Direct comparison of FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls

Purpose Diagnosing Parkinson’s disease (PD) on clinical grounds may be difficult, especially in the early stages of the disease. F-DOPA PET and FP-CIT SPECT scans are able to determine presynaptic dopaminergic activity in different ways. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the sensiti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2009-03, Vol.36 (3), p.454-462
Hauptverfasser: Eshuis, S. A., Jager, P. L., Maguire, R. P., Jonkman, S., Dierckx, R. A., Leenders, K. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 462
container_issue 3
container_start_page 454
container_title European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
container_volume 36
creator Eshuis, S. A.
Jager, P. L.
Maguire, R. P.
Jonkman, S.
Dierckx, R. A.
Leenders, K. L.
description Purpose Diagnosing Parkinson’s disease (PD) on clinical grounds may be difficult, especially in the early stages of the disease. F-DOPA PET and FP-CIT SPECT scans are able to determine presynaptic dopaminergic activity in different ways. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the two methods in the detection of striatal dopaminergic deficits in the same cohort of PD patients and healthy controls. Methods Movement disorder specialists recruited 11 patients with early-stage PD and 17 patients with advanced PD. The patients underwent both an FP-CIT SPECT scan and an F-DOPA PET scan. In addition, 10 FP-CIT SPECT scans or 10 F-DOPA PET scans were performed in 20 healthy controls. A template with regions of interest was used to sample tracer activity of the caudate, putamen and a reference region in the brain. The outcome parameter was the striatooccipital ratio (SOR). Normal SOR values were determined in the controls. The sensitivity and specificity of both scanning methods were calculated. Results FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET scans were both able to discriminate PD patients from healthy controls. For the early phases of the disease, sensitivity and specificity of the contralateral striatal and putaminal uptake of FP-CIT and F-DOPA was 100%. When only caudate uptake was considered, the specificities were 100% and 90% for FP-CIT and F-DOPA, respectively, while the sensitivity was 91% for both scanning techniques. Conclusion FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET scans are both able to diagnose presynaptic dopaminergic deficits in early phases of PD with excellent sensitivity and specificity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00259-008-0989-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66931430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1647223691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff1a37f4c88a0fa8dde56e70382dedd8d573862d51f75413d05074f3ab2fcc973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9qVDEUh4MotlYfwI0EF-6iJ_9ukmWZzmih0AuO65DeJE7qndwxuYN052v4ej6JqTNYEMRVDuT7_Q6HD6GXFN5SAPWuAjBpCIAmYLQh8hE6pR01RIE2j__MCk7Qs1pvAahm2jxFJ9QAVx1Xp2i8SCUMMx6m7c6VVKeMp4hXPVlcrvHHfrlYY5c9XpGL6_4c98s1Thnv3JxCniv-luYN7l35knJL_vz-o2KfanA1_E5tghvnzV0rz3OZxvocPYlurOHF8T1Dn1bL9eIDubp-f7k4vyKDEHwmMVLHVRSD1g6i094H2QUFXDMfvNdeKq475iWNSgrKPUhQInJ3w-IwGMXP0JtD765MX_ehznab6hDG0eUw7avtOsOp4PBfkIGQzIiuga__Am-nfcntCMuo6CQwRRtED9BQplpLiHZX0taVO0vB3guzB2G2CbP3wqxsmVfH4v3NNviHxNFQA9gBqO0rfw7lYfO_W38BzqufsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214650271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct comparison of FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Eshuis, S. A. ; Jager, P. L. ; Maguire, R. P. ; Jonkman, S. ; Dierckx, R. A. ; Leenders, K. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eshuis, S. A. ; Jager, P. L. ; Maguire, R. P. ; Jonkman, S. ; Dierckx, R. A. ; Leenders, K. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Diagnosing Parkinson’s disease (PD) on clinical grounds may be difficult, especially in the early stages of the disease. F-DOPA PET and FP-CIT SPECT scans are able to determine presynaptic dopaminergic activity in different ways. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the two methods in the detection of striatal dopaminergic deficits in the same cohort of PD patients and healthy controls. Methods Movement disorder specialists recruited 11 patients with early-stage PD and 17 patients with advanced PD. The patients underwent both an FP-CIT SPECT scan and an F-DOPA PET scan. In addition, 10 FP-CIT SPECT scans or 10 F-DOPA PET scans were performed in 20 healthy controls. A template with regions of interest was used to sample tracer activity of the caudate, putamen and a reference region in the brain. The outcome parameter was the striatooccipital ratio (SOR). Normal SOR values were determined in the controls. The sensitivity and specificity of both scanning methods were calculated. Results FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET scans were both able to discriminate PD patients from healthy controls. For the early phases of the disease, sensitivity and specificity of the contralateral striatal and putaminal uptake of FP-CIT and F-DOPA was 100%. When only caudate uptake was considered, the specificities were 100% and 90% for FP-CIT and F-DOPA, respectively, while the sensitivity was 91% for both scanning techniques. Conclusion FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET scans are both able to diagnose presynaptic dopaminergic deficits in early phases of PD with excellent sensitivity and specificity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0989-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19037637</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Brain ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - metabolism ; Cardiology ; Case-Control Studies ; Comparative studies ; Dihydroxyphenylalanine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins - metabolism ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Iodine Radioisotopes ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis ; Parkinson Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Parkinson Disease - metabolism ; Parkinsons disease ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Radiology ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sex Characteristics ; Tomography ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Tropanes</subject><ispartof>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2009-03, Vol.36 (3), p.454-462</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2008</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff1a37f4c88a0fa8dde56e70382dedd8d573862d51f75413d05074f3ab2fcc973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff1a37f4c88a0fa8dde56e70382dedd8d573862d51f75413d05074f3ab2fcc973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00259-008-0989-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00259-008-0989-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19037637$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eshuis, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jager, P. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonkman, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierckx, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leenders, K. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Direct comparison of FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls</title><title>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose Diagnosing Parkinson’s disease (PD) on clinical grounds may be difficult, especially in the early stages of the disease. F-DOPA PET and FP-CIT SPECT scans are able to determine presynaptic dopaminergic activity in different ways. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the two methods in the detection of striatal dopaminergic deficits in the same cohort of PD patients and healthy controls. Methods Movement disorder specialists recruited 11 patients with early-stage PD and 17 patients with advanced PD. The patients underwent both an FP-CIT SPECT scan and an F-DOPA PET scan. In addition, 10 FP-CIT SPECT scans or 10 F-DOPA PET scans were performed in 20 healthy controls. A template with regions of interest was used to sample tracer activity of the caudate, putamen and a reference region in the brain. The outcome parameter was the striatooccipital ratio (SOR). Normal SOR values were determined in the controls. The sensitivity and specificity of both scanning methods were calculated. Results FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET scans were both able to discriminate PD patients from healthy controls. For the early phases of the disease, sensitivity and specificity of the contralateral striatal and putaminal uptake of FP-CIT and F-DOPA was 100%. When only caudate uptake was considered, the specificities were 100% and 90% for FP-CIT and F-DOPA, respectively, while the sensitivity was 91% for both scanning techniques. Conclusion FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET scans are both able to diagnose presynaptic dopaminergic deficits in early phases of PD with excellent sensitivity and specificity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Dihydroxyphenylalanine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Iodine Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - metabolism</subject><subject>Parkinsons disease</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Tropanes</subject><issn>1619-7070</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9qVDEUh4MotlYfwI0EF-6iJ_9ukmWZzmih0AuO65DeJE7qndwxuYN052v4ej6JqTNYEMRVDuT7_Q6HD6GXFN5SAPWuAjBpCIAmYLQh8hE6pR01RIE2j__MCk7Qs1pvAahm2jxFJ9QAVx1Xp2i8SCUMMx6m7c6VVKeMp4hXPVlcrvHHfrlYY5c9XpGL6_4c98s1Thnv3JxCniv-luYN7l35knJL_vz-o2KfanA1_E5tghvnzV0rz3OZxvocPYlurOHF8T1Dn1bL9eIDubp-f7k4vyKDEHwmMVLHVRSD1g6i094H2QUFXDMfvNdeKq475iWNSgrKPUhQInJ3w-IwGMXP0JtD765MX_ehznab6hDG0eUw7avtOsOp4PBfkIGQzIiuga__Am-nfcntCMuo6CQwRRtED9BQplpLiHZX0taVO0vB3guzB2G2CbP3wqxsmVfH4v3NNviHxNFQA9gBqO0rfw7lYfO_W38BzqufsQ</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Eshuis, S. A.</creator><creator>Jager, P. L.</creator><creator>Maguire, R. P.</creator><creator>Jonkman, S.</creator><creator>Dierckx, R. A.</creator><creator>Leenders, K. L.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Direct comparison of FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls</title><author>Eshuis, S. A. ; Jager, P. L. ; Maguire, R. P. ; Jonkman, S. ; Dierckx, R. A. ; Leenders, K. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff1a37f4c88a0fa8dde56e70382dedd8d573862d51f75413d05074f3ab2fcc973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Dihydroxyphenylalanine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Iodine Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - metabolism</topic><topic>Parkinsons disease</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Tropanes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eshuis, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jager, P. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, R. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonkman, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierckx, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leenders, K. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eshuis, S. A.</au><au>Jager, P. L.</au><au>Maguire, R. P.</au><au>Jonkman, S.</au><au>Dierckx, R. A.</au><au>Leenders, K. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct comparison of FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>454</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>454-462</pages><issn>1619-7070</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><abstract>Purpose Diagnosing Parkinson’s disease (PD) on clinical grounds may be difficult, especially in the early stages of the disease. F-DOPA PET and FP-CIT SPECT scans are able to determine presynaptic dopaminergic activity in different ways. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the two methods in the detection of striatal dopaminergic deficits in the same cohort of PD patients and healthy controls. Methods Movement disorder specialists recruited 11 patients with early-stage PD and 17 patients with advanced PD. The patients underwent both an FP-CIT SPECT scan and an F-DOPA PET scan. In addition, 10 FP-CIT SPECT scans or 10 F-DOPA PET scans were performed in 20 healthy controls. A template with regions of interest was used to sample tracer activity of the caudate, putamen and a reference region in the brain. The outcome parameter was the striatooccipital ratio (SOR). Normal SOR values were determined in the controls. The sensitivity and specificity of both scanning methods were calculated. Results FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET scans were both able to discriminate PD patients from healthy controls. For the early phases of the disease, sensitivity and specificity of the contralateral striatal and putaminal uptake of FP-CIT and F-DOPA was 100%. When only caudate uptake was considered, the specificities were 100% and 90% for FP-CIT and F-DOPA, respectively, while the sensitivity was 91% for both scanning techniques. Conclusion FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET scans are both able to diagnose presynaptic dopaminergic deficits in early phases of PD with excellent sensitivity and specificity.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19037637</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00259-008-0989-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1619-7070
ispartof European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2009-03, Vol.36 (3), p.454-462
issn 1619-7070
1619-7089
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66931430
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Brain
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - metabolism
Cardiology
Case-Control Studies
Comparative studies
Dihydroxyphenylalanine - analogs & derivatives
Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins - metabolism
Female
Humans
Imaging
Iodine Radioisotopes
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Nuclear Medicine
Oncology
Original Article
Orthopedics
Parkinson Disease - diagnosis
Parkinson Disease - diagnostic imaging
Parkinson Disease - metabolism
Parkinsons disease
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Positron-Emission Tomography - statistics & numerical data
Radiology
Radiopharmaceuticals
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sex Characteristics
Tomography
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - statistics & numerical data
Tropanes
title Direct comparison of FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T04%3A23%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20comparison%20of%20FP-CIT%20SPECT%20and%20F-DOPA%20PET%20in%20patients%20with%20Parkinson%E2%80%99s%20disease%20and%20healthy%20controls&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Eshuis,%20S.%20A.&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=454&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=454-462&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00259-008-0989-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1647223691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214650271&rft_id=info:pmid/19037637&rfr_iscdi=true