Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?
Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheoc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endocrinological investigation 2004-07, Vol.27 (7), p.691-694 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 694 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 691 |
container_title | Journal of endocrinological investigation |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Lipsic, E Balazovjech, I Kosmálová, V Makaiová, I Dekrét, J Zanou, D F |
description | Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheochromocytoma. In one patient we found 20-times higher levels of epinephrine and 3-times higher levels of dopamine in 24-h urine, in the second patient there were 8-times higher levels of epinephrine alone. Norepinephrine in urine, as well as values of all adrenal cortical hormones were normal. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in both cases by a 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. The patients underwent adrenalectomy, which was performed without complications. We conclude that levels of single catecholamines excreted are decisive for the clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma. Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma is more often oligo- or asymptomatic. We stress the importance of a complete hormonal screening in every case of adrenal incidentaloma, with measuring levels of catecholamines and/or metanephrines. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF03347506 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67013950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67013950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-dc37369835b01f23b2e2c1fc2a3a5c40a28eed9d528771632e8a8388d9113ab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWw8AOQJwakFH_UsT0hqFqoVIkF5shxLtQoiYPtIPXfE2gllrvl0Xv3PghdUzKnhMj7pzXhfCEFyU_QlEpGMsVVfoqmhGuaLYiWE3QR4ychXHIlz9GECkGE1nKK3Kp3HfS7ME7cB18N1nUfuN-Bt7vgW2_3ybdmjjcRpx3gCDZA8mGPe5MShA5XYF1034BrH_4Q27jOWdPg1nSuhphMcr57uERntWkiXB33DL2vV2_Ll2z7-rxZPm4zyxRPWWXHJ3OtuCgJrRkvGTBLa8sMN8IuiGEKoNKVYEpKmnMGyox1VaUp5abUfIZuD7ljm69hPF-0LlpoGtOBH2KRS0K5FmQE7w6gDT7GAHXRB9easC8oKX7FFv9iR_jmmDqULVT_6NEk_wH3mXRG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67013950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lipsic, E ; Balazovjech, I ; Kosmálová, V ; Makaiová, I ; Dekrét, J ; Zanou, D F</creator><creatorcontrib>Lipsic, E ; Balazovjech, I ; Kosmálová, V ; Makaiová, I ; Dekrét, J ; Zanou, D F</creatorcontrib><description>Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheochromocytoma. In one patient we found 20-times higher levels of epinephrine and 3-times higher levels of dopamine in 24-h urine, in the second patient there were 8-times higher levels of epinephrine alone. Norepinephrine in urine, as well as values of all adrenal cortical hormones were normal. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in both cases by a 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. The patients underwent adrenalectomy, which was performed without complications. We conclude that levels of single catecholamines excreted are decisive for the clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma. Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma is more often oligo- or asymptomatic. We stress the importance of a complete hormonal screening in every case of adrenal incidentaloma, with measuring levels of catecholamines and/or metanephrines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-4097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1720-8386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03347506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15505997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy</publisher><subject>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - pathology ; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - surgery ; Adrenalectomy ; Adult ; Dopamine - secretion ; Dopamine - urine ; Epinephrine - secretion ; Epinephrine - urine ; Female ; Humans ; Pheochromocytoma - diagnosis ; Pheochromocytoma - pathology ; Pheochromocytoma - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2004-07, Vol.27 (7), p.691-694</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-dc37369835b01f23b2e2c1fc2a3a5c40a28eed9d528771632e8a8388d9113ab93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-dc37369835b01f23b2e2c1fc2a3a5c40a28eed9d528771632e8a8388d9113ab93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15505997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lipsic, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balazovjech, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmálová, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makaiová, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekrét, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanou, D F</creatorcontrib><title>Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?</title><title>Journal of endocrinological investigation</title><addtitle>J Endocrinol Invest</addtitle><description>Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheochromocytoma. In one patient we found 20-times higher levels of epinephrine and 3-times higher levels of dopamine in 24-h urine, in the second patient there were 8-times higher levels of epinephrine alone. Norepinephrine in urine, as well as values of all adrenal cortical hormones were normal. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in both cases by a 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. The patients underwent adrenalectomy, which was performed without complications. We conclude that levels of single catecholamines excreted are decisive for the clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma. Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma is more often oligo- or asymptomatic. We stress the importance of a complete hormonal screening in every case of adrenal incidentaloma, with measuring levels of catecholamines and/or metanephrines.</description><subject>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Adrenalectomy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Dopamine - secretion</subject><subject>Dopamine - urine</subject><subject>Epinephrine - secretion</subject><subject>Epinephrine - urine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pheochromocytoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pheochromocytoma - pathology</subject><subject>Pheochromocytoma - surgery</subject><issn>0391-4097</issn><issn>1720-8386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWw8AOQJwakFH_UsT0hqFqoVIkF5shxLtQoiYPtIPXfE2gllrvl0Xv3PghdUzKnhMj7pzXhfCEFyU_QlEpGMsVVfoqmhGuaLYiWE3QR4ychXHIlz9GECkGE1nKK3Kp3HfS7ME7cB18N1nUfuN-Bt7vgW2_3ybdmjjcRpx3gCDZA8mGPe5MShA5XYF1034BrH_4Q27jOWdPg1nSuhphMcr57uERntWkiXB33DL2vV2_Ll2z7-rxZPm4zyxRPWWXHJ3OtuCgJrRkvGTBLa8sMN8IuiGEKoNKVYEpKmnMGyox1VaUp5abUfIZuD7ljm69hPF-0LlpoGtOBH2KRS0K5FmQE7w6gDT7GAHXRB9easC8oKX7FFv9iR_jmmDqULVT_6NEk_wH3mXRG</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Lipsic, E</creator><creator>Balazovjech, I</creator><creator>Kosmálová, V</creator><creator>Makaiová, I</creator><creator>Dekrét, J</creator><creator>Zanou, D F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?</title><author>Lipsic, E ; Balazovjech, I ; Kosmálová, V ; Makaiová, I ; Dekrét, J ; Zanou, D F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-dc37369835b01f23b2e2c1fc2a3a5c40a28eed9d528771632e8a8388d9113ab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Adrenalectomy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Dopamine - secretion</topic><topic>Dopamine - urine</topic><topic>Epinephrine - secretion</topic><topic>Epinephrine - urine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pheochromocytoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pheochromocytoma - pathology</topic><topic>Pheochromocytoma - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lipsic, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balazovjech, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmálová, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makaiová, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekrét, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanou, D F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endocrinological investigation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lipsic, E</au><au>Balazovjech, I</au><au>Kosmálová, V</au><au>Makaiová, I</au><au>Dekrét, J</au><au>Zanou, D F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endocrinological investigation</jtitle><addtitle>J Endocrinol Invest</addtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>694</epage><pages>691-694</pages><issn>0391-4097</issn><eissn>1720-8386</eissn><abstract>Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheochromocytoma. In one patient we found 20-times higher levels of epinephrine and 3-times higher levels of dopamine in 24-h urine, in the second patient there were 8-times higher levels of epinephrine alone. Norepinephrine in urine, as well as values of all adrenal cortical hormones were normal. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in both cases by a 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. The patients underwent adrenalectomy, which was performed without complications. We conclude that levels of single catecholamines excreted are decisive for the clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma. Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma is more often oligo- or asymptomatic. We stress the importance of a complete hormonal screening in every case of adrenal incidentaloma, with measuring levels of catecholamines and/or metanephrines.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pmid>15505997</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03347506</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0391-4097 |
ispartof | Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2004-07, Vol.27 (7), p.691-694 |
issn | 0391-4097 1720-8386 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67013950 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - diagnosis Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - pathology Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - surgery Adrenalectomy Adult Dopamine - secretion Dopamine - urine Epinephrine - secretion Epinephrine - urine Female Humans Pheochromocytoma - diagnosis Pheochromocytoma - pathology Pheochromocytoma - surgery |
title | Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A42%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epinephrine%20producing%20pheochromocytoma.%20Is%20the%20secretory%20pattern%20decisive%20for%20the%20clinical%20manifestation?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endocrinological%20investigation&rft.au=Lipsic,%20E&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=694&rft.pages=691-694&rft.issn=0391-4097&rft.eissn=1720-8386&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03347506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67013950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67013950&rft_id=info:pmid/15505997&rfr_iscdi=true |