Does Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Reduce the Incidence of Clinically Evident Renal Dysfunction After Multivessel Myocardial Revascularization?
In this prospective, observational trial, we determined whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) was associated with less postoperative renal dysfunction (RD) compared with coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG). All patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary surgery a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anesthesia and analgesia 2004-10, Vol.99 (4), p.959-964 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 964 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 959 |
container_title | Anesthesia and analgesia |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Schwann, Nanette M. Horrow, Jay C. Strong, Michael D. Chamchad, Dmitri Guerraty, Albert Wechsler, Andrew S. |
description | In this prospective, observational trial, we determined whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) was associated with less postoperative renal dysfunction (RD) compared with coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG). All patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary surgery at our institution in the year 2000 participated. Data collected on each patient included demographics, preoperative risk factors for RD, perioperative events, and serum creatinine concentrations from date of admission until discharge or death. The criteria for RD was both a ≥50% increase from preoperative creatinine and an absolute postoperative creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL (177 μM). Student’s t-test or the Fisher’s exact test was used to compare groups. Stepwise multiple logistic regression identified determinants of RD; P < 0.05 significant. The CABG group (n = 119) differed from the OPCAB group (n = 220) with respect to age (64 ± 13 versus 67 ± 10 yr, P = 0.0074) and number of distal grafts (median 4 versus 3, P = 0.0003). Type of operation did not associate with the presence of postoperative RD18 (8.2%) of 220 OPCAB patients versus 12 (10%) of 119 CABG patients (P = 0.55). Our data suggest that choice of operative technique (OPCAB versus CABG) is not associated with reduced renal morbidity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132978.32215.2C |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66904722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66904722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4421-46cad96828abed04292cba3726bd80f2a16bcec650001068d966009deeeed9363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkV1v0zAUhi0EYmXwF5CFBHcJ_oobc4NK1o1JG0MTXFuOc6IG3LjYSafwL_jHOG2lnpujYz3nw--L0DtKcsoo_0hovvq2zkkKyplaljlnjBY5q56hBS2YzJaFKp-jRQJ4xpRSF-hVjL9mnpTyJbqgBS8LzsUC_bvyEPFD22bfx-0OVz743oQJr8IAKX2ZdiZG_AjNaAEPG8C3ve0a6FPlW1y5ru-scW7C6_38PCS0Nw5fTbEdezt0vserNo3C96Mbuj3ECA7fT96a0HQJfIS9iXZ0JnR_zYx_fo1etMZFeHPKl-jn9fpH9TW7e7i5rVZ3mRWC0UxIaxolS1aaGhoimGK2NnzJZN2UpGWGytqClcXh17JMrCRENZCiUVzyS_ThOHcX_J8R4qC3XbTgnOnBj1FLqYhYMpbAT0fQBh9jgFbvQrdNImlK9GyIJlQnQ_TZEH0wRLMqNb89bRnrLTTn1pMDCXh_ApIOxrXBJIHjmZNUKEHLxIkj9-Rd0jP-duMTBL0B44bNYTUpuMoYIYLORXa85j-ZU6XV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66904722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Reduce the Incidence of Clinically Evident Renal Dysfunction After Multivessel Myocardial Revascularization?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Schwann, Nanette M. ; Horrow, Jay C. ; Strong, Michael D. ; Chamchad, Dmitri ; Guerraty, Albert ; Wechsler, Andrew S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwann, Nanette M. ; Horrow, Jay C. ; Strong, Michael D. ; Chamchad, Dmitri ; Guerraty, Albert ; Wechsler, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><description>In this prospective, observational trial, we determined whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) was associated with less postoperative renal dysfunction (RD) compared with coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG). All patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary surgery at our institution in the year 2000 participated. Data collected on each patient included demographics, preoperative risk factors for RD, perioperative events, and serum creatinine concentrations from date of admission until discharge or death. The criteria for RD was both a ≥50% increase from preoperative creatinine and an absolute postoperative creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL (177 μM). Student’s t-test or the Fisher’s exact test was used to compare groups. Stepwise multiple logistic regression identified determinants of RD; P < 0.05 significant. The CABG group (n = 119) differed from the OPCAB group (n = 220) with respect to age (64 ± 13 versus 67 ± 10 yr, P = 0.0074) and number of distal grafts (median 4 versus 3, P = 0.0003). Type of operation did not associate with the presence of postoperative RD18 (8.2%) of 220 OPCAB patients versus 12 (10%) of 119 CABG patients (P = 0.55). Our data suggest that choice of operative technique (OPCAB versus CABG) is not associated with reduced renal morbidity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132978.32215.2C</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15385334</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthetics ; Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers ; Coronary Artery Bypass - adverse effects ; Coronary Artery Bypass - methods ; Creatinine - blood ; Female ; Hemodynamics - physiology ; Humans ; Intraoperative Care ; Kidney Diseases - epidemiology ; Kidney Diseases - etiology ; Kidney Function Tests ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Myocardial Revascularization - adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Regression Analysis</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2004-10, Vol.99 (4), p.959-964</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4421-46cad96828abed04292cba3726bd80f2a16bcec650001068d966009deeeed9363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4421-46cad96828abed04292cba3726bd80f2a16bcec650001068d966009deeeed9363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00000539-200410000-00001$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00000539-200410000-00001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,4611,27931,27932,64673,65468</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16149418$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15385334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwann, Nanette M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horrow, Jay C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamchad, Dmitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerraty, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wechsler, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Reduce the Incidence of Clinically Evident Renal Dysfunction After Multivessel Myocardial Revascularization?</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>In this prospective, observational trial, we determined whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) was associated with less postoperative renal dysfunction (RD) compared with coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG). All patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary surgery at our institution in the year 2000 participated. Data collected on each patient included demographics, preoperative risk factors for RD, perioperative events, and serum creatinine concentrations from date of admission until discharge or death. The criteria for RD was both a ≥50% increase from preoperative creatinine and an absolute postoperative creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL (177 μM). Student’s t-test or the Fisher’s exact test was used to compare groups. Stepwise multiple logistic regression identified determinants of RD; P < 0.05 significant. The CABG group (n = 119) differed from the OPCAB group (n = 220) with respect to age (64 ± 13 versus 67 ± 10 yr, P = 0.0074) and number of distal grafts (median 4 versus 3, P = 0.0003). Type of operation did not associate with the presence of postoperative RD18 (8.2%) of 220 OPCAB patients versus 12 (10%) of 119 CABG patients (P = 0.55). Our data suggest that choice of operative technique (OPCAB versus CABG) is not associated with reduced renal morbidity.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthetics</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - adverse effects</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - methods</subject><subject>Creatinine - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Kidney Function Tests</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Myocardial Revascularization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkV1v0zAUhi0EYmXwF5CFBHcJ_oobc4NK1o1JG0MTXFuOc6IG3LjYSafwL_jHOG2lnpujYz3nw--L0DtKcsoo_0hovvq2zkkKyplaljlnjBY5q56hBS2YzJaFKp-jRQJ4xpRSF-hVjL9mnpTyJbqgBS8LzsUC_bvyEPFD22bfx-0OVz743oQJr8IAKX2ZdiZG_AjNaAEPG8C3ve0a6FPlW1y5ru-scW7C6_38PCS0Nw5fTbEdezt0vserNo3C96Mbuj3ECA7fT96a0HQJfIS9iXZ0JnR_zYx_fo1etMZFeHPKl-jn9fpH9TW7e7i5rVZ3mRWC0UxIaxolS1aaGhoimGK2NnzJZN2UpGWGytqClcXh17JMrCRENZCiUVzyS_ThOHcX_J8R4qC3XbTgnOnBj1FLqYhYMpbAT0fQBh9jgFbvQrdNImlK9GyIJlQnQ_TZEH0wRLMqNb89bRnrLTTn1pMDCXh_ApIOxrXBJIHjmZNUKEHLxIkj9-Rd0jP-duMTBL0B44bNYTUpuMoYIYLORXa85j-ZU6XV</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Schwann, Nanette M.</creator><creator>Horrow, Jay C.</creator><creator>Strong, Michael D.</creator><creator>Chamchad, Dmitri</creator><creator>Guerraty, Albert</creator><creator>Wechsler, Andrew S.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Does Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Reduce the Incidence of Clinically Evident Renal Dysfunction After Multivessel Myocardial Revascularization?</title><author>Schwann, Nanette M. ; Horrow, Jay C. ; Strong, Michael D. ; Chamchad, Dmitri ; Guerraty, Albert ; Wechsler, Andrew S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4421-46cad96828abed04292cba3726bd80f2a16bcec650001068d966009deeeed9363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthetics</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - adverse effects</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - methods</topic><topic>Creatinine - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Kidney Function Tests</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Myocardial Revascularization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwann, Nanette M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horrow, Jay C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamchad, Dmitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerraty, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wechsler, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwann, Nanette M.</au><au>Horrow, Jay C.</au><au>Strong, Michael D.</au><au>Chamchad, Dmitri</au><au>Guerraty, Albert</au><au>Wechsler, Andrew S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Reduce the Incidence of Clinically Evident Renal Dysfunction After Multivessel Myocardial Revascularization?</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>964</epage><pages>959-964</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>In this prospective, observational trial, we determined whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) was associated with less postoperative renal dysfunction (RD) compared with coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG). All patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary surgery at our institution in the year 2000 participated. Data collected on each patient included demographics, preoperative risk factors for RD, perioperative events, and serum creatinine concentrations from date of admission until discharge or death. The criteria for RD was both a ≥50% increase from preoperative creatinine and an absolute postoperative creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL (177 μM). Student’s t-test or the Fisher’s exact test was used to compare groups. Stepwise multiple logistic regression identified determinants of RD; P < 0.05 significant. The CABG group (n = 119) differed from the OPCAB group (n = 220) with respect to age (64 ± 13 versus 67 ± 10 yr, P = 0.0074) and number of distal grafts (median 4 versus 3, P = 0.0003). Type of operation did not associate with the presence of postoperative RD18 (8.2%) of 220 OPCAB patients versus 12 (10%) of 119 CABG patients (P = 0.55). Our data suggest that choice of operative technique (OPCAB versus CABG) is not associated with reduced renal morbidity.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>15385334</pmid><doi>10.1213/01.ANE.0000132978.32215.2C</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2999 |
ispartof | Anesthesia and analgesia, 2004-10, Vol.99 (4), p.959-964 |
issn | 0003-2999 1526-7598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66904722 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aged Anesthesia Anesthesia, General Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthetics Anticoagulants - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers Coronary Artery Bypass - adverse effects Coronary Artery Bypass - methods Creatinine - blood Female Hemodynamics - physiology Humans Intraoperative Care Kidney Diseases - epidemiology Kidney Diseases - etiology Kidney Function Tests Male Medical sciences Myocardial Revascularization - adverse effects Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Prospective Studies Regression Analysis |
title | Does Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Reduce the Incidence of Clinically Evident Renal Dysfunction After Multivessel Myocardial Revascularization? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T04%3A56%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Off-Pump%20Coronary%20Artery%20Bypass%20Reduce%20the%20Incidence%20of%20Clinically%20Evident%20Renal%20Dysfunction%20After%20Multivessel%20Myocardial%20Revascularization?&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Schwann,%20Nanette%20M.&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=964&rft.pages=959-964&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/01.ANE.0000132978.32215.2C&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66904722%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66904722&rft_id=info:pmid/15385334&rfr_iscdi=true |