Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine: effects of small-or large-volume regimen of infusion

Background: The question of whether the dose, concentration or volume of a local anesthetic solution is the relevant determinant of the spread and quality of post‐operative epidural analgesia is still open. In this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study, we compared the effects of a large volum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2009-04, Vol.53 (4), p.483-488
Hauptverfasser: DANELLI, G., VENUTI, F. S., ZASA, M., SINARDI, D., FANELLI, A., GHISI, D., FANELLI, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 488
container_issue 4
container_start_page 483
container_title Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
container_volume 53
creator DANELLI, G.
VENUTI, F. S.
ZASA, M.
SINARDI, D.
FANELLI, A.
GHISI, D.
FANELLI, G.
description Background: The question of whether the dose, concentration or volume of a local anesthetic solution is the relevant determinant of the spread and quality of post‐operative epidural analgesia is still open. In this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study, we compared the effects of a large volume–low concentration with a small‐volume–high‐concentration lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine. Methods: Seventy patients scheduled for total hip replacement were enrolled. After surgery, patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine (10.5 mg/h) using either 0.125% levobupivacaine infused at 8.4 ml/h (low concentration group, n=35) or 0.75% levobupivacaine infused at 1.4 ml/h (high concentration group, n=35). We blindly recorded the degree of pain relief at rest and during movement every 8 h for the first two post‐operative days, as well as hip flexion, motor block, rescue analgesic consumption and adverse events. Results: No difference in pain relief was observed between groups as estimated with the areas under the curve of the verbal Numerical Rating Scale for pain over time, both at rest and during movement. Similarly, there was no difference between groups in hip flexion degree, motor blockade and hemodynamic stability. Conclusions: Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.75% levobupivacaine was as effective as continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine, when administered at the same hourly dose of 10.5 mg, in achieving adequate analgesia both at rest and during movement, without differences in the incidence of hypotension and motor blockade.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01814.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67068831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67068831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4854-ff762bb8cfef5f85fed8e84057240d6d4ebdaa19b777ed036c4b575de1fc9e073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS0EokvhKyBf4JZgx3-DxGG7oi1SRQ-l6tFynHHlxUkWe7Nsvz1Jd1mu-GJb835vZh5CmJKSTufTuqSsrgsplCwrQnRJqKa83L9Ai1PhJVoQQmghqKrO0Juc19OX8bp-jc5ozajSki9QXA39NvTjMGYcx66xCcMmtGOyEYfejzkMPR48jrAbmnETdtbZ0MNnDN6D2-a5ljsbYzEkHG16hGI3TEaAEzyGDp7hv0Zv0StvY4Z3x_sc3V9-_bG6Lm5ur76tljeF41rwwnslq6bRzoMXXgsPrQbNiVAVJ61sOTSttbRulFLQEiYdb4QSLVDvaiCKnaOPB99NGn6NkLemC9lBjLaHaVEjFZFaMzoJ9UHo0pBzAm82KXQ2PRlKzJy0WZs5UDMHauakzXPSZj-h7489xqaD9h94jHYSfDgKbHY2-mR7F_JJV9GKy1rPw3456H6HCE__PYBZLu_m18QXBz7kLexPvE0_pz2ZEubh-5UhrBLXF5qYS_YHdaCrRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67068831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine: effects of small-or large-volume regimen of infusion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>DANELLI, G. ; VENUTI, F. S. ; ZASA, M. ; SINARDI, D. ; FANELLI, A. ; GHISI, D. ; FANELLI, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>DANELLI, G. ; VENUTI, F. S. ; ZASA, M. ; SINARDI, D. ; FANELLI, A. ; GHISI, D. ; FANELLI, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The question of whether the dose, concentration or volume of a local anesthetic solution is the relevant determinant of the spread and quality of post‐operative epidural analgesia is still open. In this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study, we compared the effects of a large volume–low concentration with a small‐volume–high‐concentration lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine. Methods: Seventy patients scheduled for total hip replacement were enrolled. After surgery, patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine (10.5 mg/h) using either 0.125% levobupivacaine infused at 8.4 ml/h (low concentration group, n=35) or 0.75% levobupivacaine infused at 1.4 ml/h (high concentration group, n=35). We blindly recorded the degree of pain relief at rest and during movement every 8 h for the first two post‐operative days, as well as hip flexion, motor block, rescue analgesic consumption and adverse events. Results: No difference in pain relief was observed between groups as estimated with the areas under the curve of the verbal Numerical Rating Scale for pain over time, both at rest and during movement. Similarly, there was no difference between groups in hip flexion degree, motor blockade and hemodynamic stability. Conclusions: Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.75% levobupivacaine was as effective as continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine, when administered at the same hourly dose of 10.5 mg, in achieving adequate analgesia both at rest and during movement, without differences in the incidence of hypotension and motor blockade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01814.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19317864</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANEAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Analgesia, Epidural - methods ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bupivacaine - administration &amp; dosage ; Bupivacaine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2009-04, Vol.53 (4), p.483-488</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4854-ff762bb8cfef5f85fed8e84057240d6d4ebdaa19b777ed036c4b575de1fc9e073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4854-ff762bb8cfef5f85fed8e84057240d6d4ebdaa19b777ed036c4b575de1fc9e073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2008.01814.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1399-6576.2008.01814.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21246987$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19317864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DANELLI, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VENUTI, F. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZASA, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINARDI, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FANELLI, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GHISI, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FANELLI, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine: effects of small-or large-volume regimen of infusion</title><title>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><description>Background: The question of whether the dose, concentration or volume of a local anesthetic solution is the relevant determinant of the spread and quality of post‐operative epidural analgesia is still open. In this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study, we compared the effects of a large volume–low concentration with a small‐volume–high‐concentration lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine. Methods: Seventy patients scheduled for total hip replacement were enrolled. After surgery, patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine (10.5 mg/h) using either 0.125% levobupivacaine infused at 8.4 ml/h (low concentration group, n=35) or 0.75% levobupivacaine infused at 1.4 ml/h (high concentration group, n=35). We blindly recorded the degree of pain relief at rest and during movement every 8 h for the first two post‐operative days, as well as hip flexion, motor block, rescue analgesic consumption and adverse events. Results: No difference in pain relief was observed between groups as estimated with the areas under the curve of the verbal Numerical Rating Scale for pain over time, both at rest and during movement. Similarly, there was no difference between groups in hip flexion degree, motor blockade and hemodynamic stability. Conclusions: Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.75% levobupivacaine was as effective as continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine, when administered at the same hourly dose of 10.5 mg, in achieving adequate analgesia both at rest and during movement, without differences in the incidence of hypotension and motor blockade.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bupivacaine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Bupivacaine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS0EokvhKyBf4JZgx3-DxGG7oi1SRQ-l6tFynHHlxUkWe7Nsvz1Jd1mu-GJb835vZh5CmJKSTufTuqSsrgsplCwrQnRJqKa83L9Ai1PhJVoQQmghqKrO0Juc19OX8bp-jc5ozajSki9QXA39NvTjMGYcx66xCcMmtGOyEYfejzkMPR48jrAbmnETdtbZ0MNnDN6D2-a5ljsbYzEkHG16hGI3TEaAEzyGDp7hv0Zv0StvY4Z3x_sc3V9-_bG6Lm5ur76tljeF41rwwnslq6bRzoMXXgsPrQbNiVAVJ61sOTSttbRulFLQEiYdb4QSLVDvaiCKnaOPB99NGn6NkLemC9lBjLaHaVEjFZFaMzoJ9UHo0pBzAm82KXQ2PRlKzJy0WZs5UDMHauakzXPSZj-h7489xqaD9h94jHYSfDgKbHY2-mR7F_JJV9GKy1rPw3456H6HCE__PYBZLu_m18QXBz7kLexPvE0_pz2ZEubh-5UhrBLXF5qYS_YHdaCrRQ</recordid><startdate>200904</startdate><enddate>200904</enddate><creator>DANELLI, G.</creator><creator>VENUTI, F. S.</creator><creator>ZASA, M.</creator><creator>SINARDI, D.</creator><creator>FANELLI, A.</creator><creator>GHISI, D.</creator><creator>FANELLI, G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200904</creationdate><title>Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine: effects of small-or large-volume regimen of infusion</title><author>DANELLI, G. ; VENUTI, F. S. ; ZASA, M. ; SINARDI, D. ; FANELLI, A. ; GHISI, D. ; FANELLI, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4854-ff762bb8cfef5f85fed8e84057240d6d4ebdaa19b777ed036c4b575de1fc9e073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bupivacaine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Bupivacaine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DANELLI, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VENUTI, F. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZASA, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINARDI, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FANELLI, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GHISI, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FANELLI, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DANELLI, G.</au><au>VENUTI, F. S.</au><au>ZASA, M.</au><au>SINARDI, D.</au><au>FANELLI, A.</au><au>GHISI, D.</au><au>FANELLI, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine: effects of small-or large-volume regimen of infusion</atitle><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><date>2009-04</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>488</epage><pages>483-488</pages><issn>0001-5172</issn><eissn>1399-6576</eissn><coden>AANEAB</coden><abstract>Background: The question of whether the dose, concentration or volume of a local anesthetic solution is the relevant determinant of the spread and quality of post‐operative epidural analgesia is still open. In this prospective, randomized, double‐blind study, we compared the effects of a large volume–low concentration with a small‐volume–high‐concentration lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine. Methods: Seventy patients scheduled for total hip replacement were enrolled. After surgery, patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine (10.5 mg/h) using either 0.125% levobupivacaine infused at 8.4 ml/h (low concentration group, n=35) or 0.75% levobupivacaine infused at 1.4 ml/h (high concentration group, n=35). We blindly recorded the degree of pain relief at rest and during movement every 8 h for the first two post‐operative days, as well as hip flexion, motor block, rescue analgesic consumption and adverse events. Results: No difference in pain relief was observed between groups as estimated with the areas under the curve of the verbal Numerical Rating Scale for pain over time, both at rest and during movement. Similarly, there was no difference between groups in hip flexion degree, motor blockade and hemodynamic stability. Conclusions: Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.75% levobupivacaine was as effective as continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine, when administered at the same hourly dose of 10.5 mg, in achieving adequate analgesia both at rest and during movement, without differences in the incidence of hypotension and motor blockade.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19317864</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01814.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-5172
ispartof Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2009-04, Vol.53 (4), p.483-488
issn 0001-5172
1399-6576
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67068831
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Analgesia, Epidural - methods
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Biological and medical sciences
Bupivacaine - administration & dosage
Bupivacaine - analogs & derivatives
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Prospective Studies
title Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine: effects of small-or large-volume regimen of infusion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T02%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuous%20lumbar%20epidural%20infusion%20of%20levobupivacaine:%20effects%20of%20small-or%20large-volume%20regimen%20of%20infusion&rft.jtitle=Acta%20anaesthesiologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=DANELLI,%20G.&rft.date=2009-04&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=488&rft.pages=483-488&rft.issn=0001-5172&rft.eissn=1399-6576&rft.coden=AANEAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01814.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67068831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67068831&rft_id=info:pmid/19317864&rfr_iscdi=true