Accurate assessment of clinical nurses' work environments: Response rate needed
Improvement of hospital unit work environments is key to quality patient care, productivity, nurse retention, and job satisfaction. Accurate measurement of such environments is necessary prior to introduction and evaluation of improvement structures and strategies. Characteristics and attributes of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research in nursing & health 2009-04, Vol.32 (2), p.229-240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | Research in nursing & health |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Kramer, Marlene Schmalenberg, Claudia Brewer, Barbara B. Verran, Joyce A. Keller-Unger, Jan |
description | Improvement of hospital unit work environments is key to quality patient care, productivity, nurse retention, and job satisfaction. Accurate measurement of such environments is necessary prior to introduction and evaluation of improvement structures and strategies. Characteristics and attributes of work environments are group level phenomena. Accurate assessment of these phenomena requires survey response rates of sufficient size to ensure sample representativeness and data that can reliably be aggregated to group level. What is the sufficient response rate? This question was answered through psychometric testing of five random samples from the population of 23 M.D. Anderson Cancer Center clinical units that had 100% response rates on an environmental survey. Response rates of 40% or more had acceptable psychometric properties for unit‐specific scales. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 32:229–240, 2009 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nur.20315 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67011243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57280473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-53743e5de056a210fb54a7e94b101e04f26a217d2412165d9f50c015db91b4f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCgT-AIiSKekg749jxhltVQakordhSwc1ynImUNutsPRtK_z3e7rZISIiTrdH33tO8EeIVwj4CyIMwxn0JBeonYoJQTXOp4MdTMQEsIS-nFW6L58xXAIha4jOxjVX6KNATcX7o_RjdkjLHTMxzCstsaDPfd6Hzrs-Sd5q_y26HeJ1R-NnFIawgfp_NiBdDYMru9YGooeaF2Gpdz_Ry8-6Iy48fvh19yk_Pj0-ODk9zr1Slc10YVZBuCHTpJEJba-UMVapGQALVytXYNFKhxFI3VavBA-qmrrBWrSl2xO7adxGHm5F4aecde-p7F2gY2ZYmLStV8V9QGzkFZVbgm7_Aq2GMIS1hpZRGaVOpBO2tIR8H5kitXcRu7uKdRbCrW9jUl72_RWJfbwzHek7NH3JTfgLebgDHqeo2uuA7fuQkypQJ08QdrLnbrqe7fyfas8vZQ3S-VnS8pF-PChevUzGF0fb72bG9mH39_AXgwlbFbzstrWs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222745794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accurate assessment of clinical nurses' work environments: Response rate needed</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Kramer, Marlene ; Schmalenberg, Claudia ; Brewer, Barbara B. ; Verran, Joyce A. ; Keller-Unger, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Marlene ; Schmalenberg, Claudia ; Brewer, Barbara B. ; Verran, Joyce A. ; Keller-Unger, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Improvement of hospital unit work environments is key to quality patient care, productivity, nurse retention, and job satisfaction. Accurate measurement of such environments is necessary prior to introduction and evaluation of improvement structures and strategies. Characteristics and attributes of work environments are group level phenomena. Accurate assessment of these phenomena requires survey response rates of sufficient size to ensure sample representativeness and data that can reliably be aggregated to group level. What is the sufficient response rate? This question was answered through psychometric testing of five random samples from the population of 23 M.D. Anderson Cancer Center clinical units that had 100% response rates on an environmental survey. Response rates of 40% or more had acceptable psychometric properties for unit‐specific scales. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 32:229–240, 2009</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-6891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-240X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nur.20315</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19152405</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RNHEDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer Care Facilities ; Clinical nursing ; data aggregation ; Data Collection - methods ; Data Collection - standards ; Efficiency, Organizational ; essentials of magnetism ; group level phenomenon ; Health Facility Environment - organization & administration ; Health participants ; healthy work environment ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Job Satisfaction ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; multi-level analysis ; Needs Assessment - organization & administration ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Administration Research ; Nursing Methodology Research ; Nursing Staff, Hospital - organization & administration ; Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology ; Occupational medicine ; Organizational Culture ; Patient care ; Productivity ; Psychometrics ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Quality of care ; Quality of Health Care - organization & administration ; Response rate ; Response rates ; Sample Size ; Selection Bias ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Texas ; Work environment ; Workplace - organization & administration ; Workplace - psychology</subject><ispartof>Research in nursing & health, 2009-04, Vol.32 (2), p.229-240</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Apr 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-53743e5de056a210fb54a7e94b101e04f26a217d2412165d9f50c015db91b4f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-53743e5de056a210fb54a7e94b101e04f26a217d2412165d9f50c015db91b4f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnur.20315$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnur.20315$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,30980,30981,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21257908$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19152405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmalenberg, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Barbara B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verran, Joyce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller-Unger, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Accurate assessment of clinical nurses' work environments: Response rate needed</title><title>Research in nursing & health</title><addtitle>Res. Nurs. Health</addtitle><description>Improvement of hospital unit work environments is key to quality patient care, productivity, nurse retention, and job satisfaction. Accurate measurement of such environments is necessary prior to introduction and evaluation of improvement structures and strategies. Characteristics and attributes of work environments are group level phenomena. Accurate assessment of these phenomena requires survey response rates of sufficient size to ensure sample representativeness and data that can reliably be aggregated to group level. What is the sufficient response rate? This question was answered through psychometric testing of five random samples from the population of 23 M.D. Anderson Cancer Center clinical units that had 100% response rates on an environmental survey. Response rates of 40% or more had acceptable psychometric properties for unit‐specific scales. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 32:229–240, 2009</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer Care Facilities</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>data aggregation</subject><subject>Data Collection - methods</subject><subject>Data Collection - standards</subject><subject>Efficiency, Organizational</subject><subject>essentials of magnetism</subject><subject>group level phenomenon</subject><subject>Health Facility Environment - organization & administration</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>healthy work environment</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>multi-level analysis</subject><subject>Needs Assessment - organization & administration</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Administration Research</subject><subject>Nursing Methodology Research</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology</subject><subject>Occupational medicine</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Response rate</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Selection Bias</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Workplace - organization & administration</subject><subject>Workplace - psychology</subject><issn>0160-6891</issn><issn>1098-240X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCgT-AIiSKekg749jxhltVQakordhSwc1ynImUNutsPRtK_z3e7rZISIiTrdH33tO8EeIVwj4CyIMwxn0JBeonYoJQTXOp4MdTMQEsIS-nFW6L58xXAIha4jOxjVX6KNATcX7o_RjdkjLHTMxzCstsaDPfd6Hzrs-Sd5q_y26HeJ1R-NnFIawgfp_NiBdDYMru9YGooeaF2Gpdz_Ry8-6Iy48fvh19yk_Pj0-ODk9zr1Slc10YVZBuCHTpJEJba-UMVapGQALVytXYNFKhxFI3VavBA-qmrrBWrSl2xO7adxGHm5F4aecde-p7F2gY2ZYmLStV8V9QGzkFZVbgm7_Aq2GMIS1hpZRGaVOpBO2tIR8H5kitXcRu7uKdRbCrW9jUl72_RWJfbwzHek7NH3JTfgLebgDHqeo2uuA7fuQkypQJ08QdrLnbrqe7fyfas8vZQ3S-VnS8pF-PChevUzGF0fb72bG9mH39_AXgwlbFbzstrWs</recordid><startdate>200904</startdate><enddate>200904</enddate><creator>Kramer, Marlene</creator><creator>Schmalenberg, Claudia</creator><creator>Brewer, Barbara B.</creator><creator>Verran, Joyce A.</creator><creator>Keller-Unger, Jan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200904</creationdate><title>Accurate assessment of clinical nurses' work environments: Response rate needed</title><author>Kramer, Marlene ; Schmalenberg, Claudia ; Brewer, Barbara B. ; Verran, Joyce A. ; Keller-Unger, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-53743e5de056a210fb54a7e94b101e04f26a217d2412165d9f50c015db91b4f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer Care Facilities</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>data aggregation</topic><topic>Data Collection - methods</topic><topic>Data Collection - standards</topic><topic>Efficiency, Organizational</topic><topic>essentials of magnetism</topic><topic>group level phenomenon</topic><topic>Health Facility Environment - organization & administration</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>healthy work environment</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>multi-level analysis</topic><topic>Needs Assessment - organization & administration</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Administration Research</topic><topic>Nursing Methodology Research</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology</topic><topic>Occupational medicine</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Response rate</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Selection Bias</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Workplace - organization & administration</topic><topic>Workplace - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmalenberg, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Barbara B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verran, Joyce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller-Unger, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research in nursing & health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kramer, Marlene</au><au>Schmalenberg, Claudia</au><au>Brewer, Barbara B.</au><au>Verran, Joyce A.</au><au>Keller-Unger, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accurate assessment of clinical nurses' work environments: Response rate needed</atitle><jtitle>Research in nursing & health</jtitle><addtitle>Res. Nurs. Health</addtitle><date>2009-04</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>229-240</pages><issn>0160-6891</issn><eissn>1098-240X</eissn><coden>RNHEDO</coden><abstract>Improvement of hospital unit work environments is key to quality patient care, productivity, nurse retention, and job satisfaction. Accurate measurement of such environments is necessary prior to introduction and evaluation of improvement structures and strategies. Characteristics and attributes of work environments are group level phenomena. Accurate assessment of these phenomena requires survey response rates of sufficient size to ensure sample representativeness and data that can reliably be aggregated to group level. What is the sufficient response rate? This question was answered through psychometric testing of five random samples from the population of 23 M.D. Anderson Cancer Center clinical units that had 100% response rates on an environmental survey. Response rates of 40% or more had acceptable psychometric properties for unit‐specific scales. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 32:229–240, 2009</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>19152405</pmid><doi>10.1002/nur.20315</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0160-6891 |
ispartof | Research in nursing & health, 2009-04, Vol.32 (2), p.229-240 |
issn | 0160-6891 1098-240X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67011243 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Attitude of Health Personnel Biological and medical sciences Cancer Care Facilities Clinical nursing data aggregation Data Collection - methods Data Collection - standards Efficiency, Organizational essentials of magnetism group level phenomenon Health Facility Environment - organization & administration Health participants healthy work environment Hospitals Humans Job Satisfaction Medical sciences Miscellaneous multi-level analysis Needs Assessment - organization & administration Nurses Nursing Nursing Administration Research Nursing Methodology Research Nursing Staff, Hospital - organization & administration Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology Occupational medicine Organizational Culture Patient care Productivity Psychometrics Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Quality of care Quality of Health Care - organization & administration Response rate Response rates Sample Size Selection Bias Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Texas Work environment Workplace - organization & administration Workplace - psychology |
title | Accurate assessment of clinical nurses' work environments: Response rate needed |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A35%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accurate%20assessment%20of%20clinical%20nurses'%20work%20environments:%20Response%20rate%20needed&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20nursing%20&%20health&rft.au=Kramer,%20Marlene&rft.date=2009-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=229-240&rft.issn=0160-6891&rft.eissn=1098-240X&rft.coden=RNHEDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nur.20315&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57280473%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222745794&rft_id=info:pmid/19152405&rfr_iscdi=true |