Treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile prothesis. Our experience

The aim of this study was to review the current situation of penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and to analyze the indications, degree of acceptability and complications in our experience. From 1984 to 2003, 48 implants were inserted in men suffering from impotence due to dif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Actas urologicas españolas 2004-09, Vol.28 (8), p.575-580
Hauptverfasser:	Rodríguez Faba, O, Martín Benito, J L, Escaf Barmadah, S, Rodríguez Martínez, J J, Jalón Monzón, A, Regadera Sejas, J
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	spa
Schlagworte:	Adult Aged Erectile Dysfunction - surgery Humans Male Middle Aged Penile Prosthesis - adverse effects Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	580
container_issue	8
container_start_page	575
container_title	Actas urologicas españolas
container_volume	28
creator	Rodríguez Faba, O Martín Benito, J L Escaf Barmadah, S Rodríguez Martínez, J J Jalón Monzón, A Regadera Sejas, J
description	The aim of this study was to review the current situation of penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and to analyze the indications, degree of acceptability and complications in our experience. From 1984 to 2003, 48 implants were inserted in men suffering from impotence due to different etiologies. The mean age was 55 years. Vascular disease, Diabetes and pelvic surgery were the most common pathologies recorded. The type of prothesis inserted were malleable inactive in 7 cases (14.58%), Jonas6, Acu-form1. Inflable active with 3 components in 19 cases (39.58%), AMS 700 plus17, Alpha2. Inflable active integrated in 5 cases (10.41%) Hydroflex4, Dynaflex1. Inflable active with 2 components in 17 cases (35.4%), Ambicor2, Mark II15. Infection of the prosthesis was observed in 6.25% of the cases. This infectious complication required removal of the prosthesis. 4.16% of the cases complained of mechanical failure that required change of the prosthesis. 80% of the patients were satisfied with the results. Penile prostheses continue to be an effective and valid therapeutic alternative in impotent. Although the complication rate is low, adequate information must be provided to the patient.
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67059743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67059743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p543-5dfe649ea8fe149133252a3c3b2b778fd6da21fbe3651f2dbf23d8dcd996dce83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jz1PwzAYhD2AaCn8BeSJLSj-jD2iCgpSpS7ZI8d-rRolTrAdQf89RZTpTqdHp7srtK4pqSuuarlCtzl_1DXlTDU3aEWEoFpTtka7NoEpI8SCJ48hgS1hAOxO2S_x7KeIv0I54hnibz6nqRwhh_yED0vC8D1DChAt3KFrb4YM9xfdoPb1pd2-VfvD7n37vK9mwVklnAfJNRjlgXBNGKOCGmZZT_umUd5JZyjxPTApiKeu95Q55azTWjoLim3Q41_tecjnArl0Y8gWhsFEmJbcyaYWuuHsDD5cwKUfwXVzCqNJp-7_OfsBsU1VRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67059743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile prothesis. Our experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Rodríguez Faba, O ; Martín Benito, J L ; Escaf Barmadah, S ; Rodríguez Martínez, J J ; Jalón Monzón, A ; Regadera Sejas, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Faba, O ; Martín Benito, J L ; Escaf Barmadah, S ; Rodríguez Martínez, J J ; Jalón Monzón, A ; Regadera Sejas, J</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to review the current situation of penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and to analyze the indications, degree of acceptability and complications in our experience. From 1984 to 2003, 48 implants were inserted in men suffering from impotence due to different etiologies. The mean age was 55 years. Vascular disease, Diabetes and pelvic surgery were the most common pathologies recorded. The type of prothesis inserted were malleable inactive in 7 cases (14.58%), Jonas6, Acu-form1. Inflable active with 3 components in 19 cases (39.58%), AMS 700 plus17, Alpha2. Inflable active integrated in 5 cases (10.41%) Hydroflex4, Dynaflex1. Inflable active with 2 components in 17 cases (35.4%), Ambicor2, Mark II15. Infection of the prosthesis was observed in 6.25% of the cases. This infectious complication required removal of the prosthesis. 4.16% of the cases complained of mechanical failure that required change of the prosthesis. 80% of the patients were satisfied with the results. Penile prostheses continue to be an effective and valid therapeutic alternative in impotent. Although the complication rate is low, adequate information must be provided to the patient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0210-4806</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15529923</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Erectile Dysfunction - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Penile Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Actas urologicas españolas, 2004-09, Vol.28 (8), p.575-580</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15529923$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Faba, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín Benito, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escaf Barmadah, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Martínez, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalón Monzón, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regadera Sejas, J</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile prothesis. Our experience</title><title>Actas urologicas españolas</title><addtitle>Actas Urol Esp</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to review the current situation of penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and to analyze the indications, degree of acceptability and complications in our experience. From 1984 to 2003, 48 implants were inserted in men suffering from impotence due to different etiologies. The mean age was 55 years. Vascular disease, Diabetes and pelvic surgery were the most common pathologies recorded. The type of prothesis inserted were malleable inactive in 7 cases (14.58%), Jonas6, Acu-form1. Inflable active with 3 components in 19 cases (39.58%), AMS 700 plus17, Alpha2. Inflable active integrated in 5 cases (10.41%) Hydroflex4, Dynaflex1. Inflable active with 2 components in 17 cases (35.4%), Ambicor2, Mark II15. Infection of the prosthesis was observed in 6.25% of the cases. This infectious complication required removal of the prosthesis. 4.16% of the cases complained of mechanical failure that required change of the prosthesis. 80% of the patients were satisfied with the results. Penile prostheses continue to be an effective and valid therapeutic alternative in impotent. Although the complication rate is low, adequate information must be provided to the patient.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Penile Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><issn>0210-4806</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jz1PwzAYhD2AaCn8BeSJLSj-jD2iCgpSpS7ZI8d-rRolTrAdQf89RZTpTqdHp7srtK4pqSuuarlCtzl_1DXlTDU3aEWEoFpTtka7NoEpI8SCJ48hgS1hAOxO2S_x7KeIv0I54hnibz6nqRwhh_yED0vC8D1DChAt3KFrb4YM9xfdoPb1pd2-VfvD7n37vK9mwVklnAfJNRjlgXBNGKOCGmZZT_umUd5JZyjxPTApiKeu95Q55azTWjoLim3Q41_tecjnArl0Y8gWhsFEmJbcyaYWuuHsDD5cwKUfwXVzCqNJp-7_OfsBsU1VRQ</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>Rodríguez Faba, O</creator><creator>Martín Benito, J L</creator><creator>Escaf Barmadah, S</creator><creator>Rodríguez Martínez, J J</creator><creator>Jalón Monzón, A</creator><creator>Regadera Sejas, J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>Treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile prothesis. Our experience</title><author>Rodríguez Faba, O ; Martín Benito, J L ; Escaf Barmadah, S ; Rodríguez Martínez, J J ; Jalón Monzón, A ; Regadera Sejas, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p543-5dfe649ea8fe149133252a3c3b2b778fd6da21fbe3651f2dbf23d8dcd996dce83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Penile Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Faba, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín Benito, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escaf Barmadah, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Martínez, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalón Monzón, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regadera Sejas, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Actas urologicas españolas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodríguez Faba, O</au><au>Martín Benito, J L</au><au>Escaf Barmadah, S</au><au>Rodríguez Martínez, J J</au><au>Jalón Monzón, A</au><au>Regadera Sejas, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile prothesis. Our experience</atitle><jtitle>Actas urologicas españolas</jtitle><addtitle>Actas Urol Esp</addtitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>580</epage><pages>575-580</pages><issn>0210-4806</issn><abstract>The aim of this study was to review the current situation of penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and to analyze the indications, degree of acceptability and complications in our experience. From 1984 to 2003, 48 implants were inserted in men suffering from impotence due to different etiologies. The mean age was 55 years. Vascular disease, Diabetes and pelvic surgery were the most common pathologies recorded. The type of prothesis inserted were malleable inactive in 7 cases (14.58%), Jonas6, Acu-form1. Inflable active with 3 components in 19 cases (39.58%), AMS 700 plus17, Alpha2. Inflable active integrated in 5 cases (10.41%) Hydroflex4, Dynaflex1. Inflable active with 2 components in 17 cases (35.4%), Ambicor2, Mark II15. Infection of the prosthesis was observed in 6.25% of the cases. This infectious complication required removal of the prosthesis. 4.16% of the cases complained of mechanical failure that required change of the prosthesis. 80% of the patients were satisfied with the results. Penile prostheses continue to be an effective and valid therapeutic alternative in impotent. Although the complication rate is low, adequate information must be provided to the patient.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>15529923</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0210-4806
ispartof	Actas urologicas españolas, 2004-09, Vol.28 (8), p.575-580
issn	0210-4806
language	spa
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67059743
source	MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects	Adult Aged Erectile Dysfunction - surgery Humans Male Middle Aged Penile Prosthesis - adverse effects Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
title	Treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile prothesis. Our experience
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T23%3A34%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20erectile%20dysfunction%20with%20penile%20prothesis.%20Our%20experience&rft.jtitle=Actas%20urologicas%20espa%C3%B1olas&rft.au=Rodr%C3%ADguez%20Faba,%20O&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=580&rft.pages=575-580&rft.issn=0210-4806&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67059743%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67059743&rft_id=info:pmid/15529923&rfr_iscdi=true