Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris
Chronic refractory angina pectoris is defined as a condition with coronary insufficiency that cannot be controlled by a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or bypass surgery. Different treatment options are evaluated in this patient group; spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the one that is bes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening 2004-11, Vol.124 (21), p.2754-2756 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | nor |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2756 |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 2754 |
container_title | Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Myran, Rigmor Jørgensen, Jan V Wiseth, Rune |
description | Chronic refractory angina pectoris is defined as a condition with coronary insufficiency that cannot be controlled by a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or bypass surgery. Different treatment options are evaluated in this patient group; spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the one that is best documented. We have used this method since 1996 and present our experience.
From 1996 to 2001, spinal cord stimulators were implanted in 21 patients. A follow-up study was performed after 27 months (range 7-71) with a questionnaire. Preoperative clinical and angiographic data were retrieved from our records.
17 men and 4 women aged 55-88 years (median 73) were treated with SCS. Preoperatively all patients were in CCS (Canadian Cardiovascular Society) class III-IV. 81% had previously undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. At follow up, 81% were alive. Lead fracture occurred in two patients, displacement of the electrode in one. There were no other complications. 71% reported symptomatic improvement, mean CCS class was reduced from 3.5 prior to SCS to 2.2 at follow up, and use of nitroglycerin was reduced.
In chronic refractory angina pectoris, spinal cord stimulation is an alternative. We report "beginners' experience" that is positive including substantial symptomatic effect and a low complication rate. More hospitals in Norway should consider establishing SCS in order to offer this treatment option to a growing patient group. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67062820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67062820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p547-91779c0d1849ac5309c2d5ac72954cb1d8167a510b13e8420d58a6f2185bce313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j81KAzEYRYMgtlZfQbJyN_AlmfwtpbQqFLrpfsgkGY3MJDGZWfTtrVhXhwuHA_cGrUGBbCRosUL3tX4BUCWIvkMrwjlrhZBrtN_l4JZiRlxziBfYVByuc5iW0cwhRRwitp8lxWBx8UMxdk7ljE38uOg4-98Z6gO6HcxY_eOVG3Ta707bt-ZwfH3fvhyazFvZaCKltuCIarWxnIG21HFjJdW8tT1xighpOIGeMK9aCo4rIwZKFO-tZ4Rt0PNfNpf0vfg6d1Oo1o-jiT4ttRMSBFUULuLTVVz6ybsulzCZcu7-j7MfufFTSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67062820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Norart Open Access</source><creator>Myran, Rigmor ; Jørgensen, Jan V ; Wiseth, Rune</creator><creatorcontrib>Myran, Rigmor ; Jørgensen, Jan V ; Wiseth, Rune</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic refractory angina pectoris is defined as a condition with coronary insufficiency that cannot be controlled by a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or bypass surgery. Different treatment options are evaluated in this patient group; spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the one that is best documented. We have used this method since 1996 and present our experience.
From 1996 to 2001, spinal cord stimulators were implanted in 21 patients. A follow-up study was performed after 27 months (range 7-71) with a questionnaire. Preoperative clinical and angiographic data were retrieved from our records.
17 men and 4 women aged 55-88 years (median 73) were treated with SCS. Preoperatively all patients were in CCS (Canadian Cardiovascular Society) class III-IV. 81% had previously undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. At follow up, 81% were alive. Lead fracture occurred in two patients, displacement of the electrode in one. There were no other complications. 71% reported symptomatic improvement, mean CCS class was reduced from 3.5 prior to SCS to 2.2 at follow up, and use of nitroglycerin was reduced.
In chronic refractory angina pectoris, spinal cord stimulation is an alternative. We report "beginners' experience" that is positive including substantial symptomatic effect and a low complication rate. More hospitals in Norway should consider establishing SCS in order to offer this treatment option to a growing patient group.</description><identifier>EISSN: 0807-7096</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15534667</identifier><language>nor</language><publisher>Norway</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angina Pectoris - therapy ; Chronic Disease ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Epidural Space ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Spinal Cord - physiopathology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening, 2004-11, Vol.124 (21), p.2754-2756</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15534667$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Myran, Rigmor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Jan V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseth, Rune</creatorcontrib><title>Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris</title><title>Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening</title><addtitle>Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen</addtitle><description>Chronic refractory angina pectoris is defined as a condition with coronary insufficiency that cannot be controlled by a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or bypass surgery. Different treatment options are evaluated in this patient group; spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the one that is best documented. We have used this method since 1996 and present our experience.
From 1996 to 2001, spinal cord stimulators were implanted in 21 patients. A follow-up study was performed after 27 months (range 7-71) with a questionnaire. Preoperative clinical and angiographic data were retrieved from our records.
17 men and 4 women aged 55-88 years (median 73) were treated with SCS. Preoperatively all patients were in CCS (Canadian Cardiovascular Society) class III-IV. 81% had previously undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. At follow up, 81% were alive. Lead fracture occurred in two patients, displacement of the electrode in one. There were no other complications. 71% reported symptomatic improvement, mean CCS class was reduced from 3.5 prior to SCS to 2.2 at follow up, and use of nitroglycerin was reduced.
In chronic refractory angina pectoris, spinal cord stimulation is an alternative. We report "beginners' experience" that is positive including substantial symptomatic effect and a low complication rate. More hospitals in Norway should consider establishing SCS in order to offer this treatment option to a growing patient group.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angina Pectoris - therapy</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Epidural Space</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - physiopathology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0807-7096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j81KAzEYRYMgtlZfQbJyN_AlmfwtpbQqFLrpfsgkGY3MJDGZWfTtrVhXhwuHA_cGrUGBbCRosUL3tX4BUCWIvkMrwjlrhZBrtN_l4JZiRlxziBfYVByuc5iW0cwhRRwitp8lxWBx8UMxdk7ljE38uOg4-98Z6gO6HcxY_eOVG3Ta707bt-ZwfH3fvhyazFvZaCKltuCIarWxnIG21HFjJdW8tT1xighpOIGeMK9aCo4rIwZKFO-tZ4Rt0PNfNpf0vfg6d1Oo1o-jiT4ttRMSBFUULuLTVVz6ybsulzCZcu7-j7MfufFTSQ</recordid><startdate>20041104</startdate><enddate>20041104</enddate><creator>Myran, Rigmor</creator><creator>Jørgensen, Jan V</creator><creator>Wiseth, Rune</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041104</creationdate><title>Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris</title><author>Myran, Rigmor ; Jørgensen, Jan V ; Wiseth, Rune</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p547-91779c0d1849ac5309c2d5ac72954cb1d8167a510b13e8420d58a6f2185bce313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>nor</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angina Pectoris - therapy</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Epidural Space</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - physiopathology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Myran, Rigmor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Jan V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseth, Rune</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Myran, Rigmor</au><au>Jørgensen, Jan V</au><au>Wiseth, Rune</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris</atitle><jtitle>Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening</jtitle><addtitle>Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen</addtitle><date>2004-11-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>2754</spage><epage>2756</epage><pages>2754-2756</pages><eissn>0807-7096</eissn><abstract>Chronic refractory angina pectoris is defined as a condition with coronary insufficiency that cannot be controlled by a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or bypass surgery. Different treatment options are evaluated in this patient group; spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the one that is best documented. We have used this method since 1996 and present our experience.
From 1996 to 2001, spinal cord stimulators were implanted in 21 patients. A follow-up study was performed after 27 months (range 7-71) with a questionnaire. Preoperative clinical and angiographic data were retrieved from our records.
17 men and 4 women aged 55-88 years (median 73) were treated with SCS. Preoperatively all patients were in CCS (Canadian Cardiovascular Society) class III-IV. 81% had previously undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. At follow up, 81% were alive. Lead fracture occurred in two patients, displacement of the electrode in one. There were no other complications. 71% reported symptomatic improvement, mean CCS class was reduced from 3.5 prior to SCS to 2.2 at follow up, and use of nitroglycerin was reduced.
In chronic refractory angina pectoris, spinal cord stimulation is an alternative. We report "beginners' experience" that is positive including substantial symptomatic effect and a low complication rate. More hospitals in Norway should consider establishing SCS in order to offer this treatment option to a growing patient group.</abstract><cop>Norway</cop><pmid>15534667</pmid><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 0807-7096 |
ispartof | Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening, 2004-11, Vol.124 (21), p.2754-2756 |
issn | 0807-7096 |
language | nor |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67062820 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Norart Open Access |
subjects | Aged Angina Pectoris - therapy Chronic Disease Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods Electrodes, Implanted Epidural Space Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Middle Aged Spinal Cord - physiopathology Surveys and Questionnaires Treatment Outcome |
title | Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A01%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidural%20spinal%20cord%20stimulation%20in%20chronic%20refractory%20angina%20pectoris&rft.jtitle=Tidsskrift%20for%20den%20Norske%20L%C3%A6geforening&rft.au=Myran,%20Rigmor&rft.date=2004-11-04&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=2754&rft.epage=2756&rft.pages=2754-2756&rft.eissn=0807-7096&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67062820%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67062820&rft_id=info:pmid/15534667&rfr_iscdi=true |