A pan-European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility towards human-use antimicrobial drugs among zoonotic and commensal enteric bacteria isolated from healthy food-producing animals
Objectives The aim of the study was to study antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter and Enterococcus recovered from chickens, pigs and cattle using uniform methodology. Methods Intestinal samples were taken at slaughter in five EU countries per host and bacteria...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2009-04, Vol.63 (4), p.733-744 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 744 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 733 |
container_title | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | de Jong, Anno Bywater, Robin Butty, Pascal Deroover, Erik Godinho, Kevin Klein, Ulrich Marion, Hervé Simjee, Shabbir Smets, Katelijne Thomas, Valérie Vallé, Michel Wheadon, Aileen |
description | Objectives The aim of the study was to study antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter and Enterococcus recovered from chickens, pigs and cattle using uniform methodology. Methods Intestinal samples were taken at slaughter in five EU countries per host and bacteria isolated in national laboratories. MICs were determined in a central laboratory of key antimicrobials used in human medicine. Clinical resistance was based on CLSI breakpoints and decreased susceptibility on EFSA epidemiological cut-off values. Results Isolation rates from a total of 1500 samples were high for E. coli (n=1465), low for Salmonella (n=205) and intermediate for Campylobacter (n=785) and Enterococcus (n=718). Resistance prevalence varied among antibiotics, bacteria, hosts and countries. For E. coli and Salmonella, clinical resistance to newer compounds (cefepime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin) was absent or low, but a decreased susceptibility was apparent, particularly in chickens. Clinical resistance to older compounds (except colistin and gentamicin) was variable and higher. For Campylobacter jejuni from chickens, ciprofloxacin resistance was markedly higher than in isolates from cattle. Clinical resistance to erythromycin was absent for both hosts; decreased susceptibility very low. Similar trends were determined for Campylobacter coli, but C. jejuni was less resistant. None of the enterococcal strains was resistant to linezolid, but a few displayed resistance to ampicillin or vancomycin. Resistance prevalence to quinupristin/dalfopristin was clearly higher. Conclusions Antimicrobial resistance among enteric organisms in food animals varied among countries, particularly for older antimicrobials, but clinical resistance to essential compounds used to treat disease in humans was generally zero or low. In the absence of clinical resistance to newer compounds in E. coli and Salmonella, the apparent decreased susceptibility should be monitored carefully. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jac/dkp012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67020939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jac/dkp012</oup_id><sourcerecordid>21024735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-fc046386b70f49cbf7e41de5977f43cc2b2bd6572e98a8b8ed457c070139defb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1u1DAQAGALgeiycOEBkIVUDpXS2nESJ8dqVWilFb2AVHGJHP90vU3s4B9geTCej6l21Uo9wGks6_OMZwaht5ScUtKxs62QZ-puJrR8hha0akhRko4-RwvCSF3wqmZH6FWMW0JIUzftS3REu5KxtuML9Occz8IVFzn4WQuHYw4_9A57g4VLdrIy-MGKEe6j1HOygx1t2uHkf4qgIt7kCV7nqJ9wFfJtxGLy7hb_9t75ZCUQhaWfJu0iEO2SDnA7CHl_ENhGP4qkFTbBT3ijxZg2O2y8V8UcvMrSQjLh7CTG-Bq9MBD0m0Ncoq8fL76sLov19aer1fm6kDUpU2EkqRrWNgMnpurkYLiuqNJ1x7mpmJTlUA6qqXmpu1a0Q6tVVXNJOKGsU9oMbIk-7PPCD75nHVM_WRjEOAqnfY59wwnMmnX_hSUlZcVZDfD9E7j1OThoAgyHfBSKL9HJHsE8Ywza9HOAvsOup6S_33kPO-_3Owf87pAxD5NWj_SwZADHByCiFKMJwkkbH1xJGWFNUz86n-d_Fyz2zsakfz1IEe5gHozX_eXNt75b3aybz3zVV-wv8CjVvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217670101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A pan-European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility towards human-use antimicrobial drugs among zoonotic and commensal enteric bacteria isolated from healthy food-producing animals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>de Jong, Anno ; Bywater, Robin ; Butty, Pascal ; Deroover, Erik ; Godinho, Kevin ; Klein, Ulrich ; Marion, Hervé ; Simjee, Shabbir ; Smets, Katelijne ; Thomas, Valérie ; Vallé, Michel ; Wheadon, Aileen</creator><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Anno ; Bywater, Robin ; Butty, Pascal ; Deroover, Erik ; Godinho, Kevin ; Klein, Ulrich ; Marion, Hervé ; Simjee, Shabbir ; Smets, Katelijne ; Thomas, Valérie ; Vallé, Michel ; Wheadon, Aileen</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The aim of the study was to study antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter and Enterococcus recovered from chickens, pigs and cattle using uniform methodology. Methods Intestinal samples were taken at slaughter in five EU countries per host and bacteria isolated in national laboratories. MICs were determined in a central laboratory of key antimicrobials used in human medicine. Clinical resistance was based on CLSI breakpoints and decreased susceptibility on EFSA epidemiological cut-off values. Results Isolation rates from a total of 1500 samples were high for E. coli (n=1465), low for Salmonella (n=205) and intermediate for Campylobacter (n=785) and Enterococcus (n=718). Resistance prevalence varied among antibiotics, bacteria, hosts and countries. For E. coli and Salmonella, clinical resistance to newer compounds (cefepime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin) was absent or low, but a decreased susceptibility was apparent, particularly in chickens. Clinical resistance to older compounds (except colistin and gentamicin) was variable and higher. For Campylobacter jejuni from chickens, ciprofloxacin resistance was markedly higher than in isolates from cattle. Clinical resistance to erythromycin was absent for both hosts; decreased susceptibility very low. Similar trends were determined for Campylobacter coli, but C. jejuni was less resistant. None of the enterococcal strains was resistant to linezolid, but a few displayed resistance to ampicillin or vancomycin. Resistance prevalence to quinupristin/dalfopristin was clearly higher. Conclusions Antimicrobial resistance among enteric organisms in food animals varied among countries, particularly for older antimicrobials, but clinical resistance to essential compounds used to treat disease in humans was generally zero or low. In the absence of clinical resistance to newer compounds in E. coli and Salmonella, the apparent decreased susceptibility should be monitored carefully.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19233897</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal diseases ; Animals ; Animals, Domestic - microbiology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Antimicrobial agents ; antimicrobial resistance ; Bacteria ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen ; Biological and medical sciences ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter coli ; Campylobacter jejuni ; Cattle ; Chickens ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; E. coli ; Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects ; Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification ; enterococci ; Enterococcus ; Escherichia coli ; European Union ; Gastrointestinal Tract - microbiology ; Hogs ; Human bacterial diseases ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Poultry ; Salmonella ; surveillance ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2009-04, Vol.63 (4), p.733-744</ispartof><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-fc046386b70f49cbf7e41de5977f43cc2b2bd6572e98a8b8ed457c070139defb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-fc046386b70f49cbf7e41de5977f43cc2b2bd6572e98a8b8ed457c070139defb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21303665$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19233897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Anno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bywater, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butty, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deroover, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godinho, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marion, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simjee, Shabbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smets, Katelijne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallé, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheadon, Aileen</creatorcontrib><title>A pan-European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility towards human-use antimicrobial drugs among zoonotic and commensal enteric bacteria isolated from healthy food-producing animals</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><description>Objectives The aim of the study was to study antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter and Enterococcus recovered from chickens, pigs and cattle using uniform methodology. Methods Intestinal samples were taken at slaughter in five EU countries per host and bacteria isolated in national laboratories. MICs were determined in a central laboratory of key antimicrobials used in human medicine. Clinical resistance was based on CLSI breakpoints and decreased susceptibility on EFSA epidemiological cut-off values. Results Isolation rates from a total of 1500 samples were high for E. coli (n=1465), low for Salmonella (n=205) and intermediate for Campylobacter (n=785) and Enterococcus (n=718). Resistance prevalence varied among antibiotics, bacteria, hosts and countries. For E. coli and Salmonella, clinical resistance to newer compounds (cefepime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin) was absent or low, but a decreased susceptibility was apparent, particularly in chickens. Clinical resistance to older compounds (except colistin and gentamicin) was variable and higher. For Campylobacter jejuni from chickens, ciprofloxacin resistance was markedly higher than in isolates from cattle. Clinical resistance to erythromycin was absent for both hosts; decreased susceptibility very low. Similar trends were determined for Campylobacter coli, but C. jejuni was less resistant. None of the enterococcal strains was resistant to linezolid, but a few displayed resistance to ampicillin or vancomycin. Resistance prevalence to quinupristin/dalfopristin was clearly higher. Conclusions Antimicrobial resistance among enteric organisms in food animals varied among countries, particularly for older antimicrobials, but clinical resistance to essential compounds used to treat disease in humans was generally zero or low. In the absence of clinical resistance to newer compounds in E. coli and Salmonella, the apparent decreased susceptibility should be monitored carefully.</description><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Domestic - microbiology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter coli</subject><subject>Campylobacter jejuni</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>E. coli</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification</subject><subject>enterococci</subject><subject>Enterococcus</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Tract - microbiology</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>surveillance</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1u1DAQAGALgeiycOEBkIVUDpXS2nESJ8dqVWilFb2AVHGJHP90vU3s4B9geTCej6l21Uo9wGks6_OMZwaht5ScUtKxs62QZ-puJrR8hha0akhRko4-RwvCSF3wqmZH6FWMW0JIUzftS3REu5KxtuML9Occz8IVFzn4WQuHYw4_9A57g4VLdrIy-MGKEe6j1HOygx1t2uHkf4qgIt7kCV7nqJ9wFfJtxGLy7hb_9t75ZCUQhaWfJu0iEO2SDnA7CHl_ENhGP4qkFTbBT3ijxZg2O2y8V8UcvMrSQjLh7CTG-Bq9MBD0m0Ncoq8fL76sLov19aer1fm6kDUpU2EkqRrWNgMnpurkYLiuqNJ1x7mpmJTlUA6qqXmpu1a0Q6tVVXNJOKGsU9oMbIk-7PPCD75nHVM_WRjEOAqnfY59wwnMmnX_hSUlZcVZDfD9E7j1OThoAgyHfBSKL9HJHsE8Ywza9HOAvsOup6S_33kPO-_3Owf87pAxD5NWj_SwZADHByCiFKMJwkkbH1xJGWFNUz86n-d_Fyz2zsakfz1IEe5gHozX_eXNt75b3aybz3zVV-wv8CjVvw</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>de Jong, Anno</creator><creator>Bywater, Robin</creator><creator>Butty, Pascal</creator><creator>Deroover, Erik</creator><creator>Godinho, Kevin</creator><creator>Klein, Ulrich</creator><creator>Marion, Hervé</creator><creator>Simjee, Shabbir</creator><creator>Smets, Katelijne</creator><creator>Thomas, Valérie</creator><creator>Vallé, Michel</creator><creator>Wheadon, Aileen</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>A pan-European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility towards human-use antimicrobial drugs among zoonotic and commensal enteric bacteria isolated from healthy food-producing animals</title><author>de Jong, Anno ; Bywater, Robin ; Butty, Pascal ; Deroover, Erik ; Godinho, Kevin ; Klein, Ulrich ; Marion, Hervé ; Simjee, Shabbir ; Smets, Katelijne ; Thomas, Valérie ; Vallé, Michel ; Wheadon, Aileen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-fc046386b70f49cbf7e41de5977f43cc2b2bd6572e98a8b8ed457c070139defb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Domestic - microbiology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter coli</topic><topic>Campylobacter jejuni</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>E. coli</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification</topic><topic>enterococci</topic><topic>Enterococcus</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Tract - microbiology</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>surveillance</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Anno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bywater, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butty, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deroover, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godinho, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marion, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simjee, Shabbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smets, Katelijne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallé, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheadon, Aileen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Jong, Anno</au><au>Bywater, Robin</au><au>Butty, Pascal</au><au>Deroover, Erik</au><au>Godinho, Kevin</au><au>Klein, Ulrich</au><au>Marion, Hervé</au><au>Simjee, Shabbir</au><au>Smets, Katelijne</au><au>Thomas, Valérie</au><au>Vallé, Michel</au><au>Wheadon, Aileen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A pan-European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility towards human-use antimicrobial drugs among zoonotic and commensal enteric bacteria isolated from healthy food-producing animals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>733</spage><epage>744</epage><pages>733-744</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><coden>JACHDX</coden><abstract>Objectives The aim of the study was to study antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter and Enterococcus recovered from chickens, pigs and cattle using uniform methodology. Methods Intestinal samples were taken at slaughter in five EU countries per host and bacteria isolated in national laboratories. MICs were determined in a central laboratory of key antimicrobials used in human medicine. Clinical resistance was based on CLSI breakpoints and decreased susceptibility on EFSA epidemiological cut-off values. Results Isolation rates from a total of 1500 samples were high for E. coli (n=1465), low for Salmonella (n=205) and intermediate for Campylobacter (n=785) and Enterococcus (n=718). Resistance prevalence varied among antibiotics, bacteria, hosts and countries. For E. coli and Salmonella, clinical resistance to newer compounds (cefepime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin) was absent or low, but a decreased susceptibility was apparent, particularly in chickens. Clinical resistance to older compounds (except colistin and gentamicin) was variable and higher. For Campylobacter jejuni from chickens, ciprofloxacin resistance was markedly higher than in isolates from cattle. Clinical resistance to erythromycin was absent for both hosts; decreased susceptibility very low. Similar trends were determined for Campylobacter coli, but C. jejuni was less resistant. None of the enterococcal strains was resistant to linezolid, but a few displayed resistance to ampicillin or vancomycin. Resistance prevalence to quinupristin/dalfopristin was clearly higher. Conclusions Antimicrobial resistance among enteric organisms in food animals varied among countries, particularly for older antimicrobials, but clinical resistance to essential compounds used to treat disease in humans was generally zero or low. In the absence of clinical resistance to newer compounds in E. coli and Salmonella, the apparent decreased susceptibility should be monitored carefully.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>19233897</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/dkp012</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7453 |
ispartof | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2009-04, Vol.63 (4), p.733-744 |
issn | 0305-7453 1460-2091 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67020939 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford Journals Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Animal diseases Animals Animals, Domestic - microbiology Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Antimicrobial agents antimicrobial resistance Bacteria Bacterial diseases Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen Biological and medical sciences Campylobacter Campylobacter coli Campylobacter jejuni Cattle Chickens Drug resistance Drug Resistance, Bacterial E. coli Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification enterococci Enterococcus Escherichia coli European Union Gastrointestinal Tract - microbiology Hogs Human bacterial diseases Infectious diseases Medical sciences Microbial Sensitivity Tests Pharmacology. Drug treatments Poultry Salmonella surveillance Swine |
title | A pan-European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility towards human-use antimicrobial drugs among zoonotic and commensal enteric bacteria isolated from healthy food-producing animals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T22%3A52%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20pan-European%20survey%20of%20antimicrobial%20susceptibility%20towards%20human-use%20antimicrobial%20drugs%20among%20zoonotic%20and%20commensal%20enteric%20bacteria%20isolated%20from%20healthy%20food-producing%20animals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=de%20Jong,%20Anno&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=733&rft.epage=744&rft.pages=733-744&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft.coden=JACHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/dkp012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21024735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217670101&rft_id=info:pmid/19233897&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jac/dkp012&rfr_iscdi=true |