Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius
The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery 2009, Vol.43 (2), p.94-101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 94 |
container_title | Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Wilcke, Maria T. Abbaszadegan, Hassan Adolphson, Per Y. |
description | The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the responsiveness, validity, and reliability of the Swedish version were tested in 99 patients who were recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. The patients completed the PRWE questionnaire 7 weeks and 4 to 6 months after the injury. Responsiveness was assessed by Standard Response Mean and Effect Size. Content validity was evaluated by examining the proportion of best and worse possible scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing scores twice after the injury and by comparing patients with fractures of different severity. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the PRWE with another upper extremity score: the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. Reliability was evaluated with a test-retest and by internal consistency. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM = 1.4-1.7, ES = 1.3). Five patients reported the best possible result after 4 to 6 months but none at 7 weeks, and no patient reported the worst score at any time. The PRWE score corresponded well with improvement and showed good correlation with severity of fracture. The PRWE showed a strong correlation with DASH score (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.86). Intraobserver reliability of the test-retest and internal consistency was good (Kendall W coefficient = 0.79, Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.99, Cronbach's = 0.94-0.97). We found this Swedish version of the PRWE to be responsive, valid, and reliable for evaluating the patient-rated outcome after a fracture of the distal radius. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02844310902734598 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67050258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67050258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e2ab0708d598046e52a4cb360145ebc0a2915db175ecdf0e03a9776b865226af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEokPhAdggr1g1cO3E-YFuUFUKUiUWwNq6cW4Yl8QebGdG84y8FJ5Oyo-Qukp073eOj87NsuccXnFo4DWIpiwLDi2Iuihl2zzIVrySPBdQFw-z1WGfJ4CfZE9CuAEAUZb14-yEtwU0TQWr7OflFscZo3GWuYEh-7yj3oQ125IPyzCuiW0SQjbmHiP1bOdNiIz-ks5Ru4nYj5nCYWDReHrDrpzrmaewcTaYLVkK4YwllelN3J8xtIftaLAz4-3AWNa2d2-FtNMu5TD2Gxu8m1K6waOOs6e7WClqxJF57M0cnmaPBhwDPVu-p9nX95dfLj7k15-uPl68u851WYqYk8AOamj6VBiUFUmBpe6KCngpqdOAouWy73gtSfcDEBTY1nXVNZUUosKhOM3yo2_Y0Wbu1MabCf1eOTRqGX1Pf6SkbNq2TPzLI7_x7rYgNZmgaRzRkpuDqmqQIGSTQH4EtXcheBp-W3NQh4ur_y6eNC8W87mbqP-jWE6cgPMjYOzg_IQ758deRdyPzqc6rTZBFff5v_1HviYc41qjJ3XjZm9T0fek-wXl39D_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67050258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Wilcke, Maria T. ; Abbaszadegan, Hassan ; Adolphson, Per Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilcke, Maria T. ; Abbaszadegan, Hassan ; Adolphson, Per Y.</creatorcontrib><description>The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the responsiveness, validity, and reliability of the Swedish version were tested in 99 patients who were recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. The patients completed the PRWE questionnaire 7 weeks and 4 to 6 months after the injury. Responsiveness was assessed by Standard Response Mean and Effect Size. Content validity was evaluated by examining the proportion of best and worse possible scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing scores twice after the injury and by comparing patients with fractures of different severity. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the PRWE with another upper extremity score: the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. Reliability was evaluated with a test-retest and by internal consistency. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM = 1.4-1.7, ES = 1.3). Five patients reported the best possible result after 4 to 6 months but none at 7 weeks, and no patient reported the worst score at any time. The PRWE score corresponded well with improvement and showed good correlation with severity of fracture. The PRWE showed a strong correlation with DASH score (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.86). Intraobserver reliability of the test-retest and internal consistency was good (Kendall W coefficient = 0.79, Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.99, Cronbach's = 0.94-0.97). We found this Swedish version of the PRWE to be responsive, valid, and reliable for evaluating the patient-rated outcome after a fracture of the distal radius.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-4311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02844310902734598</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19308860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Colles' fracture ; DASH ; distal radius fracture ; Humans ; outcome ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Satisfaction ; PRWE ; questionnaire ; Radius Fractures - physiopathology ; Radius Fractures - therapy ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Sweden ; Treatment Outcome ; validation ; Wrist Injuries - physiopathology ; Wrist Injuries - surgery ; Wrist Joint - surgery</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery, 2009, Vol.43 (2), p.94-101</ispartof><rights>2009 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e2ab0708d598046e52a4cb360145ebc0a2915db175ecdf0e03a9776b865226af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e2ab0708d598046e52a4cb360145ebc0a2915db175ecdf0e03a9776b865226af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02844310902734598$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02844310902734598$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010,27902,27903,27904,59623,59729,60412,60518,61197,61232,61378,61413</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19308860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:118520964$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilcke, Maria T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaszadegan, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adolphson, Per Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius</title><title>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery</title><addtitle>Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg</addtitle><description>The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the responsiveness, validity, and reliability of the Swedish version were tested in 99 patients who were recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. The patients completed the PRWE questionnaire 7 weeks and 4 to 6 months after the injury. Responsiveness was assessed by Standard Response Mean and Effect Size. Content validity was evaluated by examining the proportion of best and worse possible scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing scores twice after the injury and by comparing patients with fractures of different severity. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the PRWE with another upper extremity score: the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. Reliability was evaluated with a test-retest and by internal consistency. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM = 1.4-1.7, ES = 1.3). Five patients reported the best possible result after 4 to 6 months but none at 7 weeks, and no patient reported the worst score at any time. The PRWE score corresponded well with improvement and showed good correlation with severity of fracture. The PRWE showed a strong correlation with DASH score (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.86). Intraobserver reliability of the test-retest and internal consistency was good (Kendall W coefficient = 0.79, Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.99, Cronbach's = 0.94-0.97). We found this Swedish version of the PRWE to be responsive, valid, and reliable for evaluating the patient-rated outcome after a fracture of the distal radius.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Colles' fracture</subject><subject>DASH</subject><subject>distal radius fracture</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>PRWE</subject><subject>questionnaire</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - therapy</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>validation</subject><subject>Wrist Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Wrist Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Wrist Joint - surgery</subject><issn>0284-4311</issn><issn>1651-2073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEokPhAdggr1g1cO3E-YFuUFUKUiUWwNq6cW4Yl8QebGdG84y8FJ5Oyo-Qukp073eOj87NsuccXnFo4DWIpiwLDi2Iuihl2zzIVrySPBdQFw-z1WGfJ4CfZE9CuAEAUZb14-yEtwU0TQWr7OflFscZo3GWuYEh-7yj3oQ125IPyzCuiW0SQjbmHiP1bOdNiIz-ks5Ru4nYj5nCYWDReHrDrpzrmaewcTaYLVkK4YwllelN3J8xtIftaLAz4-3AWNa2d2-FtNMu5TD2Gxu8m1K6waOOs6e7WClqxJF57M0cnmaPBhwDPVu-p9nX95dfLj7k15-uPl68u851WYqYk8AOamj6VBiUFUmBpe6KCngpqdOAouWy73gtSfcDEBTY1nXVNZUUosKhOM3yo2_Y0Wbu1MabCf1eOTRqGX1Pf6SkbNq2TPzLI7_x7rYgNZmgaRzRkpuDqmqQIGSTQH4EtXcheBp-W3NQh4ur_y6eNC8W87mbqP-jWE6cgPMjYOzg_IQ758deRdyPzqc6rTZBFff5v_1HviYc41qjJ3XjZm9T0fek-wXl39D_</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Wilcke, Maria T.</creator><creator>Abbaszadegan, Hassan</creator><creator>Adolphson, Per Y.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius</title><author>Wilcke, Maria T. ; Abbaszadegan, Hassan ; Adolphson, Per Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e2ab0708d598046e52a4cb360145ebc0a2915db175ecdf0e03a9776b865226af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Colles' fracture</topic><topic>DASH</topic><topic>distal radius fracture</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>PRWE</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - therapy</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>validation</topic><topic>Wrist Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Wrist Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Wrist Joint - surgery</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilcke, Maria T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaszadegan, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adolphson, Per Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilcke, Maria T.</au><au>Abbaszadegan, Hassan</au><au>Adolphson, Per Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>94-101</pages><issn>0284-4311</issn><eissn>1651-2073</eissn><abstract>The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the responsiveness, validity, and reliability of the Swedish version were tested in 99 patients who were recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. The patients completed the PRWE questionnaire 7 weeks and 4 to 6 months after the injury. Responsiveness was assessed by Standard Response Mean and Effect Size. Content validity was evaluated by examining the proportion of best and worse possible scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing scores twice after the injury and by comparing patients with fractures of different severity. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the PRWE with another upper extremity score: the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. Reliability was evaluated with a test-retest and by internal consistency. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM = 1.4-1.7, ES = 1.3). Five patients reported the best possible result after 4 to 6 months but none at 7 weeks, and no patient reported the worst score at any time. The PRWE score corresponded well with improvement and showed good correlation with severity of fracture. The PRWE showed a strong correlation with DASH score (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.86). Intraobserver reliability of the test-retest and internal consistency was good (Kendall W coefficient = 0.79, Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.99, Cronbach's = 0.94-0.97). We found this Swedish version of the PRWE to be responsive, valid, and reliable for evaluating the patient-rated outcome after a fracture of the distal radius.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>19308860</pmid><doi>10.1080/02844310902734598</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0284-4311 |
ispartof | Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery, 2009, Vol.43 (2), p.94-101 |
issn | 0284-4311 1651-2073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67050258 |
source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Activities of Daily Living Colles' fracture DASH distal radius fracture Humans outcome Pain Measurement Patient Satisfaction PRWE questionnaire Radius Fractures - physiopathology Radius Fractures - therapy Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Sweden Treatment Outcome validation Wrist Injuries - physiopathology Wrist Injuries - surgery Wrist Joint - surgery |
title | Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A38%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Swedish%20version%20of%20the%20patient-rated%20wrist%20evaluation%20outcome%20questionnaire:%20Good%20responsiveness,%20validity,%20and%20reliability,%20in%2099%20patients%20recovering%20from%20a%20fracture%20of%20the%20distal%20radius&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20and%20hand%20surgery&rft.au=Wilcke,%20Maria%20T.&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=94-101&rft.issn=0284-4311&rft.eissn=1651-2073&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02844310902734598&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67050258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67050258&rft_id=info:pmid/19308860&rfr_iscdi=true |