinsert |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A31%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computed%20tomographic%20confirmation%20of%20distally%20placed%20Essure%E2%88%97%20microinsert&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Palmer,%20Andrea%20B.,%20M.D&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1294.e5&rft.epage=1294.e7&rft.pages=1294.e5-1294.e7&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67076339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67076339&rft_id=info:pmid/19200953&rft_els_id=S001502820804750X&rfr_iscdi=true |