Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of per...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2004-10, Vol.15 (10), p.2735-2746 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2746 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2735 |
container_title | Journal of the American Society of Nephrology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M TONG, Allison JOHNSON, David SCHENA, Francesco P CRAIG, Jonathan C |
description | As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of peritonitis in PD. The goal was to assess the trial evidence supporting their use. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of catheter types and related interventions in PD. Two reviewers extracted data on the rates of peritonitis and exit-site/tunnel infection, catheter removal/replacement, technique failure, and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by a random effects model, and results are expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-seven eligible trials (2822 patients) were identified: eight of surgical strategies of catheter insertion, eight of straight versus coiled catheters, 10 of Y-set versus conventional spike systems, four of Y-set versus double-bag systems, and seven of other interventions. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial, and the methodologic quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (seven trials, 485 patients; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence intervals 0.53 to 0.77), and no other catheter-related intervention was demonstrated to prevent peritonitis in PD. This systematic review demonstrates that of all catheter-related interventions designed to prevent peritonitis in PD, only disconnect (twin-bag and Y-set) systems have been proved to be effective (compared with conventional spike systems). Despite the importance of PD as a renal replacement therapy modality and the large number of patients who receive it, it is still not known whether any particular PD catheter designs, implantation techniques, or modalities are effective, given the limitations of available trials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.ASN.0000141463.95561.79 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66940829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66940829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-d04f196567e114338646354e37a928ad07a0b5d9c6835454f482a4b0e5678bfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU9PGzEQxS1E1YS0XwFZSHDqLvb63zq3KKK0UlQO0LPl7M4Ko911sJ1W6ZFPjhNSxZfxs37Po5mH0BUlJSVa3RJaLh5_lSQfyimXrNRCSFoqfYamVDBWMC7Ieb4TLgspFZugixhfMi4qpT6jCRVcykrpKXpb2vQMCUIRoLcJWuzGrP7AmJwfI04ebwLsJd5AcMmPLrmYof8SbI9bZ_tddHGOFzjuYoLBJtfg7HPwF_sOBzu2fnD_oP2GGz-m4Ps-t0ohG-MX9KnLBb4e6wz9_n73tPxRrB7ufy4Xq6KpNElFS3hHtRRSAaWcsVrmyQUHpqyuatsSZclatLqRdX4WvON1ZfmaQHbU686yGbr5-HcT_OsWYjKDiw30vR3Bb6ORUnNSVzqD8w-wCT7GAJ3ZBDfYsDOUmH0ChlCTEzCnBMwhAaP25stjl-16gPZkPa48A9dHwMbG9l3eTePiiZP0MBd7BzyRkZI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66940829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M ; TONG, Allison ; JOHNSON, David ; SCHENA, Francesco P ; CRAIG, Jonathan C</creator><creatorcontrib>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M ; TONG, Allison ; JOHNSON, David ; SCHENA, Francesco P ; CRAIG, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><description>As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of peritonitis in PD. The goal was to assess the trial evidence supporting their use. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of catheter types and related interventions in PD. Two reviewers extracted data on the rates of peritonitis and exit-site/tunnel infection, catheter removal/replacement, technique failure, and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by a random effects model, and results are expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-seven eligible trials (2822 patients) were identified: eight of surgical strategies of catheter insertion, eight of straight versus coiled catheters, 10 of Y-set versus conventional spike systems, four of Y-set versus double-bag systems, and seven of other interventions. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial, and the methodologic quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (seven trials, 485 patients; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence intervals 0.53 to 0.77), and no other catheter-related intervention was demonstrated to prevent peritonitis in PD. This systematic review demonstrates that of all catheter-related interventions designed to prevent peritonitis in PD, only disconnect (twin-bag and Y-set) systems have been proved to be effective (compared with conventional spike systems). Despite the importance of PD as a renal replacement therapy modality and the large number of patients who receive it, it is still not known whether any particular PD catheter designs, implantation techniques, or modalities are effective, given the limitations of available trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-6673</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000141463.95561.79</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15466279</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASNEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Adult ; Aged ; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects ; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization - standards ; Catheterization - trends ; Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects ; Device Removal ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Safety ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Incidence ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects ; Peritoneal Dialysis - methods ; Peritonitis - epidemiology ; Peritonitis - etiology ; Peritonitis - prevention & control ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prognosis ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Risk Assessment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2004-10, Vol.15 (10), p.2735-2746</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16146354$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15466279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TONG, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHENA, Francesco P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRAIG, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><title>Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials</title><title>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</title><addtitle>J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><description>As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of peritonitis in PD. The goal was to assess the trial evidence supporting their use. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of catheter types and related interventions in PD. Two reviewers extracted data on the rates of peritonitis and exit-site/tunnel infection, catheter removal/replacement, technique failure, and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by a random effects model, and results are expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-seven eligible trials (2822 patients) were identified: eight of surgical strategies of catheter insertion, eight of straight versus coiled catheters, 10 of Y-set versus conventional spike systems, four of Y-set versus double-bag systems, and seven of other interventions. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial, and the methodologic quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (seven trials, 485 patients; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence intervals 0.53 to 0.77), and no other catheter-related intervention was demonstrated to prevent peritonitis in PD. This systematic review demonstrates that of all catheter-related interventions designed to prevent peritonitis in PD, only disconnect (twin-bag and Y-set) systems have been proved to be effective (compared with conventional spike systems). Despite the importance of PD as a renal replacement therapy modality and the large number of patients who receive it, it is still not known whether any particular PD catheter designs, implantation techniques, or modalities are effective, given the limitations of available trials.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization - standards</subject><subject>Catheterization - trends</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis - methods</subject><subject>Peritonitis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Peritonitis - etiology</subject><subject>Peritonitis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1046-6673</issn><issn>1533-3450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkU9PGzEQxS1E1YS0XwFZSHDqLvb63zq3KKK0UlQO0LPl7M4Ko911sJ1W6ZFPjhNSxZfxs37Po5mH0BUlJSVa3RJaLh5_lSQfyimXrNRCSFoqfYamVDBWMC7Ieb4TLgspFZugixhfMi4qpT6jCRVcykrpKXpb2vQMCUIRoLcJWuzGrP7AmJwfI04ebwLsJd5AcMmPLrmYof8SbI9bZ_tddHGOFzjuYoLBJtfg7HPwF_sOBzu2fnD_oP2GGz-m4Ps-t0ohG-MX9KnLBb4e6wz9_n73tPxRrB7ufy4Xq6KpNElFS3hHtRRSAaWcsVrmyQUHpqyuatsSZclatLqRdX4WvON1ZfmaQHbU686yGbr5-HcT_OsWYjKDiw30vR3Bb6ORUnNSVzqD8w-wCT7GAJ3ZBDfYsDOUmH0ChlCTEzCnBMwhAaP25stjl-16gPZkPa48A9dHwMbG9l3eTePiiZP0MBd7BzyRkZI</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M</creator><creator>TONG, Allison</creator><creator>JOHNSON, David</creator><creator>SCHENA, Francesco P</creator><creator>CRAIG, Jonathan C</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials</title><author>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M ; TONG, Allison ; JOHNSON, David ; SCHENA, Francesco P ; CRAIG, Jonathan C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-d04f196567e114338646354e37a928ad07a0b5d9c6835454f482a4b0e5678bfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization - standards</topic><topic>Catheterization - trends</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis - methods</topic><topic>Peritonitis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Peritonitis - etiology</topic><topic>Peritonitis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TONG, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHENA, Francesco P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRAIG, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M</au><au>TONG, Allison</au><au>JOHNSON, David</au><au>SCHENA, Francesco P</au><au>CRAIG, Jonathan C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2735</spage><epage>2746</epage><pages>2735-2746</pages><issn>1046-6673</issn><eissn>1533-3450</eissn><coden>JASNEU</coden><abstract>As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of peritonitis in PD. The goal was to assess the trial evidence supporting their use. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of catheter types and related interventions in PD. Two reviewers extracted data on the rates of peritonitis and exit-site/tunnel infection, catheter removal/replacement, technique failure, and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by a random effects model, and results are expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-seven eligible trials (2822 patients) were identified: eight of surgical strategies of catheter insertion, eight of straight versus coiled catheters, 10 of Y-set versus conventional spike systems, four of Y-set versus double-bag systems, and seven of other interventions. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial, and the methodologic quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (seven trials, 485 patients; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence intervals 0.53 to 0.77), and no other catheter-related intervention was demonstrated to prevent peritonitis in PD. This systematic review demonstrates that of all catheter-related interventions designed to prevent peritonitis in PD, only disconnect (twin-bag and Y-set) systems have been proved to be effective (compared with conventional spike systems). Despite the importance of PD as a renal replacement therapy modality and the large number of patients who receive it, it is still not known whether any particular PD catheter designs, implantation techniques, or modalities are effective, given the limitations of available trials.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>15466279</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.ASN.0000141463.95561.79</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1046-6673 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2004-10, Vol.15 (10), p.2735-2746 |
issn | 1046-6673 1533-3450 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66940829 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Abdomen Adult Aged Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - methods Biological and medical sciences Catheterization - standards Catheterization - trends Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects Device Removal Equipment Design Equipment Safety Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans Incidence Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Other diseases. Semiology Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects Peritoneal Dialysis - methods Peritonitis - epidemiology Peritonitis - etiology Peritonitis - prevention & control Practice Guidelines as Topic Prognosis Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Risk Assessment Treatment Outcome |
title | Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A11%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Catheter-related%20interventions%20to%20prevent%20peritonitis%20in%20peritoneal%20dialysis:%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20randomized,%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Nephrology&rft.au=STRIPPOLI,%20Giovanni%20F.%20M&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2735&rft.epage=2746&rft.pages=2735-2746&rft.issn=1046-6673&rft.eissn=1533-3450&rft.coden=JASNEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.ASN.0000141463.95561.79&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66940829%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66940829&rft_id=info:pmid/15466279&rfr_iscdi=true |