Comparison of femoral geometry among cases with and without hip fractures

Hip fractures have high morbidity and mortality rate for the people as a complication of osteoporosis and is generally seen in old age. It is known that femoral geometric measurements are important in the assessment of hip fracture risks. This study aimed to examine the association between hip geome...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Yonsei medical journal 2004-10, Vol.45 (5), p.901-907
Hauptverfasser: Calis, Havva Talay, Eryavuz, Merih, Calis, Mustafa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 907
container_issue 5
container_start_page 901
container_title Yonsei medical journal
container_volume 45
creator Calis, Havva Talay
Eryavuz, Merih
Calis, Mustafa
description Hip fractures have high morbidity and mortality rate for the people as a complication of osteoporosis and is generally seen in old age. It is known that femoral geometric measurements are important in the assessment of hip fracture risks. This study aimed to examine the association between hip geometry and hip fracture in post-menopausal elderly females. In the present study, 232 hip X-rays were taken from women with no hip fractures (Group 1) and 29 post-menopausal women with hip fractures (Group 2) after a minor trauma. After standard anterior-posterior plain pelvic X-ray radiographs were obtained, various radiographic measurements were performed in all cases, including the hip axis length (HAL), femoral neck axis length (FAL), acetabular width (AW), femoral head width (HW), femoral neck width (FW), femoral shaft width (FSW), intertrochanteric width (TW), lateral and medial cortical thickness of the femoral shaft (LCT, SMCT), femoral neck cortical thickness (NMCT) and femoral neck-shaft angle (Q-angle). In group 1, the mean age, weight and height were 62.5 +/- 7.4 years, 70.8 +/- 12.5 kg, and 157.5 +/- 6.7 cm, respectively. In group 2, these values were 70.17 +/- 6.8 years, 64.7 +/- 11.5 kg, and 158.3 +/- 2.7 cm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of HAL, FAL, AW and HW between the two groups. In group 2, the mean FW value was significantly higher than in group 1 (p= 0.01). The mean values for FSW, TW, NMCT, SMCT, LCT were statistically lower in group 2 than those in group 1 (p= 0.01, p=0.038, p=0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Q-angle was also significantly higher in cases with hip fracture than in cases with no hip fracture (p=0.01). The values of FW, FSW, TW, NMCT, SMCT, LCT and Q-angle seem to be important parameters in the evaluation of hip fracture risks. However, further studies are needed to clarify this conclusion.
doi_str_mv 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.5.901
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67024909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67024909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-d76ca2791acc67b2345647e8302cd6b26aa2912e4cbc0b8520e1e05b8531eeb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkD1PwzAYhD2AaCn8ABbkiS3h9VfSjKiCUqkSC8yW47xpU8VxsBOh_ntSWonpbrg7nR5CHhikQsji-egOKQeQqVSpSgtgV2QOiolE5UU2I7cxHgB4zoDfkBlTiikOfE42K-96E5roO-prWqPzwbR0h97hEI7UON_tqDURI_1phj01XfVn_DjQfdPTOhg7jAHjHbmuTRvx_qIL8vX2-rl6T7Yf683qZZtYIWFIqjyzhucFM9ZmecmFVJnMcSmA2yoreWYMLxhHaUsL5XJ6iQxBTU4wxFKKBXk67_bBf48YB-2aaLFtTYd-jDrLgcsCiinIzkEbfIwBa92Hxplw1Az0iZmemOkTMy2VVnpiNnUeL-Nj6bD6b1yAiV8aaGqR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67024909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of femoral geometry among cases with and without hip fractures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Calis, Havva Talay ; Eryavuz, Merih ; Calis, Mustafa</creator><creatorcontrib>Calis, Havva Talay ; Eryavuz, Merih ; Calis, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><description>Hip fractures have high morbidity and mortality rate for the people as a complication of osteoporosis and is generally seen in old age. It is known that femoral geometric measurements are important in the assessment of hip fracture risks. This study aimed to examine the association between hip geometry and hip fracture in post-menopausal elderly females. In the present study, 232 hip X-rays were taken from women with no hip fractures (Group 1) and 29 post-menopausal women with hip fractures (Group 2) after a minor trauma. After standard anterior-posterior plain pelvic X-ray radiographs were obtained, various radiographic measurements were performed in all cases, including the hip axis length (HAL), femoral neck axis length (FAL), acetabular width (AW), femoral head width (HW), femoral neck width (FW), femoral shaft width (FSW), intertrochanteric width (TW), lateral and medial cortical thickness of the femoral shaft (LCT, SMCT), femoral neck cortical thickness (NMCT) and femoral neck-shaft angle (Q-angle). In group 1, the mean age, weight and height were 62.5 +/- 7.4 years, 70.8 +/- 12.5 kg, and 157.5 +/- 6.7 cm, respectively. In group 2, these values were 70.17 +/- 6.8 years, 64.7 +/- 11.5 kg, and 158.3 +/- 2.7 cm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of HAL, FAL, AW and HW between the two groups. In group 2, the mean FW value was significantly higher than in group 1 (p= 0.01). The mean values for FSW, TW, NMCT, SMCT, LCT were statistically lower in group 2 than those in group 1 (p= 0.01, p=0.038, p=0.001, p &lt; 0.001, p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Q-angle was also significantly higher in cases with hip fracture than in cases with no hip fracture (p=0.01). The values of FW, FSW, TW, NMCT, SMCT, LCT and Q-angle seem to be important parameters in the evaluation of hip fracture risks. However, further studies are needed to clarify this conclusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0513-5796</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.5.901</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15515202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South)</publisher><subject>Aged ; Body Mass Index ; Female ; Femur - anatomy &amp; histology ; Femur Neck - anatomy &amp; histology ; Hip Fractures - pathology ; Humans ; Middle Aged</subject><ispartof>Yonsei medical journal, 2004-10, Vol.45 (5), p.901-907</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-d76ca2791acc67b2345647e8302cd6b26aa2912e4cbc0b8520e1e05b8531eeb43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15515202$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calis, Havva Talay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eryavuz, Merih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calis, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of femoral geometry among cases with and without hip fractures</title><title>Yonsei medical journal</title><addtitle>Yonsei Med J</addtitle><description>Hip fractures have high morbidity and mortality rate for the people as a complication of osteoporosis and is generally seen in old age. It is known that femoral geometric measurements are important in the assessment of hip fracture risks. This study aimed to examine the association between hip geometry and hip fracture in post-menopausal elderly females. In the present study, 232 hip X-rays were taken from women with no hip fractures (Group 1) and 29 post-menopausal women with hip fractures (Group 2) after a minor trauma. After standard anterior-posterior plain pelvic X-ray radiographs were obtained, various radiographic measurements were performed in all cases, including the hip axis length (HAL), femoral neck axis length (FAL), acetabular width (AW), femoral head width (HW), femoral neck width (FW), femoral shaft width (FSW), intertrochanteric width (TW), lateral and medial cortical thickness of the femoral shaft (LCT, SMCT), femoral neck cortical thickness (NMCT) and femoral neck-shaft angle (Q-angle). In group 1, the mean age, weight and height were 62.5 +/- 7.4 years, 70.8 +/- 12.5 kg, and 157.5 +/- 6.7 cm, respectively. In group 2, these values were 70.17 +/- 6.8 years, 64.7 +/- 11.5 kg, and 158.3 +/- 2.7 cm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of HAL, FAL, AW and HW between the two groups. In group 2, the mean FW value was significantly higher than in group 1 (p= 0.01). The mean values for FSW, TW, NMCT, SMCT, LCT were statistically lower in group 2 than those in group 1 (p= 0.01, p=0.038, p=0.001, p &lt; 0.001, p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Q-angle was also significantly higher in cases with hip fracture than in cases with no hip fracture (p=0.01). The values of FW, FSW, TW, NMCT, SMCT, LCT and Q-angle seem to be important parameters in the evaluation of hip fracture risks. However, further studies are needed to clarify this conclusion.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Femur Neck - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><issn>0513-5796</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkD1PwzAYhD2AaCn8ABbkiS3h9VfSjKiCUqkSC8yW47xpU8VxsBOh_ntSWonpbrg7nR5CHhikQsji-egOKQeQqVSpSgtgV2QOiolE5UU2I7cxHgB4zoDfkBlTiikOfE42K-96E5roO-prWqPzwbR0h97hEI7UON_tqDURI_1phj01XfVn_DjQfdPTOhg7jAHjHbmuTRvx_qIL8vX2-rl6T7Yf683qZZtYIWFIqjyzhucFM9ZmecmFVJnMcSmA2yoreWYMLxhHaUsL5XJ6iQxBTU4wxFKKBXk67_bBf48YB-2aaLFtTYd-jDrLgcsCiinIzkEbfIwBa92Hxplw1Az0iZmemOkTMy2VVnpiNnUeL-Nj6bD6b1yAiV8aaGqR</recordid><startdate>20041031</startdate><enddate>20041031</enddate><creator>Calis, Havva Talay</creator><creator>Eryavuz, Merih</creator><creator>Calis, Mustafa</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041031</creationdate><title>Comparison of femoral geometry among cases with and without hip fractures</title><author>Calis, Havva Talay ; Eryavuz, Merih ; Calis, Mustafa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-d76ca2791acc67b2345647e8302cd6b26aa2912e4cbc0b8520e1e05b8531eeb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Femur Neck - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calis, Havva Talay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eryavuz, Merih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calis, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Yonsei medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calis, Havva Talay</au><au>Eryavuz, Merih</au><au>Calis, Mustafa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of femoral geometry among cases with and without hip fractures</atitle><jtitle>Yonsei medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Yonsei Med J</addtitle><date>2004-10-31</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>901</spage><epage>907</epage><pages>901-907</pages><issn>0513-5796</issn><abstract>Hip fractures have high morbidity and mortality rate for the people as a complication of osteoporosis and is generally seen in old age. It is known that femoral geometric measurements are important in the assessment of hip fracture risks. This study aimed to examine the association between hip geometry and hip fracture in post-menopausal elderly females. In the present study, 232 hip X-rays were taken from women with no hip fractures (Group 1) and 29 post-menopausal women with hip fractures (Group 2) after a minor trauma. After standard anterior-posterior plain pelvic X-ray radiographs were obtained, various radiographic measurements were performed in all cases, including the hip axis length (HAL), femoral neck axis length (FAL), acetabular width (AW), femoral head width (HW), femoral neck width (FW), femoral shaft width (FSW), intertrochanteric width (TW), lateral and medial cortical thickness of the femoral shaft (LCT, SMCT), femoral neck cortical thickness (NMCT) and femoral neck-shaft angle (Q-angle). In group 1, the mean age, weight and height were 62.5 +/- 7.4 years, 70.8 +/- 12.5 kg, and 157.5 +/- 6.7 cm, respectively. In group 2, these values were 70.17 +/- 6.8 years, 64.7 +/- 11.5 kg, and 158.3 +/- 2.7 cm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the measurements of HAL, FAL, AW and HW between the two groups. In group 2, the mean FW value was significantly higher than in group 1 (p= 0.01). The mean values for FSW, TW, NMCT, SMCT, LCT were statistically lower in group 2 than those in group 1 (p= 0.01, p=0.038, p=0.001, p &lt; 0.001, p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Q-angle was also significantly higher in cases with hip fracture than in cases with no hip fracture (p=0.01). The values of FW, FSW, TW, NMCT, SMCT, LCT and Q-angle seem to be important parameters in the evaluation of hip fracture risks. However, further studies are needed to clarify this conclusion.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pmid>15515202</pmid><doi>10.3349/ymj.2004.45.5.901</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0513-5796
ispartof Yonsei medical journal, 2004-10, Vol.45 (5), p.901-907
issn 0513-5796
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67024909
source MEDLINE; KoreaMed Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Body Mass Index
Female
Femur - anatomy & histology
Femur Neck - anatomy & histology
Hip Fractures - pathology
Humans
Middle Aged
title Comparison of femoral geometry among cases with and without hip fractures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A30%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20femoral%20geometry%20among%20cases%20with%20and%20without%20hip%20fractures&rft.jtitle=Yonsei%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Calis,%20Havva%20Talay&rft.date=2004-10-31&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=901&rft.epage=907&rft.pages=901-907&rft.issn=0513-5796&rft_id=info:doi/10.3349/ymj.2004.45.5.901&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67024909%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67024909&rft_id=info:pmid/15515202&rfr_iscdi=true