Why are most rhizobia beneficial to their plant hosts, rather than parasitic?
Multiple strains per plant and root-to-root (not seed-borne) transmission should favor rhizobia that invest in their own reproduction, rather than symbiotic N 2 fixation, as analogous factors may favor pathogen virulence. But legumes can select for greater mutualism, controlling nodule O 2 supply an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Microbes and infection 2004-11, Vol.6 (13), p.1235-1239 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1239 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 13 |
| container_start_page | 1235 |
| container_title | Microbes and infection |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Denison, R. Ford Toby Kiers, E. |
| description | Multiple strains per plant and root-to-root (not seed-borne) transmission should favor rhizobia that invest in their own reproduction, rather than symbiotic N
2 fixation, as analogous factors may favor pathogen virulence. But legumes can select for greater mutualism, controlling nodule O
2 supply and reducing reproduction of rhizobia that fix less N
2. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.08.005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66980397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1286457904002539</els_id><sourcerecordid>66980397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-16f93f5e511794ca110a837f2404a8a5c783267d2d6310c61be9b6f2d14af88f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtrFEEQhxtRzEP_A5G-6Ckz6Zrp11wMEnwEIrkoemtqeqrZXuaxds8G4l9vh13ITU9VVH31o_gYewOiBgH6cltP0cc51I0Qsha2FkI9Y6dgdFcZkL-el76xupLKdCfsLOetEKCMli_ZCShprZHylH37uXngmIhPS1552sQ_Sx-R9zRTKPE48nXh64Zi4rsR55VvCpcveMIyTGWDM99hwhzX6K9esRcBx0yvj_Wc_fj86fv11-r27svN9cfbykut1gp06NqgSAGYTnoEEGhbExopJFpU3ti20WZoBt2C8Bp66nodmgEkBmtDe87eH3J3afm9p7y6KWZPY_mQln12WndWtJ35LwimMcZCU0B5AH1ack4U3C7FCdODA-EefbutO_h2j76dsK74Lmdvj_n7fqLh6egouADvjgBmj2NIOPuYnzgNVhW2cB8OHBVt95GSyz7S7GmIifzqhiX--5O_XDKfHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17277812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why are most rhizobia beneficial to their plant hosts, rather than parasitic?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Denison, R. Ford ; Toby Kiers, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Denison, R. Ford ; Toby Kiers, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Multiple strains per plant and root-to-root (not seed-borne) transmission should favor rhizobia that invest in their own reproduction, rather than symbiotic N
2 fixation, as analogous factors may favor pathogen virulence. But legumes can select for greater mutualism, controlling nodule O
2 supply and reducing reproduction of rhizobia that fix less N
2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1286-4579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1769-714X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.08.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15488744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier SAS</publisher><subject>Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bradyrhizobium - physiology ; Evolution ; Fabaceae ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Microbiology ; Miscellaneous ; Nitrogen Fixation ; Oxygen ; Oxygen - metabolism ; Plants - metabolism ; Plants - microbiology ; Rhizobium ; Rhizobium - physiology ; Sinorhizobium - physiology ; Symbiosis ; Virulence</subject><ispartof>Microbes and infection, 2004-11, Vol.6 (13), p.1235-1239</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier SAS</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-16f93f5e511794ca110a837f2404a8a5c783267d2d6310c61be9b6f2d14af88f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-16f93f5e511794ca110a837f2404a8a5c783267d2d6310c61be9b6f2d14af88f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2004.08.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16185548$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15488744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denison, R. Ford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toby Kiers, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Why are most rhizobia beneficial to their plant hosts, rather than parasitic?</title><title>Microbes and infection</title><addtitle>Microbes Infect</addtitle><description>Multiple strains per plant and root-to-root (not seed-borne) transmission should favor rhizobia that invest in their own reproduction, rather than symbiotic N
2 fixation, as analogous factors may favor pathogen virulence. But legumes can select for greater mutualism, controlling nodule O
2 supply and reducing reproduction of rhizobia that fix less N
2.</description><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bradyrhizobium - physiology</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fabaceae</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nitrogen Fixation</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen - metabolism</subject><subject>Plants - metabolism</subject><subject>Plants - microbiology</subject><subject>Rhizobium</subject><subject>Rhizobium - physiology</subject><subject>Sinorhizobium - physiology</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Virulence</subject><issn>1286-4579</issn><issn>1769-714X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtrFEEQhxtRzEP_A5G-6Ckz6Zrp11wMEnwEIrkoemtqeqrZXuaxds8G4l9vh13ITU9VVH31o_gYewOiBgH6cltP0cc51I0Qsha2FkI9Y6dgdFcZkL-el76xupLKdCfsLOetEKCMli_ZCShprZHylH37uXngmIhPS1552sQ_Sx-R9zRTKPE48nXh64Zi4rsR55VvCpcveMIyTGWDM99hwhzX6K9esRcBx0yvj_Wc_fj86fv11-r27svN9cfbykut1gp06NqgSAGYTnoEEGhbExopJFpU3ti20WZoBt2C8Bp66nodmgEkBmtDe87eH3J3afm9p7y6KWZPY_mQln12WndWtJ35LwimMcZCU0B5AH1ack4U3C7FCdODA-EefbutO_h2j76dsK74Lmdvj_n7fqLh6egouADvjgBmj2NIOPuYnzgNVhW2cB8OHBVt95GSyz7S7GmIifzqhiX--5O_XDKfHg</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>Denison, R. Ford</creator><creator>Toby Kiers, E.</creator><general>Elsevier SAS</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Why are most rhizobia beneficial to their plant hosts, rather than parasitic?</title><author>Denison, R. Ford ; Toby Kiers, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-16f93f5e511794ca110a837f2404a8a5c783267d2d6310c61be9b6f2d14af88f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bradyrhizobium - physiology</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fabaceae</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nitrogen Fixation</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen - metabolism</topic><topic>Plants - metabolism</topic><topic>Plants - microbiology</topic><topic>Rhizobium</topic><topic>Rhizobium - physiology</topic><topic>Sinorhizobium - physiology</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Virulence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denison, R. Ford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toby Kiers, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microbes and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denison, R. Ford</au><au>Toby Kiers, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why are most rhizobia beneficial to their plant hosts, rather than parasitic?</atitle><jtitle>Microbes and infection</jtitle><addtitle>Microbes Infect</addtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1235</spage><epage>1239</epage><pages>1235-1239</pages><issn>1286-4579</issn><eissn>1769-714X</eissn><abstract>Multiple strains per plant and root-to-root (not seed-borne) transmission should favor rhizobia that invest in their own reproduction, rather than symbiotic N
2 fixation, as analogous factors may favor pathogen virulence. But legumes can select for greater mutualism, controlling nodule O
2 supply and reducing reproduction of rhizobia that fix less N
2.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Elsevier SAS</pub><pmid>15488744</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.micinf.2004.08.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1286-4579 |
| ispartof | Microbes and infection, 2004-11, Vol.6 (13), p.1235-1239 |
| issn | 1286-4579 1769-714X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66980397 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Bacteriology Biological and medical sciences Bradyrhizobium - physiology Evolution Fabaceae Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Microbiology Miscellaneous Nitrogen Fixation Oxygen Oxygen - metabolism Plants - metabolism Plants - microbiology Rhizobium Rhizobium - physiology Sinorhizobium - physiology Symbiosis Virulence |
| title | Why are most rhizobia beneficial to their plant hosts, rather than parasitic? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T06%3A21%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20are%20most%20rhizobia%20beneficial%20to%20their%20plant%20hosts,%20rather%20than%20parasitic?&rft.jtitle=Microbes%20and%20infection&rft.au=Denison,%20R.%20Ford&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1235&rft.epage=1239&rft.pages=1235-1239&rft.issn=1286-4579&rft.eissn=1769-714X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.micinf.2004.08.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66980397%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17277812&rft_id=info:pmid/15488744&rft_els_id=S1286457904002539&rfr_iscdi=true |