Clinical and Histopathologic Review of 18 Explanted Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implants
Purpose To review the clinical and histopathologic features of porous polyethylene (PP) orbital implants requiring explantation. Design Case series. Participants Eighteen explanted PP orbital implants of 18 patients were studied. Methods The charts and histopathologic findings were reviewed for all...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2009-02, Vol.116 (2), p.349-354 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 354 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 349 |
container_title | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | Chuo, Jean Y., MD Dolman, Peter J., MD, FRCSC Ng, Tony L., MD Buffam, Frank V., MD, FRCSC White, Valerie A., MD, FRCPC |
description | Purpose To review the clinical and histopathologic features of porous polyethylene (PP) orbital implants requiring explantation. Design Case series. Participants Eighteen explanted PP orbital implants of 18 patients were studied. Methods The charts and histopathologic findings were reviewed for all patients requiring explantation of PP orbital implants between 1997 and 2006 by 2 oculoplastic surgeons at the University of British Columbia. Main Outcome Measures Clinical data obtained included patient demographics, the nature of the primary surgery, and the clinical presentation leading to eventual implant removal. The histopathologic data observed included the presence of anterior exposure, area of fibrovascular ingrowth, type of inflammation, and presence and type of bacterial colonies. Results Nine (50%) of the 18 patients studied were referred from other surgeons. The balance represented 3.2% of all PP implants placed by the 2 surgeons. The procedures for the primary surgery were 12 enucleations (67%), 5 eviscerations (28%), and 1 secondary implant (5%). Clinical findings included anterior implant exposure and discharge in all cases. Histopathologic analysis was performed in all of the implants and showed less than 50% fibrovascular ingrowth in 16 implants (89%) and predominantly acute or mixed inflammation in 15 (83%). Foreign body giant cells were seen adjacent to the implant material in all cases. Bacterial colonies on gram stain were identified in 12 specimens (67%); overall, gram-positive cocci in clusters or chains were found in 10 implants (56%), and gram-negative bacteria were found in 1 (5.5%). Thirteen patients (72%) lived in locations distant from Vancouver, the surgical center. Conclusions This article presents the largest review of explanted porous polyethylene orbital spheres. The findings suggest that anterior exposure allows bacterial colonization and the development of a heavy inflammatory infiltrate. Poor tissue ingrowth may limit the penetration of topical or systemic antibiotic therapy, leading to the necessity for explantation. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66886739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016164200800941X</els_id><sourcerecordid>66886739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b552f60f93555ee50cfaebd365f89565ccca35c1228efd57985ada1bc69b1c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAURS1ERYfCHyCUDewSnh3bE2-Q0Ki0lSq1arvoznKcZ8ZDJg52pjB_Xw8TgcSG1ducd3V1LiHvKFQUqPy0qcK4ntamYgBNBaoCxl6QBRVclXxJ65dkkTFaSs7glLxOaQMAUtb8FTmlChTllC3I46r3g7emL8zQFZc-TWE00zr04Zu3xR0-efxZBFfQpjj_NfZmmLArbkMMu5RPv8dpve9xwOImtn7KMVfb31R6Q06c6RO-ne8Zefh6_rC6LK9vLq5WX65Ly7mYylYI5iQ4VQshEAVYZ7Dtailco4QU1lpTC0sZa9B1YqkaYTpDWytVSy2vz8jHY-wYw48dpklvfbLY5w6YO2opm0Yua5VBfgRtDClFdHqMfmviXlPQB6F6o49C9UGoBqWz0Pz2fs7ftVvs_j7NBjPwYQZMyhpdNIP16Q_HKKgliDpzn48cZhnZatTJehwsdj6inXQX_P-a_Btg5-m-4x7TJuzikEVrqhPToO8P4x-2hwZAcfpYPwOZBKuB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66886739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical and Histopathologic Review of 18 Explanted Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chuo, Jean Y., MD ; Dolman, Peter J., MD, FRCSC ; Ng, Tony L., MD ; Buffam, Frank V., MD, FRCSC ; White, Valerie A., MD, FRCPC</creator><creatorcontrib>Chuo, Jean Y., MD ; Dolman, Peter J., MD, FRCSC ; Ng, Tony L., MD ; Buffam, Frank V., MD, FRCSC ; White, Valerie A., MD, FRCPC</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To review the clinical and histopathologic features of porous polyethylene (PP) orbital implants requiring explantation. Design Case series. Participants Eighteen explanted PP orbital implants of 18 patients were studied. Methods The charts and histopathologic findings were reviewed for all patients requiring explantation of PP orbital implants between 1997 and 2006 by 2 oculoplastic surgeons at the University of British Columbia. Main Outcome Measures Clinical data obtained included patient demographics, the nature of the primary surgery, and the clinical presentation leading to eventual implant removal. The histopathologic data observed included the presence of anterior exposure, area of fibrovascular ingrowth, type of inflammation, and presence and type of bacterial colonies. Results Nine (50%) of the 18 patients studied were referred from other surgeons. The balance represented 3.2% of all PP implants placed by the 2 surgeons. The procedures for the primary surgery were 12 enucleations (67%), 5 eviscerations (28%), and 1 secondary implant (5%). Clinical findings included anterior implant exposure and discharge in all cases. Histopathologic analysis was performed in all of the implants and showed less than 50% fibrovascular ingrowth in 16 implants (89%) and predominantly acute or mixed inflammation in 15 (83%). Foreign body giant cells were seen adjacent to the implant material in all cases. Bacterial colonies on gram stain were identified in 12 specimens (67%); overall, gram-positive cocci in clusters or chains were found in 10 implants (56%), and gram-negative bacteria were found in 1 (5.5%). Thirteen patients (72%) lived in locations distant from Vancouver, the surgical center. Conclusions This article presents the largest review of explanted porous polyethylene orbital spheres. The findings suggest that anterior exposure allows bacterial colonization and the development of a heavy inflammatory infiltrate. Poor tissue ingrowth may limit the penetration of topical or systemic antibiotic therapy, leading to the necessity for explantation. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19091412</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPHTDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible ; Device Removal ; Eye Enucleation ; Eye Evisceration ; Eye Infections, Bacterial - etiology ; Eye Infections, Bacterial - pathology ; Eye, Artificial ; Female ; Fibrosis - pathology ; Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology ; Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology ; Giant Cells, Foreign-Body - pathology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ophthalmology ; Orbit - surgery ; Orbital Implants - adverse effects ; Polyethylene ; Porosity ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2009-02, Vol.116 (2), p.349-354</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2009 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b552f60f93555ee50cfaebd365f89565ccca35c1228efd57985ada1bc69b1c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b552f60f93555ee50cfaebd365f89565ccca35c1228efd57985ada1bc69b1c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016164200800941X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21097053$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091412$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chuo, Jean Y., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolman, Peter J., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Tony L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffam, Frank V., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Valerie A., MD, FRCPC</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical and Histopathologic Review of 18 Explanted Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implants</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>Purpose To review the clinical and histopathologic features of porous polyethylene (PP) orbital implants requiring explantation. Design Case series. Participants Eighteen explanted PP orbital implants of 18 patients were studied. Methods The charts and histopathologic findings were reviewed for all patients requiring explantation of PP orbital implants between 1997 and 2006 by 2 oculoplastic surgeons at the University of British Columbia. Main Outcome Measures Clinical data obtained included patient demographics, the nature of the primary surgery, and the clinical presentation leading to eventual implant removal. The histopathologic data observed included the presence of anterior exposure, area of fibrovascular ingrowth, type of inflammation, and presence and type of bacterial colonies. Results Nine (50%) of the 18 patients studied were referred from other surgeons. The balance represented 3.2% of all PP implants placed by the 2 surgeons. The procedures for the primary surgery were 12 enucleations (67%), 5 eviscerations (28%), and 1 secondary implant (5%). Clinical findings included anterior implant exposure and discharge in all cases. Histopathologic analysis was performed in all of the implants and showed less than 50% fibrovascular ingrowth in 16 implants (89%) and predominantly acute or mixed inflammation in 15 (83%). Foreign body giant cells were seen adjacent to the implant material in all cases. Bacterial colonies on gram stain were identified in 12 specimens (67%); overall, gram-positive cocci in clusters or chains were found in 10 implants (56%), and gram-negative bacteria were found in 1 (5.5%). Thirteen patients (72%) lived in locations distant from Vancouver, the surgical center. Conclusions This article presents the largest review of explanted porous polyethylene orbital spheres. The findings suggest that anterior exposure allows bacterial colonization and the development of a heavy inflammatory infiltrate. Poor tissue ingrowth may limit the penetration of topical or systemic antibiotic therapy, leading to the necessity for explantation. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Eye Enucleation</subject><subject>Eye Evisceration</subject><subject>Eye Infections, Bacterial - etiology</subject><subject>Eye Infections, Bacterial - pathology</subject><subject>Eye, Artificial</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibrosis - pathology</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology</subject><subject>Giant Cells, Foreign-Body - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Orbit - surgery</subject><subject>Orbital Implants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAURS1ERYfCHyCUDewSnh3bE2-Q0Ki0lSq1arvoznKcZ8ZDJg52pjB_Xw8TgcSG1ducd3V1LiHvKFQUqPy0qcK4ntamYgBNBaoCxl6QBRVclXxJ65dkkTFaSs7glLxOaQMAUtb8FTmlChTllC3I46r3g7emL8zQFZc-TWE00zr04Zu3xR0-efxZBFfQpjj_NfZmmLArbkMMu5RPv8dpve9xwOImtn7KMVfb31R6Q06c6RO-ne8Zefh6_rC6LK9vLq5WX65Ly7mYylYI5iQ4VQshEAVYZ7Dtailco4QU1lpTC0sZa9B1YqkaYTpDWytVSy2vz8jHY-wYw48dpklvfbLY5w6YO2opm0Yua5VBfgRtDClFdHqMfmviXlPQB6F6o49C9UGoBqWz0Pz2fs7ftVvs_j7NBjPwYQZMyhpdNIP16Q_HKKgliDpzn48cZhnZatTJehwsdj6inXQX_P-a_Btg5-m-4x7TJuzikEVrqhPToO8P4x-2hwZAcfpYPwOZBKuB</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Chuo, Jean Y., MD</creator><creator>Dolman, Peter J., MD, FRCSC</creator><creator>Ng, Tony L., MD</creator><creator>Buffam, Frank V., MD, FRCSC</creator><creator>White, Valerie A., MD, FRCPC</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Clinical and Histopathologic Review of 18 Explanted Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implants</title><author>Chuo, Jean Y., MD ; Dolman, Peter J., MD, FRCSC ; Ng, Tony L., MD ; Buffam, Frank V., MD, FRCSC ; White, Valerie A., MD, FRCPC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-b552f60f93555ee50cfaebd365f89565ccca35c1228efd57985ada1bc69b1c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Eye Enucleation</topic><topic>Eye Evisceration</topic><topic>Eye Infections, Bacterial - etiology</topic><topic>Eye Infections, Bacterial - pathology</topic><topic>Eye, Artificial</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibrosis - pathology</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology</topic><topic>Giant Cells, Foreign-Body - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Orbit - surgery</topic><topic>Orbital Implants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chuo, Jean Y., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolman, Peter J., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Tony L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffam, Frank V., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Valerie A., MD, FRCPC</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chuo, Jean Y., MD</au><au>Dolman, Peter J., MD, FRCSC</au><au>Ng, Tony L., MD</au><au>Buffam, Frank V., MD, FRCSC</au><au>White, Valerie A., MD, FRCPC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical and Histopathologic Review of 18 Explanted Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implants</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>349-354</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><coden>OPHTDG</coden><abstract>Purpose To review the clinical and histopathologic features of porous polyethylene (PP) orbital implants requiring explantation. Design Case series. Participants Eighteen explanted PP orbital implants of 18 patients were studied. Methods The charts and histopathologic findings were reviewed for all patients requiring explantation of PP orbital implants between 1997 and 2006 by 2 oculoplastic surgeons at the University of British Columbia. Main Outcome Measures Clinical data obtained included patient demographics, the nature of the primary surgery, and the clinical presentation leading to eventual implant removal. The histopathologic data observed included the presence of anterior exposure, area of fibrovascular ingrowth, type of inflammation, and presence and type of bacterial colonies. Results Nine (50%) of the 18 patients studied were referred from other surgeons. The balance represented 3.2% of all PP implants placed by the 2 surgeons. The procedures for the primary surgery were 12 enucleations (67%), 5 eviscerations (28%), and 1 secondary implant (5%). Clinical findings included anterior implant exposure and discharge in all cases. Histopathologic analysis was performed in all of the implants and showed less than 50% fibrovascular ingrowth in 16 implants (89%) and predominantly acute or mixed inflammation in 15 (83%). Foreign body giant cells were seen adjacent to the implant material in all cases. Bacterial colonies on gram stain were identified in 12 specimens (67%); overall, gram-positive cocci in clusters or chains were found in 10 implants (56%), and gram-negative bacteria were found in 1 (5.5%). Thirteen patients (72%) lived in locations distant from Vancouver, the surgical center. Conclusions This article presents the largest review of explanted porous polyethylene orbital spheres. The findings suggest that anterior exposure allows bacterial colonization and the development of a heavy inflammatory infiltrate. Poor tissue ingrowth may limit the penetration of topical or systemic antibiotic therapy, leading to the necessity for explantation. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19091412</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.022</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-6420 |
ispartof | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2009-02, Vol.116 (2), p.349-354 |
issn | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66886739 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Coated Materials, Biocompatible Device Removal Eye Enucleation Eye Evisceration Eye Infections, Bacterial - etiology Eye Infections, Bacterial - pathology Eye, Artificial Female Fibrosis - pathology Foreign-Body Reaction - etiology Foreign-Body Reaction - pathology Giant Cells, Foreign-Body - pathology Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Ophthalmology Orbit - surgery Orbital Implants - adverse effects Polyethylene Porosity Prosthesis Implantation Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology |
title | Clinical and Histopathologic Review of 18 Explanted Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A09%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20and%20Histopathologic%20Review%20of%2018%20Explanted%20Porous%20Polyethylene%20Orbital%20Implants&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Chuo,%20Jean%20Y.,%20MD&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=349-354&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.coden=OPHTDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66886739%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66886739&rft_id=info:pmid/19091412&rft_els_id=S016164200800941X&rfr_iscdi=true |