Autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints in relatives of systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a community based approach

First-degree relatives (FDRs) and spouses to a population-derived cohort of lupus patients were investigated for the occurrence of selected autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints. A healthy reference population was included. The lupus population consisted of 103 index cases. A total of 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lupus 2004-01, Vol.13 (10), p.792-799
Hauptverfasser: Laustrup, H, Heegaard, N HH, Voss, A, Green, A, Lillevang, S T, Junker, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 799
container_issue 10
container_start_page 792
container_title Lupus
container_volume 13
creator Laustrup, H
Heegaard, N HH
Voss, A
Green, A
Lillevang, S T
Junker, P
description First-degree relatives (FDRs) and spouses to a population-derived cohort of lupus patients were investigated for the occurrence of selected autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints. A healthy reference population was included. The lupus population consisted of 103 index cases. A total of 275/375 available relatives accepted to enter the study. Two hundred and twenty-six/315 (72%) were FDRs and 49/60 (82%) were spouses. Serum was analysed for ANA using indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells at the following dilutions: 1: 40, 1: 80 and 1: 160 and in addition sera were tested for anti-dsDNA, IgM RF, ACA (IgM, IgG), anti-β2 GPI (IgM, IgG) and antibodies to prothrombin. ANA positivity occurred more frequently in FDRs compared with spouses and controls at serum dilution 1: 160 (10 versus 0% and 2.5%, respectively, P = 0.04 and P < 0.01), 1: 80 (24 versus 4% and 5%, respectively, P = 0.003 and P < 0.001) and 1: 40 (31 versus 10% and 10%, respectively, P = 0.006 and P < 0.0001). ANA positivity in FDRs occurred randomly, irrespective of family relationship. Fifty-three/184 versus 2/32 FDRs to patients with definite SLE (D-SLE) and incomplete SLE (I-SLE), respectively, tested ANA positive at 1: 80 (P < 0.05). FDRs with ANA titer at 80 were affiliated to lupus probands with high SLICC scores (P < 0.05). Self-reported health complaints, cardiovascular/thromboembolic events in particular, were more frequent among FDRs than in spouses. The population-based approach adopted in the present study supports previous clinic-based evidence of an increased propensity for autoantibody occurrence in relatives to SLE patients. In FDRs, present ANA positivity was associated with increased prevalence of health complaints and ANA positivity in FDRs was related to the criterial burden and cumulated damage in corresponding lupus probands. The low ANA frequency among spouses of SLE patients argues against a significant autoantibody triggering effect of shared environment in adult life.
doi_str_mv 10.1191/0961203304lu2015oa
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67064164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1191_0961203304lu2015oa</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67064164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ca5fb6dff2b4d07de1fbb951295e2d35d2659bcbb07875c33093b59c005af0023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhkNR2mv1D7iQ4KK7sfmYTG7clWJtoeBG10M-TrxTMpMxH8Ld-8PN5V4oKOgqhDzvczh5EXpLyQdKFb0maqCMcE76UBmhIuoztKG9lF17YS_Q5gB0B-ICvcr5iRDCqRrO0QUVoieCsg36dVNL1EuZTHQTZKwXhzME3yVYYyrg8A50KDts47wGPS0l42nBCYIu088WiB7nfS4wTxaHutaMIe3LDmZdYm63tXHQUh-xPjjmukxlj43OTa3XNUVtd6_RS69Dhjen8xJ9u_v09fa-e_zy-eH25rGzXMnSWS28GZz3zPSOSAfUG6PaGkoAc1w4NghlrDFEbqWw7WMUN0JZQoT2hDB-ia6O3jb2R4VcxnnKFkLQC8Sax0GSoadD_1-QSsmVotsGvv8DfIo1LW2JkTE2cCm3okHsCNkUc07gxzVNs077kZLx0OT4d5Mt9O5krmYG9xw5VdeA6yOQ9Xd4HvsP5W-eZKsv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222637785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints in relatives of systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a community based approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Laustrup, H ; Heegaard, N HH ; Voss, A ; Green, A ; Lillevang, S T ; Junker, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Laustrup, H ; Heegaard, N HH ; Voss, A ; Green, A ; Lillevang, S T ; Junker, P</creatorcontrib><description>First-degree relatives (FDRs) and spouses to a population-derived cohort of lupus patients were investigated for the occurrence of selected autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints. A healthy reference population was included. The lupus population consisted of 103 index cases. A total of 275/375 available relatives accepted to enter the study. Two hundred and twenty-six/315 (72%) were FDRs and 49/60 (82%) were spouses. Serum was analysed for ANA using indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells at the following dilutions: 1: 40, 1: 80 and 1: 160 and in addition sera were tested for anti-dsDNA, IgM RF, ACA (IgM, IgG), anti-β2 GPI (IgM, IgG) and antibodies to prothrombin. ANA positivity occurred more frequently in FDRs compared with spouses and controls at serum dilution 1: 160 (10 versus 0% and 2.5%, respectively, P = 0.04 and P &lt; 0.01), 1: 80 (24 versus 4% and 5%, respectively, P = 0.003 and P &lt; 0.001) and 1: 40 (31 versus 10% and 10%, respectively, P = 0.006 and P &lt; 0.0001). ANA positivity in FDRs occurred randomly, irrespective of family relationship. Fifty-three/184 versus 2/32 FDRs to patients with definite SLE (D-SLE) and incomplete SLE (I-SLE), respectively, tested ANA positive at 1: 80 (P &lt; 0.05). FDRs with ANA titer at 80 were affiliated to lupus probands with high SLICC scores (P &lt; 0.05). Self-reported health complaints, cardiovascular/thromboembolic events in particular, were more frequent among FDRs than in spouses. The population-based approach adopted in the present study supports previous clinic-based evidence of an increased propensity for autoantibody occurrence in relatives to SLE patients. In FDRs, present ANA positivity was associated with increased prevalence of health complaints and ANA positivity in FDRs was related to the criterial burden and cumulated damage in corresponding lupus probands. The low ANA frequency among spouses of SLE patients argues against a significant autoantibody triggering effect of shared environment in adult life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-2033</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0962</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1191/0961203304lu2015oa</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15540512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibodies ; Antibodies, Antinuclear - blood ; Autoantibodies - blood ; Cohort Studies ; Disease ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Health Status ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immunology ; Lupus ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - genetics ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prevalence ; Rheumatology ; Self report ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Lupus, 2004-01, Vol.13 (10), p.792-799</ispartof><rights>2004 Arnold</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ca5fb6dff2b4d07de1fbb951295e2d35d2659bcbb07875c33093b59c005af0023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ca5fb6dff2b4d07de1fbb951295e2d35d2659bcbb07875c33093b59c005af0023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/0961203304lu2015oa$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1191/0961203304lu2015oa$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15540512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laustrup, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heegaard, N HH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillevang, S T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junker, P</creatorcontrib><title>Autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints in relatives of systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a community based approach</title><title>Lupus</title><addtitle>Lupus</addtitle><description>First-degree relatives (FDRs) and spouses to a population-derived cohort of lupus patients were investigated for the occurrence of selected autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints. A healthy reference population was included. The lupus population consisted of 103 index cases. A total of 275/375 available relatives accepted to enter the study. Two hundred and twenty-six/315 (72%) were FDRs and 49/60 (82%) were spouses. Serum was analysed for ANA using indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells at the following dilutions: 1: 40, 1: 80 and 1: 160 and in addition sera were tested for anti-dsDNA, IgM RF, ACA (IgM, IgG), anti-β2 GPI (IgM, IgG) and antibodies to prothrombin. ANA positivity occurred more frequently in FDRs compared with spouses and controls at serum dilution 1: 160 (10 versus 0% and 2.5%, respectively, P = 0.04 and P &lt; 0.01), 1: 80 (24 versus 4% and 5%, respectively, P = 0.003 and P &lt; 0.001) and 1: 40 (31 versus 10% and 10%, respectively, P = 0.006 and P &lt; 0.0001). ANA positivity in FDRs occurred randomly, irrespective of family relationship. Fifty-three/184 versus 2/32 FDRs to patients with definite SLE (D-SLE) and incomplete SLE (I-SLE), respectively, tested ANA positive at 1: 80 (P &lt; 0.05). FDRs with ANA titer at 80 were affiliated to lupus probands with high SLICC scores (P &lt; 0.05). Self-reported health complaints, cardiovascular/thromboembolic events in particular, were more frequent among FDRs than in spouses. The population-based approach adopted in the present study supports previous clinic-based evidence of an increased propensity for autoantibody occurrence in relatives to SLE patients. In FDRs, present ANA positivity was associated with increased prevalence of health complaints and ANA positivity in FDRs was related to the criterial burden and cumulated damage in corresponding lupus probands. The low ANA frequency among spouses of SLE patients argues against a significant autoantibody triggering effect of shared environment in adult life.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Antinuclear - blood</subject><subject>Autoantibodies - blood</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Lupus</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - genetics</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0961-2033</issn><issn>1477-0962</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhkNR2mv1D7iQ4KK7sfmYTG7clWJtoeBG10M-TrxTMpMxH8Ld-8PN5V4oKOgqhDzvczh5EXpLyQdKFb0maqCMcE76UBmhIuoztKG9lF17YS_Q5gB0B-ICvcr5iRDCqRrO0QUVoieCsg36dVNL1EuZTHQTZKwXhzME3yVYYyrg8A50KDts47wGPS0l42nBCYIu088WiB7nfS4wTxaHutaMIe3LDmZdYm63tXHQUh-xPjjmukxlj43OTa3XNUVtd6_RS69Dhjen8xJ9u_v09fa-e_zy-eH25rGzXMnSWS28GZz3zPSOSAfUG6PaGkoAc1w4NghlrDFEbqWw7WMUN0JZQoT2hDB-ia6O3jb2R4VcxnnKFkLQC8Sax0GSoadD_1-QSsmVotsGvv8DfIo1LW2JkTE2cCm3okHsCNkUc07gxzVNs077kZLx0OT4d5Mt9O5krmYG9xw5VdeA6yOQ9Xd4HvsP5W-eZKsv</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Laustrup, H</creator><creator>Heegaard, N HH</creator><creator>Voss, A</creator><creator>Green, A</creator><creator>Lillevang, S T</creator><creator>Junker, P</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints in relatives of systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a community based approach</title><author>Laustrup, H ; Heegaard, N HH ; Voss, A ; Green, A ; Lillevang, S T ; Junker, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ca5fb6dff2b4d07de1fbb951295e2d35d2659bcbb07875c33093b59c005af0023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Antinuclear - blood</topic><topic>Autoantibodies - blood</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Lupus</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - genetics</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laustrup, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heegaard, N HH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillevang, S T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junker, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lupus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laustrup, H</au><au>Heegaard, N HH</au><au>Voss, A</au><au>Green, A</au><au>Lillevang, S T</au><au>Junker, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints in relatives of systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a community based approach</atitle><jtitle>Lupus</jtitle><addtitle>Lupus</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>792</spage><epage>799</epage><pages>792-799</pages><issn>0961-2033</issn><eissn>1477-0962</eissn><abstract>First-degree relatives (FDRs) and spouses to a population-derived cohort of lupus patients were investigated for the occurrence of selected autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints. A healthy reference population was included. The lupus population consisted of 103 index cases. A total of 275/375 available relatives accepted to enter the study. Two hundred and twenty-six/315 (72%) were FDRs and 49/60 (82%) were spouses. Serum was analysed for ANA using indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells at the following dilutions: 1: 40, 1: 80 and 1: 160 and in addition sera were tested for anti-dsDNA, IgM RF, ACA (IgM, IgG), anti-β2 GPI (IgM, IgG) and antibodies to prothrombin. ANA positivity occurred more frequently in FDRs compared with spouses and controls at serum dilution 1: 160 (10 versus 0% and 2.5%, respectively, P = 0.04 and P &lt; 0.01), 1: 80 (24 versus 4% and 5%, respectively, P = 0.003 and P &lt; 0.001) and 1: 40 (31 versus 10% and 10%, respectively, P = 0.006 and P &lt; 0.0001). ANA positivity in FDRs occurred randomly, irrespective of family relationship. Fifty-three/184 versus 2/32 FDRs to patients with definite SLE (D-SLE) and incomplete SLE (I-SLE), respectively, tested ANA positive at 1: 80 (P &lt; 0.05). FDRs with ANA titer at 80 were affiliated to lupus probands with high SLICC scores (P &lt; 0.05). Self-reported health complaints, cardiovascular/thromboembolic events in particular, were more frequent among FDRs than in spouses. The population-based approach adopted in the present study supports previous clinic-based evidence of an increased propensity for autoantibody occurrence in relatives to SLE patients. In FDRs, present ANA positivity was associated with increased prevalence of health complaints and ANA positivity in FDRs was related to the criterial burden and cumulated damage in corresponding lupus probands. The low ANA frequency among spouses of SLE patients argues against a significant autoantibody triggering effect of shared environment in adult life.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>15540512</pmid><doi>10.1191/0961203304lu2015oa</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0961-2033
ispartof Lupus, 2004-01, Vol.13 (10), p.792-799
issn 0961-2033
1477-0962
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67064164
source MEDLINE; SAGE Journals
subjects Adult
Antibodies
Antibodies, Antinuclear - blood
Autoantibodies - blood
Cohort Studies
Disease
Epidemiology
Female
Health Status
Hospitals
Humans
Immunology
Lupus
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - genetics
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology
Male
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Rheumatology
Self report
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Autoantibodies and self-reported health complaints in relatives of systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a community based approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T23%3A45%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Autoantibodies%20and%20self-reported%20health%20complaints%20in%20relatives%20of%20systemic%20lupus%20erythematosus%20patients:%20a%20community%20based%20approach&rft.jtitle=Lupus&rft.au=Laustrup,%20H&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=792&rft.epage=799&rft.pages=792-799&rft.issn=0961-2033&rft.eissn=1477-0962&rft_id=info:doi/10.1191/0961203304lu2015oa&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67064164%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222637785&rft_id=info:pmid/15540512&rft_sage_id=10.1191_0961203304lu2015oa&rfr_iscdi=true