Proliferating pilar tumors: A clinicopathologic study of 76 cases with a proposal for definition of benign and malignant variants

We studied proliferating pilar tumors (PPTs) to establish histologic criteria that could predict behavior. We reviewed all cases in our consultation files (1989-2000) and evaluated 76 cases with meaningful follow-up information. Histologic examination involved attention to tumor silhouette, degree o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of clinical pathology 2004-10, Vol.122 (4), p.566-574
Hauptverfasser: YE, Jay, NAPPI, Oscar, SWANSON, Paul E, PATTERSON, James W, WICK, Mark R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We studied proliferating pilar tumors (PPTs) to establish histologic criteria that could predict behavior. We reviewed all cases in our consultation files (1989-2000) and evaluated 76 cases with meaningful follow-up information. Histologic examination involved attention to tumor silhouette, degree of nuclear atypia, mitotic activity, necrosis, and perineurial or angiolymphatic invasion. Tumors were stratified as follows: group 1 PPTs, circumscribed silhouettes with "pushing " margins, modest nuclear atypia, and an absence of pathologic mitoses, necrosis, and invasion of nerves or vessels; group 2 PPTs, similar to group 1 but manifested irregular, locally invasive silhouettes with involvement of the deep dermis and subcutis; group 3, invasive growth patterns, marked nuclear atypia, pathologic mitotic forms, and geographic necrosis, with or without involvement of nerves or vascular structures. Recurrence occurred in none of 48 group 1 PPTs; 3 (15%) of 20 group 2 PPTs had local regrowth; 4 (50%) of 8 of group 3 PPTs recurred and/or metastasized to regional lymph nodes. The differences between groups 1 and 3 and between 2 and 3 were statistically significant (P = .0002, P < .05, respectively). It seems justifiable to regard group 1 PPTs as benign, group 2 as having potential for locally aggressive growth, and group 3 also as having metastatic potential. The latter 2 categories might be equated with low and high grades of malignancy among PPTs of the skin.
ISSN:0002-9173
1943-7722
DOI:10.1309/0XLEGFQ64XYJU4G6