The International Study on General Practitioners and Early Psychosis (IGPS)

Abstract Background In much of the world, general practitioners (GPs) are the health professionals most frequently initially contacted when a young person is developing psychosis. However little is known about their expertise in assessing psychosis and its risk. Methods To assess the diagnostic patt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia research 2009-03, Vol.108 (1), p.182-190
Hauptverfasser: Simon, Andor E, Lester, Helen, Tait, Lynda, Stip, Emanuel, Roy, Paul, Conrad, Gretchen, Hunt, Jennifer, Epstein, Irvin, Larsen, Tor K, Amminger, Paul, Holub, David, Wenigová, Barbora, Turner, Mark, Berger, Gregor E, O'Donnell, Colin, Umbricht, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 190
container_issue 1
container_start_page 182
container_title Schizophrenia research
container_volume 108
creator Simon, Andor E
Lester, Helen
Tait, Lynda
Stip, Emanuel
Roy, Paul
Conrad, Gretchen
Hunt, Jennifer
Epstein, Irvin
Larsen, Tor K
Amminger, Paul
Holub, David
Wenigová, Barbora
Turner, Mark
Berger, Gregor E
O'Donnell, Colin
Umbricht, Daniel
description Abstract Background In much of the world, general practitioners (GPs) are the health professionals most frequently initially contacted when a young person is developing psychosis. However little is known about their expertise in assessing psychosis and its risk. Methods To assess the diagnostic patterns and treatment practices related to psychosis of GPs working in a range of health care systems, questionnaires were mailed to 12,516 randomly selected GPs in seven countries: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, England, Norway, Austria and the Czech Republic. Sites were defined as gatekeeping or non-gatekeeping, based on the primary care health system in effect at each site. A gatekeeping system (GK) is one which mandates that patients see a GP before in order to be referred to a specialist. By contrast, in a non-gatekeeping (nGK) system, individuals can seek help directly from specialists without authorization by a GP. Results Twenty-two percent ( n = 2784) GPs responded to the mailed questionnaire. They reported low prevalence of early psychosis seen in general practice. Using awareness of functional decline as a prognostic sign as a proxy, gatekeeping (GK) GPs were found to be superior in their knowledge of the signs and symptoms of early psychosis than were non-gatekeeping GPs. GP's with less knowledge as to early psychosis were more likely to refer individuals with suspected psychosis to specialists. GP's reported a preference for access to specialized outpatient services as compared with obtaining continuous medical education relevant to early psychosis. The duration of maintenance treatment recommended by GP's was less than that recommended in international guidelines. GP's also underestimated the risk for relapse after a first episode of psychosis. Conclusions As GPs were largely unaware of features of early psychosis, such as functional decline, this should be the target of educational programs for GP's. However, the incidence of psychosis is low and GP's express a preference for access to appropriate referral over continuing medical education. Therefore, the development of specializ ed services for the assessment and care of patients who are in the early stages of developing schizophrenia may be warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.schres.2008.11.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66954814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0920996408005082</els_id><sourcerecordid>66954814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-d07614080f125d9459b04c777ef0c1459b1228d01ced355e4a119854ac754eff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVGL1DAQx4Mo3t7pNxDpi3I-bJ3JJm3yciDHuS4euLDnc8ilUzZrNz2TVui3N2UXBV98Ckl-M5P8_oy9QSgRsPp4KJPbR0olB1AlYgkgnrEFynq15BL0c7YAzWGpdSUu2GVKBwBACfVLdoEaVK10vWBfH_ZUbMJAMdjB98F2xW4Ym6noQ7GmQDEfbKN1g59vKabChqa4s7Gbim2a3L5PPhXXm_V29-EVe9HaLtHr83rFvn--e7j9srz_tt7cfrpfOiHksGygrlCAgha5bLSQ-hGEq-uaWnA4b5Fz1QA6alZSkrCIWklhXS0Fte3qir0_9X2K_c-R0mCOPjnqOhuoH5OpKi2FQpFBcQJd7FOK1Jqn6I82TgbBzBLNwZwkmlmiQTRZYi57e-4_Ph6p-Vt0tpaBd2fAJme7NtrgfPrDceSVVgozd3PiKNv45SnmaZ5C_peP5AbT9P5_L_m3get88HnmD5ooHfoxx9YlgyZxA2Y3Bz7nneWCBMVXvwFys6Tb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66954814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The International Study on General Practitioners and Early Psychosis (IGPS)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Simon, Andor E ; Lester, Helen ; Tait, Lynda ; Stip, Emanuel ; Roy, Paul ; Conrad, Gretchen ; Hunt, Jennifer ; Epstein, Irvin ; Larsen, Tor K ; Amminger, Paul ; Holub, David ; Wenigová, Barbora ; Turner, Mark ; Berger, Gregor E ; O'Donnell, Colin ; Umbricht, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Simon, Andor E ; Lester, Helen ; Tait, Lynda ; Stip, Emanuel ; Roy, Paul ; Conrad, Gretchen ; Hunt, Jennifer ; Epstein, Irvin ; Larsen, Tor K ; Amminger, Paul ; Holub, David ; Wenigová, Barbora ; Turner, Mark ; Berger, Gregor E ; O'Donnell, Colin ; Umbricht, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background In much of the world, general practitioners (GPs) are the health professionals most frequently initially contacted when a young person is developing psychosis. However little is known about their expertise in assessing psychosis and its risk. Methods To assess the diagnostic patterns and treatment practices related to psychosis of GPs working in a range of health care systems, questionnaires were mailed to 12,516 randomly selected GPs in seven countries: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, England, Norway, Austria and the Czech Republic. Sites were defined as gatekeeping or non-gatekeeping, based on the primary care health system in effect at each site. A gatekeeping system (GK) is one which mandates that patients see a GP before in order to be referred to a specialist. By contrast, in a non-gatekeeping (nGK) system, individuals can seek help directly from specialists without authorization by a GP. Results Twenty-two percent ( n = 2784) GPs responded to the mailed questionnaire. They reported low prevalence of early psychosis seen in general practice. Using awareness of functional decline as a prognostic sign as a proxy, gatekeeping (GK) GPs were found to be superior in their knowledge of the signs and symptoms of early psychosis than were non-gatekeeping GPs. GP's with less knowledge as to early psychosis were more likely to refer individuals with suspected psychosis to specialists. GP's reported a preference for access to specialized outpatient services as compared with obtaining continuous medical education relevant to early psychosis. The duration of maintenance treatment recommended by GP's was less than that recommended in international guidelines. GP's also underestimated the risk for relapse after a first episode of psychosis. Conclusions As GPs were largely unaware of features of early psychosis, such as functional decline, this should be the target of educational programs for GP's. However, the incidence of psychosis is low and GP's express a preference for access to appropriate referral over continuing medical education. Therefore, the development of specializ ed services for the assessment and care of patients who are in the early stages of developing schizophrenia may be warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.11.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19087897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Early psychosis ; Female ; General practitioners ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Physicians, Family - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Primary care ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Schizophrenia ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2009-03, Vol.108 (1), p.182-190</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-d07614080f125d9459b04c777ef0c1459b1228d01ced355e4a119854ac754eff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-d07614080f125d9459b04c777ef0c1459b1228d01ced355e4a119854ac754eff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996408005082$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21269881$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19087897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simon, Andor E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Lynda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stip, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Irvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Tor K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amminger, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holub, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenigová, Barbora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Gregor E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umbricht, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>The International Study on General Practitioners and Early Psychosis (IGPS)</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Background In much of the world, general practitioners (GPs) are the health professionals most frequently initially contacted when a young person is developing psychosis. However little is known about their expertise in assessing psychosis and its risk. Methods To assess the diagnostic patterns and treatment practices related to psychosis of GPs working in a range of health care systems, questionnaires were mailed to 12,516 randomly selected GPs in seven countries: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, England, Norway, Austria and the Czech Republic. Sites were defined as gatekeeping or non-gatekeeping, based on the primary care health system in effect at each site. A gatekeeping system (GK) is one which mandates that patients see a GP before in order to be referred to a specialist. By contrast, in a non-gatekeeping (nGK) system, individuals can seek help directly from specialists without authorization by a GP. Results Twenty-two percent ( n = 2784) GPs responded to the mailed questionnaire. They reported low prevalence of early psychosis seen in general practice. Using awareness of functional decline as a prognostic sign as a proxy, gatekeeping (GK) GPs were found to be superior in their knowledge of the signs and symptoms of early psychosis than were non-gatekeeping GPs. GP's with less knowledge as to early psychosis were more likely to refer individuals with suspected psychosis to specialists. GP's reported a preference for access to specialized outpatient services as compared with obtaining continuous medical education relevant to early psychosis. The duration of maintenance treatment recommended by GP's was less than that recommended in international guidelines. GP's also underestimated the risk for relapse after a first episode of psychosis. Conclusions As GPs were largely unaware of features of early psychosis, such as functional decline, this should be the target of educational programs for GP's. However, the incidence of psychosis is low and GP's express a preference for access to appropriate referral over continuing medical education. Therefore, the development of specializ ed services for the assessment and care of patients who are in the early stages of developing schizophrenia may be warranted.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Early psychosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General practitioners</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVGL1DAQx4Mo3t7pNxDpi3I-bJ3JJm3yciDHuS4euLDnc8ilUzZrNz2TVui3N2UXBV98Ckl-M5P8_oy9QSgRsPp4KJPbR0olB1AlYgkgnrEFynq15BL0c7YAzWGpdSUu2GVKBwBACfVLdoEaVK10vWBfH_ZUbMJAMdjB98F2xW4Ym6noQ7GmQDEfbKN1g59vKabChqa4s7Gbim2a3L5PPhXXm_V29-EVe9HaLtHr83rFvn--e7j9srz_tt7cfrpfOiHksGygrlCAgha5bLSQ-hGEq-uaWnA4b5Fz1QA6alZSkrCIWklhXS0Fte3qir0_9X2K_c-R0mCOPjnqOhuoH5OpKi2FQpFBcQJd7FOK1Jqn6I82TgbBzBLNwZwkmlmiQTRZYi57e-4_Ph6p-Vt0tpaBd2fAJme7NtrgfPrDceSVVgozd3PiKNv45SnmaZ5C_peP5AbT9P5_L_m3get88HnmD5ooHfoxx9YlgyZxA2Y3Bz7nneWCBMVXvwFys6Tb</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Simon, Andor E</creator><creator>Lester, Helen</creator><creator>Tait, Lynda</creator><creator>Stip, Emanuel</creator><creator>Roy, Paul</creator><creator>Conrad, Gretchen</creator><creator>Hunt, Jennifer</creator><creator>Epstein, Irvin</creator><creator>Larsen, Tor K</creator><creator>Amminger, Paul</creator><creator>Holub, David</creator><creator>Wenigová, Barbora</creator><creator>Turner, Mark</creator><creator>Berger, Gregor E</creator><creator>O'Donnell, Colin</creator><creator>Umbricht, Daniel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>The International Study on General Practitioners and Early Psychosis (IGPS)</title><author>Simon, Andor E ; Lester, Helen ; Tait, Lynda ; Stip, Emanuel ; Roy, Paul ; Conrad, Gretchen ; Hunt, Jennifer ; Epstein, Irvin ; Larsen, Tor K ; Amminger, Paul ; Holub, David ; Wenigová, Barbora ; Turner, Mark ; Berger, Gregor E ; O'Donnell, Colin ; Umbricht, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-d07614080f125d9459b04c777ef0c1459b1228d01ced355e4a119854ac754eff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Early psychosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General practitioners</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simon, Andor E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Lynda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stip, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Irvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Tor K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amminger, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holub, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenigová, Barbora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Gregor E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umbricht, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simon, Andor E</au><au>Lester, Helen</au><au>Tait, Lynda</au><au>Stip, Emanuel</au><au>Roy, Paul</au><au>Conrad, Gretchen</au><au>Hunt, Jennifer</au><au>Epstein, Irvin</au><au>Larsen, Tor K</au><au>Amminger, Paul</au><au>Holub, David</au><au>Wenigová, Barbora</au><au>Turner, Mark</au><au>Berger, Gregor E</au><au>O'Donnell, Colin</au><au>Umbricht, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The International Study on General Practitioners and Early Psychosis (IGPS)</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>182-190</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background In much of the world, general practitioners (GPs) are the health professionals most frequently initially contacted when a young person is developing psychosis. However little is known about their expertise in assessing psychosis and its risk. Methods To assess the diagnostic patterns and treatment practices related to psychosis of GPs working in a range of health care systems, questionnaires were mailed to 12,516 randomly selected GPs in seven countries: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, England, Norway, Austria and the Czech Republic. Sites were defined as gatekeeping or non-gatekeeping, based on the primary care health system in effect at each site. A gatekeeping system (GK) is one which mandates that patients see a GP before in order to be referred to a specialist. By contrast, in a non-gatekeeping (nGK) system, individuals can seek help directly from specialists without authorization by a GP. Results Twenty-two percent ( n = 2784) GPs responded to the mailed questionnaire. They reported low prevalence of early psychosis seen in general practice. Using awareness of functional decline as a prognostic sign as a proxy, gatekeeping (GK) GPs were found to be superior in their knowledge of the signs and symptoms of early psychosis than were non-gatekeeping GPs. GP's with less knowledge as to early psychosis were more likely to refer individuals with suspected psychosis to specialists. GP's reported a preference for access to specialized outpatient services as compared with obtaining continuous medical education relevant to early psychosis. The duration of maintenance treatment recommended by GP's was less than that recommended in international guidelines. GP's also underestimated the risk for relapse after a first episode of psychosis. Conclusions As GPs were largely unaware of features of early psychosis, such as functional decline, this should be the target of educational programs for GP's. However, the incidence of psychosis is low and GP's express a preference for access to appropriate referral over continuing medical education. Therefore, the development of specializ ed services for the assessment and care of patients who are in the early stages of developing schizophrenia may be warranted.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>19087897</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.schres.2008.11.004</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-9964
ispartof Schizophrenia research, 2009-03, Vol.108 (1), p.182-190
issn 0920-9964
1573-2509
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66954814
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Biological and medical sciences
Early psychosis
Female
General practitioners
Humans
International Cooperation
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Physician-Patient Relations
Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Primary care
Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Psychoses
Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis
Schizophrenia
Surveys and Questionnaires
title The International Study on General Practitioners and Early Psychosis (IGPS)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20International%20Study%20on%20General%20Practitioners%20and%20Early%20Psychosis%20(IGPS)&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Simon,%20Andor%20E&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=182-190&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.schres.2008.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66954814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66954814&rft_id=info:pmid/19087897&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0920996408005082&rfr_iscdi=true