The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning
The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Col...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2004-08, Vol.18 (8), p.1224-1230 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1230 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1224 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | MAHMOOD, T DARZI, A |
description | The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback. This could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided. There are no previous studies on this matter.
Candidates were asked to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Modules 3 and 4 were used at random. In total, each candidate was asked to perform five consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module. These five episodes were collectively referred to as one trial. A time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) was used to denote perforation. No guidance or feedback was given to candidates before, during, or after each procedure. A total of 26 postgraduate doctors were recruited, including nine research fellows, five preregistration house officers, six specialist registrars, and six consultants. Fourteen candidates recorded five attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes). Another 12 candidates recorded five attempts (i.e., one trial each) on two modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes). Hence, 190 episodes were recorded in total, representing 38 trials.
There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from first attempt to the fifth in the absence of feedback. If there was any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning. The outcomes measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used. The results were statistically significant for all outcomes.
This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine. The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66928791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>712080481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-45bdc7869165ece8155f6297d9f59fbff70988135146f909c94df520b898f9be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9LHDEUxYMo7tb6AXwpQWifOpr_k-tbkbYKoi_2OWQyiZ11NlmTHWG_fSO77EKfDvfyO4fLPQhdUHJFCWmvCyFCiYYQ3gAVvBFHaF6VNYxRfYzmBDhpWAtihj6VsiAVBypP0YxKIVuu2Ry9PP_1ePQ2xyG-YDfld49Dythil8YUU3FptcFlWE6jXdf9EPG6OmxXfHQep4Bt3ODgfd9Z93qDH9N--I5j2kd_RifBjsWf7_QM_fn18_n2rnl4-n1_--OhcVzzdSNk17tWK6BKeuc1lTIoBm0PQULoQmgJaE25pEIFIOBA9EEy0mnQATrPz9C3be4qp7fJl7VZDsX5cbTRp6kYpYDpFmgFL_8DF2nKsd5mGAUhCW9VhegWcjmVkn0wqzwsbd4YSsxHBWZbgakVmI8KjKieL7vgqVv6_uDY_bwCX3eALc6OIdvohnLgFKEgteb_AEJijUo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219450376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>MAHMOOD, T ; DARZI, A</creator><creatorcontrib>MAHMOOD, T ; DARZI, A</creatorcontrib><description>The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback. This could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided. There are no previous studies on this matter.
Candidates were asked to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Modules 3 and 4 were used at random. In total, each candidate was asked to perform five consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module. These five episodes were collectively referred to as one trial. A time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) was used to denote perforation. No guidance or feedback was given to candidates before, during, or after each procedure. A total of 26 postgraduate doctors were recruited, including nine research fellows, five preregistration house officers, six specialist registrars, and six consultants. Fourteen candidates recorded five attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes). Another 12 candidates recorded five attempts (i.e., one trial each) on two modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes). Hence, 190 episodes were recorded in total, representing 38 trials.
There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from first attempt to the fifth in the absence of feedback. If there was any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning. The outcomes measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used. The results were statistically significant for all outcomes.
This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine. The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15457382</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SUREEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Colonoscopy - standards ; Computer-Assisted Instruction - standards ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Feedback ; General aspects ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Learning ; Medical sciences</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2004-08, Vol.18 (8), p.1224-1230</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-45bdc7869165ece8155f6297d9f59fbff70988135146f909c94df520b898f9be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-45bdc7869165ece8155f6297d9f59fbff70988135146f909c94df520b898f9be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16019588$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15457382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MAHMOOD, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DARZI, A</creatorcontrib><title>The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback. This could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided. There are no previous studies on this matter.
Candidates were asked to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Modules 3 and 4 were used at random. In total, each candidate was asked to perform five consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module. These five episodes were collectively referred to as one trial. A time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) was used to denote perforation. No guidance or feedback was given to candidates before, during, or after each procedure. A total of 26 postgraduate doctors were recruited, including nine research fellows, five preregistration house officers, six specialist registrars, and six consultants. Fourteen candidates recorded five attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes). Another 12 candidates recorded five attempts (i.e., one trial each) on two modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes). Hence, 190 episodes were recorded in total, representing 38 trials.
There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from first attempt to the fifth in the absence of feedback. If there was any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning. The outcomes measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used. The results were statistically significant for all outcomes.
This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine. The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Computer-Assisted Instruction - standards</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9LHDEUxYMo7tb6AXwpQWifOpr_k-tbkbYKoi_2OWQyiZ11NlmTHWG_fSO77EKfDvfyO4fLPQhdUHJFCWmvCyFCiYYQ3gAVvBFHaF6VNYxRfYzmBDhpWAtihj6VsiAVBypP0YxKIVuu2Ry9PP_1ePQ2xyG-YDfld49Dythil8YUU3FptcFlWE6jXdf9EPG6OmxXfHQep4Bt3ODgfd9Z93qDH9N--I5j2kd_RifBjsWf7_QM_fn18_n2rnl4-n1_--OhcVzzdSNk17tWK6BKeuc1lTIoBm0PQULoQmgJaE25pEIFIOBA9EEy0mnQATrPz9C3be4qp7fJl7VZDsX5cbTRp6kYpYDpFmgFL_8DF2nKsd5mGAUhCW9VhegWcjmVkn0wqzwsbd4YSsxHBWZbgakVmI8KjKieL7vgqVv6_uDY_bwCX3eALc6OIdvohnLgFKEgteb_AEJijUo</recordid><startdate>20040801</startdate><enddate>20040801</enddate><creator>MAHMOOD, T</creator><creator>DARZI, A</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040801</creationdate><title>The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning</title><author>MAHMOOD, T ; DARZI, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-45bdc7869165ece8155f6297d9f59fbff70988135146f909c94df520b898f9be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Computer-Assisted Instruction - standards</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MAHMOOD, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DARZI, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MAHMOOD, T</au><au>DARZI, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2004-08-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1224</spage><epage>1230</epage><pages>1224-1230</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><coden>SUREEX</coden><abstract>The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback. This could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided. There are no previous studies on this matter.
Candidates were asked to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Modules 3 and 4 were used at random. In total, each candidate was asked to perform five consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module. These five episodes were collectively referred to as one trial. A time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) was used to denote perforation. No guidance or feedback was given to candidates before, during, or after each procedure. A total of 26 postgraduate doctors were recruited, including nine research fellows, five preregistration house officers, six specialist registrars, and six consultants. Fourteen candidates recorded five attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes). Another 12 candidates recorded five attempts (i.e., one trial each) on two modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes). Hence, 190 episodes were recorded in total, representing 38 trials.
There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from first attempt to the fifth in the absence of feedback. If there was any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning. The outcomes measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used. The results were statistically significant for all outcomes.
This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine. The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>15457382</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2004-08, Vol.18 (8), p.1224-1230 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66928791 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Clinical Competence - standards Colonoscopy - standards Computer-Assisted Instruction - standards Digestive system. Abdomen Endoscopy Feedback General aspects Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Learning Medical sciences |
title | The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A01%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20learning%20curve%20for%20a%20colonoscopy%20simulator%20in%20the%20absence%20of%20any%20feedback:%20No%20feedback,%20no%20learning&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=MAHMOOD,%20T&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1224&rft.epage=1230&rft.pages=1224-1230&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft.coden=SUREEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E712080481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219450376&rft_id=info:pmid/15457382&rfr_iscdi=true |