Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms
The present research investigated three approaches to the role of norms in the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Two studies examined the proposed predictors of intentions to engage in household recycling (Studies 1 and 2) and reported recycling behaviour (Study 1). Study 1 tested the impact of des...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of social psychology 2009-03, Vol.48 (1), p.135-158 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 158 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 135 |
| container_title | British journal of social psychology |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | White, Katherine M. Smith, Joanne R. Terry, Deborah J. Greenslade, Jaimi H. McKimmie, Blake M. |
| description | The present research investigated three approaches to the role of norms in the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Two studies examined the proposed predictors of intentions to engage in household recycling (Studies 1 and 2) and reported recycling behaviour (Study 1). Study 1 tested the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms (personal and social) and the moderating role of self‐monitoring on norm ‐ intention relations. Study 2 examined the role of group norms and group identification and the moderating role of collective self on norm ‐ intention relations. Both studies demonstrated support for the TPB and the inclusion of additional normative variables: attitudes; perceived behavioural control; descriptive; and personal injunctive norms (but not social injunctive norm) emerged as significant independent predictors of intentions. There was no evidence that the impact of norms on intentions varied as a function of the dispositional variables of self‐monitoring (Study 1) or the collective self (Study 2). There was support, however, for the social identity approach to attitude ‐ behaviour relations in that group norms predicted recycling intentions, particularly for individuals who identified strongly with the group. The results of these two studies highlight the critical role of social influence processes within the TPB and the attitude ‐ behaviour context. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1348/014466608X295207 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66862428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61743561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5158-ef5079501e63198b065f40bdf507db342226ec172775469f0ead2fc1fa4f41f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhzgnlAicC_rbDDSoooIVKbBHcLMcZU5dsHOxNYf89jrIqEpc9WJ7x-7xjewahxwS_IIzrl5hwLqXE-jttBMXqDlpRzHmtGW7uotUs10UXJ-hBztcYE8awuo9OiOZMaMlWqN9EF2xfhcH3EwwOSlTtrmBeMe2r6Kuxt8MAXdXClb0JcUqvqssCpNjDLHeQXQrjLtzA82K-nga3xHboSl7_SHEaqyGmbX6I7nnbZ3h02E_R13dvL8_e1-uL8w9nr9e1E0ToGrzAqhGYgGSk0S2WwnPcdvNx1zJOKZXgiKJKCS4bj8F21DviLfec-IadomdL3THFXxPkndmG7KAvH4E4ZSOllpRTfRwkqjRKkqMgU7ghgsoC4gV0KeacwJsxha1Ne0OwmWdm_p9ZsTw51J7aLXT_DIchFeDpAbDZ2d4nO7iQbzlKiG4Umx8pFu536GF_9GLz5uPmgvO5C_XiC3kHf259Nv00UjElzLfP52bDP2Emv6yNYn8BQze78Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37091526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>White, Katherine M. ; Smith, Joanne R. ; Terry, Deborah J. ; Greenslade, Jaimi H. ; McKimmie, Blake M.</creator><creatorcontrib>White, Katherine M. ; Smith, Joanne R. ; Terry, Deborah J. ; Greenslade, Jaimi H. ; McKimmie, Blake M.</creatorcontrib><description>The present research investigated three approaches to the role of norms in the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Two studies examined the proposed predictors of intentions to engage in household recycling (Studies 1 and 2) and reported recycling behaviour (Study 1). Study 1 tested the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms (personal and social) and the moderating role of self‐monitoring on norm ‐ intention relations. Study 2 examined the role of group norms and group identification and the moderating role of collective self on norm ‐ intention relations. Both studies demonstrated support for the TPB and the inclusion of additional normative variables: attitudes; perceived behavioural control; descriptive; and personal injunctive norms (but not social injunctive norm) emerged as significant independent predictors of intentions. There was no evidence that the impact of norms on intentions varied as a function of the dispositional variables of self‐monitoring (Study 1) or the collective self (Study 2). There was support, however, for the social identity approach to attitude ‐ behaviour relations in that group norms predicted recycling intentions, particularly for individuals who identified strongly with the group. The results of these two studies highlight the critical role of social influence processes within the TPB and the attitude ‐ behaviour context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-6665</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1348/014466608X295207</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18435863</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSPDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Attitudes ; Behavioural psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Group Identity ; Group Norms ; Households ; Humans ; Individuality ; Intention ; Internal-External Control ; Locus of Control ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Public Opinion ; Self Concept ; Self-management ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social Facilitation ; Social Identification ; Social Identity ; Social Influence ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social norms ; Social psychology ; Social Responsibility ; Social Values ; Waste management ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of social psychology, 2009-03, Vol.48 (1), p.135-158</ispartof><rights>2009 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5158-ef5079501e63198b065f40bdf507db342226ec172775469f0ead2fc1fa4f41f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5158-ef5079501e63198b065f40bdf507db342226ec172775469f0ead2fc1fa4f41f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348%2F014466608X295207$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348%2F014466608X295207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33775,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21189731$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18435863$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joanne R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Deborah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenslade, Jaimi H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKimmie, Blake M.</creatorcontrib><title>Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms</title><title>British journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>The present research investigated three approaches to the role of norms in the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Two studies examined the proposed predictors of intentions to engage in household recycling (Studies 1 and 2) and reported recycling behaviour (Study 1). Study 1 tested the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms (personal and social) and the moderating role of self‐monitoring on norm ‐ intention relations. Study 2 examined the role of group norms and group identification and the moderating role of collective self on norm ‐ intention relations. Both studies demonstrated support for the TPB and the inclusion of additional normative variables: attitudes; perceived behavioural control; descriptive; and personal injunctive norms (but not social injunctive norm) emerged as significant independent predictors of intentions. There was no evidence that the impact of norms on intentions varied as a function of the dispositional variables of self‐monitoring (Study 1) or the collective self (Study 2). There was support, however, for the social identity approach to attitude ‐ behaviour relations in that group norms predicted recycling intentions, particularly for individuals who identified strongly with the group. The results of these two studies highlight the critical role of social influence processes within the TPB and the attitude ‐ behaviour context.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavioural psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Group Identity</subject><subject>Group Norms</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Internal-External Control</subject><subject>Locus of Control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Self-management</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social Facilitation</subject><subject>Social Identification</subject><subject>Social Identity</subject><subject>Social Influence</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0144-6665</issn><issn>2044-8309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhzgnlAicC_rbDDSoooIVKbBHcLMcZU5dsHOxNYf89jrIqEpc9WJ7x-7xjewahxwS_IIzrl5hwLqXE-jttBMXqDlpRzHmtGW7uotUs10UXJ-hBztcYE8awuo9OiOZMaMlWqN9EF2xfhcH3EwwOSlTtrmBeMe2r6Kuxt8MAXdXClb0JcUqvqssCpNjDLHeQXQrjLtzA82K-nga3xHboSl7_SHEaqyGmbX6I7nnbZ3h02E_R13dvL8_e1-uL8w9nr9e1E0ToGrzAqhGYgGSk0S2WwnPcdvNx1zJOKZXgiKJKCS4bj8F21DviLfec-IadomdL3THFXxPkndmG7KAvH4E4ZSOllpRTfRwkqjRKkqMgU7ghgsoC4gV0KeacwJsxha1Ne0OwmWdm_p9ZsTw51J7aLXT_DIchFeDpAbDZ2d4nO7iQbzlKiG4Umx8pFu536GF_9GLz5uPmgvO5C_XiC3kHf259Nv00UjElzLfP52bDP2Emv6yNYn8BQze78Q</recordid><startdate>200903</startdate><enddate>200903</enddate><creator>White, Katherine M.</creator><creator>Smith, Joanne R.</creator><creator>Terry, Deborah J.</creator><creator>Greenslade, Jaimi H.</creator><creator>McKimmie, Blake M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200903</creationdate><title>Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms</title><author>White, Katherine M. ; Smith, Joanne R. ; Terry, Deborah J. ; Greenslade, Jaimi H. ; McKimmie, Blake M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5158-ef5079501e63198b065f40bdf507db342226ec172775469f0ead2fc1fa4f41f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavioural psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Group Identity</topic><topic>Group Norms</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Internal-External Control</topic><topic>Locus of Control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Self-management</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social Facilitation</topic><topic>Social Identification</topic><topic>Social Identity</topic><topic>Social Influence</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joanne R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Deborah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenslade, Jaimi H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKimmie, Blake M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, Katherine M.</au><au>Smith, Joanne R.</au><au>Terry, Deborah J.</au><au>Greenslade, Jaimi H.</au><au>McKimmie, Blake M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms</atitle><jtitle>British journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2009-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>135-158</pages><issn>0144-6665</issn><eissn>2044-8309</eissn><coden>BJSPDA</coden><abstract>The present research investigated three approaches to the role of norms in the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Two studies examined the proposed predictors of intentions to engage in household recycling (Studies 1 and 2) and reported recycling behaviour (Study 1). Study 1 tested the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms (personal and social) and the moderating role of self‐monitoring on norm ‐ intention relations. Study 2 examined the role of group norms and group identification and the moderating role of collective self on norm ‐ intention relations. Both studies demonstrated support for the TPB and the inclusion of additional normative variables: attitudes; perceived behavioural control; descriptive; and personal injunctive norms (but not social injunctive norm) emerged as significant independent predictors of intentions. There was no evidence that the impact of norms on intentions varied as a function of the dispositional variables of self‐monitoring (Study 1) or the collective self (Study 2). There was support, however, for the social identity approach to attitude ‐ behaviour relations in that group norms predicted recycling intentions, particularly for individuals who identified strongly with the group. The results of these two studies highlight the critical role of social influence processes within the TPB and the attitude ‐ behaviour context.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18435863</pmid><doi>10.1348/014466608X295207</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-6665 |
| ispartof | British journal of social psychology, 2009-03, Vol.48 (1), p.135-158 |
| issn | 0144-6665 2044-8309 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66862428 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Attitudes Behavioural psychology Biological and medical sciences Conservation of Natural Resources Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Group Identity Group Norms Households Humans Individuality Intention Internal-External Control Locus of Control Male Middle Aged Psychological Theory Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Public Opinion Self Concept Self-management Social attribution, perception and cognition Social Facilitation Social Identification Social Identity Social Influence Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social norms Social psychology Social Responsibility Social Values Waste management Young Adult |
| title | Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T05%3A12%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20influence%20in%20the%20theory%20of%20planned%20behaviour:%20The%20role%20of%20descriptive,%20injunctive,%20and%20in-group%20norms&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=White,%20Katherine%20M.&rft.date=2009-03&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=135-158&rft.issn=0144-6665&rft.eissn=2044-8309&rft.coden=BJSPDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1348/014466608X295207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61743561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37091526&rft_id=info:pmid/18435863&rfr_iscdi=true |