The importance of semantics in auditory representations
The purpose of the present study was to examine the nature of auditory representations by manipulating the semantic and physical relationships between auditory objects. On each trial, listeners heard a group of four simultaneous sounds for 1 sec, followed by 350 msec of noise, and then either the sa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2009-04, Vol.71 (3), p.607-619 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 619 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 607 |
| container_title | Attention, perception & psychophysics |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Gregg, Melissa K. Samuel, Arthur G. |
| description | The purpose of the present study was to examine the nature of auditory representations by manipulating the semantic and physical relationships between auditory objects. On each trial, listeners heard a group of four simultaneous sounds for 1 sec, followed by 350 msec of noise, and then either the same sounds or three of the same plus a new one. Listeners completed a change-detection task and an object-encoding task. For change detection, listeners made a same-different judgment for the two groups of sounds. Object encoding was measured by presenting probe sounds that either were or were not present in the two groups. In Experiments 1 and 3, changing the target to an object that was acoustically different from but semantically the same as the original target resulted in more errors on both tasks than when the target changed to an acoustically and semantically different object. In Experiment 2, comparison of semantic and acoustic effects demonstrated that acoustics provide a weaker cue than semantics for both change detection and object encoding. The results suggest that listeners rely more on semantic information than on physical detail.) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/APP.71.3.607 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67053714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67053714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-bdaea97e1bb4fe6a7a6662bddf52397b30a8b28c460874db22b135c0439cb1293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0E1LwzAYB_AgitPpzbMUQU-25q1JexzDNxi4wwRvIUlTzWjTmbSHfXsjKxuIpzyQH8_LH4ArBDPC8-JhtlxmHGUkY5AfgTNUUpKSknwc72uMJuA8hDWEjDAOT8EElQRSlsMzwFdfJrHtpvO9dNokXZ0E00rXWx0S6xI5VLbv_DbxZuNNMK6Xve1cuAAntWyCuRzfKXh_elzNX9LF2_PrfLZINS2KPlWVNLLkBilFa8Mkl4wxrKqqzjEpuSJQFgoXmjJYcFopjBUiuYaUlFohXJIpuNv13fjuezChF60N2jSNdKYbgoj35IQjGuHNH7juBu_ibgJDiiGilEd0v0PadyF4U4uNt630W4Gg-E1TxDQFR4KImGbk12PPQbWmOuAxvghuRyCDlk3tY4Y27B1GmHFKWXTpzoX45T6NPyz37-AfhEGKnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204201447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The importance of semantics in auditory representations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gregg, Melissa K. ; Samuel, Arthur G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gregg, Melissa K. ; Samuel, Arthur G.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the present study was to examine the nature of auditory representations by manipulating the semantic and physical relationships between auditory objects. On each trial, listeners heard a group of four simultaneous sounds for 1 sec, followed by 350 msec of noise, and then either the same sounds or three of the same plus a new one. Listeners completed a change-detection task and an object-encoding task. For change detection, listeners made a same-different judgment for the two groups of sounds. Object encoding was measured by presenting probe sounds that either were or were not present in the two groups. In Experiments 1 and 3, changing the target to an object that was acoustically different from but semantically the same as the original target resulted in more errors on both tasks than when the target changed to an acoustically and semantically different object. In Experiment 2, comparison of semantic and acoustic effects demonstrated that acoustics provide a weaker cue than semantics for both change detection and object encoding. The results suggest that listeners rely more on semantic information than on physical detail.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.3.607</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19304650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Airplane engines ; Association Learning ; Attention ; Audition ; Auditory Perception ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blindness ; Changes ; Cognitive Psychology ; Communication disorders ; Concept Formation ; Conflict (Psychology) ; Deafness ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Memory, Short-Term ; Perception ; Psychoacoustics ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Semantics ; Semiotics ; Set (Psychology) ; Sound Spectrography ; Stimuli ; Theory ; Visual Environment</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2009-04, Vol.71 (3), p.607-619</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Apr 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-bdaea97e1bb4fe6a7a6662bddf52397b30a8b28c460874db22b135c0439cb1293</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/APP.71.3.607$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/APP.71.3.607$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21267446$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19304650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gregg, Melissa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Arthur G.</creatorcontrib><title>The importance of semantics in auditory representations</title><title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><addtitle>Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>The purpose of the present study was to examine the nature of auditory representations by manipulating the semantic and physical relationships between auditory objects. On each trial, listeners heard a group of four simultaneous sounds for 1 sec, followed by 350 msec of noise, and then either the same sounds or three of the same plus a new one. Listeners completed a change-detection task and an object-encoding task. For change detection, listeners made a same-different judgment for the two groups of sounds. Object encoding was measured by presenting probe sounds that either were or were not present in the two groups. In Experiments 1 and 3, changing the target to an object that was acoustically different from but semantically the same as the original target resulted in more errors on both tasks than when the target changed to an acoustically and semantically different object. In Experiment 2, comparison of semantic and acoustic effects demonstrated that acoustics provide a weaker cue than semantics for both change detection and object encoding. The results suggest that listeners rely more on semantic information than on physical detail.)</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Airplane engines</subject><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blindness</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Conflict (Psychology)</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychoacoustics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Visual Environment</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0E1LwzAYB_AgitPpzbMUQU-25q1JexzDNxi4wwRvIUlTzWjTmbSHfXsjKxuIpzyQH8_LH4ArBDPC8-JhtlxmHGUkY5AfgTNUUpKSknwc72uMJuA8hDWEjDAOT8EElQRSlsMzwFdfJrHtpvO9dNokXZ0E00rXWx0S6xI5VLbv_DbxZuNNMK6Xve1cuAAntWyCuRzfKXh_elzNX9LF2_PrfLZINS2KPlWVNLLkBilFa8Mkl4wxrKqqzjEpuSJQFgoXmjJYcFopjBUiuYaUlFohXJIpuNv13fjuezChF60N2jSNdKYbgoj35IQjGuHNH7juBu_ibgJDiiGilEd0v0PadyF4U4uNt630W4Gg-E1TxDQFR4KImGbk12PPQbWmOuAxvghuRyCDlk3tY4Y27B1GmHFKWXTpzoX45T6NPyz37-AfhEGKnQ</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Gregg, Melissa K.</creator><creator>Samuel, Arthur G.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>The importance of semantics in auditory representations</title><author>Gregg, Melissa K. ; Samuel, Arthur G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-bdaea97e1bb4fe6a7a6662bddf52397b30a8b28c460874db22b135c0439cb1293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Airplane engines</topic><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blindness</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Conflict (Psychology)</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychoacoustics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Visual Environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gregg, Melissa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Arthur G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gregg, Melissa K.</au><au>Samuel, Arthur G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The importance of semantics in auditory representations</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>607-619</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of the present study was to examine the nature of auditory representations by manipulating the semantic and physical relationships between auditory objects. On each trial, listeners heard a group of four simultaneous sounds for 1 sec, followed by 350 msec of noise, and then either the same sounds or three of the same plus a new one. Listeners completed a change-detection task and an object-encoding task. For change detection, listeners made a same-different judgment for the two groups of sounds. Object encoding was measured by presenting probe sounds that either were or were not present in the two groups. In Experiments 1 and 3, changing the target to an object that was acoustically different from but semantically the same as the original target resulted in more errors on both tasks than when the target changed to an acoustically and semantically different object. In Experiment 2, comparison of semantic and acoustic effects demonstrated that acoustics provide a weaker cue than semantics for both change detection and object encoding. The results suggest that listeners rely more on semantic information than on physical detail.)</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19304650</pmid><doi>10.3758/APP.71.3.607</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1943-3921 |
| ispartof | Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2009-04, Vol.71 (3), p.607-619 |
| issn | 1943-3921 1943-393X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67053714 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Acoustics Airplane engines Association Learning Attention Audition Auditory Perception Behavioral Science and Psychology Biological and medical sciences Blindness Changes Cognitive Psychology Communication disorders Concept Formation Conflict (Psychology) Deafness Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Memory, Short-Term Perception Psychoacoustics Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Semantics Semiotics Set (Psychology) Sound Spectrography Stimuli Theory Visual Environment |
| title | The importance of semantics in auditory representations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A40%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20importance%20of%20semantics%20in%20auditory%20representations&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Gregg,%20Melissa%20K.&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=607-619&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/APP.71.3.607&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67053714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204201447&rft_id=info:pmid/19304650&rfr_iscdi=true |