Analysis of Multiple End Points in Consumer Research in Support of Switching Drugs From Prescription to Over-the-Counter Status: The Concept of End-Point Hierarchies
Clinical and regulatory decision making concerning over‐the‐counter (OTC) drugs requires research designed to understand how consumers will self‐manage treatment using the candidate OTC drug. Consumer research for an OTC drug may include studies of label comprehension, self‐selection, and actual use...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2009-04, Vol.85 (4), p.369-374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 374 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 369 |
container_title | Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Brass, EP Shay, LE Leonard‐Segal, A |
description | Clinical and regulatory decision making concerning over‐the‐counter (OTC) drugs requires research designed to understand how consumers will self‐manage treatment using the candidate OTC drug. Consumer research for an OTC drug may include studies of label comprehension, self‐selection, and actual use. Definition and analysis of end points for these trials have varied in the absence of consensus on optimal approaches. Research programs should prospectively prioritize the importance of label messages based on their roles in the safe and effective use of the drug. The assessment of messages for which failure to heed warnings will expose the consumer to increased risk or clinically relevant treatment failure should receive the highest priority as study end points. Based on the consequences of unheeded warnings, message‐specific targets for appropriate response rates can be predefined. This prospective, hierarchical approach to end‐point definition, combined with prespecification of targeted correct‐response rates, has the potential to increase the scientific rigor and regulatory utility of these important research studies.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2009); 85, 4, 369–374 doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.254 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/clpt.2008.254 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67043117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67043117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3974-1bf9a9493b6f77c535948184e42b9de7291ef3f1f3b1a7bba4b37103b93d5d583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCki0yC7rL4L9MYnZVaCnSoI6YYR05zk3HKGMH26GaB-I9cZqh7FhZ1_rOOVf3IPSGkiUlvPyg-yEuGSHlkuXiGVrQnLNslfP8OVoQQmQmGV-dofMQfqRRyLJ8ic6opCJnnCzQ7yur-mMwAbsOfx37aIYe8LVt8cYZGwM2FlfOhvEAHn-DAMrr_fS5HYfB-TjJtg8m6r2x9_iTH-8DvvHugDcegvZmiMZZHB2--wU-i3vIKjfamMy2UcUxfMS7PUwJGoZHsxSdPUbjWwN-SjMQXqEXneoDvD69F-j7zfWuus3Wd5-_VFfrTHNZiIw2nVRSSN6suqLQ6QhSlLQUIFgjWyiYpNDxjna8oapoGiUaXqQrNpK3eZuX_AJdzr6Ddz9HCLE-mKCh75UFN4Z6VRDBKS0SmM2g9i4ED109eHNQ_lhTUk-91FMv9dRLnXpJ_NuT8dgcoP1Hn4pIwPsToIJWfeeV1SY8cYwywQrKEidn7sH0cPx_al1tdtV6s5vmeYl3s9amy3t4Ek-iv8wfHi-1EQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67043117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Multiple End Points in Consumer Research in Support of Switching Drugs From Prescription to Over-the-Counter Status: The Concept of End-Point Hierarchies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Brass, EP ; Shay, LE ; Leonard‐Segal, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Brass, EP ; Shay, LE ; Leonard‐Segal, A</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical and regulatory decision making concerning over‐the‐counter (OTC) drugs requires research designed to understand how consumers will self‐manage treatment using the candidate OTC drug. Consumer research for an OTC drug may include studies of label comprehension, self‐selection, and actual use. Definition and analysis of end points for these trials have varied in the absence of consensus on optimal approaches. Research programs should prospectively prioritize the importance of label messages based on their roles in the safe and effective use of the drug. The assessment of messages for which failure to heed warnings will expose the consumer to increased risk or clinically relevant treatment failure should receive the highest priority as study end points. Based on the consequences of unheeded warnings, message‐specific targets for appropriate response rates can be predefined. This prospective, hierarchical approach to end‐point definition, combined with prespecification of targeted correct‐response rates, has the potential to increase the scientific rigor and regulatory utility of these important research studies.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2009); 85, 4, 369–374 doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.254</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2008.254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19145230</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLPTAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basingstoke: Nature Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Consumer Behavior ; Endpoint Determination - methods ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Nonprescription Drugs - adverse effects ; Nonprescription Drugs - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Prescription Drugs - adverse effects ; Prescription Drugs - therapeutic use ; Self Care - methods</subject><ispartof>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2009-04, Vol.85 (4), p.369-374</ispartof><rights>2009 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3974-1bf9a9493b6f77c535948184e42b9de7291ef3f1f3b1a7bba4b37103b93d5d583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3974-1bf9a9493b6f77c535948184e42b9de7291ef3f1f3b1a7bba4b37103b93d5d583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1038%2Fclpt.2008.254$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1038%2Fclpt.2008.254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21242712$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19145230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brass, EP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shay, LE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard‐Segal, A</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Multiple End Points in Consumer Research in Support of Switching Drugs From Prescription to Over-the-Counter Status: The Concept of End-Point Hierarchies</title><title>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><description>Clinical and regulatory decision making concerning over‐the‐counter (OTC) drugs requires research designed to understand how consumers will self‐manage treatment using the candidate OTC drug. Consumer research for an OTC drug may include studies of label comprehension, self‐selection, and actual use. Definition and analysis of end points for these trials have varied in the absence of consensus on optimal approaches. Research programs should prospectively prioritize the importance of label messages based on their roles in the safe and effective use of the drug. The assessment of messages for which failure to heed warnings will expose the consumer to increased risk or clinically relevant treatment failure should receive the highest priority as study end points. Based on the consequences of unheeded warnings, message‐specific targets for appropriate response rates can be predefined. This prospective, hierarchical approach to end‐point definition, combined with prespecification of targeted correct‐response rates, has the potential to increase the scientific rigor and regulatory utility of these important research studies.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2009); 85, 4, 369–374 doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.254</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Endpoint Determination - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nonprescription Drugs - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nonprescription Drugs - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Prescription Drugs - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prescription Drugs - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Self Care - methods</subject><issn>0009-9236</issn><issn>1532-6535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCki0yC7rL4L9MYnZVaCnSoI6YYR05zk3HKGMH26GaB-I9cZqh7FhZ1_rOOVf3IPSGkiUlvPyg-yEuGSHlkuXiGVrQnLNslfP8OVoQQmQmGV-dofMQfqRRyLJ8ic6opCJnnCzQ7yur-mMwAbsOfx37aIYe8LVt8cYZGwM2FlfOhvEAHn-DAMrr_fS5HYfB-TjJtg8m6r2x9_iTH-8DvvHugDcegvZmiMZZHB2--wU-i3vIKjfamMy2UcUxfMS7PUwJGoZHsxSdPUbjWwN-SjMQXqEXneoDvD69F-j7zfWuus3Wd5-_VFfrTHNZiIw2nVRSSN6suqLQ6QhSlLQUIFgjWyiYpNDxjna8oapoGiUaXqQrNpK3eZuX_AJdzr6Ddz9HCLE-mKCh75UFN4Z6VRDBKS0SmM2g9i4ED109eHNQ_lhTUk-91FMv9dRLnXpJ_NuT8dgcoP1Hn4pIwPsToIJWfeeV1SY8cYwywQrKEidn7sH0cPx_al1tdtV6s5vmeYl3s9amy3t4Ek-iv8wfHi-1EQ</recordid><startdate>200904</startdate><enddate>200904</enddate><creator>Brass, EP</creator><creator>Shay, LE</creator><creator>Leonard‐Segal, A</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200904</creationdate><title>Analysis of Multiple End Points in Consumer Research in Support of Switching Drugs From Prescription to Over-the-Counter Status: The Concept of End-Point Hierarchies</title><author>Brass, EP ; Shay, LE ; Leonard‐Segal, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3974-1bf9a9493b6f77c535948184e42b9de7291ef3f1f3b1a7bba4b37103b93d5d583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Endpoint Determination - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nonprescription Drugs - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nonprescription Drugs - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Prescription Drugs - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prescription Drugs - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Self Care - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brass, EP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shay, LE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard‐Segal, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brass, EP</au><au>Shay, LE</au><au>Leonard‐Segal, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Multiple End Points in Consumer Research in Support of Switching Drugs From Prescription to Over-the-Counter Status: The Concept of End-Point Hierarchies</atitle><jtitle>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><date>2009-04</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>369-374</pages><issn>0009-9236</issn><eissn>1532-6535</eissn><coden>CLPTAT</coden><abstract>Clinical and regulatory decision making concerning over‐the‐counter (OTC) drugs requires research designed to understand how consumers will self‐manage treatment using the candidate OTC drug. Consumer research for an OTC drug may include studies of label comprehension, self‐selection, and actual use. Definition and analysis of end points for these trials have varied in the absence of consensus on optimal approaches. Research programs should prospectively prioritize the importance of label messages based on their roles in the safe and effective use of the drug. The assessment of messages for which failure to heed warnings will expose the consumer to increased risk or clinically relevant treatment failure should receive the highest priority as study end points. Based on the consequences of unheeded warnings, message‐specific targets for appropriate response rates can be predefined. This prospective, hierarchical approach to end‐point definition, combined with prespecification of targeted correct‐response rates, has the potential to increase the scientific rigor and regulatory utility of these important research studies.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2009); 85, 4, 369–374 doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.254</abstract><cop>Basingstoke</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group</pub><pmid>19145230</pmid><doi>10.1038/clpt.2008.254</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-9236 |
ispartof | Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2009-04, Vol.85 (4), p.369-374 |
issn | 0009-9236 1532-6535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67043117 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Consumer Behavior Endpoint Determination - methods Humans Medical sciences Nonprescription Drugs - adverse effects Nonprescription Drugs - therapeutic use Pharmacology. Drug treatments Prescription Drugs - adverse effects Prescription Drugs - therapeutic use Self Care - methods |
title | Analysis of Multiple End Points in Consumer Research in Support of Switching Drugs From Prescription to Over-the-Counter Status: The Concept of End-Point Hierarchies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A27%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Multiple%20End%20Points%20in%20Consumer%20Research%20in%20Support%20of%20Switching%20Drugs%20From%20Prescription%20to%20Over-the-Counter%20Status:%20The%20Concept%20of%20End-Point%20Hierarchies&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20pharmacology%20and%20therapeutics&rft.au=Brass,%20EP&rft.date=2009-04&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=369-374&rft.issn=0009-9236&rft.eissn=1532-6535&rft.coden=CLPTAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/clpt.2008.254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67043117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67043117&rft_id=info:pmid/19145230&rfr_iscdi=true |