Barriers to Providing Osteoporosis Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Perceptions of Medical Directors and Directors of Nursing

The objectives of this study were to identify the barriers to osteoporosis clinical practice guideline use perceived by Medical Directors (MED DIR) and Directors of Nursing (DON) in skilled nursing facilities; and to describe differences in the perceptions of MED DIRs and DONs. The authors conducted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2004-11, Vol.5 (6), p.361-366
Hauptverfasser: Colón-Emeric, Cathleen S., Casebeer, Linda, Saag, Kenneth, Allison, Jeroan, Levine, Deborah, Suh, Theodore T., Lyles, Kenneth W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 366
container_issue 6
container_start_page 361
container_title Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
container_volume 5
creator Colón-Emeric, Cathleen S.
Casebeer, Linda
Saag, Kenneth
Allison, Jeroan
Levine, Deborah
Suh, Theodore T.
Lyles, Kenneth W.
description The objectives of this study were to identify the barriers to osteoporosis clinical practice guideline use perceived by Medical Directors (MED DIR) and Directors of Nursing (DON) in skilled nursing facilities; and to describe differences in the perceptions of MED DIRs and DONs. The authors conducted a cross-sectional national survey. This study consisted of a random national sample of MED DIRs (n = 1300) and DONs (n = 1300) belonging to the American Medical Directors Association or the National Association of Directors of Nursing Administration in Long-term Care. A 24-item survey using a five-point Likert scale was developed. The survey measured agreement to questions in four domains (provider factors, guideline characteristics, patient factors, environmental factors) and 10 content areas (problem acknowledgment, patient/family concern, patient/family compliance, testing availability, safety, reimbursement, regulatory oversight, staff knowledge/time/ability, belief in guidelines, and malpractice liability). Response distributions to each item were plotted and differences between MED DIRs and DONs were tested. Survey response rates were 40% for MED DIRs and 48% for DONs. Respondents strongly agreed that fractures are a problem in their facilities and that osteoporosis guidelines are useful and cost-beneficial (mean responses ≥ 4.0). A large proportion of respondents (at least 40% of the sample) identified multiple patient comorbidities, reimbursement issues, length of stay, and regulatory oversight as barriers to providing osteoporosis care. Respondents did not believe that patient and family acceptance, testing availability, staff time, staff self-efficacy, or concerns about bisphosphonate safety were barriers to osteoporosis care. DONs were more likely than MED DIRs to believe that patients and families are concerned about fractures, whereas MED DIRs were more likely to endorse length of stay, staffing issues, and regulatory oversight as influencing treatment decisions. Years of practice and facility size, but not formal geriatrics training, significantly influenced responses. Perceived barriers to implementing osteoporosis guidelines differ between facilities and between MED DIRs and DONs. Identification of these barriers could facilitate quality improvement initiatives and improve the quality of osteoporosis care. (J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004; 5: 361-366)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70002-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67048967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S152586100470002X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67048967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2082-5664f0273e0e242544aeb93a02d274ff1b3c26bd8657442eb0413ab157b715e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhi3UCijwE4p8qtpDytjxR9ILotvSVuJLgkrcLMeZIEM2XuwsEjd-eh02UnvraWakZ97RPIS8Z_CZAVNH10xyWVSKwUcQnzQA8OJ2i-wyWVZFXWr5ZupnZIe8S-k-I8BqtU12mJQlMM13yctXG6PHmOgY6FUMT771wx29TCOGVYgh-UQXNiL1A71-8H2PLb1YxzRBp9b53o8e0xd6hdHhavRhSDR09Bxb72xPv_mIbgw53g7tP1NG5pR98razfcKDue6R36ffbxY_i7PLH78WJ2eF41DxQiolOuC6REAuuBTCYlOXFnjLteg61pSOq6atlNRCcGxAsNI2TOpGM4l1uUc-bHJXMTyuMY1m6ZPDvrcDhnUySoOoaqUzKDegy9-niJ1ZRb-08dkwMJN686reTF4NCPOq3tzmvcP5wLpZYvt3a3adgeMNgPnNp-zcJOdxcFnVpMW0wf_nxB-BY5Q8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67048967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers to Providing Osteoporosis Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Perceptions of Medical Directors and Directors of Nursing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Colón-Emeric, Cathleen S. ; Casebeer, Linda ; Saag, Kenneth ; Allison, Jeroan ; Levine, Deborah ; Suh, Theodore T. ; Lyles, Kenneth W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Colón-Emeric, Cathleen S. ; Casebeer, Linda ; Saag, Kenneth ; Allison, Jeroan ; Levine, Deborah ; Suh, Theodore T. ; Lyles, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to identify the barriers to osteoporosis clinical practice guideline use perceived by Medical Directors (MED DIR) and Directors of Nursing (DON) in skilled nursing facilities; and to describe differences in the perceptions of MED DIRs and DONs. The authors conducted a cross-sectional national survey. This study consisted of a random national sample of MED DIRs (n = 1300) and DONs (n = 1300) belonging to the American Medical Directors Association or the National Association of Directors of Nursing Administration in Long-term Care. A 24-item survey using a five-point Likert scale was developed. The survey measured agreement to questions in four domains (provider factors, guideline characteristics, patient factors, environmental factors) and 10 content areas (problem acknowledgment, patient/family concern, patient/family compliance, testing availability, safety, reimbursement, regulatory oversight, staff knowledge/time/ability, belief in guidelines, and malpractice liability). Response distributions to each item were plotted and differences between MED DIRs and DONs were tested. Survey response rates were 40% for MED DIRs and 48% for DONs. Respondents strongly agreed that fractures are a problem in their facilities and that osteoporosis guidelines are useful and cost-beneficial (mean responses ≥ 4.0). A large proportion of respondents (at least 40% of the sample) identified multiple patient comorbidities, reimbursement issues, length of stay, and regulatory oversight as barriers to providing osteoporosis care. Respondents did not believe that patient and family acceptance, testing availability, staff time, staff self-efficacy, or concerns about bisphosphonate safety were barriers to osteoporosis care. DONs were more likely than MED DIRs to believe that patients and families are concerned about fractures, whereas MED DIRs were more likely to endorse length of stay, staffing issues, and regulatory oversight as influencing treatment decisions. Years of practice and facility size, but not formal geriatrics training, significantly influenced responses. Perceived barriers to implementing osteoporosis guidelines differ between facilities and between MED DIRs and DONs. Identification of these barriers could facilitate quality improvement initiatives and improve the quality of osteoporosis care. (J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004; 5: 361-366)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-8610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-9375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70002-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15530172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; barrier ; Communication Barriers ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Fractures, Bone - etiology ; Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control ; Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; guidelines ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Institutional Practice - standards ; Long-Term Care - standards ; Male ; nursing facilities ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - complications ; Osteoporosis - prevention &amp; control ; Osteoporosis - therapy ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Management - standards ; Skilled Nursing Facilities - standards ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2004-11, Vol.5 (6), p.361-366</ispartof><rights>2004 American Medical Directors Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2082-5664f0273e0e242544aeb93a02d274ff1b3c26bd8657442eb0413ab157b715e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2082-5664f0273e0e242544aeb93a02d274ff1b3c26bd8657442eb0413ab157b715e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152586100470002X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15530172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colón-Emeric, Cathleen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casebeer, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saag, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allison, Jeroan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Theodore T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyles, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers to Providing Osteoporosis Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Perceptions of Medical Directors and Directors of Nursing</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</title><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were to identify the barriers to osteoporosis clinical practice guideline use perceived by Medical Directors (MED DIR) and Directors of Nursing (DON) in skilled nursing facilities; and to describe differences in the perceptions of MED DIRs and DONs. The authors conducted a cross-sectional national survey. This study consisted of a random national sample of MED DIRs (n = 1300) and DONs (n = 1300) belonging to the American Medical Directors Association or the National Association of Directors of Nursing Administration in Long-term Care. A 24-item survey using a five-point Likert scale was developed. The survey measured agreement to questions in four domains (provider factors, guideline characteristics, patient factors, environmental factors) and 10 content areas (problem acknowledgment, patient/family concern, patient/family compliance, testing availability, safety, reimbursement, regulatory oversight, staff knowledge/time/ability, belief in guidelines, and malpractice liability). Response distributions to each item were plotted and differences between MED DIRs and DONs were tested. Survey response rates were 40% for MED DIRs and 48% for DONs. Respondents strongly agreed that fractures are a problem in their facilities and that osteoporosis guidelines are useful and cost-beneficial (mean responses ≥ 4.0). A large proportion of respondents (at least 40% of the sample) identified multiple patient comorbidities, reimbursement issues, length of stay, and regulatory oversight as barriers to providing osteoporosis care. Respondents did not believe that patient and family acceptance, testing availability, staff time, staff self-efficacy, or concerns about bisphosphonate safety were barriers to osteoporosis care. DONs were more likely than MED DIRs to believe that patients and families are concerned about fractures, whereas MED DIRs were more likely to endorse length of stay, staffing issues, and regulatory oversight as influencing treatment decisions. Years of practice and facility size, but not formal geriatrics training, significantly influenced responses. Perceived barriers to implementing osteoporosis guidelines differ between facilities and between MED DIRs and DONs. Identification of these barriers could facilitate quality improvement initiatives and improve the quality of osteoporosis care. (J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004; 5: 361-366)</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>barrier</subject><subject>Communication Barriers</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - etiology</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>guidelines</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institutional Practice - standards</subject><subject>Long-Term Care - standards</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>nursing facilities</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - complications</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - therapy</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Management - standards</subject><subject>Skilled Nursing Facilities - standards</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1525-8610</issn><issn>1538-9375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhi3UCijwE4p8qtpDytjxR9ILotvSVuJLgkrcLMeZIEM2XuwsEjd-eh02UnvraWakZ97RPIS8Z_CZAVNH10xyWVSKwUcQnzQA8OJ2i-wyWVZFXWr5ZupnZIe8S-k-I8BqtU12mJQlMM13yctXG6PHmOgY6FUMT771wx29TCOGVYgh-UQXNiL1A71-8H2PLb1YxzRBp9b53o8e0xd6hdHhavRhSDR09Bxb72xPv_mIbgw53g7tP1NG5pR98razfcKDue6R36ffbxY_i7PLH78WJ2eF41DxQiolOuC6REAuuBTCYlOXFnjLteg61pSOq6atlNRCcGxAsNI2TOpGM4l1uUc-bHJXMTyuMY1m6ZPDvrcDhnUySoOoaqUzKDegy9-niJ1ZRb-08dkwMJN686reTF4NCPOq3tzmvcP5wLpZYvt3a3adgeMNgPnNp-zcJOdxcFnVpMW0wf_nxB-BY5Q8</recordid><startdate>200411</startdate><enddate>200411</enddate><creator>Colón-Emeric, Cathleen S.</creator><creator>Casebeer, Linda</creator><creator>Saag, Kenneth</creator><creator>Allison, Jeroan</creator><creator>Levine, Deborah</creator><creator>Suh, Theodore T.</creator><creator>Lyles, Kenneth W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200411</creationdate><title>Barriers to Providing Osteoporosis Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Perceptions of Medical Directors and Directors of Nursing</title><author>Colón-Emeric, Cathleen S. ; Casebeer, Linda ; Saag, Kenneth ; Allison, Jeroan ; Levine, Deborah ; Suh, Theodore T. ; Lyles, Kenneth W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2082-5664f0273e0e242544aeb93a02d274ff1b3c26bd8657442eb0413ab157b715e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>barrier</topic><topic>Communication Barriers</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - etiology</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>guidelines</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institutional Practice - standards</topic><topic>Long-Term Care - standards</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>nursing facilities</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - complications</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - therapy</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Management - standards</topic><topic>Skilled Nursing Facilities - standards</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colón-Emeric, Cathleen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casebeer, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saag, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allison, Jeroan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Theodore T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyles, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colón-Emeric, Cathleen S.</au><au>Casebeer, Linda</au><au>Saag, Kenneth</au><au>Allison, Jeroan</au><au>Levine, Deborah</au><au>Suh, Theodore T.</au><au>Lyles, Kenneth W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers to Providing Osteoporosis Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Perceptions of Medical Directors and Directors of Nursing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><date>2004-11</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>361-366</pages><issn>1525-8610</issn><eissn>1538-9375</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this study were to identify the barriers to osteoporosis clinical practice guideline use perceived by Medical Directors (MED DIR) and Directors of Nursing (DON) in skilled nursing facilities; and to describe differences in the perceptions of MED DIRs and DONs. The authors conducted a cross-sectional national survey. This study consisted of a random national sample of MED DIRs (n = 1300) and DONs (n = 1300) belonging to the American Medical Directors Association or the National Association of Directors of Nursing Administration in Long-term Care. A 24-item survey using a five-point Likert scale was developed. The survey measured agreement to questions in four domains (provider factors, guideline characteristics, patient factors, environmental factors) and 10 content areas (problem acknowledgment, patient/family concern, patient/family compliance, testing availability, safety, reimbursement, regulatory oversight, staff knowledge/time/ability, belief in guidelines, and malpractice liability). Response distributions to each item were plotted and differences between MED DIRs and DONs were tested. Survey response rates were 40% for MED DIRs and 48% for DONs. Respondents strongly agreed that fractures are a problem in their facilities and that osteoporosis guidelines are useful and cost-beneficial (mean responses ≥ 4.0). A large proportion of respondents (at least 40% of the sample) identified multiple patient comorbidities, reimbursement issues, length of stay, and regulatory oversight as barriers to providing osteoporosis care. Respondents did not believe that patient and family acceptance, testing availability, staff time, staff self-efficacy, or concerns about bisphosphonate safety were barriers to osteoporosis care. DONs were more likely than MED DIRs to believe that patients and families are concerned about fractures, whereas MED DIRs were more likely to endorse length of stay, staffing issues, and regulatory oversight as influencing treatment decisions. Years of practice and facility size, but not formal geriatrics training, significantly influenced responses. Perceived barriers to implementing osteoporosis guidelines differ between facilities and between MED DIRs and DONs. Identification of these barriers could facilitate quality improvement initiatives and improve the quality of osteoporosis care. (J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004; 5: 361-366)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15530172</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70002-X</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-8610
ispartof Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2004-11, Vol.5 (6), p.361-366
issn 1525-8610
1538-9375
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67048967
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
barrier
Communication Barriers
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Fractures, Bone - etiology
Fractures, Bone - prevention & control
Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data
guidelines
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Institutional Practice - standards
Long-Term Care - standards
Male
nursing facilities
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - complications
Osteoporosis - prevention & control
Osteoporosis - therapy
Risk Assessment
Risk Management - standards
Skilled Nursing Facilities - standards
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
United States
title Barriers to Providing Osteoporosis Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Perceptions of Medical Directors and Directors of Nursing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20to%20Providing%20Osteoporosis%20Care%20in%20Skilled%20Nursing%20Facilities:%20Perceptions%20of%20Medical%20Directors%20and%20Directors%20of%20Nursing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Directors%20Association&rft.au=Col%C3%B3n-Emeric,%20Cathleen%20S.&rft.date=2004-11&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=361-366&rft.issn=1525-8610&rft.eissn=1538-9375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70002-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67048967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67048967&rft_id=info:pmid/15530172&rft_els_id=S152586100470002X&rfr_iscdi=true