Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?

Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheoc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endocrinological investigation 2004-07, Vol.27 (7), p.691-694
Hauptverfasser: Lipsic, E, Balazovjech, I, Kosmálová, V, Makaiová, I, Dekrét, J, Zanou, D F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 694
container_issue 7
container_start_page 691
container_title Journal of endocrinological investigation
container_volume 27
creator Lipsic, E
Balazovjech, I
Kosmálová, V
Makaiová, I
Dekrét, J
Zanou, D F
description Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheochromocytoma. In one patient we found 20-times higher levels of epinephrine and 3-times higher levels of dopamine in 24-h urine, in the second patient there were 8-times higher levels of epinephrine alone. Norepinephrine in urine, as well as values of all adrenal cortical hormones were normal. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in both cases by a 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. The patients underwent adrenalectomy, which was performed without complications. We conclude that levels of single catecholamines excreted are decisive for the clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma. Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma is more often oligo- or asymptomatic. We stress the importance of a complete hormonal screening in every case of adrenal incidentaloma, with measuring levels of catecholamines and/or metanephrines.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03347506
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67013950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67013950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-dc37369835b01f23b2e2c1fc2a3a5c40a28eed9d528771632e8a8388d9113ab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWw8AOQJwakFH_UsT0hqFqoVIkF5shxLtQoiYPtIPXfE2gllrvl0Xv3PghdUzKnhMj7pzXhfCEFyU_QlEpGMsVVfoqmhGuaLYiWE3QR4ychXHIlz9GECkGE1nKK3Kp3HfS7ME7cB18N1nUfuN-Bt7vgW2_3ybdmjjcRpx3gCDZA8mGPe5MShA5XYF1034BrH_4Q27jOWdPg1nSuhphMcr57uERntWkiXB33DL2vV2_Ll2z7-rxZPm4zyxRPWWXHJ3OtuCgJrRkvGTBLa8sMN8IuiGEKoNKVYEpKmnMGyox1VaUp5abUfIZuD7ljm69hPF-0LlpoGtOBH2KRS0K5FmQE7w6gDT7GAHXRB9easC8oKX7FFv9iR_jmmDqULVT_6NEk_wH3mXRG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67013950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lipsic, E ; Balazovjech, I ; Kosmálová, V ; Makaiová, I ; Dekrét, J ; Zanou, D F</creator><creatorcontrib>Lipsic, E ; Balazovjech, I ; Kosmálová, V ; Makaiová, I ; Dekrét, J ; Zanou, D F</creatorcontrib><description>Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheochromocytoma. In one patient we found 20-times higher levels of epinephrine and 3-times higher levels of dopamine in 24-h urine, in the second patient there were 8-times higher levels of epinephrine alone. Norepinephrine in urine, as well as values of all adrenal cortical hormones were normal. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in both cases by a 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. The patients underwent adrenalectomy, which was performed without complications. We conclude that levels of single catecholamines excreted are decisive for the clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma. Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma is more often oligo- or asymptomatic. We stress the importance of a complete hormonal screening in every case of adrenal incidentaloma, with measuring levels of catecholamines and/or metanephrines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-4097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1720-8386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03347506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15505997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy</publisher><subject>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - pathology ; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - surgery ; Adrenalectomy ; Adult ; Dopamine - secretion ; Dopamine - urine ; Epinephrine - secretion ; Epinephrine - urine ; Female ; Humans ; Pheochromocytoma - diagnosis ; Pheochromocytoma - pathology ; Pheochromocytoma - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2004-07, Vol.27 (7), p.691-694</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-dc37369835b01f23b2e2c1fc2a3a5c40a28eed9d528771632e8a8388d9113ab93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-dc37369835b01f23b2e2c1fc2a3a5c40a28eed9d528771632e8a8388d9113ab93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15505997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lipsic, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balazovjech, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmálová, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makaiová, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekrét, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanou, D F</creatorcontrib><title>Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?</title><title>Journal of endocrinological investigation</title><addtitle>J Endocrinol Invest</addtitle><description>Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheochromocytoma. In one patient we found 20-times higher levels of epinephrine and 3-times higher levels of dopamine in 24-h urine, in the second patient there were 8-times higher levels of epinephrine alone. Norepinephrine in urine, as well as values of all adrenal cortical hormones were normal. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in both cases by a 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. The patients underwent adrenalectomy, which was performed without complications. We conclude that levels of single catecholamines excreted are decisive for the clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma. Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma is more often oligo- or asymptomatic. We stress the importance of a complete hormonal screening in every case of adrenal incidentaloma, with measuring levels of catecholamines and/or metanephrines.</description><subject>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Adrenalectomy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Dopamine - secretion</subject><subject>Dopamine - urine</subject><subject>Epinephrine - secretion</subject><subject>Epinephrine - urine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pheochromocytoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pheochromocytoma - pathology</subject><subject>Pheochromocytoma - surgery</subject><issn>0391-4097</issn><issn>1720-8386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWw8AOQJwakFH_UsT0hqFqoVIkF5shxLtQoiYPtIPXfE2gllrvl0Xv3PghdUzKnhMj7pzXhfCEFyU_QlEpGMsVVfoqmhGuaLYiWE3QR4ychXHIlz9GECkGE1nKK3Kp3HfS7ME7cB18N1nUfuN-Bt7vgW2_3ybdmjjcRpx3gCDZA8mGPe5MShA5XYF1034BrH_4Q27jOWdPg1nSuhphMcr57uERntWkiXB33DL2vV2_Ll2z7-rxZPm4zyxRPWWXHJ3OtuCgJrRkvGTBLa8sMN8IuiGEKoNKVYEpKmnMGyox1VaUp5abUfIZuD7ljm69hPF-0LlpoGtOBH2KRS0K5FmQE7w6gDT7GAHXRB9easC8oKX7FFv9iR_jmmDqULVT_6NEk_wH3mXRG</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Lipsic, E</creator><creator>Balazovjech, I</creator><creator>Kosmálová, V</creator><creator>Makaiová, I</creator><creator>Dekrét, J</creator><creator>Zanou, D F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?</title><author>Lipsic, E ; Balazovjech, I ; Kosmálová, V ; Makaiová, I ; Dekrét, J ; Zanou, D F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-dc37369835b01f23b2e2c1fc2a3a5c40a28eed9d528771632e8a8388d9113ab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Adrenalectomy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Dopamine - secretion</topic><topic>Dopamine - urine</topic><topic>Epinephrine - secretion</topic><topic>Epinephrine - urine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pheochromocytoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pheochromocytoma - pathology</topic><topic>Pheochromocytoma - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lipsic, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balazovjech, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmálová, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makaiová, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekrét, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanou, D F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endocrinological investigation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lipsic, E</au><au>Balazovjech, I</au><au>Kosmálová, V</au><au>Makaiová, I</au><au>Dekrét, J</au><au>Zanou, D F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endocrinological investigation</jtitle><addtitle>J Endocrinol Invest</addtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>694</epage><pages>691-694</pages><issn>0391-4097</issn><eissn>1720-8386</eissn><abstract>Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheochromocytoma. In one patient we found 20-times higher levels of epinephrine and 3-times higher levels of dopamine in 24-h urine, in the second patient there were 8-times higher levels of epinephrine alone. Norepinephrine in urine, as well as values of all adrenal cortical hormones were normal. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in both cases by a 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. The patients underwent adrenalectomy, which was performed without complications. We conclude that levels of single catecholamines excreted are decisive for the clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma. Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma is more often oligo- or asymptomatic. We stress the importance of a complete hormonal screening in every case of adrenal incidentaloma, with measuring levels of catecholamines and/or metanephrines.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pmid>15505997</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03347506</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0391-4097
ispartof Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2004-07, Vol.27 (7), p.691-694
issn 0391-4097
1720-8386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67013950
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - diagnosis
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - pathology
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms - surgery
Adrenalectomy
Adult
Dopamine - secretion
Dopamine - urine
Epinephrine - secretion
Epinephrine - urine
Female
Humans
Pheochromocytoma - diagnosis
Pheochromocytoma - pathology
Pheochromocytoma - surgery
title Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A42%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epinephrine%20producing%20pheochromocytoma.%20Is%20the%20secretory%20pattern%20decisive%20for%20the%20clinical%20manifestation?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endocrinological%20investigation&rft.au=Lipsic,%20E&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=694&rft.pages=691-694&rft.issn=0391-4097&rft.eissn=1720-8386&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03347506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67013950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67013950&rft_id=info:pmid/15505997&rfr_iscdi=true