Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement

Abstract Background C2 laminar screws are becoming an increasingly used method of fixation. They allow for avoidance of fixation through the C2 pedicle, eliminating the risk of vertebral artery injury. Recent studies have described the anatomic considerations of this technique in a large cadaveric p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2009-03, Vol.9 (3), p.258-262
Hauptverfasser: Dean, Clayton L., MD, Lee, Michael J., MD, Robbin, Mark, MD, Cassinelli, Ezequiel H., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 262
container_issue 3
container_start_page 258
container_title The spine journal
container_volume 9
creator Dean, Clayton L., MD
Lee, Michael J., MD
Robbin, Mark, MD
Cassinelli, Ezequiel H., MD
description Abstract Background C2 laminar screws are becoming an increasingly used method of fixation. They allow for avoidance of fixation through the C2 pedicle, eliminating the risk of vertebral artery injury. Recent studies have described the anatomic considerations of this technique in a large cadaveric population. In clinical practice, however, direct measurement is impractical and preoperative imaging must be relied upon to determine whether or not this technique can be safely used. Purpose To evaluate the ability of computed tomography (CT) to accurately assess critical dimensions of the C2 vertebrae with regard to intralaminar screw placement. Study design/setting Cadaveric analysis. Methods The C2 vertebrae of 84 adult spines were randomly selected from a large cadaveric collection. Direct measurements were performed to determine laminar thickness, estimated screw length, and spinolaminar angle. Fine cut axial CT scans were then performed on all specimens and all measurements were repeated from these images. Correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the ability of CT scan to accurately determine these measurements. Results CT scan measurements were found to be highly correlated with direct measurements for both left and right mean laminar thickness (0.975 and 0.947, respectively). Screw lengths using CT scan were found to be significantly longer than previously reported direct measurements (24.8 vs. 28.8 mm; p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.454
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66954177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S152994300800716X</els_id><sourcerecordid>66954177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-fa919a3eca3ec0110a89c3af9cad967ca2c8562502dae2215f958a2bf4559853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEoqXtGyDkFbsE24mdeIOErviTKrGgC3bWXGdCfUnsYDst9zH6xjjkSgg2XVgeyd85I8-ZonjJaMUok28OVZytQ6w4pV1FZdWI5klxzrq2K5ms-dNcC65K1dT0rHgR44FmsGX8eXGWIdHypj0vHnY-BBwhWe_IHtM9oiPGT_OSsCfJT_57gPn2SCaEuASc0KVIwPWktwFNyiVkypp_AT-QdIsEftlIBh-yo4u2x7D1ya87TkaYrINAogl4T-YRzB_xZfFsgDHi1em-KG4-vL_ZfSqvv3z8vHt3XZqGiVQOoJiCGs16KGMUOmVqGJSBXsnWADedkFxQ3gNyzsSgRAd8PzRCqE7UF8XrzXYO_ueCMenJRoPjCA79ErWUSjSsbTPYbKAJPsaAg56DnSAcNaN6TUIf9JaEXpPQVOqcRJa9Ovkv-wn7v6LT6DPwdgMwf_LOYtDRWHQGt8Hq3tvHOvxvYEbrrIHxBx4xHvwSXB6gZjpyTfXXdRvWZaAdpS2T3-rfl9m1NA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66954177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Dean, Clayton L., MD ; Lee, Michael J., MD ; Robbin, Mark, MD ; Cassinelli, Ezequiel H., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Dean, Clayton L., MD ; Lee, Michael J., MD ; Robbin, Mark, MD ; Cassinelli, Ezequiel H., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background C2 laminar screws are becoming an increasingly used method of fixation. They allow for avoidance of fixation through the C2 pedicle, eliminating the risk of vertebral artery injury. Recent studies have described the anatomic considerations of this technique in a large cadaveric population. In clinical practice, however, direct measurement is impractical and preoperative imaging must be relied upon to determine whether or not this technique can be safely used. Purpose To evaluate the ability of computed tomography (CT) to accurately assess critical dimensions of the C2 vertebrae with regard to intralaminar screw placement. Study design/setting Cadaveric analysis. Methods The C2 vertebrae of 84 adult spines were randomly selected from a large cadaveric collection. Direct measurements were performed to determine laminar thickness, estimated screw length, and spinolaminar angle. Fine cut axial CT scans were then performed on all specimens and all measurements were repeated from these images. Correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the ability of CT scan to accurately determine these measurements. Results CT scan measurements were found to be highly correlated with direct measurements for both left and right mean laminar thickness (0.975 and 0.947, respectively). Screw lengths using CT scan were found to be significantly longer than previously reported direct measurements (24.8 vs. 28.8 mm; p&lt;.01). The mean CT spinolaminar angle was 42.45°, whereas it was 48.47° on direct measurement. Correlation coefficient for spinolaminar angle measurements was low (0.23); however, this is likely because of measurement variability. Conclusions Given the high degree of correlation between CT measurements and direct anatomic measurements, we conclude that CT scan can accurately determine laminar thickness, a measurement critical to safe placement of intralaminar screws. It appears that longer screw lengths that were previously reported may be safely used while remaining intra-osseous. We continue to advocate preoperative planning using CT to identify patients whose lamina may be unable to accommodate safe screw placement using this technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.454</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18757247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthrodesis ; Atlantoaxial ; Axis ; Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging ; Axis, Cervical Vertebra - surgery ; Bone Screws ; C2 vertebrae ; Cadaver ; CT scan ; Humans ; Laminar screw ; Orthopedics ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2009-03, Vol.9 (3), p.258-262</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-fa919a3eca3ec0110a89c3af9cad967ca2c8562502dae2215f958a2bf4559853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-fa919a3eca3ec0110a89c3af9cad967ca2c8562502dae2215f958a2bf4559853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.454$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18757247$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dean, Clayton L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Michael J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbin, Mark, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassinelli, Ezequiel H., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Abstract Background C2 laminar screws are becoming an increasingly used method of fixation. They allow for avoidance of fixation through the C2 pedicle, eliminating the risk of vertebral artery injury. Recent studies have described the anatomic considerations of this technique in a large cadaveric population. In clinical practice, however, direct measurement is impractical and preoperative imaging must be relied upon to determine whether or not this technique can be safely used. Purpose To evaluate the ability of computed tomography (CT) to accurately assess critical dimensions of the C2 vertebrae with regard to intralaminar screw placement. Study design/setting Cadaveric analysis. Methods The C2 vertebrae of 84 adult spines were randomly selected from a large cadaveric collection. Direct measurements were performed to determine laminar thickness, estimated screw length, and spinolaminar angle. Fine cut axial CT scans were then performed on all specimens and all measurements were repeated from these images. Correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the ability of CT scan to accurately determine these measurements. Results CT scan measurements were found to be highly correlated with direct measurements for both left and right mean laminar thickness (0.975 and 0.947, respectively). Screw lengths using CT scan were found to be significantly longer than previously reported direct measurements (24.8 vs. 28.8 mm; p&lt;.01). The mean CT spinolaminar angle was 42.45°, whereas it was 48.47° on direct measurement. Correlation coefficient for spinolaminar angle measurements was low (0.23); however, this is likely because of measurement variability. Conclusions Given the high degree of correlation between CT measurements and direct anatomic measurements, we conclude that CT scan can accurately determine laminar thickness, a measurement critical to safe placement of intralaminar screws. It appears that longer screw lengths that were previously reported may be safely used while remaining intra-osseous. We continue to advocate preoperative planning using CT to identify patients whose lamina may be unable to accommodate safe screw placement using this technique.</description><subject>Arthrodesis</subject><subject>Atlantoaxial</subject><subject>Axis</subject><subject>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - surgery</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>C2 vertebrae</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>CT scan</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laminar screw</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEoqXtGyDkFbsE24mdeIOErviTKrGgC3bWXGdCfUnsYDst9zH6xjjkSgg2XVgeyd85I8-ZonjJaMUok28OVZytQ6w4pV1FZdWI5klxzrq2K5ms-dNcC65K1dT0rHgR44FmsGX8eXGWIdHypj0vHnY-BBwhWe_IHtM9oiPGT_OSsCfJT_57gPn2SCaEuASc0KVIwPWktwFNyiVkypp_AT-QdIsEftlIBh-yo4u2x7D1ya87TkaYrINAogl4T-YRzB_xZfFsgDHi1em-KG4-vL_ZfSqvv3z8vHt3XZqGiVQOoJiCGs16KGMUOmVqGJSBXsnWADedkFxQ3gNyzsSgRAd8PzRCqE7UF8XrzXYO_ueCMenJRoPjCA79ErWUSjSsbTPYbKAJPsaAg56DnSAcNaN6TUIf9JaEXpPQVOqcRJa9Ovkv-wn7v6LT6DPwdgMwf_LOYtDRWHQGt8Hq3tvHOvxvYEbrrIHxBx4xHvwSXB6gZjpyTfXXdRvWZaAdpS2T3-rfl9m1NA</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Dean, Clayton L., MD</creator><creator>Lee, Michael J., MD</creator><creator>Robbin, Mark, MD</creator><creator>Cassinelli, Ezequiel H., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement</title><author>Dean, Clayton L., MD ; Lee, Michael J., MD ; Robbin, Mark, MD ; Cassinelli, Ezequiel H., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-fa919a3eca3ec0110a89c3af9cad967ca2c8562502dae2215f958a2bf4559853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Arthrodesis</topic><topic>Atlantoaxial</topic><topic>Axis</topic><topic>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Axis, Cervical Vertebra - surgery</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>C2 vertebrae</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>CT scan</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laminar screw</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dean, Clayton L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Michael J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbin, Mark, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassinelli, Ezequiel H., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dean, Clayton L., MD</au><au>Lee, Michael J., MD</au><au>Robbin, Mark, MD</au><au>Cassinelli, Ezequiel H., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>258-262</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background C2 laminar screws are becoming an increasingly used method of fixation. They allow for avoidance of fixation through the C2 pedicle, eliminating the risk of vertebral artery injury. Recent studies have described the anatomic considerations of this technique in a large cadaveric population. In clinical practice, however, direct measurement is impractical and preoperative imaging must be relied upon to determine whether or not this technique can be safely used. Purpose To evaluate the ability of computed tomography (CT) to accurately assess critical dimensions of the C2 vertebrae with regard to intralaminar screw placement. Study design/setting Cadaveric analysis. Methods The C2 vertebrae of 84 adult spines were randomly selected from a large cadaveric collection. Direct measurements were performed to determine laminar thickness, estimated screw length, and spinolaminar angle. Fine cut axial CT scans were then performed on all specimens and all measurements were repeated from these images. Correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the ability of CT scan to accurately determine these measurements. Results CT scan measurements were found to be highly correlated with direct measurements for both left and right mean laminar thickness (0.975 and 0.947, respectively). Screw lengths using CT scan were found to be significantly longer than previously reported direct measurements (24.8 vs. 28.8 mm; p&lt;.01). The mean CT spinolaminar angle was 42.45°, whereas it was 48.47° on direct measurement. Correlation coefficient for spinolaminar angle measurements was low (0.23); however, this is likely because of measurement variability. Conclusions Given the high degree of correlation between CT measurements and direct anatomic measurements, we conclude that CT scan can accurately determine laminar thickness, a measurement critical to safe placement of intralaminar screws. It appears that longer screw lengths that were previously reported may be safely used while remaining intra-osseous. We continue to advocate preoperative planning using CT to identify patients whose lamina may be unable to accommodate safe screw placement using this technique.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18757247</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.454</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-9430
ispartof The spine journal, 2009-03, Vol.9 (3), p.258-262
issn 1529-9430
1878-1632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66954177
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Arthrodesis
Atlantoaxial
Axis
Axis, Cervical Vertebra - diagnostic imaging
Axis, Cervical Vertebra - surgery
Bone Screws
C2 vertebrae
Cadaver
CT scan
Humans
Laminar screw
Orthopedics
Spinal Fusion - instrumentation
Spinal Fusion - methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T08%3A29%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20between%20computed%20tomography%20measurements%20and%20direct%20anatomic%20measurements%20of%20the%20axis%20for%20consideration%20of%20C2%20laminar%20screw%20placement&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Dean,%20Clayton%20L.,%20MD&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=258-262&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66954177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66954177&rft_id=info:pmid/18757247&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S152994300800716X&rfr_iscdi=true