The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning

The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Col...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2004-08, Vol.18 (8), p.1224-1230
Hauptverfasser: MAHMOOD, T, DARZI, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1230
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1224
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 18
creator MAHMOOD, T
DARZI, A
description The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback. This could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided. There are no previous studies on this matter. Candidates were asked to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Modules 3 and 4 were used at random. In total, each candidate was asked to perform five consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module. These five episodes were collectively referred to as one trial. A time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) was used to denote perforation. No guidance or feedback was given to candidates before, during, or after each procedure. A total of 26 postgraduate doctors were recruited, including nine research fellows, five preregistration house officers, six specialist registrars, and six consultants. Fourteen candidates recorded five attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes). Another 12 candidates recorded five attempts (i.e., one trial each) on two modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes). Hence, 190 episodes were recorded in total, representing 38 trials. There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from first attempt to the fifth in the absence of feedback. If there was any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning. The outcomes measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used. The results were statistically significant for all outcomes. This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine. The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66928791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>712080481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-45bdc7869165ece8155f6297d9f59fbff70988135146f909c94df520b898f9be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9LHDEUxYMo7tb6AXwpQWifOpr_k-tbkbYKoi_2OWQyiZ11NlmTHWG_fSO77EKfDvfyO4fLPQhdUHJFCWmvCyFCiYYQ3gAVvBFHaF6VNYxRfYzmBDhpWAtihj6VsiAVBypP0YxKIVuu2Ry9PP_1ePQ2xyG-YDfld49Dythil8YUU3FptcFlWE6jXdf9EPG6OmxXfHQep4Bt3ODgfd9Z93qDH9N--I5j2kd_RifBjsWf7_QM_fn18_n2rnl4-n1_--OhcVzzdSNk17tWK6BKeuc1lTIoBm0PQULoQmgJaE25pEIFIOBA9EEy0mnQATrPz9C3be4qp7fJl7VZDsX5cbTRp6kYpYDpFmgFL_8DF2nKsd5mGAUhCW9VhegWcjmVkn0wqzwsbd4YSsxHBWZbgakVmI8KjKieL7vgqVv6_uDY_bwCX3eALc6OIdvohnLgFKEgteb_AEJijUo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219450376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>MAHMOOD, T ; DARZI, A</creator><creatorcontrib>MAHMOOD, T ; DARZI, A</creatorcontrib><description>The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback. This could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided. There are no previous studies on this matter. Candidates were asked to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Modules 3 and 4 were used at random. In total, each candidate was asked to perform five consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module. These five episodes were collectively referred to as one trial. A time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) was used to denote perforation. No guidance or feedback was given to candidates before, during, or after each procedure. A total of 26 postgraduate doctors were recruited, including nine research fellows, five preregistration house officers, six specialist registrars, and six consultants. Fourteen candidates recorded five attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes). Another 12 candidates recorded five attempts (i.e., one trial each) on two modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes). Hence, 190 episodes were recorded in total, representing 38 trials. There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from first attempt to the fifth in the absence of feedback. If there was any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning. The outcomes measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used. The results were statistically significant for all outcomes. This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine. The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15457382</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SUREEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Colonoscopy - standards ; Computer-Assisted Instruction - standards ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Feedback ; General aspects ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Learning ; Medical sciences</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2004-08, Vol.18 (8), p.1224-1230</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-45bdc7869165ece8155f6297d9f59fbff70988135146f909c94df520b898f9be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-45bdc7869165ece8155f6297d9f59fbff70988135146f909c94df520b898f9be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16019588$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15457382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MAHMOOD, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DARZI, A</creatorcontrib><title>The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback. This could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided. There are no previous studies on this matter. Candidates were asked to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Modules 3 and 4 were used at random. In total, each candidate was asked to perform five consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module. These five episodes were collectively referred to as one trial. A time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) was used to denote perforation. No guidance or feedback was given to candidates before, during, or after each procedure. A total of 26 postgraduate doctors were recruited, including nine research fellows, five preregistration house officers, six specialist registrars, and six consultants. Fourteen candidates recorded five attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes). Another 12 candidates recorded five attempts (i.e., one trial each) on two modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes). Hence, 190 episodes were recorded in total, representing 38 trials. There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from first attempt to the fifth in the absence of feedback. If there was any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning. The outcomes measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used. The results were statistically significant for all outcomes. This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine. The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Computer-Assisted Instruction - standards</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9LHDEUxYMo7tb6AXwpQWifOpr_k-tbkbYKoi_2OWQyiZ11NlmTHWG_fSO77EKfDvfyO4fLPQhdUHJFCWmvCyFCiYYQ3gAVvBFHaF6VNYxRfYzmBDhpWAtihj6VsiAVBypP0YxKIVuu2Ry9PP_1ePQ2xyG-YDfld49Dythil8YUU3FptcFlWE6jXdf9EPG6OmxXfHQep4Bt3ODgfd9Z93qDH9N--I5j2kd_RifBjsWf7_QM_fn18_n2rnl4-n1_--OhcVzzdSNk17tWK6BKeuc1lTIoBm0PQULoQmgJaE25pEIFIOBA9EEy0mnQATrPz9C3be4qp7fJl7VZDsX5cbTRp6kYpYDpFmgFL_8DF2nKsd5mGAUhCW9VhegWcjmVkn0wqzwsbd4YSsxHBWZbgakVmI8KjKieL7vgqVv6_uDY_bwCX3eALc6OIdvohnLgFKEgteb_AEJijUo</recordid><startdate>20040801</startdate><enddate>20040801</enddate><creator>MAHMOOD, T</creator><creator>DARZI, A</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040801</creationdate><title>The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning</title><author>MAHMOOD, T ; DARZI, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-45bdc7869165ece8155f6297d9f59fbff70988135146f909c94df520b898f9be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Computer-Assisted Instruction - standards</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MAHMOOD, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DARZI, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MAHMOOD, T</au><au>DARZI, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2004-08-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1224</spage><epage>1230</epage><pages>1224-1230</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><coden>SUREEX</coden><abstract>The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback. This could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided. There are no previous studies on this matter. Candidates were asked to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Modules 3 and 4 were used at random. In total, each candidate was asked to perform five consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module. These five episodes were collectively referred to as one trial. A time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) was used to denote perforation. No guidance or feedback was given to candidates before, during, or after each procedure. A total of 26 postgraduate doctors were recruited, including nine research fellows, five preregistration house officers, six specialist registrars, and six consultants. Fourteen candidates recorded five attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes). Another 12 candidates recorded five attempts (i.e., one trial each) on two modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes). Hence, 190 episodes were recorded in total, representing 38 trials. There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from first attempt to the fifth in the absence of feedback. If there was any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning. The outcomes measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used. The results were statistically significant for all outcomes. This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine. The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>15457382</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2004-08, Vol.18 (8), p.1224-1230
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66928791
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Clinical Competence - standards
Colonoscopy - standards
Computer-Assisted Instruction - standards
Digestive system. Abdomen
Endoscopy
Feedback
General aspects
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Learning
Medical sciences
title The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A01%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20learning%20curve%20for%20a%20colonoscopy%20simulator%20in%20the%20absence%20of%20any%20feedback:%20No%20feedback,%20no%20learning&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=MAHMOOD,%20T&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1224&rft.epage=1230&rft.pages=1224-1230&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft.coden=SUREEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E712080481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219450376&rft_id=info:pmid/15457382&rfr_iscdi=true