Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer
The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cloning and stem cells 2009-03, Vol.11 (1), p.123-130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 123 |
container_title | Cloning and stem cells |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Hossein, Mohammad Shamim Jeong, Yeon Woo Park, Sun Woo Kim, Joung Joo Lee, Eugine Ko, Kyeong Hee Kim, Huen Suk Kim, Yeun Wook Hyun, Sang Hwan Shin, Taeyoung Hawthorne, Lou Hwang, Woo Suk |
description | The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluate the effects of parity of recipient dogs on the success of SCNT. Oocytes retrieved from outbred dogs were reconstructed with adult somatic cells collected from an 11-year-old female dog named Missy. In the FSA method, oocytes were fused and activated at the same time using two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec. In the F+CA method, oocytes were fused with two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec, and then activated 1 h after fusion by 10 microM calcium ionophore for 4 m and cultured for 4 h in 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for postactivation. Activation method had a significant impact on the production efficiency of cloned dogs. There was a significant difference in full-term pregnancy rate and percentage of live puppies between the two methods (6.3% and 38.5% for FSA and F+CA, respectively). In our study, four out of five live offspring produced by F+CA survived versus FSA, which did not result in any surviving puppies. Overall, as few as 14 dogs and 54 reconstructed embryos were needed to produce a cloned puppy. In addition, the parity of recipient bitches had no effect on the success of SCNT in canine species. Both the nullipara and multipara bitches produced live puppies following SCNT-ET. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/clo.2008.0029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67028811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A200411039</galeid><sourcerecordid>A200411039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-993749ac73d8d8945d8ed647d50e48ed68d1938f9d6bac0361928d52ce61113f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVpaNIkx16LoJCbN_qyLeUWlqQtLPTSnoVWGi0KsuVa9mH_-0jsQgkEig4ann4j5s1D6AslG0qkurcxbRghckMIUx_QFW3bvulF23-sNe8axgm7RJ9zfikEkYJ8QpdUMdYxKq7QyzamMYwHPIScjw847RcTTsIalzBFwMn7PM1VSh4bnCewwQeLrSkc4AOMaTlOgPdHnNNglvoEMeJxtRHMjJfZjNnDfIMuvIkZbs_3Nfrz_PR7-6PZ_fr-c_u4ayyXammU4r1QxvbcSSeVaJ0E14netQRELaWjikuvXLc3lvCumJGuZRY6Sin3_Brdnf6d5vR3hbzo4q1OZEZIa9ZdT5iUBf0fyIiQPeVtAb-dwIOJoMPoU_FkK6wfy-4FpYSrQm3eocpxMASbRvCh6G8amlODnVPOM3hd1jyY-agp0TVcXcLVNVxdwy381_O8634A948-p8lfAd0tnuI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20487135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim ; Jeong, Yeon Woo ; Park, Sun Woo ; Kim, Joung Joo ; Lee, Eugine ; Ko, Kyeong Hee ; Kim, Huen Suk ; Kim, Yeun Wook ; Hyun, Sang Hwan ; Shin, Taeyoung ; Hawthorne, Lou ; Hwang, Woo Suk</creator><creatorcontrib>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim ; Jeong, Yeon Woo ; Park, Sun Woo ; Kim, Joung Joo ; Lee, Eugine ; Ko, Kyeong Hee ; Kim, Huen Suk ; Kim, Yeun Wook ; Hyun, Sang Hwan ; Shin, Taeyoung ; Hawthorne, Lou ; Hwang, Woo Suk</creatorcontrib><description>The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluate the effects of parity of recipient dogs on the success of SCNT. Oocytes retrieved from outbred dogs were reconstructed with adult somatic cells collected from an 11-year-old female dog named Missy. In the FSA method, oocytes were fused and activated at the same time using two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec. In the F+CA method, oocytes were fused with two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec, and then activated 1 h after fusion by 10 microM calcium ionophore for 4 m and cultured for 4 h in 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for postactivation. Activation method had a significant impact on the production efficiency of cloned dogs. There was a significant difference in full-term pregnancy rate and percentage of live puppies between the two methods (6.3% and 38.5% for FSA and F+CA, respectively). In our study, four out of five live offspring produced by F+CA survived versus FSA, which did not result in any surviving puppies. Overall, as few as 14 dogs and 54 reconstructed embryos were needed to produce a cloned puppy. In addition, the parity of recipient bitches had no effect on the success of SCNT in canine species. Both the nullipara and multipara bitches produced live puppies following SCNT-ET.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-2302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/clo.2008.0029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19226214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Calcium - chemistry ; Cloning, Organism - methods ; Cloning, Organism - veterinary ; Culture media (Biology) ; Dogs ; Dogs - genetics ; Genetic aspects ; Genotype ; Methods ; Microsatellite Repeats - genetics ; Nuclear transfer (Cloning) ; Nuclear Transfer Techniques - veterinary ; Oocytes - physiology ; Physiological aspects</subject><ispartof>Cloning and stem cells, 2009-03, Vol.11 (1), p.123-130</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-993749ac73d8d8945d8ed647d50e48ed68d1938f9d6bac0361928d52ce61113f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-993749ac73d8d8945d8ed647d50e48ed68d1938f9d6bac0361928d52ce61113f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19226214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Yeon Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sun Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joung Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eugine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Kyeong Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Huen Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeun Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Sang Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Taeyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawthorne, Lou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Woo Suk</creatorcontrib><title>Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer</title><title>Cloning and stem cells</title><addtitle>Cloning Stem Cells</addtitle><description>The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluate the effects of parity of recipient dogs on the success of SCNT. Oocytes retrieved from outbred dogs were reconstructed with adult somatic cells collected from an 11-year-old female dog named Missy. In the FSA method, oocytes were fused and activated at the same time using two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec. In the F+CA method, oocytes were fused with two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec, and then activated 1 h after fusion by 10 microM calcium ionophore for 4 m and cultured for 4 h in 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for postactivation. Activation method had a significant impact on the production efficiency of cloned dogs. There was a significant difference in full-term pregnancy rate and percentage of live puppies between the two methods (6.3% and 38.5% for FSA and F+CA, respectively). In our study, four out of five live offspring produced by F+CA survived versus FSA, which did not result in any surviving puppies. Overall, as few as 14 dogs and 54 reconstructed embryos were needed to produce a cloned puppy. In addition, the parity of recipient bitches had no effect on the success of SCNT in canine species. Both the nullipara and multipara bitches produced live puppies following SCNT-ET.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Calcium - chemistry</subject><subject>Cloning, Organism - methods</subject><subject>Cloning, Organism - veterinary</subject><subject>Culture media (Biology)</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Dogs - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats - genetics</subject><subject>Nuclear transfer (Cloning)</subject><subject>Nuclear Transfer Techniques - veterinary</subject><subject>Oocytes - physiology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><issn>1536-2302</issn><issn>1557-7457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVpaNIkx16LoJCbN_qyLeUWlqQtLPTSnoVWGi0KsuVa9mH_-0jsQgkEig4ann4j5s1D6AslG0qkurcxbRghckMIUx_QFW3bvulF23-sNe8axgm7RJ9zfikEkYJ8QpdUMdYxKq7QyzamMYwHPIScjw847RcTTsIalzBFwMn7PM1VSh4bnCewwQeLrSkc4AOMaTlOgPdHnNNglvoEMeJxtRHMjJfZjNnDfIMuvIkZbs_3Nfrz_PR7-6PZ_fr-c_u4ayyXammU4r1QxvbcSSeVaJ0E14netQRELaWjikuvXLc3lvCumJGuZRY6Sin3_Brdnf6d5vR3hbzo4q1OZEZIa9ZdT5iUBf0fyIiQPeVtAb-dwIOJoMPoU_FkK6wfy-4FpYSrQm3eocpxMASbRvCh6G8amlODnVPOM3hd1jyY-agp0TVcXcLVNVxdwy381_O8634A948-p8lfAd0tnuI</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim</creator><creator>Jeong, Yeon Woo</creator><creator>Park, Sun Woo</creator><creator>Kim, Joung Joo</creator><creator>Lee, Eugine</creator><creator>Ko, Kyeong Hee</creator><creator>Kim, Huen Suk</creator><creator>Kim, Yeun Wook</creator><creator>Hyun, Sang Hwan</creator><creator>Shin, Taeyoung</creator><creator>Hawthorne, Lou</creator><creator>Hwang, Woo Suk</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer</title><author>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim ; Jeong, Yeon Woo ; Park, Sun Woo ; Kim, Joung Joo ; Lee, Eugine ; Ko, Kyeong Hee ; Kim, Huen Suk ; Kim, Yeun Wook ; Hyun, Sang Hwan ; Shin, Taeyoung ; Hawthorne, Lou ; Hwang, Woo Suk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-993749ac73d8d8945d8ed647d50e48ed68d1938f9d6bac0361928d52ce61113f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Calcium - chemistry</topic><topic>Cloning, Organism - methods</topic><topic>Cloning, Organism - veterinary</topic><topic>Culture media (Biology)</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Dogs - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats - genetics</topic><topic>Nuclear transfer (Cloning)</topic><topic>Nuclear Transfer Techniques - veterinary</topic><topic>Oocytes - physiology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Yeon Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sun Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joung Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eugine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Kyeong Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Huen Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeun Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Sang Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Taeyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawthorne, Lou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Woo Suk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cloning and stem cells</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim</au><au>Jeong, Yeon Woo</au><au>Park, Sun Woo</au><au>Kim, Joung Joo</au><au>Lee, Eugine</au><au>Ko, Kyeong Hee</au><au>Kim, Huen Suk</au><au>Kim, Yeun Wook</au><au>Hyun, Sang Hwan</au><au>Shin, Taeyoung</au><au>Hawthorne, Lou</au><au>Hwang, Woo Suk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer</atitle><jtitle>Cloning and stem cells</jtitle><addtitle>Cloning Stem Cells</addtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>123-130</pages><issn>1536-2302</issn><eissn>1557-7457</eissn><abstract>The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluate the effects of parity of recipient dogs on the success of SCNT. Oocytes retrieved from outbred dogs were reconstructed with adult somatic cells collected from an 11-year-old female dog named Missy. In the FSA method, oocytes were fused and activated at the same time using two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec. In the F+CA method, oocytes were fused with two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec, and then activated 1 h after fusion by 10 microM calcium ionophore for 4 m and cultured for 4 h in 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for postactivation. Activation method had a significant impact on the production efficiency of cloned dogs. There was a significant difference in full-term pregnancy rate and percentage of live puppies between the two methods (6.3% and 38.5% for FSA and F+CA, respectively). In our study, four out of five live offspring produced by F+CA survived versus FSA, which did not result in any surviving puppies. Overall, as few as 14 dogs and 54 reconstructed embryos were needed to produce a cloned puppy. In addition, the parity of recipient bitches had no effect on the success of SCNT in canine species. Both the nullipara and multipara bitches produced live puppies following SCNT-ET.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>19226214</pmid><doi>10.1089/clo.2008.0029</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1536-2302 |
ispartof | Cloning and stem cells, 2009-03, Vol.11 (1), p.123-130 |
issn | 1536-2302 1557-7457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67028811 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Calcium - chemistry Cloning, Organism - methods Cloning, Organism - veterinary Culture media (Biology) Dogs Dogs - genetics Genetic aspects Genotype Methods Microsatellite Repeats - genetics Nuclear transfer (Cloning) Nuclear Transfer Techniques - veterinary Oocytes - physiology Physiological aspects |
title | Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A26%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cloning%20missy:%20obtaining%20multiple%20offspring%20of%20a%20specific%20canine%20genotype%20by%20somatic%20cell%20nuclear%20transfer&rft.jtitle=Cloning%20and%20stem%20cells&rft.au=Hossein,%20Mohammad%20Shamim&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=123-130&rft.issn=1536-2302&rft.eissn=1557-7457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/clo.2008.0029&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA200411039%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20487135&rft_id=info:pmid/19226214&rft_galeid=A200411039&rfr_iscdi=true |