Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer

The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cloning and stem cells 2009-03, Vol.11 (1), p.123-130
Hauptverfasser: Hossein, Mohammad Shamim, Jeong, Yeon Woo, Park, Sun Woo, Kim, Joung Joo, Lee, Eugine, Ko, Kyeong Hee, Kim, Huen Suk, Kim, Yeun Wook, Hyun, Sang Hwan, Shin, Taeyoung, Hawthorne, Lou, Hwang, Woo Suk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 130
container_issue 1
container_start_page 123
container_title Cloning and stem cells
container_volume 11
creator Hossein, Mohammad Shamim
Jeong, Yeon Woo
Park, Sun Woo
Kim, Joung Joo
Lee, Eugine
Ko, Kyeong Hee
Kim, Huen Suk
Kim, Yeun Wook
Hyun, Sang Hwan
Shin, Taeyoung
Hawthorne, Lou
Hwang, Woo Suk
description The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluate the effects of parity of recipient dogs on the success of SCNT. Oocytes retrieved from outbred dogs were reconstructed with adult somatic cells collected from an 11-year-old female dog named Missy. In the FSA method, oocytes were fused and activated at the same time using two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec. In the F+CA method, oocytes were fused with two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec, and then activated 1 h after fusion by 10 microM calcium ionophore for 4 m and cultured for 4 h in 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for postactivation. Activation method had a significant impact on the production efficiency of cloned dogs. There was a significant difference in full-term pregnancy rate and percentage of live puppies between the two methods (6.3% and 38.5% for FSA and F+CA, respectively). In our study, four out of five live offspring produced by F+CA survived versus FSA, which did not result in any surviving puppies. Overall, as few as 14 dogs and 54 reconstructed embryos were needed to produce a cloned puppy. In addition, the parity of recipient bitches had no effect on the success of SCNT in canine species. Both the nullipara and multipara bitches produced live puppies following SCNT-ET.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/clo.2008.0029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67028811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A200411039</galeid><sourcerecordid>A200411039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-993749ac73d8d8945d8ed647d50e48ed68d1938f9d6bac0361928d52ce61113f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVpaNIkx16LoJCbN_qyLeUWlqQtLPTSnoVWGi0KsuVa9mH_-0jsQgkEig4ann4j5s1D6AslG0qkurcxbRghckMIUx_QFW3bvulF23-sNe8axgm7RJ9zfikEkYJ8QpdUMdYxKq7QyzamMYwHPIScjw847RcTTsIalzBFwMn7PM1VSh4bnCewwQeLrSkc4AOMaTlOgPdHnNNglvoEMeJxtRHMjJfZjNnDfIMuvIkZbs_3Nfrz_PR7-6PZ_fr-c_u4ayyXammU4r1QxvbcSSeVaJ0E14netQRELaWjikuvXLc3lvCumJGuZRY6Sin3_Brdnf6d5vR3hbzo4q1OZEZIa9ZdT5iUBf0fyIiQPeVtAb-dwIOJoMPoU_FkK6wfy-4FpYSrQm3eocpxMASbRvCh6G8amlODnVPOM3hd1jyY-agp0TVcXcLVNVxdwy381_O8634A948-p8lfAd0tnuI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20487135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim ; Jeong, Yeon Woo ; Park, Sun Woo ; Kim, Joung Joo ; Lee, Eugine ; Ko, Kyeong Hee ; Kim, Huen Suk ; Kim, Yeun Wook ; Hyun, Sang Hwan ; Shin, Taeyoung ; Hawthorne, Lou ; Hwang, Woo Suk</creator><creatorcontrib>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim ; Jeong, Yeon Woo ; Park, Sun Woo ; Kim, Joung Joo ; Lee, Eugine ; Ko, Kyeong Hee ; Kim, Huen Suk ; Kim, Yeun Wook ; Hyun, Sang Hwan ; Shin, Taeyoung ; Hawthorne, Lou ; Hwang, Woo Suk</creatorcontrib><description>The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluate the effects of parity of recipient dogs on the success of SCNT. Oocytes retrieved from outbred dogs were reconstructed with adult somatic cells collected from an 11-year-old female dog named Missy. In the FSA method, oocytes were fused and activated at the same time using two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec. In the F+CA method, oocytes were fused with two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec, and then activated 1 h after fusion by 10 microM calcium ionophore for 4 m and cultured for 4 h in 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for postactivation. Activation method had a significant impact on the production efficiency of cloned dogs. There was a significant difference in full-term pregnancy rate and percentage of live puppies between the two methods (6.3% and 38.5% for FSA and F+CA, respectively). In our study, four out of five live offspring produced by F+CA survived versus FSA, which did not result in any surviving puppies. Overall, as few as 14 dogs and 54 reconstructed embryos were needed to produce a cloned puppy. In addition, the parity of recipient bitches had no effect on the success of SCNT in canine species. Both the nullipara and multipara bitches produced live puppies following SCNT-ET.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-2302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/clo.2008.0029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19226214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Calcium - chemistry ; Cloning, Organism - methods ; Cloning, Organism - veterinary ; Culture media (Biology) ; Dogs ; Dogs - genetics ; Genetic aspects ; Genotype ; Methods ; Microsatellite Repeats - genetics ; Nuclear transfer (Cloning) ; Nuclear Transfer Techniques - veterinary ; Oocytes - physiology ; Physiological aspects</subject><ispartof>Cloning and stem cells, 2009-03, Vol.11 (1), p.123-130</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-993749ac73d8d8945d8ed647d50e48ed68d1938f9d6bac0361928d52ce61113f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-993749ac73d8d8945d8ed647d50e48ed68d1938f9d6bac0361928d52ce61113f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19226214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Yeon Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sun Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joung Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eugine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Kyeong Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Huen Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeun Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Sang Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Taeyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawthorne, Lou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Woo Suk</creatorcontrib><title>Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer</title><title>Cloning and stem cells</title><addtitle>Cloning Stem Cells</addtitle><description>The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluate the effects of parity of recipient dogs on the success of SCNT. Oocytes retrieved from outbred dogs were reconstructed with adult somatic cells collected from an 11-year-old female dog named Missy. In the FSA method, oocytes were fused and activated at the same time using two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec. In the F+CA method, oocytes were fused with two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec, and then activated 1 h after fusion by 10 microM calcium ionophore for 4 m and cultured for 4 h in 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for postactivation. Activation method had a significant impact on the production efficiency of cloned dogs. There was a significant difference in full-term pregnancy rate and percentage of live puppies between the two methods (6.3% and 38.5% for FSA and F+CA, respectively). In our study, four out of five live offspring produced by F+CA survived versus FSA, which did not result in any surviving puppies. Overall, as few as 14 dogs and 54 reconstructed embryos were needed to produce a cloned puppy. In addition, the parity of recipient bitches had no effect on the success of SCNT in canine species. Both the nullipara and multipara bitches produced live puppies following SCNT-ET.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Calcium - chemistry</subject><subject>Cloning, Organism - methods</subject><subject>Cloning, Organism - veterinary</subject><subject>Culture media (Biology)</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Dogs - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats - genetics</subject><subject>Nuclear transfer (Cloning)</subject><subject>Nuclear Transfer Techniques - veterinary</subject><subject>Oocytes - physiology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><issn>1536-2302</issn><issn>1557-7457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVpaNIkx16LoJCbN_qyLeUWlqQtLPTSnoVWGi0KsuVa9mH_-0jsQgkEig4ann4j5s1D6AslG0qkurcxbRghckMIUx_QFW3bvulF23-sNe8axgm7RJ9zfikEkYJ8QpdUMdYxKq7QyzamMYwHPIScjw847RcTTsIalzBFwMn7PM1VSh4bnCewwQeLrSkc4AOMaTlOgPdHnNNglvoEMeJxtRHMjJfZjNnDfIMuvIkZbs_3Nfrz_PR7-6PZ_fr-c_u4ayyXammU4r1QxvbcSSeVaJ0E14netQRELaWjikuvXLc3lvCumJGuZRY6Sin3_Brdnf6d5vR3hbzo4q1OZEZIa9ZdT5iUBf0fyIiQPeVtAb-dwIOJoMPoU_FkK6wfy-4FpYSrQm3eocpxMASbRvCh6G8amlODnVPOM3hd1jyY-agp0TVcXcLVNVxdwy381_O8634A948-p8lfAd0tnuI</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim</creator><creator>Jeong, Yeon Woo</creator><creator>Park, Sun Woo</creator><creator>Kim, Joung Joo</creator><creator>Lee, Eugine</creator><creator>Ko, Kyeong Hee</creator><creator>Kim, Huen Suk</creator><creator>Kim, Yeun Wook</creator><creator>Hyun, Sang Hwan</creator><creator>Shin, Taeyoung</creator><creator>Hawthorne, Lou</creator><creator>Hwang, Woo Suk</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer</title><author>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim ; Jeong, Yeon Woo ; Park, Sun Woo ; Kim, Joung Joo ; Lee, Eugine ; Ko, Kyeong Hee ; Kim, Huen Suk ; Kim, Yeun Wook ; Hyun, Sang Hwan ; Shin, Taeyoung ; Hawthorne, Lou ; Hwang, Woo Suk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-993749ac73d8d8945d8ed647d50e48ed68d1938f9d6bac0361928d52ce61113f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Calcium - chemistry</topic><topic>Cloning, Organism - methods</topic><topic>Cloning, Organism - veterinary</topic><topic>Culture media (Biology)</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Dogs - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats - genetics</topic><topic>Nuclear transfer (Cloning)</topic><topic>Nuclear Transfer Techniques - veterinary</topic><topic>Oocytes - physiology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Yeon Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sun Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joung Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eugine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Kyeong Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Huen Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeun Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Sang Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Taeyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawthorne, Lou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Woo Suk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cloning and stem cells</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hossein, Mohammad Shamim</au><au>Jeong, Yeon Woo</au><au>Park, Sun Woo</au><au>Kim, Joung Joo</au><au>Lee, Eugine</au><au>Ko, Kyeong Hee</au><au>Kim, Huen Suk</au><au>Kim, Yeun Wook</au><au>Hyun, Sang Hwan</au><au>Shin, Taeyoung</au><au>Hawthorne, Lou</au><au>Hwang, Woo Suk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer</atitle><jtitle>Cloning and stem cells</jtitle><addtitle>Cloning Stem Cells</addtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>123-130</pages><issn>1536-2302</issn><eissn>1557-7457</eissn><abstract>The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluate the effects of parity of recipient dogs on the success of SCNT. Oocytes retrieved from outbred dogs were reconstructed with adult somatic cells collected from an 11-year-old female dog named Missy. In the FSA method, oocytes were fused and activated at the same time using two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec. In the F+CA method, oocytes were fused with two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec, and then activated 1 h after fusion by 10 microM calcium ionophore for 4 m and cultured for 4 h in 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for postactivation. Activation method had a significant impact on the production efficiency of cloned dogs. There was a significant difference in full-term pregnancy rate and percentage of live puppies between the two methods (6.3% and 38.5% for FSA and F+CA, respectively). In our study, four out of five live offspring produced by F+CA survived versus FSA, which did not result in any surviving puppies. Overall, as few as 14 dogs and 54 reconstructed embryos were needed to produce a cloned puppy. In addition, the parity of recipient bitches had no effect on the success of SCNT in canine species. Both the nullipara and multipara bitches produced live puppies following SCNT-ET.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>19226214</pmid><doi>10.1089/clo.2008.0029</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1536-2302
ispartof Cloning and stem cells, 2009-03, Vol.11 (1), p.123-130
issn 1536-2302
1557-7457
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67028811
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Calcium - chemistry
Cloning, Organism - methods
Cloning, Organism - veterinary
Culture media (Biology)
Dogs
Dogs - genetics
Genetic aspects
Genotype
Methods
Microsatellite Repeats - genetics
Nuclear transfer (Cloning)
Nuclear Transfer Techniques - veterinary
Oocytes - physiology
Physiological aspects
title Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A26%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cloning%20missy:%20obtaining%20multiple%20offspring%20of%20a%20specific%20canine%20genotype%20by%20somatic%20cell%20nuclear%20transfer&rft.jtitle=Cloning%20and%20stem%20cells&rft.au=Hossein,%20Mohammad%20Shamim&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=123-130&rft.issn=1536-2302&rft.eissn=1557-7457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/clo.2008.0029&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA200411039%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20487135&rft_id=info:pmid/19226214&rft_galeid=A200411039&rfr_iscdi=true