Consensus recommendations for use of central venous access devices in haemophilia

Venous access is essential for delivery of haemophilia factor concentrate. Wherever possible, peripheral veins remain the route of choice, and the use of central venous access devices (CVADs) should be limited to cases of clear need in patients with caregivers able to exercise diligence in CVAD care...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia 2004-09, Vol.10 (5), p.629-648
Hauptverfasser: Ewenstein, B. M., Valentino, L. A., Journeycake, J. M., Tarantino, M. D., Shapiro, A. D., Blanchette, V. S., Hoots, W. K., Buchanan, G. R., Manco-Johnson, M. J., Rivard, G.-E., Miller, K. L., Geraghty, S., Maahs, J. A., Stuart, R., Dunham, T., Navickis, R. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 648
container_issue 5
container_start_page 629
container_title Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
container_volume 10
creator Ewenstein, B. M.
Valentino, L. A.
Journeycake, J. M.
Tarantino, M. D.
Shapiro, A. D.
Blanchette, V. S.
Hoots, W. K.
Buchanan, G. R.
Manco-Johnson, M. J.
Rivard, G.-E.
Miller, K. L.
Geraghty, S.
Maahs, J. A.
Stuart, R.
Dunham, T.
Navickis, R. J.
description Venous access is essential for delivery of haemophilia factor concentrate. Wherever possible, peripheral veins remain the route of choice, and the use of central venous access devices (CVADs) should be limited to cases of clear need in patients with caregivers able to exercise diligence in CVAD care and should continue no longer than necessary. CVADs are of recognized value for repeated administration of coagulation factors in haemophilia, particularly for prophylaxis and immune tolerance therapy and in young children. Evidence to guide best practices has been fragmentary, and standardized methods for CVAD usage have yet to be established. We have developed management recommendations based upon available published evidence as well as extensive clinical experience. These recommendations address patient and CVAD selection; CVAD placement, care and removal; caregiver/patient guidance; and complications, including infection and thrombosis. In the absence of inhibitors, ports are recommended, primarily because of fewer associated infections than with external catheters. For patients with inhibitors, ports also appear to be associated with fewer infections. Infection is the most frequent complication, and recommendations to prevent and treat infections are supported by extensive clinical data and experience. Strict adherence to handwashing and aseptic technique are essential elements of catheter care. Evidence‐based data regarding the detection and treatment of CVAD‐related thrombotic complications are limited. Caregiver education is an integral part of CVAD use and the procedural practices of users should be regularly re‐assessed. These recommendations provide a basis for sound current CVAD practice and are expected to undergo further refinements as new evidence is compiled and clinical experience is gained.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.00943.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66859789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66859789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4023-60bf17a0c2b11a7354a16a1cc96dc045e3b305d1453ad592b5bc50f2d22f26803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtP4zAUhS3EiNfMX0BesUu4tmMnkdigUigDGgRiNEvLcW6ESx7FbqH8e5xpBVu88ZHvOcdXHyGUQcriOZ2nTCiZcMlUygGyFKDMRLreIQefg91RS5YUnKl9chjCHIAJDmqP7DMpZJ6XcEDuJ0MfsA-rQD3aoeuwr83SxUfaDJ6uAtKhoRb7pTctfcV-iE5jLYZAa3x1UVDX0yeD3bB4cq0zP8mPxrQBf23vI_L3cvo4mSW3d1fXk_PbxGbARaKgalhuwPKKMZMLmRmmDLO2VLWFTKKoBMiaZVKYWpa8kpWV0PCa84arAsQROdn0LvzwssKw1J0LFtvW9BiX1EoVssyLMhqLjdH6IQSPjV541xn_rhnoEaee65GaHqnpEaf-j1OvY_R4-8eq6rD-Cm75RcPZxvDmWnz_drGenU-jiPFkE3dhievPuPHPWuUil_rfnyv9-HAzKy7y37HrA_nEkoI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66859789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consensus recommendations for use of central venous access devices in haemophilia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ewenstein, B. M. ; Valentino, L. A. ; Journeycake, J. M. ; Tarantino, M. D. ; Shapiro, A. D. ; Blanchette, V. S. ; Hoots, W. K. ; Buchanan, G. R. ; Manco-Johnson, M. J. ; Rivard, G.-E. ; Miller, K. L. ; Geraghty, S. ; Maahs, J. A. ; Stuart, R. ; Dunham, T. ; Navickis, R. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ewenstein, B. M. ; Valentino, L. A. ; Journeycake, J. M. ; Tarantino, M. D. ; Shapiro, A. D. ; Blanchette, V. S. ; Hoots, W. K. ; Buchanan, G. R. ; Manco-Johnson, M. J. ; Rivard, G.-E. ; Miller, K. L. ; Geraghty, S. ; Maahs, J. A. ; Stuart, R. ; Dunham, T. ; Navickis, R. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Venous access is essential for delivery of haemophilia factor concentrate. Wherever possible, peripheral veins remain the route of choice, and the use of central venous access devices (CVADs) should be limited to cases of clear need in patients with caregivers able to exercise diligence in CVAD care and should continue no longer than necessary. CVADs are of recognized value for repeated administration of coagulation factors in haemophilia, particularly for prophylaxis and immune tolerance therapy and in young children. Evidence to guide best practices has been fragmentary, and standardized methods for CVAD usage have yet to be established. We have developed management recommendations based upon available published evidence as well as extensive clinical experience. These recommendations address patient and CVAD selection; CVAD placement, care and removal; caregiver/patient guidance; and complications, including infection and thrombosis. In the absence of inhibitors, ports are recommended, primarily because of fewer associated infections than with external catheters. For patients with inhibitors, ports also appear to be associated with fewer infections. Infection is the most frequent complication, and recommendations to prevent and treat infections are supported by extensive clinical data and experience. Strict adherence to handwashing and aseptic technique are essential elements of catheter care. Evidence‐based data regarding the detection and treatment of CVAD‐related thrombotic complications are limited. Caregiver education is an integral part of CVAD use and the procedural practices of users should be regularly re‐assessed. These recommendations provide a basis for sound current CVAD practice and are expected to undergo further refinements as new evidence is compiled and clinical experience is gained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-8216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2516</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.00943.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15357790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>catheterization ; Catheterization, Central Venous - methods ; Catheters, Indwelling ; central venous ; Choice Behavior ; Contraindications ; Device Removal ; Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control ; haemophilia A ; haemophilia B ; Hemophilia A - complications ; Humans ; infection ; Infection Control ; Patient Selection ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; practice guidelines ; Risk Assessment ; Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control ; venous thrombosis</subject><ispartof>Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2004-09, Vol.10 (5), p.629-648</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4023-60bf17a0c2b11a7354a16a1cc96dc045e3b305d1453ad592b5bc50f2d22f26803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4023-60bf17a0c2b11a7354a16a1cc96dc045e3b305d1453ad592b5bc50f2d22f26803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2516.2004.00943.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2516.2004.00943.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15357790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ewenstein, B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentino, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Journeycake, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarantino, M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchette, V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoots, W. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, G. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manco-Johnson, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivard, G.-E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geraghty, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maahs, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunham, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navickis, R. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Consensus recommendations for use of central venous access devices in haemophilia</title><title>Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia</title><addtitle>Haemophilia</addtitle><description>Venous access is essential for delivery of haemophilia factor concentrate. Wherever possible, peripheral veins remain the route of choice, and the use of central venous access devices (CVADs) should be limited to cases of clear need in patients with caregivers able to exercise diligence in CVAD care and should continue no longer than necessary. CVADs are of recognized value for repeated administration of coagulation factors in haemophilia, particularly for prophylaxis and immune tolerance therapy and in young children. Evidence to guide best practices has been fragmentary, and standardized methods for CVAD usage have yet to be established. We have developed management recommendations based upon available published evidence as well as extensive clinical experience. These recommendations address patient and CVAD selection; CVAD placement, care and removal; caregiver/patient guidance; and complications, including infection and thrombosis. In the absence of inhibitors, ports are recommended, primarily because of fewer associated infections than with external catheters. For patients with inhibitors, ports also appear to be associated with fewer infections. Infection is the most frequent complication, and recommendations to prevent and treat infections are supported by extensive clinical data and experience. Strict adherence to handwashing and aseptic technique are essential elements of catheter care. Evidence‐based data regarding the detection and treatment of CVAD‐related thrombotic complications are limited. Caregiver education is an integral part of CVAD use and the procedural practices of users should be regularly re‐assessed. These recommendations provide a basis for sound current CVAD practice and are expected to undergo further refinements as new evidence is compiled and clinical experience is gained.</description><subject>catheterization</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling</subject><subject>central venous</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Contraindications</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>haemophilia A</subject><subject>haemophilia B</subject><subject>Hemophilia A - complications</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infection</subject><subject>Infection Control</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>practice guidelines</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>venous thrombosis</subject><issn>1351-8216</issn><issn>1365-2516</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtP4zAUhS3EiNfMX0BesUu4tmMnkdigUigDGgRiNEvLcW6ESx7FbqH8e5xpBVu88ZHvOcdXHyGUQcriOZ2nTCiZcMlUygGyFKDMRLreIQefg91RS5YUnKl9chjCHIAJDmqP7DMpZJ6XcEDuJ0MfsA-rQD3aoeuwr83SxUfaDJ6uAtKhoRb7pTctfcV-iE5jLYZAa3x1UVDX0yeD3bB4cq0zP8mPxrQBf23vI_L3cvo4mSW3d1fXk_PbxGbARaKgalhuwPKKMZMLmRmmDLO2VLWFTKKoBMiaZVKYWpa8kpWV0PCa84arAsQROdn0LvzwssKw1J0LFtvW9BiX1EoVssyLMhqLjdH6IQSPjV541xn_rhnoEaee65GaHqnpEaf-j1OvY_R4-8eq6rD-Cm75RcPZxvDmWnz_drGenU-jiPFkE3dhievPuPHPWuUil_rfnyv9-HAzKy7y37HrA_nEkoI</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>Ewenstein, B. M.</creator><creator>Valentino, L. A.</creator><creator>Journeycake, J. M.</creator><creator>Tarantino, M. D.</creator><creator>Shapiro, A. D.</creator><creator>Blanchette, V. S.</creator><creator>Hoots, W. K.</creator><creator>Buchanan, G. R.</creator><creator>Manco-Johnson, M. J.</creator><creator>Rivard, G.-E.</creator><creator>Miller, K. L.</creator><creator>Geraghty, S.</creator><creator>Maahs, J. A.</creator><creator>Stuart, R.</creator><creator>Dunham, T.</creator><creator>Navickis, R. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>Consensus recommendations for use of central venous access devices in haemophilia</title><author>Ewenstein, B. M. ; Valentino, L. A. ; Journeycake, J. M. ; Tarantino, M. D. ; Shapiro, A. D. ; Blanchette, V. S. ; Hoots, W. K. ; Buchanan, G. R. ; Manco-Johnson, M. J. ; Rivard, G.-E. ; Miller, K. L. ; Geraghty, S. ; Maahs, J. A. ; Stuart, R. ; Dunham, T. ; Navickis, R. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4023-60bf17a0c2b11a7354a16a1cc96dc045e3b305d1453ad592b5bc50f2d22f26803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>catheterization</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling</topic><topic>central venous</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Contraindications</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>haemophilia A</topic><topic>haemophilia B</topic><topic>Hemophilia A - complications</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infection</topic><topic>Infection Control</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>practice guidelines</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>venous thrombosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ewenstein, B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentino, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Journeycake, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarantino, M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchette, V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoots, W. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, G. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manco-Johnson, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivard, G.-E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geraghty, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maahs, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunham, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navickis, R. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ewenstein, B. M.</au><au>Valentino, L. A.</au><au>Journeycake, J. M.</au><au>Tarantino, M. D.</au><au>Shapiro, A. D.</au><au>Blanchette, V. S.</au><au>Hoots, W. K.</au><au>Buchanan, G. R.</au><au>Manco-Johnson, M. J.</au><au>Rivard, G.-E.</au><au>Miller, K. L.</au><au>Geraghty, S.</au><au>Maahs, J. A.</au><au>Stuart, R.</au><au>Dunham, T.</au><au>Navickis, R. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consensus recommendations for use of central venous access devices in haemophilia</atitle><jtitle>Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia</jtitle><addtitle>Haemophilia</addtitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>648</epage><pages>629-648</pages><issn>1351-8216</issn><eissn>1365-2516</eissn><abstract>Venous access is essential for delivery of haemophilia factor concentrate. Wherever possible, peripheral veins remain the route of choice, and the use of central venous access devices (CVADs) should be limited to cases of clear need in patients with caregivers able to exercise diligence in CVAD care and should continue no longer than necessary. CVADs are of recognized value for repeated administration of coagulation factors in haemophilia, particularly for prophylaxis and immune tolerance therapy and in young children. Evidence to guide best practices has been fragmentary, and standardized methods for CVAD usage have yet to be established. We have developed management recommendations based upon available published evidence as well as extensive clinical experience. These recommendations address patient and CVAD selection; CVAD placement, care and removal; caregiver/patient guidance; and complications, including infection and thrombosis. In the absence of inhibitors, ports are recommended, primarily because of fewer associated infections than with external catheters. For patients with inhibitors, ports also appear to be associated with fewer infections. Infection is the most frequent complication, and recommendations to prevent and treat infections are supported by extensive clinical data and experience. Strict adherence to handwashing and aseptic technique are essential elements of catheter care. Evidence‐based data regarding the detection and treatment of CVAD‐related thrombotic complications are limited. Caregiver education is an integral part of CVAD use and the procedural practices of users should be regularly re‐assessed. These recommendations provide a basis for sound current CVAD practice and are expected to undergo further refinements as new evidence is compiled and clinical experience is gained.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>15357790</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.00943.x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-8216
ispartof Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2004-09, Vol.10 (5), p.629-648
issn 1351-8216
1365-2516
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66859789
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects catheterization
Catheterization, Central Venous - methods
Catheters, Indwelling
central venous
Choice Behavior
Contraindications
Device Removal
Equipment Contamination - prevention & control
haemophilia A
haemophilia B
Hemophilia A - complications
Humans
infection
Infection Control
Patient Selection
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
practice guidelines
Risk Assessment
Thrombosis - prevention & control
venous thrombosis
title Consensus recommendations for use of central venous access devices in haemophilia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A06%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consensus%20recommendations%20for%20use%20of%20central%20venous%20access%20devices%20in%20haemophilia&rft.jtitle=Haemophilia%20:%20the%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20World%20Federation%20of%20Hemophilia&rft.au=Ewenstein,%20B.%20M.&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=648&rft.pages=629-648&rft.issn=1351-8216&rft.eissn=1365-2516&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.00943.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66859789%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66859789&rft_id=info:pmid/15357790&rfr_iscdi=true