Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris

Chronic refractory angina pectoris is defined as a condition with coronary insufficiency that cannot be controlled by a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or bypass surgery. Different treatment options are evaluated in this patient group; spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the one that is bes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening 2004-11, Vol.124 (21), p.2754-2756
Hauptverfasser: Myran, Rigmor, Jørgensen, Jan V, Wiseth, Rune
Format: Artikel
Sprache:nor
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2756
container_issue 21
container_start_page 2754
container_title Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening
container_volume 124
creator Myran, Rigmor
Jørgensen, Jan V
Wiseth, Rune
description Chronic refractory angina pectoris is defined as a condition with coronary insufficiency that cannot be controlled by a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or bypass surgery. Different treatment options are evaluated in this patient group; spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the one that is best documented. We have used this method since 1996 and present our experience. From 1996 to 2001, spinal cord stimulators were implanted in 21 patients. A follow-up study was performed after 27 months (range 7-71) with a questionnaire. Preoperative clinical and angiographic data were retrieved from our records. 17 men and 4 women aged 55-88 years (median 73) were treated with SCS. Preoperatively all patients were in CCS (Canadian Cardiovascular Society) class III-IV. 81% had previously undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. At follow up, 81% were alive. Lead fracture occurred in two patients, displacement of the electrode in one. There were no other complications. 71% reported symptomatic improvement, mean CCS class was reduced from 3.5 prior to SCS to 2.2 at follow up, and use of nitroglycerin was reduced. In chronic refractory angina pectoris, spinal cord stimulation is an alternative. We report "beginners' experience" that is positive including substantial symptomatic effect and a low complication rate. More hospitals in Norway should consider establishing SCS in order to offer this treatment option to a growing patient group.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67062820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67062820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p547-91779c0d1849ac5309c2d5ac72954cb1d8167a510b13e8420d58a6f2185bce313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j81KAzEYRYMgtlZfQbJyN_AlmfwtpbQqFLrpfsgkGY3MJDGZWfTtrVhXhwuHA_cGrUGBbCRosUL3tX4BUCWIvkMrwjlrhZBrtN_l4JZiRlxziBfYVByuc5iW0cwhRRwitp8lxWBx8UMxdk7ljE38uOg4-98Z6gO6HcxY_eOVG3Ta707bt-ZwfH3fvhyazFvZaCKltuCIarWxnIG21HFjJdW8tT1xighpOIGeMK9aCo4rIwZKFO-tZ4Rt0PNfNpf0vfg6d1Oo1o-jiT4ttRMSBFUULuLTVVz6ybsulzCZcu7-j7MfufFTSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67062820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Norart Open Access</source><creator>Myran, Rigmor ; Jørgensen, Jan V ; Wiseth, Rune</creator><creatorcontrib>Myran, Rigmor ; Jørgensen, Jan V ; Wiseth, Rune</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic refractory angina pectoris is defined as a condition with coronary insufficiency that cannot be controlled by a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or bypass surgery. Different treatment options are evaluated in this patient group; spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the one that is best documented. We have used this method since 1996 and present our experience. From 1996 to 2001, spinal cord stimulators were implanted in 21 patients. A follow-up study was performed after 27 months (range 7-71) with a questionnaire. Preoperative clinical and angiographic data were retrieved from our records. 17 men and 4 women aged 55-88 years (median 73) were treated with SCS. Preoperatively all patients were in CCS (Canadian Cardiovascular Society) class III-IV. 81% had previously undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. At follow up, 81% were alive. Lead fracture occurred in two patients, displacement of the electrode in one. There were no other complications. 71% reported symptomatic improvement, mean CCS class was reduced from 3.5 prior to SCS to 2.2 at follow up, and use of nitroglycerin was reduced. In chronic refractory angina pectoris, spinal cord stimulation is an alternative. We report "beginners' experience" that is positive including substantial symptomatic effect and a low complication rate. More hospitals in Norway should consider establishing SCS in order to offer this treatment option to a growing patient group.</description><identifier>EISSN: 0807-7096</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15534667</identifier><language>nor</language><publisher>Norway</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angina Pectoris - therapy ; Chronic Disease ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Epidural Space ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Spinal Cord - physiopathology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening, 2004-11, Vol.124 (21), p.2754-2756</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15534667$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Myran, Rigmor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Jan V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseth, Rune</creatorcontrib><title>Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris</title><title>Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening</title><addtitle>Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen</addtitle><description>Chronic refractory angina pectoris is defined as a condition with coronary insufficiency that cannot be controlled by a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or bypass surgery. Different treatment options are evaluated in this patient group; spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the one that is best documented. We have used this method since 1996 and present our experience. From 1996 to 2001, spinal cord stimulators were implanted in 21 patients. A follow-up study was performed after 27 months (range 7-71) with a questionnaire. Preoperative clinical and angiographic data were retrieved from our records. 17 men and 4 women aged 55-88 years (median 73) were treated with SCS. Preoperatively all patients were in CCS (Canadian Cardiovascular Society) class III-IV. 81% had previously undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. At follow up, 81% were alive. Lead fracture occurred in two patients, displacement of the electrode in one. There were no other complications. 71% reported symptomatic improvement, mean CCS class was reduced from 3.5 prior to SCS to 2.2 at follow up, and use of nitroglycerin was reduced. In chronic refractory angina pectoris, spinal cord stimulation is an alternative. We report "beginners' experience" that is positive including substantial symptomatic effect and a low complication rate. More hospitals in Norway should consider establishing SCS in order to offer this treatment option to a growing patient group.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angina Pectoris - therapy</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Epidural Space</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - physiopathology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0807-7096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j81KAzEYRYMgtlZfQbJyN_AlmfwtpbQqFLrpfsgkGY3MJDGZWfTtrVhXhwuHA_cGrUGBbCRosUL3tX4BUCWIvkMrwjlrhZBrtN_l4JZiRlxziBfYVByuc5iW0cwhRRwitp8lxWBx8UMxdk7ljE38uOg4-98Z6gO6HcxY_eOVG3Ta707bt-ZwfH3fvhyazFvZaCKltuCIarWxnIG21HFjJdW8tT1xighpOIGeMK9aCo4rIwZKFO-tZ4Rt0PNfNpf0vfg6d1Oo1o-jiT4ttRMSBFUULuLTVVz6ybsulzCZcu7-j7MfufFTSQ</recordid><startdate>20041104</startdate><enddate>20041104</enddate><creator>Myran, Rigmor</creator><creator>Jørgensen, Jan V</creator><creator>Wiseth, Rune</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041104</creationdate><title>Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris</title><author>Myran, Rigmor ; Jørgensen, Jan V ; Wiseth, Rune</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p547-91779c0d1849ac5309c2d5ac72954cb1d8167a510b13e8420d58a6f2185bce313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>nor</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angina Pectoris - therapy</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Epidural Space</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - physiopathology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Myran, Rigmor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Jan V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseth, Rune</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Myran, Rigmor</au><au>Jørgensen, Jan V</au><au>Wiseth, Rune</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris</atitle><jtitle>Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening</jtitle><addtitle>Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen</addtitle><date>2004-11-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>2754</spage><epage>2756</epage><pages>2754-2756</pages><eissn>0807-7096</eissn><abstract>Chronic refractory angina pectoris is defined as a condition with coronary insufficiency that cannot be controlled by a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or bypass surgery. Different treatment options are evaluated in this patient group; spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the one that is best documented. We have used this method since 1996 and present our experience. From 1996 to 2001, spinal cord stimulators were implanted in 21 patients. A follow-up study was performed after 27 months (range 7-71) with a questionnaire. Preoperative clinical and angiographic data were retrieved from our records. 17 men and 4 women aged 55-88 years (median 73) were treated with SCS. Preoperatively all patients were in CCS (Canadian Cardiovascular Society) class III-IV. 81% had previously undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. At follow up, 81% were alive. Lead fracture occurred in two patients, displacement of the electrode in one. There were no other complications. 71% reported symptomatic improvement, mean CCS class was reduced from 3.5 prior to SCS to 2.2 at follow up, and use of nitroglycerin was reduced. In chronic refractory angina pectoris, spinal cord stimulation is an alternative. We report "beginners' experience" that is positive including substantial symptomatic effect and a low complication rate. More hospitals in Norway should consider establishing SCS in order to offer this treatment option to a growing patient group.</abstract><cop>Norway</cop><pmid>15534667</pmid><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 0807-7096
ispartof Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening, 2004-11, Vol.124 (21), p.2754-2756
issn 0807-7096
language nor
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67062820
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Norart Open Access
subjects Aged
Angina Pectoris - therapy
Chronic Disease
Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods
Electrodes, Implanted
Epidural Space
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Spinal Cord - physiopathology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
title Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A01%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidural%20spinal%20cord%20stimulation%20in%20chronic%20refractory%20angina%20pectoris&rft.jtitle=Tidsskrift%20for%20den%20Norske%20L%C3%A6geforening&rft.au=Myran,%20Rigmor&rft.date=2004-11-04&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=2754&rft.epage=2756&rft.pages=2754-2756&rft.eissn=0807-7096&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67062820%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67062820&rft_id=info:pmid/15534667&rfr_iscdi=true