Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN

Objective  The objective of this study was to quantify inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) and decision to intervene following STAN guidelines. Design  A prospective, observational study. Setting  Obstetrics Department of a tertiary referral...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2009-03, Vol.116 (4), p.545-551
Hauptverfasser: Westerhuis, MEMH, van Horen, E, Kwee, A, van der Tweel, I, Visser, GHA, Moons, KGM
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 551
container_issue 4
container_start_page 545
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 116
creator Westerhuis, MEMH
van Horen, E
Kwee, A
van der Tweel, I
Visser, GHA
Moons, KGM
description Objective  The objective of this study was to quantify inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) and decision to intervene following STAN guidelines. Design  A prospective, observational study. Setting  Obstetrics Department of a tertiary referral hospital. Population  STAN recordings of 73 women after 36 weeks of gestation with a high‐risk pregnancy, induced or oxytocin‐augmented labour, meconium‐stained amniotic fluid or epidural analgesia. Methods  Six observers classified 73 STAN recordings and decided if and when they would suggest an intervention. Proportions of specific agreement (Ps) and kappa values (K) were calculated. Main outcome measures  Agreement upon classification of the intrapartum CTG and decision to perform an intervention. Results  Agreement for classification of a normal and a (pre)terminal CTG was good (Ps range 0.50–0.84), but poor for the intermediary and abnormal CTG (Ps range 0.34–0.56). Agreement on the decision to intervene was higher, especially on the decision to perform ‘no intervention’ (Ps range 0.76–0.94). Overall inter‐observer agreement on the decision to intervene was considered moderate in five of six observer combinations according to the kappa (K range 0.42–0.73). Intra‐observer agreement for CTG classification and decision to intervene was moderate (K range 0.52–0.67 and 0.61–0.75). Conclusions  Inter‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum CTG is poor, but addition of information regarding fetal electrocardiogram, especially in case of intermediary or abnormal CTG traces, results in a more standardised decision to intervene.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02092.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66969467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1648492721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5ddf4be6e958acf0c3559101cefcdc924ba73c46a6899a68720e42a7596034d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERX_gFZCFBLuktuM48YJFW1FoVdEFZW3dODcloyQebId2JBY8As_Ik-B0RkXqCi_sa53vHNk6hFDOcp7W8SrnsuIZK0WdC8bqnAmmRX7_jBw8Cs8fZpaxQtT75DCEFWNcCVa8IPtci5IVSh2QnxdTRP_n128KU0v7KXpIF9cE9D_QU7j1iCNOkbpuq67Bx3mkX26SAYZN6MMixW9IO4wwUBzQRu8s-LZ3tx7GZKN3LmXQ0U19dB5b2mxSwMnnl2SvgyHgq915RL6ef7g5-5RdXX-8ODu5yqwUUmRl23ayQYW6rMF2zBZlqTnjFjvbWi1kA1VhpQJVa522SjCUAqpSK1bIVhZH5N02d-3d9xlDNGMfLA4DTOjmYJTSSktVJfDNE3DlZp_-GYwQpWKVrOsE1VvIeheCx86sfT-C3xjOzFKPWZmlBbO0YJZ6zEM95j5ZX-_y52bE9p9x10cC3u4ACBaGzsNk-_DICc5VxSuRuPdb7q4fcPPfDzCnl9fLVPwFT9itgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225607488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Westerhuis, MEMH ; van Horen, E ; Kwee, A ; van der Tweel, I ; Visser, GHA ; Moons, KGM</creator><creatorcontrib>Westerhuis, MEMH ; van Horen, E ; Kwee, A ; van der Tweel, I ; Visser, GHA ; Moons, KGM</creatorcontrib><description>Objective  The objective of this study was to quantify inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) and decision to intervene following STAN guidelines. Design  A prospective, observational study. Setting  Obstetrics Department of a tertiary referral hospital. Population  STAN recordings of 73 women after 36 weeks of gestation with a high‐risk pregnancy, induced or oxytocin‐augmented labour, meconium‐stained amniotic fluid or epidural analgesia. Methods  Six observers classified 73 STAN recordings and decided if and when they would suggest an intervention. Proportions of specific agreement (Ps) and kappa values (K) were calculated. Main outcome measures  Agreement upon classification of the intrapartum CTG and decision to perform an intervention. Results  Agreement for classification of a normal and a (pre)terminal CTG was good (Ps range 0.50–0.84), but poor for the intermediary and abnormal CTG (Ps range 0.34–0.56). Agreement on the decision to intervene was higher, especially on the decision to perform ‘no intervention’ (Ps range 0.76–0.94). Overall inter‐observer agreement on the decision to intervene was considered moderate in five of six observer combinations according to the kappa (K range 0.42–0.73). Intra‐observer agreement for CTG classification and decision to intervene was moderate (K range 0.52–0.67 and 0.61–0.75). Conclusions  Inter‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum CTG is poor, but addition of information regarding fetal electrocardiogram, especially in case of intermediary or abnormal CTG traces, results in a more standardised decision to intervene.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02092.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19250366</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGFQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acidosis - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiotocography ; Cardiotocography - standards ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Decision Making ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Fetal Diseases - physiopathology ; fetal electrocardiogram ; Fetuses ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health risk assessment ; Heart ; Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology ; Humans ; Intervention ; inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement ; Medical sciences ; Medical Staff, Hospital - standards ; Observer Variation ; Obstetrics ; Perinatal Care ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, High-Risk ; Prospective Studies ; ST analysis</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2009-03, Vol.116 (4), p.545-551</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2009 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Journal compilation © RCOG 2009 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5ddf4be6e958acf0c3559101cefcdc924ba73c46a6899a68720e42a7596034d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5ddf4be6e958acf0c3559101cefcdc924ba73c46a6899a68720e42a7596034d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2008.02092.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2008.02092.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21167172$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19250366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Westerhuis, MEMH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Horen, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwee, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Tweel, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, GHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moons, KGM</creatorcontrib><title>Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective  The objective of this study was to quantify inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) and decision to intervene following STAN guidelines. Design  A prospective, observational study. Setting  Obstetrics Department of a tertiary referral hospital. Population  STAN recordings of 73 women after 36 weeks of gestation with a high‐risk pregnancy, induced or oxytocin‐augmented labour, meconium‐stained amniotic fluid or epidural analgesia. Methods  Six observers classified 73 STAN recordings and decided if and when they would suggest an intervention. Proportions of specific agreement (Ps) and kappa values (K) were calculated. Main outcome measures  Agreement upon classification of the intrapartum CTG and decision to perform an intervention. Results  Agreement for classification of a normal and a (pre)terminal CTG was good (Ps range 0.50–0.84), but poor for the intermediary and abnormal CTG (Ps range 0.34–0.56). Agreement on the decision to intervene was higher, especially on the decision to perform ‘no intervention’ (Ps range 0.76–0.94). Overall inter‐observer agreement on the decision to intervene was considered moderate in five of six observer combinations according to the kappa (K range 0.42–0.73). Intra‐observer agreement for CTG classification and decision to intervene was moderate (K range 0.52–0.67 and 0.61–0.75). Conclusions  Inter‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum CTG is poor, but addition of information regarding fetal electrocardiogram, especially in case of intermediary or abnormal CTG traces, results in a more standardised decision to intervene.</description><subject>Acidosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiotocography</subject><subject>Cardiotocography - standards</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>fetal electrocardiogram</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Perinatal Care</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, High-Risk</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>ST analysis</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERX_gFZCFBLuktuM48YJFW1FoVdEFZW3dODcloyQebId2JBY8As_Ik-B0RkXqCi_sa53vHNk6hFDOcp7W8SrnsuIZK0WdC8bqnAmmRX7_jBw8Cs8fZpaxQtT75DCEFWNcCVa8IPtci5IVSh2QnxdTRP_n128KU0v7KXpIF9cE9D_QU7j1iCNOkbpuq67Bx3mkX26SAYZN6MMixW9IO4wwUBzQRu8s-LZ3tx7GZKN3LmXQ0U19dB5b2mxSwMnnl2SvgyHgq915RL6ef7g5-5RdXX-8ODu5yqwUUmRl23ayQYW6rMF2zBZlqTnjFjvbWi1kA1VhpQJVa522SjCUAqpSK1bIVhZH5N02d-3d9xlDNGMfLA4DTOjmYJTSSktVJfDNE3DlZp_-GYwQpWKVrOsE1VvIeheCx86sfT-C3xjOzFKPWZmlBbO0YJZ6zEM95j5ZX-_y52bE9p9x10cC3u4ACBaGzsNk-_DICc5VxSuRuPdb7q4fcPPfDzCnl9fLVPwFT9itgA</recordid><startdate>200903</startdate><enddate>200903</enddate><creator>Westerhuis, MEMH</creator><creator>van Horen, E</creator><creator>Kwee, A</creator><creator>van der Tweel, I</creator><creator>Visser, GHA</creator><creator>Moons, KGM</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200903</creationdate><title>Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN</title><author>Westerhuis, MEMH ; van Horen, E ; Kwee, A ; van der Tweel, I ; Visser, GHA ; Moons, KGM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5ddf4be6e958acf0c3559101cefcdc924ba73c46a6899a68720e42a7596034d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acidosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiotocography</topic><topic>Cardiotocography - standards</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>fetal electrocardiogram</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Perinatal Care</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, High-Risk</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>ST analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Westerhuis, MEMH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Horen, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwee, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Tweel, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, GHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moons, KGM</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Westerhuis, MEMH</au><au>van Horen, E</au><au>Kwee, A</au><au>van der Tweel, I</au><au>Visser, GHA</au><au>Moons, KGM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2009-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>551</epage><pages>545-551</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><coden>BIOGFQ</coden><abstract>Objective  The objective of this study was to quantify inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum cardiotocogram (CTG) and decision to intervene following STAN guidelines. Design  A prospective, observational study. Setting  Obstetrics Department of a tertiary referral hospital. Population  STAN recordings of 73 women after 36 weeks of gestation with a high‐risk pregnancy, induced or oxytocin‐augmented labour, meconium‐stained amniotic fluid or epidural analgesia. Methods  Six observers classified 73 STAN recordings and decided if and when they would suggest an intervention. Proportions of specific agreement (Ps) and kappa values (K) were calculated. Main outcome measures  Agreement upon classification of the intrapartum CTG and decision to perform an intervention. Results  Agreement for classification of a normal and a (pre)terminal CTG was good (Ps range 0.50–0.84), but poor for the intermediary and abnormal CTG (Ps range 0.34–0.56). Agreement on the decision to intervene was higher, especially on the decision to perform ‘no intervention’ (Ps range 0.76–0.94). Overall inter‐observer agreement on the decision to intervene was considered moderate in five of six observer combinations according to the kappa (K range 0.42–0.73). Intra‐observer agreement for CTG classification and decision to intervene was moderate (K range 0.52–0.67 and 0.61–0.75). Conclusions  Inter‐observer agreement on classification of the intrapartum CTG is poor, but addition of information regarding fetal electrocardiogram, especially in case of intermediary or abnormal CTG traces, results in a more standardised decision to intervene.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19250366</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02092.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2009-03, Vol.116 (4), p.545-551
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66969467
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Acidosis - physiopathology
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiotocography
Cardiotocography - standards
Childbirth & labor
Clinical Competence - standards
Decision Making
Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation
Electrocardiography
Female
Fetal Diseases - physiopathology
fetal electrocardiogram
Fetuses
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Health risk assessment
Heart
Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology
Humans
Intervention
inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement
Medical sciences
Medical Staff, Hospital - standards
Observer Variation
Obstetrics
Perinatal Care
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, High-Risk
Prospective Studies
ST analysis
title Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A17%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter%E2%80%90%20and%20intra%E2%80%90observer%20agreement%20of%20intrapartum%20ST%20analysis%20of%20the%20fetal%20electrocardiogram%20in%20women%20monitored%20by%20STAN&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Westerhuis,%20MEMH&rft.date=2009-03&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=551&rft.pages=545-551&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BIOGFQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02092.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1648492721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225607488&rft_id=info:pmid/19250366&rfr_iscdi=true