Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials

As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2004-10, Vol.15 (10), p.2735-2746
Hauptverfasser: STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M, TONG, Allison, JOHNSON, David, SCHENA, Francesco P, CRAIG, Jonathan C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2746
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2735
container_title Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
container_volume 15
creator STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M
TONG, Allison
JOHNSON, David
SCHENA, Francesco P
CRAIG, Jonathan C
description As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of peritonitis in PD. The goal was to assess the trial evidence supporting their use. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of catheter types and related interventions in PD. Two reviewers extracted data on the rates of peritonitis and exit-site/tunnel infection, catheter removal/replacement, technique failure, and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by a random effects model, and results are expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-seven eligible trials (2822 patients) were identified: eight of surgical strategies of catheter insertion, eight of straight versus coiled catheters, 10 of Y-set versus conventional spike systems, four of Y-set versus double-bag systems, and seven of other interventions. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial, and the methodologic quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (seven trials, 485 patients; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence intervals 0.53 to 0.77), and no other catheter-related intervention was demonstrated to prevent peritonitis in PD. This systematic review demonstrates that of all catheter-related interventions designed to prevent peritonitis in PD, only disconnect (twin-bag and Y-set) systems have been proved to be effective (compared with conventional spike systems). Despite the importance of PD as a renal replacement therapy modality and the large number of patients who receive it, it is still not known whether any particular PD catheter designs, implantation techniques, or modalities are effective, given the limitations of available trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.ASN.0000141463.95561.79
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66940829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66940829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-d04f196567e114338646354e37a928ad07a0b5d9c6835454f482a4b0e5678bfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU9PGzEQxS1E1YS0XwFZSHDqLvb63zq3KKK0UlQO0LPl7M4Ko911sJ1W6ZFPjhNSxZfxs37Po5mH0BUlJSVa3RJaLh5_lSQfyimXrNRCSFoqfYamVDBWMC7Ieb4TLgspFZugixhfMi4qpT6jCRVcykrpKXpb2vQMCUIRoLcJWuzGrP7AmJwfI04ebwLsJd5AcMmPLrmYof8SbI9bZ_tddHGOFzjuYoLBJtfg7HPwF_sOBzu2fnD_oP2GGz-m4Ps-t0ohG-MX9KnLBb4e6wz9_n73tPxRrB7ufy4Xq6KpNElFS3hHtRRSAaWcsVrmyQUHpqyuatsSZclatLqRdX4WvON1ZfmaQHbU686yGbr5-HcT_OsWYjKDiw30vR3Bb6ORUnNSVzqD8w-wCT7GAJ3ZBDfYsDOUmH0ChlCTEzCnBMwhAaP25stjl-16gPZkPa48A9dHwMbG9l3eTePiiZP0MBd7BzyRkZI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66940829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M ; TONG, Allison ; JOHNSON, David ; SCHENA, Francesco P ; CRAIG, Jonathan C</creator><creatorcontrib>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M ; TONG, Allison ; JOHNSON, David ; SCHENA, Francesco P ; CRAIG, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><description>As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of peritonitis in PD. The goal was to assess the trial evidence supporting their use. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of catheter types and related interventions in PD. Two reviewers extracted data on the rates of peritonitis and exit-site/tunnel infection, catheter removal/replacement, technique failure, and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by a random effects model, and results are expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-seven eligible trials (2822 patients) were identified: eight of surgical strategies of catheter insertion, eight of straight versus coiled catheters, 10 of Y-set versus conventional spike systems, four of Y-set versus double-bag systems, and seven of other interventions. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial, and the methodologic quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (seven trials, 485 patients; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence intervals 0.53 to 0.77), and no other catheter-related intervention was demonstrated to prevent peritonitis in PD. This systematic review demonstrates that of all catheter-related interventions designed to prevent peritonitis in PD, only disconnect (twin-bag and Y-set) systems have been proved to be effective (compared with conventional spike systems). Despite the importance of PD as a renal replacement therapy modality and the large number of patients who receive it, it is still not known whether any particular PD catheter designs, implantation techniques, or modalities are effective, given the limitations of available trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-6673</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000141463.95561.79</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15466279</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASNEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Adult ; Aged ; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects ; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization - standards ; Catheterization - trends ; Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects ; Device Removal ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Safety ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Incidence ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects ; Peritoneal Dialysis - methods ; Peritonitis - epidemiology ; Peritonitis - etiology ; Peritonitis - prevention &amp; control ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prognosis ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Risk Assessment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2004-10, Vol.15 (10), p.2735-2746</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16146354$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15466279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TONG, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHENA, Francesco P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRAIG, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><title>Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials</title><title>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</title><addtitle>J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><description>As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of peritonitis in PD. The goal was to assess the trial evidence supporting their use. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of catheter types and related interventions in PD. Two reviewers extracted data on the rates of peritonitis and exit-site/tunnel infection, catheter removal/replacement, technique failure, and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by a random effects model, and results are expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-seven eligible trials (2822 patients) were identified: eight of surgical strategies of catheter insertion, eight of straight versus coiled catheters, 10 of Y-set versus conventional spike systems, four of Y-set versus double-bag systems, and seven of other interventions. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial, and the methodologic quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (seven trials, 485 patients; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence intervals 0.53 to 0.77), and no other catheter-related intervention was demonstrated to prevent peritonitis in PD. This systematic review demonstrates that of all catheter-related interventions designed to prevent peritonitis in PD, only disconnect (twin-bag and Y-set) systems have been proved to be effective (compared with conventional spike systems). Despite the importance of PD as a renal replacement therapy modality and the large number of patients who receive it, it is still not known whether any particular PD catheter designs, implantation techniques, or modalities are effective, given the limitations of available trials.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization - standards</subject><subject>Catheterization - trends</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis - methods</subject><subject>Peritonitis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Peritonitis - etiology</subject><subject>Peritonitis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1046-6673</issn><issn>1533-3450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkU9PGzEQxS1E1YS0XwFZSHDqLvb63zq3KKK0UlQO0LPl7M4Ko911sJ1W6ZFPjhNSxZfxs37Po5mH0BUlJSVa3RJaLh5_lSQfyimXrNRCSFoqfYamVDBWMC7Ieb4TLgspFZugixhfMi4qpT6jCRVcykrpKXpb2vQMCUIRoLcJWuzGrP7AmJwfI04ebwLsJd5AcMmPLrmYof8SbI9bZ_tddHGOFzjuYoLBJtfg7HPwF_sOBzu2fnD_oP2GGz-m4Ps-t0ohG-MX9KnLBb4e6wz9_n73tPxRrB7ufy4Xq6KpNElFS3hHtRRSAaWcsVrmyQUHpqyuatsSZclatLqRdX4WvON1ZfmaQHbU686yGbr5-HcT_OsWYjKDiw30vR3Bb6ORUnNSVzqD8w-wCT7GAJ3ZBDfYsDOUmH0ChlCTEzCnBMwhAaP25stjl-16gPZkPa48A9dHwMbG9l3eTePiiZP0MBd7BzyRkZI</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M</creator><creator>TONG, Allison</creator><creator>JOHNSON, David</creator><creator>SCHENA, Francesco P</creator><creator>CRAIG, Jonathan C</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials</title><author>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M ; TONG, Allison ; JOHNSON, David ; SCHENA, Francesco P ; CRAIG, Jonathan C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-d04f196567e114338646354e37a928ad07a0b5d9c6835454f482a4b0e5678bfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization - standards</topic><topic>Catheterization - trends</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis - methods</topic><topic>Peritonitis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Peritonitis - etiology</topic><topic>Peritonitis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TONG, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHENA, Francesco P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRAIG, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STRIPPOLI, Giovanni F. M</au><au>TONG, Allison</au><au>JOHNSON, David</au><au>SCHENA, Francesco P</au><au>CRAIG, Jonathan C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2735</spage><epage>2746</epage><pages>2735-2746</pages><issn>1046-6673</issn><eissn>1533-3450</eissn><coden>JASNEU</coden><abstract>As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of peritonitis in PD. The goal was to assess the trial evidence supporting their use. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of catheter types and related interventions in PD. Two reviewers extracted data on the rates of peritonitis and exit-site/tunnel infection, catheter removal/replacement, technique failure, and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by a random effects model, and results are expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-seven eligible trials (2822 patients) were identified: eight of surgical strategies of catheter insertion, eight of straight versus coiled catheters, 10 of Y-set versus conventional spike systems, four of Y-set versus double-bag systems, and seven of other interventions. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial, and the methodologic quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (seven trials, 485 patients; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence intervals 0.53 to 0.77), and no other catheter-related intervention was demonstrated to prevent peritonitis in PD. This systematic review demonstrates that of all catheter-related interventions designed to prevent peritonitis in PD, only disconnect (twin-bag and Y-set) systems have been proved to be effective (compared with conventional spike systems). Despite the importance of PD as a renal replacement therapy modality and the large number of patients who receive it, it is still not known whether any particular PD catheter designs, implantation techniques, or modalities are effective, given the limitations of available trials.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>15466279</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.ASN.0000141463.95561.79</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1046-6673
ispartof Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2004-10, Vol.15 (10), p.2735-2746
issn 1046-6673
1533-3450
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66940829
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Abdomen
Adult
Aged
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - methods
Biological and medical sciences
Catheterization - standards
Catheterization - trends
Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects
Device Removal
Equipment Design
Equipment Safety
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Incidence
Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Other diseases. Semiology
Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects
Peritoneal Dialysis - methods
Peritonitis - epidemiology
Peritonitis - etiology
Peritonitis - prevention & control
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prognosis
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Assessment
Treatment Outcome
title Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A11%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Catheter-related%20interventions%20to%20prevent%20peritonitis%20in%20peritoneal%20dialysis:%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20randomized,%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Nephrology&rft.au=STRIPPOLI,%20Giovanni%20F.%20M&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2735&rft.epage=2746&rft.pages=2735-2746&rft.issn=1046-6673&rft.eissn=1533-3450&rft.coden=JASNEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.ASN.0000141463.95561.79&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66940829%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66940829&rft_id=info:pmid/15466279&rfr_iscdi=true