Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius

The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery 2009, Vol.43 (2), p.94-101
Hauptverfasser: Wilcke, Maria T., Abbaszadegan, Hassan, Adolphson, Per Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue 2
container_start_page 94
container_title Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery
container_volume 43
creator Wilcke, Maria T.
Abbaszadegan, Hassan
Adolphson, Per Y.
description The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the responsiveness, validity, and reliability of the Swedish version were tested in 99 patients who were recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. The patients completed the PRWE questionnaire 7 weeks and 4 to 6 months after the injury. Responsiveness was assessed by Standard Response Mean and Effect Size. Content validity was evaluated by examining the proportion of best and worse possible scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing scores twice after the injury and by comparing patients with fractures of different severity. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the PRWE with another upper extremity score: the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. Reliability was evaluated with a test-retest and by internal consistency. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM = 1.4-1.7, ES = 1.3). Five patients reported the best possible result after 4 to 6 months but none at 7 weeks, and no patient reported the worst score at any time. The PRWE score corresponded well with improvement and showed good correlation with severity of fracture. The PRWE showed a strong correlation with DASH score (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.86). Intraobserver reliability of the test-retest and internal consistency was good (Kendall W coefficient = 0.79, Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.99, Cronbach's = 0.94-0.97). We found this Swedish version of the PRWE to be responsive, valid, and reliable for evaluating the patient-rated outcome after a fracture of the distal radius.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02844310902734598
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67050258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67050258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e2ab0708d598046e52a4cb360145ebc0a2915db175ecdf0e03a9776b865226af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEokPhAdggr1g1cO3E-YFuUFUKUiUWwNq6cW4Yl8QebGdG84y8FJ5Oyo-Qukp073eOj87NsuccXnFo4DWIpiwLDi2Iuihl2zzIVrySPBdQFw-z1WGfJ4CfZE9CuAEAUZb14-yEtwU0TQWr7OflFscZo3GWuYEh-7yj3oQ125IPyzCuiW0SQjbmHiP1bOdNiIz-ks5Ru4nYj5nCYWDReHrDrpzrmaewcTaYLVkK4YwllelN3J8xtIftaLAz4-3AWNa2d2-FtNMu5TD2Gxu8m1K6waOOs6e7WClqxJF57M0cnmaPBhwDPVu-p9nX95dfLj7k15-uPl68u851WYqYk8AOamj6VBiUFUmBpe6KCngpqdOAouWy73gtSfcDEBTY1nXVNZUUosKhOM3yo2_Y0Wbu1MabCf1eOTRqGX1Pf6SkbNq2TPzLI7_x7rYgNZmgaRzRkpuDqmqQIGSTQH4EtXcheBp-W3NQh4ur_y6eNC8W87mbqP-jWE6cgPMjYOzg_IQ758deRdyPzqc6rTZBFff5v_1HviYc41qjJ3XjZm9T0fek-wXl39D_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67050258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Wilcke, Maria T. ; Abbaszadegan, Hassan ; Adolphson, Per Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilcke, Maria T. ; Abbaszadegan, Hassan ; Adolphson, Per Y.</creatorcontrib><description>The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the responsiveness, validity, and reliability of the Swedish version were tested in 99 patients who were recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. The patients completed the PRWE questionnaire 7 weeks and 4 to 6 months after the injury. Responsiveness was assessed by Standard Response Mean and Effect Size. Content validity was evaluated by examining the proportion of best and worse possible scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing scores twice after the injury and by comparing patients with fractures of different severity. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the PRWE with another upper extremity score: the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. Reliability was evaluated with a test-retest and by internal consistency. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM = 1.4-1.7, ES = 1.3). Five patients reported the best possible result after 4 to 6 months but none at 7 weeks, and no patient reported the worst score at any time. The PRWE score corresponded well with improvement and showed good correlation with severity of fracture. The PRWE showed a strong correlation with DASH score (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.86). Intraobserver reliability of the test-retest and internal consistency was good (Kendall W coefficient = 0.79, Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.99, Cronbach's = 0.94-0.97). We found this Swedish version of the PRWE to be responsive, valid, and reliable for evaluating the patient-rated outcome after a fracture of the distal radius.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-4311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02844310902734598</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19308860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Colles' fracture ; DASH ; distal radius fracture ; Humans ; outcome ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Satisfaction ; PRWE ; questionnaire ; Radius Fractures - physiopathology ; Radius Fractures - therapy ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Sweden ; Treatment Outcome ; validation ; Wrist Injuries - physiopathology ; Wrist Injuries - surgery ; Wrist Joint - surgery</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery, 2009, Vol.43 (2), p.94-101</ispartof><rights>2009 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e2ab0708d598046e52a4cb360145ebc0a2915db175ecdf0e03a9776b865226af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e2ab0708d598046e52a4cb360145ebc0a2915db175ecdf0e03a9776b865226af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02844310902734598$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02844310902734598$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010,27902,27903,27904,59623,59729,60412,60518,61197,61232,61378,61413</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19308860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:118520964$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilcke, Maria T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaszadegan, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adolphson, Per Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius</title><title>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery</title><addtitle>Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg</addtitle><description>The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the responsiveness, validity, and reliability of the Swedish version were tested in 99 patients who were recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. The patients completed the PRWE questionnaire 7 weeks and 4 to 6 months after the injury. Responsiveness was assessed by Standard Response Mean and Effect Size. Content validity was evaluated by examining the proportion of best and worse possible scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing scores twice after the injury and by comparing patients with fractures of different severity. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the PRWE with another upper extremity score: the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. Reliability was evaluated with a test-retest and by internal consistency. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM = 1.4-1.7, ES = 1.3). Five patients reported the best possible result after 4 to 6 months but none at 7 weeks, and no patient reported the worst score at any time. The PRWE score corresponded well with improvement and showed good correlation with severity of fracture. The PRWE showed a strong correlation with DASH score (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.86). Intraobserver reliability of the test-retest and internal consistency was good (Kendall W coefficient = 0.79, Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.99, Cronbach's = 0.94-0.97). We found this Swedish version of the PRWE to be responsive, valid, and reliable for evaluating the patient-rated outcome after a fracture of the distal radius.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Colles' fracture</subject><subject>DASH</subject><subject>distal radius fracture</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>PRWE</subject><subject>questionnaire</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - therapy</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>validation</subject><subject>Wrist Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Wrist Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Wrist Joint - surgery</subject><issn>0284-4311</issn><issn>1651-2073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEokPhAdggr1g1cO3E-YFuUFUKUiUWwNq6cW4Yl8QebGdG84y8FJ5Oyo-Qukp073eOj87NsuccXnFo4DWIpiwLDi2Iuihl2zzIVrySPBdQFw-z1WGfJ4CfZE9CuAEAUZb14-yEtwU0TQWr7OflFscZo3GWuYEh-7yj3oQ125IPyzCuiW0SQjbmHiP1bOdNiIz-ks5Ru4nYj5nCYWDReHrDrpzrmaewcTaYLVkK4YwllelN3J8xtIftaLAz4-3AWNa2d2-FtNMu5TD2Gxu8m1K6waOOs6e7WClqxJF57M0cnmaPBhwDPVu-p9nX95dfLj7k15-uPl68u851WYqYk8AOamj6VBiUFUmBpe6KCngpqdOAouWy73gtSfcDEBTY1nXVNZUUosKhOM3yo2_Y0Wbu1MabCf1eOTRqGX1Pf6SkbNq2TPzLI7_x7rYgNZmgaRzRkpuDqmqQIGSTQH4EtXcheBp-W3NQh4ur_y6eNC8W87mbqP-jWE6cgPMjYOzg_IQ758deRdyPzqc6rTZBFff5v_1HviYc41qjJ3XjZm9T0fek-wXl39D_</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Wilcke, Maria T.</creator><creator>Abbaszadegan, Hassan</creator><creator>Adolphson, Per Y.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius</title><author>Wilcke, Maria T. ; Abbaszadegan, Hassan ; Adolphson, Per Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e2ab0708d598046e52a4cb360145ebc0a2915db175ecdf0e03a9776b865226af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Colles' fracture</topic><topic>DASH</topic><topic>distal radius fracture</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>PRWE</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - therapy</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>validation</topic><topic>Wrist Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Wrist Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Wrist Joint - surgery</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilcke, Maria T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaszadegan, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adolphson, Per Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilcke, Maria T.</au><au>Abbaszadegan, Hassan</au><au>Adolphson, Per Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>94-101</pages><issn>0284-4311</issn><eissn>1651-2073</eissn><abstract>The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the responsiveness, validity, and reliability of the Swedish version were tested in 99 patients who were recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. The patients completed the PRWE questionnaire 7 weeks and 4 to 6 months after the injury. Responsiveness was assessed by Standard Response Mean and Effect Size. Content validity was evaluated by examining the proportion of best and worse possible scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing scores twice after the injury and by comparing patients with fractures of different severity. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the PRWE with another upper extremity score: the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. Reliability was evaluated with a test-retest and by internal consistency. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM = 1.4-1.7, ES = 1.3). Five patients reported the best possible result after 4 to 6 months but none at 7 weeks, and no patient reported the worst score at any time. The PRWE score corresponded well with improvement and showed good correlation with severity of fracture. The PRWE showed a strong correlation with DASH score (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.86). Intraobserver reliability of the test-retest and internal consistency was good (Kendall W coefficient = 0.79, Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.99, Cronbach's = 0.94-0.97). We found this Swedish version of the PRWE to be responsive, valid, and reliable for evaluating the patient-rated outcome after a fracture of the distal radius.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>19308860</pmid><doi>10.1080/02844310902734598</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0284-4311
ispartof Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery, 2009, Vol.43 (2), p.94-101
issn 0284-4311
1651-2073
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67050258
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Colles' fracture
DASH
distal radius fracture
Humans
outcome
Pain Measurement
Patient Satisfaction
PRWE
questionnaire
Radius Fractures - physiopathology
Radius Fractures - therapy
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Sweden
Treatment Outcome
validation
Wrist Injuries - physiopathology
Wrist Injuries - surgery
Wrist Joint - surgery
title Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A38%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Swedish%20version%20of%20the%20patient-rated%20wrist%20evaluation%20outcome%20questionnaire:%20Good%20responsiveness,%20validity,%20and%20reliability,%20in%2099%20patients%20recovering%20from%20a%20fracture%20of%20the%20distal%20radius&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20and%20hand%20surgery&rft.au=Wilcke,%20Maria%20T.&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=94-101&rft.issn=0284-4311&rft.eissn=1651-2073&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02844310902734598&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67050258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67050258&rft_id=info:pmid/19308860&rfr_iscdi=true