Access to spine care for the poor and near poor

Abstract Background context Access to care for poor/near poor patients is a concerning and growing problem within the American system of medical care. Purpose The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between health insurance status and access to spine care among patients below 65...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2009-03, Vol.9 (3), p.221-224
Hauptverfasser: Weiner, Bradley K., MD, Black, Kevin P., MD, Gish, Joshua, BS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 224
container_issue 3
container_start_page 221
container_title The spine journal
container_volume 9
creator Weiner, Bradley K., MD
Black, Kevin P., MD
Gish, Joshua, BS
description Abstract Background context Access to care for poor/near poor patients is a concerning and growing problem within the American system of medical care. Purpose The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between health insurance status and access to spine care among patients below 65 years of age eventually receiving treatment at our tertiary academic medical center. Study design Descriptive study based on chart review and telephone interviews. Patient sample Two groups of 64 patients each with surgical pathology of limited complexity and limited comorbidities, one with Medicaid insurance and one with private, commercial insurance. Outcome measures Reasons for referral, travel distance, travel time, frequency of visits, and proximity of fellowship-trained spinal surgeons. Methods Two groups, each with 64 consecutive spine surgical patients, were studied and compared. Group One had “Medicaid” coverage and Group Two was privately insured. All patients (both groups) were treated surgically for similar pathology of limited complexity and had limited comorbdities. They were assessed to determine the difficulties they encountered in receiving care before referral to our medical center including factors such as referral by a local provider based on insurance status alone and travel time/distance/frequency to eventually receive care at our center. The availability of local care for these patients (fellowship-trained spine surgeons in their local area) was also assessed. Results The great majority (78%) of poor/near poor patients with Medicaid coverage from counties at some distance from (and local to) our center were referred/deferred on the basis of insurance status alone given surgical problems which could have comfortably been addressed by orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, or fellowship-trained spine surgeons local to the patient. This difficulty in access to care results in a significant burden (measured in time/travel/costs) for these patients. Conclusions The poor/near poor with Medicaid insurance have less access to local spine care than those with private, commercial health insurance. The implications (from both surgeon and patient perspectives) of this dilemma are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.03.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66950924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943008000880</els_id><sourcerecordid>66950924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-7b37be14fa84e9375b755b5ec28aad2a3670e890eeaaa808435755533277bbf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhoMoTqf_QKRX3rU7SZomvRGG-AUDL9TrkKanmNm1M-mE_XvTbSB441VO4DlvyPMSckUho0CL2TILa9chZgxAZcAzAHZEzqiSKqUFZ8dxFqxMy5zDhJyHsIQISspOyYSqvFClkGdkNrcWQ0iGPtnFJdZ4TJreJ8MHJus-Dqarkw6N390uyElj2oCXh3NK3h_u3-6e0sXL4_PdfJHanIohlRWXFdK8MSrHkktRSSEqgZYpY2pmeCEBVQmIxhgFKuciAoJzJmVVNcCn5Gafu_b91wbDoFcuWGxb02G_CbooSgElyyOY70Hr-xA8Nnrt3cr4raagR1F6qfei9ChKA9dRVFy7PuRvqhXWv0sHMxG43QMYf_nt0OtgHXYWa-fRDrru3X8v_A2wreucNe0nbjEs-43vokFNdWAa9OtY1tgVqLEnBfwHhuSORg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66950924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Access to spine care for the poor and near poor</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Weiner, Bradley K., MD ; Black, Kevin P., MD ; Gish, Joshua, BS</creator><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Bradley K., MD ; Black, Kevin P., MD ; Gish, Joshua, BS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background context Access to care for poor/near poor patients is a concerning and growing problem within the American system of medical care. Purpose The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between health insurance status and access to spine care among patients below 65 years of age eventually receiving treatment at our tertiary academic medical center. Study design Descriptive study based on chart review and telephone interviews. Patient sample Two groups of 64 patients each with surgical pathology of limited complexity and limited comorbidities, one with Medicaid insurance and one with private, commercial insurance. Outcome measures Reasons for referral, travel distance, travel time, frequency of visits, and proximity of fellowship-trained spinal surgeons. Methods Two groups, each with 64 consecutive spine surgical patients, were studied and compared. Group One had “Medicaid” coverage and Group Two was privately insured. All patients (both groups) were treated surgically for similar pathology of limited complexity and had limited comorbdities. They were assessed to determine the difficulties they encountered in receiving care before referral to our medical center including factors such as referral by a local provider based on insurance status alone and travel time/distance/frequency to eventually receive care at our center. The availability of local care for these patients (fellowship-trained spine surgeons in their local area) was also assessed. Results The great majority (78%) of poor/near poor patients with Medicaid coverage from counties at some distance from (and local to) our center were referred/deferred on the basis of insurance status alone given surgical problems which could have comfortably been addressed by orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, or fellowship-trained spine surgeons local to the patient. This difficulty in access to care results in a significant burden (measured in time/travel/costs) for these patients. Conclusions The poor/near poor with Medicaid insurance have less access to local spine care than those with private, commercial health insurance. The implications (from both surgeon and patient perspectives) of this dilemma are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.03.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18468957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Access to care ; Health inequalities ; Health Services Accessibility - economics ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Medicaid ; Medical Indigency - economics ; Medically Uninsured ; Orthopedics ; Poverty ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics ; Referral and Consultation - economics ; Spinal Diseases - surgery ; Spine ; United States</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2009-03, Vol.9 (3), p.221-224</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-7b37be14fa84e9375b755b5ec28aad2a3670e890eeaaa808435755533277bbf03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-7b37be14fa84e9375b755b5ec28aad2a3670e890eeaaa808435755533277bbf03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2008.03.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18468957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Bradley K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Kevin P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gish, Joshua, BS</creatorcontrib><title>Access to spine care for the poor and near poor</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Abstract Background context Access to care for poor/near poor patients is a concerning and growing problem within the American system of medical care. Purpose The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between health insurance status and access to spine care among patients below 65 years of age eventually receiving treatment at our tertiary academic medical center. Study design Descriptive study based on chart review and telephone interviews. Patient sample Two groups of 64 patients each with surgical pathology of limited complexity and limited comorbidities, one with Medicaid insurance and one with private, commercial insurance. Outcome measures Reasons for referral, travel distance, travel time, frequency of visits, and proximity of fellowship-trained spinal surgeons. Methods Two groups, each with 64 consecutive spine surgical patients, were studied and compared. Group One had “Medicaid” coverage and Group Two was privately insured. All patients (both groups) were treated surgically for similar pathology of limited complexity and had limited comorbdities. They were assessed to determine the difficulties they encountered in receiving care before referral to our medical center including factors such as referral by a local provider based on insurance status alone and travel time/distance/frequency to eventually receive care at our center. The availability of local care for these patients (fellowship-trained spine surgeons in their local area) was also assessed. Results The great majority (78%) of poor/near poor patients with Medicaid coverage from counties at some distance from (and local to) our center were referred/deferred on the basis of insurance status alone given surgical problems which could have comfortably been addressed by orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, or fellowship-trained spine surgeons local to the patient. This difficulty in access to care results in a significant burden (measured in time/travel/costs) for these patients. Conclusions The poor/near poor with Medicaid insurance have less access to local spine care than those with private, commercial health insurance. The implications (from both surgeon and patient perspectives) of this dilemma are discussed.</description><subject>Access to care</subject><subject>Health inequalities</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical Indigency - economics</subject><subject>Medically Uninsured</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - economics</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhoMoTqf_QKRX3rU7SZomvRGG-AUDL9TrkKanmNm1M-mE_XvTbSB441VO4DlvyPMSckUho0CL2TILa9chZgxAZcAzAHZEzqiSKqUFZ8dxFqxMy5zDhJyHsIQISspOyYSqvFClkGdkNrcWQ0iGPtnFJdZ4TJreJ8MHJus-Dqarkw6N390uyElj2oCXh3NK3h_u3-6e0sXL4_PdfJHanIohlRWXFdK8MSrHkktRSSEqgZYpY2pmeCEBVQmIxhgFKuciAoJzJmVVNcCn5Gafu_b91wbDoFcuWGxb02G_CbooSgElyyOY70Hr-xA8Nnrt3cr4raagR1F6qfei9ChKA9dRVFy7PuRvqhXWv0sHMxG43QMYf_nt0OtgHXYWa-fRDrru3X8v_A2wreucNe0nbjEs-43vokFNdWAa9OtY1tgVqLEnBfwHhuSORg</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Weiner, Bradley K., MD</creator><creator>Black, Kevin P., MD</creator><creator>Gish, Joshua, BS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Access to spine care for the poor and near poor</title><author>Weiner, Bradley K., MD ; Black, Kevin P., MD ; Gish, Joshua, BS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-7b37be14fa84e9375b755b5ec28aad2a3670e890eeaaa808435755533277bbf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Access to care</topic><topic>Health inequalities</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical Indigency - economics</topic><topic>Medically Uninsured</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - economics</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Bradley K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Kevin P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gish, Joshua, BS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weiner, Bradley K., MD</au><au>Black, Kevin P., MD</au><au>Gish, Joshua, BS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Access to spine care for the poor and near poor</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>221-224</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background context Access to care for poor/near poor patients is a concerning and growing problem within the American system of medical care. Purpose The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between health insurance status and access to spine care among patients below 65 years of age eventually receiving treatment at our tertiary academic medical center. Study design Descriptive study based on chart review and telephone interviews. Patient sample Two groups of 64 patients each with surgical pathology of limited complexity and limited comorbidities, one with Medicaid insurance and one with private, commercial insurance. Outcome measures Reasons for referral, travel distance, travel time, frequency of visits, and proximity of fellowship-trained spinal surgeons. Methods Two groups, each with 64 consecutive spine surgical patients, were studied and compared. Group One had “Medicaid” coverage and Group Two was privately insured. All patients (both groups) were treated surgically for similar pathology of limited complexity and had limited comorbdities. They were assessed to determine the difficulties they encountered in receiving care before referral to our medical center including factors such as referral by a local provider based on insurance status alone and travel time/distance/frequency to eventually receive care at our center. The availability of local care for these patients (fellowship-trained spine surgeons in their local area) was also assessed. Results The great majority (78%) of poor/near poor patients with Medicaid coverage from counties at some distance from (and local to) our center were referred/deferred on the basis of insurance status alone given surgical problems which could have comfortably been addressed by orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, or fellowship-trained spine surgeons local to the patient. This difficulty in access to care results in a significant burden (measured in time/travel/costs) for these patients. Conclusions The poor/near poor with Medicaid insurance have less access to local spine care than those with private, commercial health insurance. The implications (from both surgeon and patient perspectives) of this dilemma are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18468957</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2008.03.002</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-9430
ispartof The spine journal, 2009-03, Vol.9 (3), p.221-224
issn 1529-9430
1878-1632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66950924
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Access to care
Health inequalities
Health Services Accessibility - economics
Humans
Insurance, Health
Medicaid
Medical Indigency - economics
Medically Uninsured
Orthopedics
Poverty
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics
Referral and Consultation - economics
Spinal Diseases - surgery
Spine
United States
title Access to spine care for the poor and near poor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A34%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Access%20to%20spine%20care%20for%20the%20poor%20and%20near%20poor&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Weiner,%20Bradley%20K.,%20MD&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=221-224&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2008.03.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66950924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66950924&rft_id=info:pmid/18468957&rft_els_id=S1529943008000880&rfr_iscdi=true