Prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography before and after permanent prostate brachytherapy

To quantify prostate volume (pvol) changes with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) immediately after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) and to correlate these changes with postimplant computed tomography (CT) volumetrics. To provide data relevant to evaluating the potential of TRUS-based image fusion...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2004-11, Vol.60 (3), p.767-776
Hauptverfasser: Solhjem, Matthew C., Davis, Brian J., Pisansky, Thomas M., Wilson, Torrence M., Mynderse, Lance A., Herman, Michael G., King, Bernard F., Geyer, Susan M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 776
container_issue 3
container_start_page 767
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 60
creator Solhjem, Matthew C.
Davis, Brian J.
Pisansky, Thomas M.
Wilson, Torrence M.
Mynderse, Lance A.
Herman, Michael G.
King, Bernard F.
Geyer, Susan M.
description To quantify prostate volume (pvol) changes with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) immediately after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) and to correlate these changes with postimplant computed tomography (CT) volumetrics. To provide data relevant to evaluating the potential of TRUS-based image fusion for intraoperative dosimetry. Between July 2000 and January 2003, 177 patients underwent 125I PPB monotherapy at our institution, and 165 patients provided research authorization. A total of 136 patients (82%) completed 4 imaging studies: planning TRUS, intraoperative pre- and postimplant TRUS, and CT. Mean planning TRUS pvol was 38.7 ± 11.7 cc standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI) (36.7, 40.7). Mean intraoperative TRUS pvol preimplant was 37.1 ± 11.7 cc SD, 95% CI (35.1, 39.0), and postimplant was 44.5 ± 15.1 cc SD, 95% CI (42.0, 47.1). The mean ratio of postimplant:preimplant intraoperative TRUS pvols was 1.2 ± 0.2 SD, 95% CI (1.18, 1.24), and the difference in mean values was 7.5 cc ( p < 0.0001). CT performed within 1 day revealed a mean pvol of 47.9 ± 15.7 cc SD, 95% CI (45.2, 50.5). The mean volumetric ratio of CT to postimplant TRUS pvol was 1.13 ± 0.36, 95% CI (1.07–1.19). Whereas mean preimplant step-section TRUS pvol measurements are similar, postimplant TRUS and CT measurements have greater variability that depend on initial pvol. CT-based pvol measurements determined a mean of 10.6 hours after implant were more likely to be identical to those of immediate postimplant TRUS in prostates >33 cc. These data are relevant for establishing accuracy in image-fusion based approaches being investigated for real-time intraoperative PPB dosimetry.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66948619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301604006492</els_id><sourcerecordid>19931286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-77aa99d97038e43816d2736ecc377e4218bfaf87039cf6738eea246dc67a97473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGL1TAQx4Mo7nP1G4j0orc-kyZNmosgy-oKC3pQ8Bam6dTXR9PUJF3oya9uuu8te1OYEML85j-T-RPymtE9o0y-P-6HY_DtvK8oFfstWP2E7FijdMnr-udTsqNc0pJn-IK8iPFIKWVMiefkgtVC1kzzHfnzLfiYIGFx58fFYeEQ4hLQ4ZSKdi1SgCkGtAnGYhnzK_pl6grIx3o3Lwm7InnnfwWYD2vRYu8D3qehTxiKGYODaRObHxq1AexhTQfMJetL8qyHMeKr831Jfny6_n51U95-_fzl6uNtaQXTqVQKQOtOK8obFLxhsqsUl2gtVwpFxZq2h77JaW17qTKEUAnZWalAK6H4JXl30s1j_F4wJuOGaHEc83B-iUZKLRqZV_I_kGnNWdXIDIoTaPPH8op6M4fBQVgNo2ZzyBzNySGzOWS2YHUue3PWX1qH3WPR2ZIMvD0DEC2MfTbADvGRk0xpdt__w4nDvLa7AYOJdsDJYjdsfpnOD_-e5C-_O7RP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19931286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography before and after permanent prostate brachytherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Solhjem, Matthew C. ; Davis, Brian J. ; Pisansky, Thomas M. ; Wilson, Torrence M. ; Mynderse, Lance A. ; Herman, Michael G. ; King, Bernard F. ; Geyer, Susan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Solhjem, Matthew C. ; Davis, Brian J. ; Pisansky, Thomas M. ; Wilson, Torrence M. ; Mynderse, Lance A. ; Herman, Michael G. ; King, Bernard F. ; Geyer, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><description>To quantify prostate volume (pvol) changes with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) immediately after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) and to correlate these changes with postimplant computed tomography (CT) volumetrics. To provide data relevant to evaluating the potential of TRUS-based image fusion for intraoperative dosimetry. Between July 2000 and January 2003, 177 patients underwent 125I PPB monotherapy at our institution, and 165 patients provided research authorization. A total of 136 patients (82%) completed 4 imaging studies: planning TRUS, intraoperative pre- and postimplant TRUS, and CT. Mean planning TRUS pvol was 38.7 ± 11.7 cc standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI) (36.7, 40.7). Mean intraoperative TRUS pvol preimplant was 37.1 ± 11.7 cc SD, 95% CI (35.1, 39.0), and postimplant was 44.5 ± 15.1 cc SD, 95% CI (42.0, 47.1). The mean ratio of postimplant:preimplant intraoperative TRUS pvols was 1.2 ± 0.2 SD, 95% CI (1.18, 1.24), and the difference in mean values was 7.5 cc ( p &lt; 0.0001). CT performed within 1 day revealed a mean pvol of 47.9 ± 15.7 cc SD, 95% CI (45.2, 50.5). The mean volumetric ratio of CT to postimplant TRUS pvol was 1.13 ± 0.36, 95% CI (1.07–1.19). Whereas mean preimplant step-section TRUS pvol measurements are similar, postimplant TRUS and CT measurements have greater variability that depend on initial pvol. CT-based pvol measurements determined a mean of 10.6 hours after implant were more likely to be identical to those of immediate postimplant TRUS in prostates &gt;33 cc. These data are relevant for establishing accuracy in image-fusion based approaches being investigated for real-time intraoperative PPB dosimetry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15465193</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOBPD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brachytherapy ; Computed tomography ; Confidence Intervals ; Humans ; Iodine Radioisotopes - therapeutic use ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Transrectal ultrasound ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2004-11, Vol.60 (3), p.767-776</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-77aa99d97038e43816d2736ecc377e4218bfaf87039cf6738eea246dc67a97473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-77aa99d97038e43816d2736ecc377e4218bfaf87039cf6738eea246dc67a97473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16179186$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15465193$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solhjem, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisansky, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Torrence M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mynderse, Lance A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Bernard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geyer, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><title>Prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography before and after permanent prostate brachytherapy</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>To quantify prostate volume (pvol) changes with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) immediately after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) and to correlate these changes with postimplant computed tomography (CT) volumetrics. To provide data relevant to evaluating the potential of TRUS-based image fusion for intraoperative dosimetry. Between July 2000 and January 2003, 177 patients underwent 125I PPB monotherapy at our institution, and 165 patients provided research authorization. A total of 136 patients (82%) completed 4 imaging studies: planning TRUS, intraoperative pre- and postimplant TRUS, and CT. Mean planning TRUS pvol was 38.7 ± 11.7 cc standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI) (36.7, 40.7). Mean intraoperative TRUS pvol preimplant was 37.1 ± 11.7 cc SD, 95% CI (35.1, 39.0), and postimplant was 44.5 ± 15.1 cc SD, 95% CI (42.0, 47.1). The mean ratio of postimplant:preimplant intraoperative TRUS pvols was 1.2 ± 0.2 SD, 95% CI (1.18, 1.24), and the difference in mean values was 7.5 cc ( p &lt; 0.0001). CT performed within 1 day revealed a mean pvol of 47.9 ± 15.7 cc SD, 95% CI (45.2, 50.5). The mean volumetric ratio of CT to postimplant TRUS pvol was 1.13 ± 0.36, 95% CI (1.07–1.19). Whereas mean preimplant step-section TRUS pvol measurements are similar, postimplant TRUS and CT measurements have greater variability that depend on initial pvol. CT-based pvol measurements determined a mean of 10.6 hours after implant were more likely to be identical to those of immediate postimplant TRUS in prostates &gt;33 cc. These data are relevant for establishing accuracy in image-fusion based approaches being investigated for real-time intraoperative PPB dosimetry.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brachytherapy</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iodine Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Transrectal ultrasound</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGL1TAQx4Mo7nP1G4j0orc-kyZNmosgy-oKC3pQ8Bam6dTXR9PUJF3oya9uuu8te1OYEML85j-T-RPymtE9o0y-P-6HY_DtvK8oFfstWP2E7FijdMnr-udTsqNc0pJn-IK8iPFIKWVMiefkgtVC1kzzHfnzLfiYIGFx58fFYeEQ4hLQ4ZSKdi1SgCkGtAnGYhnzK_pl6grIx3o3Lwm7InnnfwWYD2vRYu8D3qehTxiKGYODaRObHxq1AexhTQfMJetL8qyHMeKr831Jfny6_n51U95-_fzl6uNtaQXTqVQKQOtOK8obFLxhsqsUl2gtVwpFxZq2h77JaW17qTKEUAnZWalAK6H4JXl30s1j_F4wJuOGaHEc83B-iUZKLRqZV_I_kGnNWdXIDIoTaPPH8op6M4fBQVgNo2ZzyBzNySGzOWS2YHUue3PWX1qH3WPR2ZIMvD0DEC2MfTbADvGRk0xpdt__w4nDvLa7AYOJdsDJYjdsfpnOD_-e5C-_O7RP</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>Solhjem, Matthew C.</creator><creator>Davis, Brian J.</creator><creator>Pisansky, Thomas M.</creator><creator>Wilson, Torrence M.</creator><creator>Mynderse, Lance A.</creator><creator>Herman, Michael G.</creator><creator>King, Bernard F.</creator><creator>Geyer, Susan M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography before and after permanent prostate brachytherapy</title><author>Solhjem, Matthew C. ; Davis, Brian J. ; Pisansky, Thomas M. ; Wilson, Torrence M. ; Mynderse, Lance A. ; Herman, Michael G. ; King, Bernard F. ; Geyer, Susan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-77aa99d97038e43816d2736ecc377e4218bfaf87039cf6738eea246dc67a97473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brachytherapy</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iodine Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Transrectal ultrasound</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solhjem, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisansky, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Torrence M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mynderse, Lance A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Bernard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geyer, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solhjem, Matthew C.</au><au>Davis, Brian J.</au><au>Pisansky, Thomas M.</au><au>Wilson, Torrence M.</au><au>Mynderse, Lance A.</au><au>Herman, Michael G.</au><au>King, Bernard F.</au><au>Geyer, Susan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography before and after permanent prostate brachytherapy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>767</spage><epage>776</epage><pages>767-776</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><coden>IOBPD3</coden><abstract>To quantify prostate volume (pvol) changes with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) immediately after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) and to correlate these changes with postimplant computed tomography (CT) volumetrics. To provide data relevant to evaluating the potential of TRUS-based image fusion for intraoperative dosimetry. Between July 2000 and January 2003, 177 patients underwent 125I PPB monotherapy at our institution, and 165 patients provided research authorization. A total of 136 patients (82%) completed 4 imaging studies: planning TRUS, intraoperative pre- and postimplant TRUS, and CT. Mean planning TRUS pvol was 38.7 ± 11.7 cc standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI) (36.7, 40.7). Mean intraoperative TRUS pvol preimplant was 37.1 ± 11.7 cc SD, 95% CI (35.1, 39.0), and postimplant was 44.5 ± 15.1 cc SD, 95% CI (42.0, 47.1). The mean ratio of postimplant:preimplant intraoperative TRUS pvols was 1.2 ± 0.2 SD, 95% CI (1.18, 1.24), and the difference in mean values was 7.5 cc ( p &lt; 0.0001). CT performed within 1 day revealed a mean pvol of 47.9 ± 15.7 cc SD, 95% CI (45.2, 50.5). The mean volumetric ratio of CT to postimplant TRUS pvol was 1.13 ± 0.36, 95% CI (1.07–1.19). Whereas mean preimplant step-section TRUS pvol measurements are similar, postimplant TRUS and CT measurements have greater variability that depend on initial pvol. CT-based pvol measurements determined a mean of 10.6 hours after implant were more likely to be identical to those of immediate postimplant TRUS in prostates &gt;33 cc. These data are relevant for establishing accuracy in image-fusion based approaches being investigated for real-time intraoperative PPB dosimetry.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15465193</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.015</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2004-11, Vol.60 (3), p.767-776
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66948619
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Analysis of Variance
Biological and medical sciences
Brachytherapy
Computed tomography
Confidence Intervals
Humans
Iodine Radioisotopes - therapeutic use
Male
Medical sciences
Prostate - diagnostic imaging
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Transrectal ultrasound
Ultrasonography
Ultrasound
title Prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography before and after permanent prostate brachytherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T07%3A55%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prostate%20volume%20measurement%20by%20transrectal%20ultrasound%20and%20computed%20tomography%20before%20and%20after%20permanent%20prostate%20brachytherapy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Solhjem,%20Matthew%20C.&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=767&rft.epage=776&rft.pages=767-776&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.coden=IOBPD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19931286%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19931286&rft_id=info:pmid/15465193&rft_els_id=S0360301604006492&rfr_iscdi=true