Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN
Objective The objective of this study was to quantify inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) and decision to intervene following STAN guidelines. Design A prospective, observational study. Setting Obstetrics Department of a tertiary referral...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2009-03, Vol.116 (4), p.545-551 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 551 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 545 |
container_title | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | Westerhuis, MEMH van Horen, E Kwee, A van der Tweel, I Visser, GHA Moons, KGM |
description | Objective The objective of this study was to quantify inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) and decision to intervene following STAN guidelines.
Design A prospective, observational study.
Setting Obstetrics Department of a tertiary referral hospital.
Population STAN recordings of 73 women after 36 weeks of gestation with a high‐risk pregnancy, induced or oxytocin‐augmented labour, meconium‐stained amniotic fluid or epidural analgesia.
Methods Six observers classified 73 STAN recordings and decided if and when they would suggest an intervention. Proportions of specific agreement (Ps) and kappa values (K) were calculated.
Main outcome measures Agreement upon classification of the intrapartum CTG and decision to perform an intervention.
Results Agreement for classification of a normal and a (pre)terminal CTG was good (Ps range 0.50–0.84), but poor for the intermediary and abnormal CTG (Ps range 0.34–0.56). Agreement on the decision to intervene was higher, especially on the decision to perform ‘no intervention’ (Ps range 0.76–0.94). Overall inter‐observer agreement on the decision to intervene was considered moderate in five of six observer combinations according to the kappa (K range 0.42–0.73). Intra‐observer agreement for CTG classification and decision to intervene was moderate (K range 0.52–0.67 and 0.61–0.75).
Conclusions Inter‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum CTG is poor, but addition of information regarding fetal electrocardiogram, especially in case of intermediary or abnormal CTG traces, results in a more standardised decision to intervene. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02092.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66969467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1648492721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5ddf4be6e958acf0c3559101cefcdc924ba73c46a6899a68720e42a7596034d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERX_gFZCFBLuktuM48YJFW1FoVdEFZW3dODcloyQebId2JBY8As_Ik-B0RkXqCi_sa53vHNk6hFDOcp7W8SrnsuIZK0WdC8bqnAmmRX7_jBw8Cs8fZpaxQtT75DCEFWNcCVa8IPtci5IVSh2QnxdTRP_n128KU0v7KXpIF9cE9D_QU7j1iCNOkbpuq67Bx3mkX26SAYZN6MMixW9IO4wwUBzQRu8s-LZ3tx7GZKN3LmXQ0U19dB5b2mxSwMnnl2SvgyHgq915RL6ef7g5-5RdXX-8ODu5yqwUUmRl23ayQYW6rMF2zBZlqTnjFjvbWi1kA1VhpQJVa522SjCUAqpSK1bIVhZH5N02d-3d9xlDNGMfLA4DTOjmYJTSSktVJfDNE3DlZp_-GYwQpWKVrOsE1VvIeheCx86sfT-C3xjOzFKPWZmlBbO0YJZ6zEM95j5ZX-_y52bE9p9x10cC3u4ACBaGzsNk-_DICc5VxSuRuPdb7q4fcPPfDzCnl9fLVPwFT9itgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225607488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Westerhuis, MEMH ; van Horen, E ; Kwee, A ; van der Tweel, I ; Visser, GHA ; Moons, KGM</creator><creatorcontrib>Westerhuis, MEMH ; van Horen, E ; Kwee, A ; van der Tweel, I ; Visser, GHA ; Moons, KGM</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The objective of this study was to quantify inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) and decision to intervene following STAN guidelines.
Design A prospective, observational study.
Setting Obstetrics Department of a tertiary referral hospital.
Population STAN recordings of 73 women after 36 weeks of gestation with a high‐risk pregnancy, induced or oxytocin‐augmented labour, meconium‐stained amniotic fluid or epidural analgesia.
Methods Six observers classified 73 STAN recordings and decided if and when they would suggest an intervention. Proportions of specific agreement (Ps) and kappa values (K) were calculated.
Main outcome measures Agreement upon classification of the intrapartum CTG and decision to perform an intervention.
Results Agreement for classification of a normal and a (pre)terminal CTG was good (Ps range 0.50–0.84), but poor for the intermediary and abnormal CTG (Ps range 0.34–0.56). Agreement on the decision to intervene was higher, especially on the decision to perform ‘no intervention’ (Ps range 0.76–0.94). Overall inter‐observer agreement on the decision to intervene was considered moderate in five of six observer combinations according to the kappa (K range 0.42–0.73). Intra‐observer agreement for CTG classification and decision to intervene was moderate (K range 0.52–0.67 and 0.61–0.75).
Conclusions Inter‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum CTG is poor, but addition of information regarding fetal electrocardiogram, especially in case of intermediary or abnormal CTG traces, results in a more standardised decision to intervene.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02092.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19250366</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGFQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acidosis - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiotocography ; Cardiotocography - standards ; Childbirth & labor ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Decision Making ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Fetal Diseases - physiopathology ; fetal electrocardiogram ; Fetuses ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health risk assessment ; Heart ; Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology ; Humans ; Intervention ; inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement ; Medical sciences ; Medical Staff, Hospital - standards ; Observer Variation ; Obstetrics ; Perinatal Care ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, High-Risk ; Prospective Studies ; ST analysis</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2009-03, Vol.116 (4), p.545-551</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2009 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Journal compilation © RCOG 2009 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5ddf4be6e958acf0c3559101cefcdc924ba73c46a6899a68720e42a7596034d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5ddf4be6e958acf0c3559101cefcdc924ba73c46a6899a68720e42a7596034d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2008.02092.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2008.02092.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21167172$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19250366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Westerhuis, MEMH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Horen, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwee, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Tweel, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, GHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moons, KGM</creatorcontrib><title>Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective The objective of this study was to quantify inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) and decision to intervene following STAN guidelines.
Design A prospective, observational study.
Setting Obstetrics Department of a tertiary referral hospital.
Population STAN recordings of 73 women after 36 weeks of gestation with a high‐risk pregnancy, induced or oxytocin‐augmented labour, meconium‐stained amniotic fluid or epidural analgesia.
Methods Six observers classified 73 STAN recordings and decided if and when they would suggest an intervention. Proportions of specific agreement (Ps) and kappa values (K) were calculated.
Main outcome measures Agreement upon classification of the intrapartum CTG and decision to perform an intervention.
Results Agreement for classification of a normal and a (pre)terminal CTG was good (Ps range 0.50–0.84), but poor for the intermediary and abnormal CTG (Ps range 0.34–0.56). Agreement on the decision to intervene was higher, especially on the decision to perform ‘no intervention’ (Ps range 0.76–0.94). Overall inter‐observer agreement on the decision to intervene was considered moderate in five of six observer combinations according to the kappa (K range 0.42–0.73). Intra‐observer agreement for CTG classification and decision to intervene was moderate (K range 0.52–0.67 and 0.61–0.75).
Conclusions Inter‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum CTG is poor, but addition of information regarding fetal electrocardiogram, especially in case of intermediary or abnormal CTG traces, results in a more standardised decision to intervene.</description><subject>Acidosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiotocography</subject><subject>Cardiotocography - standards</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>fetal electrocardiogram</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Perinatal Care</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, High-Risk</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>ST analysis</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERX_gFZCFBLuktuM48YJFW1FoVdEFZW3dODcloyQebId2JBY8As_Ik-B0RkXqCi_sa53vHNk6hFDOcp7W8SrnsuIZK0WdC8bqnAmmRX7_jBw8Cs8fZpaxQtT75DCEFWNcCVa8IPtci5IVSh2QnxdTRP_n128KU0v7KXpIF9cE9D_QU7j1iCNOkbpuq67Bx3mkX26SAYZN6MMixW9IO4wwUBzQRu8s-LZ3tx7GZKN3LmXQ0U19dB5b2mxSwMnnl2SvgyHgq915RL6ef7g5-5RdXX-8ODu5yqwUUmRl23ayQYW6rMF2zBZlqTnjFjvbWi1kA1VhpQJVa522SjCUAqpSK1bIVhZH5N02d-3d9xlDNGMfLA4DTOjmYJTSSktVJfDNE3DlZp_-GYwQpWKVrOsE1VvIeheCx86sfT-C3xjOzFKPWZmlBbO0YJZ6zEM95j5ZX-_y52bE9p9x10cC3u4ACBaGzsNk-_DICc5VxSuRuPdb7q4fcPPfDzCnl9fLVPwFT9itgA</recordid><startdate>200903</startdate><enddate>200903</enddate><creator>Westerhuis, MEMH</creator><creator>van Horen, E</creator><creator>Kwee, A</creator><creator>van der Tweel, I</creator><creator>Visser, GHA</creator><creator>Moons, KGM</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200903</creationdate><title>Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN</title><author>Westerhuis, MEMH ; van Horen, E ; Kwee, A ; van der Tweel, I ; Visser, GHA ; Moons, KGM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5ddf4be6e958acf0c3559101cefcdc924ba73c46a6899a68720e42a7596034d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acidosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiotocography</topic><topic>Cardiotocography - standards</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>fetal electrocardiogram</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Perinatal Care</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, High-Risk</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>ST analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Westerhuis, MEMH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Horen, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwee, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Tweel, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, GHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moons, KGM</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Westerhuis, MEMH</au><au>van Horen, E</au><au>Kwee, A</au><au>van der Tweel, I</au><au>Visser, GHA</au><au>Moons, KGM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2009-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>551</epage><pages>545-551</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><coden>BIOGFQ</coden><abstract>Objective The objective of this study was to quantify inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) and decision to intervene following STAN guidelines.
Design A prospective, observational study.
Setting Obstetrics Department of a tertiary referral hospital.
Population STAN recordings of 73 women after 36 weeks of gestation with a high‐risk pregnancy, induced or oxytocin‐augmented labour, meconium‐stained amniotic fluid or epidural analgesia.
Methods Six observers classified 73 STAN recordings and decided if and when they would suggest an intervention. Proportions of specific agreement (Ps) and kappa values (K) were calculated.
Main outcome measures Agreement upon classification of the intrapartum CTG and decision to perform an intervention.
Results Agreement for classification of a normal and a (pre)terminal CTG was good (Ps range 0.50–0.84), but poor for the intermediary and abnormal CTG (Ps range 0.34–0.56). Agreement on the decision to intervene was higher, especially on the decision to perform ‘no intervention’ (Ps range 0.76–0.94). Overall inter‐observer agreement on the decision to intervene was considered moderate in five of six observer combinations according to the kappa (K range 0.42–0.73). Intra‐observer agreement for CTG classification and decision to intervene was moderate (K range 0.52–0.67 and 0.61–0.75).
Conclusions Inter‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum CTG is poor, but addition of information regarding fetal electrocardiogram, especially in case of intermediary or abnormal CTG traces, results in a more standardised decision to intervene.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19250366</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02092.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-0328 |
ispartof | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2009-03, Vol.116 (4), p.545-551 |
issn | 1470-0328 1471-0528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66969467 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Acidosis - physiopathology Biological and medical sciences Cardiotocography Cardiotocography - standards Childbirth & labor Clinical Competence - standards Decision Making Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation Electrocardiography Female Fetal Diseases - physiopathology fetal electrocardiogram Fetuses Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Health risk assessment Heart Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology Humans Intervention inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement Medical sciences Medical Staff, Hospital - standards Observer Variation Obstetrics Perinatal Care Pregnancy Pregnancy, High-Risk Prospective Studies ST analysis |
title | Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A17%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter%E2%80%90%20and%20intra%E2%80%90observer%20agreement%20of%20intrapartum%20ST%20analysis%20of%20the%20fetal%20electrocardiogram%20in%20women%20monitored%20by%20STAN&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Westerhuis,%20MEMH&rft.date=2009-03&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=551&rft.pages=545-551&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BIOGFQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02092.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1648492721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225607488&rft_id=info:pmid/19250366&rfr_iscdi=true |