The Role of Core Self-Evaluations in the Coping Process
In 2 studies, the authors investigated whether core self-evaluations (CSE) serve as an integrative framework for understanding individual differences in coping processes. A meta-analytic review demonstrated that CSEs were associated with fewer perceived stressors, lower strain, less avoidance coping...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied psychology 2009-01, Vol.94 (1), p.177-195 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 195 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 177 |
| container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
| container_volume | 94 |
| creator | Kammeyer-Mueller, John D Judge, Timothy A Scott, Brent A |
| description | In 2 studies, the authors investigated whether core self-evaluations (CSE) serve as an integrative framework for understanding individual differences in coping processes. A meta-analytic review demonstrated that CSEs were associated with fewer perceived stressors, lower strain, less avoidance coping, more problem-solving coping, and were not strongly related to emotion-focused coping. Consistent with the meta-analytic results, a daily diary study demonstrated that individuals with high CSE perceived fewer stressors, experienced less strain after controlling for stressors, and engaged in less avoidance coping. However, both studies demonstrated that emotional stability was uniquely related to the stress and coping process and that emotional stability moderated the relationship between stressors and strain. The discussion focuses on the distinction between depressive self-concept represented by CSE and the anxiety and worry represented by emotional stability. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0013214 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66881076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66881076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a558t-9f0413669a1d68aa1ea65ca49316f56f8520a68e06beda266fcd0e1a7109be913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0duKFDEQBuAgijuOgk8gjagI0lrVOV_KsB5gQdH1OtRkEu0l0-lNuoV9e3uZUVHEvaqbj5-q-hl7iPASgetXBIC8Q3GLrdBy26KR4jZbAXTYWkA4YfdqvViQ4BbushO0aJQFvmL6_FtoPuUUmhybTS6h-RxSbE-_U5pp6vNQm35opgVt8tgPX5uPJftQ6312J1Kq4cFxrtmXN6fnm3ft2Ye37zevz1qS0kytjSCQK2UJd8oQYSAlPQnLUUWpopEdkDIB1DbsqFMq-h0EJI1gt8EiX7Nnh9yx5Ms51Mnt--pDSjSEPFenlDEIWt0Ipe6MRCluhFyD1rC8cc0e_wUv8lyG5VqnUAhrsJP_Qx1yy40wZkHPD8iXXGsJ0Y2l31O5cgjuukD3s8CFPjrmzdt92P2Gx8YW8PQIqHpKsdDg-_rLdSiVEfZ6-xcHRyO5sV55KlPvU6h-LiUMk6MxOSscOtR60U_-rf9kPwDfnLmq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614498125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Core Self-Evaluations in the Coping Process</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Kammeyer-Mueller, John D ; Judge, Timothy A ; Scott, Brent A</creator><contributor>Kozlowski, Steve W. J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kammeyer-Mueller, John D ; Judge, Timothy A ; Scott, Brent A ; Kozlowski, Steve W. J</creatorcontrib><description>In 2 studies, the authors investigated whether core self-evaluations (CSE) serve as an integrative framework for understanding individual differences in coping processes. A meta-analytic review demonstrated that CSEs were associated with fewer perceived stressors, lower strain, less avoidance coping, more problem-solving coping, and were not strongly related to emotion-focused coping. Consistent with the meta-analytic results, a daily diary study demonstrated that individuals with high CSE perceived fewer stressors, experienced less strain after controlling for stressors, and engaged in less avoidance coping. However, both studies demonstrated that emotional stability was uniquely related to the stress and coping process and that emotional stability moderated the relationship between stressors and strain. The discussion focuses on the distinction between depressive self-concept represented by CSE and the anxiety and worry represented by emotional stability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0013214</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19186903</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Anxiety ; Attitudes ; Avoidance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coping ; Coping Behavior ; Depression ; Emotions ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Individual behaviour ; Individual Differences ; Internal-External Control ; Linear Models ; Mental stress ; Meta-analysis ; Models, Psychological ; Multivariate Analysis ; Occupational psychology ; Personality ; Personality. Affectivity ; Problem Solving ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Self Concept ; Self evaluation ; Self-Assessment ; Selfconcept ; Selfevaluation ; Stress ; Stress, Psychological - psychology ; Studies ; Survival strategy ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2009-01, Vol.94 (1), p.177-195</ispartof><rights>2009 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2009</rights><rights>2009, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a558t-9f0413669a1d68aa1ea65ca49316f56f8520a68e06beda266fcd0e1a7109be913</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21568499$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19186903$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kozlowski, Steve W. J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kammeyer-Mueller, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judge, Timothy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Brent A</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Core Self-Evaluations in the Coping Process</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>In 2 studies, the authors investigated whether core self-evaluations (CSE) serve as an integrative framework for understanding individual differences in coping processes. A meta-analytic review demonstrated that CSEs were associated with fewer perceived stressors, lower strain, less avoidance coping, more problem-solving coping, and were not strongly related to emotion-focused coping. Consistent with the meta-analytic results, a daily diary study demonstrated that individuals with high CSE perceived fewer stressors, experienced less strain after controlling for stressors, and engaged in less avoidance coping. However, both studies demonstrated that emotional stability was uniquely related to the stress and coping process and that emotional stability moderated the relationship between stressors and strain. The discussion focuses on the distinction between depressive self-concept represented by CSE and the anxiety and worry represented by emotional stability.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Avoidance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Coping Behavior</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual behaviour</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Internal-External Control</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Mental stress</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Self-Assessment</subject><subject>Selfconcept</subject><subject>Selfevaluation</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survival strategy</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0duKFDEQBuAgijuOgk8gjagI0lrVOV_KsB5gQdH1OtRkEu0l0-lNuoV9e3uZUVHEvaqbj5-q-hl7iPASgetXBIC8Q3GLrdBy26KR4jZbAXTYWkA4YfdqvViQ4BbushO0aJQFvmL6_FtoPuUUmhybTS6h-RxSbE-_U5pp6vNQm35opgVt8tgPX5uPJftQ6312J1Kq4cFxrtmXN6fnm3ft2Ye37zevz1qS0kytjSCQK2UJd8oQYSAlPQnLUUWpopEdkDIB1DbsqFMq-h0EJI1gt8EiX7Nnh9yx5Ms51Mnt--pDSjSEPFenlDEIWt0Ipe6MRCluhFyD1rC8cc0e_wUv8lyG5VqnUAhrsJP_Qx1yy40wZkHPD8iXXGsJ0Y2l31O5cgjuukD3s8CFPjrmzdt92P2Gx8YW8PQIqHpKsdDg-_rLdSiVEfZ6-xcHRyO5sV55KlPvU6h-LiUMk6MxOSscOtR60U_-rf9kPwDfnLmq</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Kammeyer-Mueller, John D</creator><creator>Judge, Timothy A</creator><creator>Scott, Brent A</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>The Role of Core Self-Evaluations in the Coping Process</title><author>Kammeyer-Mueller, John D ; Judge, Timothy A ; Scott, Brent A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a558t-9f0413669a1d68aa1ea65ca49316f56f8520a68e06beda266fcd0e1a7109be913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Avoidance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Coping Behavior</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual behaviour</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Internal-External Control</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Mental stress</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Self-Assessment</topic><topic>Selfconcept</topic><topic>Selfevaluation</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survival strategy</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kammeyer-Mueller, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judge, Timothy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Brent A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kammeyer-Mueller, John D</au><au>Judge, Timothy A</au><au>Scott, Brent A</au><au>Kozlowski, Steve W. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Core Self-Evaluations in the Coping Process</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>177-195</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><coden>JAPGBP</coden><abstract>In 2 studies, the authors investigated whether core self-evaluations (CSE) serve as an integrative framework for understanding individual differences in coping processes. A meta-analytic review demonstrated that CSEs were associated with fewer perceived stressors, lower strain, less avoidance coping, more problem-solving coping, and were not strongly related to emotion-focused coping. Consistent with the meta-analytic results, a daily diary study demonstrated that individuals with high CSE perceived fewer stressors, experienced less strain after controlling for stressors, and engaged in less avoidance coping. However, both studies demonstrated that emotional stability was uniquely related to the stress and coping process and that emotional stability moderated the relationship between stressors and strain. The discussion focuses on the distinction between depressive self-concept represented by CSE and the anxiety and worry represented by emotional stability.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>19186903</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0013214</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 2009-01, Vol.94 (1), p.177-195 |
| issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66881076 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Anxiety Attitudes Avoidance Biological and medical sciences Coping Coping Behavior Depression Emotions Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Individual behaviour Individual Differences Internal-External Control Linear Models Mental stress Meta-analysis Models, Psychological Multivariate Analysis Occupational psychology Personality Personality. Affectivity Problem Solving Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Self Concept Self evaluation Self-Assessment Selfconcept Selfevaluation Stress Stress, Psychological - psychology Studies Survival strategy United States |
| title | The Role of Core Self-Evaluations in the Coping Process |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A04%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Core%20Self-Evaluations%20in%20the%20Coping%20Process&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Kammeyer-Mueller,%20John%20D&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=177-195&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft.coden=JAPGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0013214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66881076%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614498125&rft_id=info:pmid/19186903&rfr_iscdi=true |