Pretreatment but not treatment with probiotics abolishes mouse intestinal barrier dysfunction in acute pancreatitis

Background Intestinal barrier failure during acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with translocation of luminal bacteria, resulting in infectious complications. We examined the effects of multispecies probiotics on the intestinal barrier impairment in a murine model of AP. Methods Mice were injecte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2009-02, Vol.145 (2), p.157-167
Hauptverfasser: Rychter, Jakub W., MSc, van Minnen, L. Paul, MD, PhD, Verheem, André, BSc, Timmerman, Harro M., PhD, Rijkers, Ger T., PhD, Schipper, Marguerite E.I., MD, Gooszen, Hein G., MD, PhD, Akkermans, Louis M.A., PhD, Kroese, Alfons B.A., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 167
container_issue 2
container_start_page 157
container_title Surgery
container_volume 145
creator Rychter, Jakub W., MSc
van Minnen, L. Paul, MD, PhD
Verheem, André, BSc
Timmerman, Harro M., PhD
Rijkers, Ger T., PhD
Schipper, Marguerite E.I., MD
Gooszen, Hein G., MD, PhD
Akkermans, Louis M.A., PhD
Kroese, Alfons B.A., PhD
description Background Intestinal barrier failure during acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with translocation of luminal bacteria, resulting in infectious complications. We examined the effects of multispecies probiotics on the intestinal barrier impairment in a murine model of AP. Methods Mice were injected with cerulein to induce AP and were sacrificed 11 (early AP) or 72 hours (late AP) after start of induction. AP and associated systemic effects were confirmed by histology of pancreas and lung. Animals received daily probiotics starting 2 days prior to AP induction (pretreatment) or at the moment of AP induction (treatment). Mucosal barrier function of the distal ileum was assessed in Ussing chambers by measurement of the epithelial electrical resistance and the permeability to Na-fluorescein. Results Histological analysis revealed pancreatic injury in both phases of AP, and lung damage in the early phase. Epithelial resistance of the ileum was reduced and permeability increased in both phases of AP, indicating impairment of the intestinal barrier. Pretreatment had no effect on resistance or permeability in the early phase of AP. In the late phase of AP, pretreatment but not treatment abolished the AP induced resistance decrease and permeability increase. Administration of probiotics as such (ie, without induction of AP) had no effect on intestinal barrier function. Conclusion Pretreatment with multispecies probiotics for 2 days abolishes intestinal barrier dysfunction in the late phase of AP, while treatment does not. The effectiveness of probiotics in this model depends on the timing of administration. Clinical trials with probiotics should seek conditions where treatment can be started prior to onset of disease or elective surgical intervention.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2008.09.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66857296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0039606008006107</els_id><sourcerecordid>66857296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-916f738d4a3cdcbc871b6a10b5177a4ca9eefef0cbbf95760279f7f800f811be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9klGL1DAQx4so3t7pF_BB8qJvrZN2mzQgghx6CgcK6nNI0omXtZuumVTZb2_KLh744FMg-c3kz2-mqp5xaDhw8WrX0JK-Ny3A0IBqgPMH1Yb3XVvLTvCH1QagU7UAARfVJdEOANSWD4-rC664kErCpqLPCXNCk_cYM7NLZnHO7P7md8h37JBmG-YcHDFj5ynQHRLbzwshCzEj5RDNxKxJKWBi45H8El0OcyzPzLglIzuY6NamIQd6Uj3yZiJ8ej6vqm_v3329_lDffrr5eP32tnbbTuW6ZPSyG8at6dzorBskt8JwsD2X0mydUYgePThrveqlgFYqL_0A4AfOLXZX1ctT35L_51Ji6n0gh9NkIpbwWoihl60SBWxPoEszUUKvDynsTTpqDnpVrXd6Va1X1RqULqpL0fNz98XucbwvObstwIszYMiZyaeiINBfruW87Ya-L9zrE4fFxa9iUJMLGB2OIaHLepzD_3O8-afcTSGG8uMPPCLt5iWV6ZDmmloN-su6FOtOQBElOMjuD-FatZc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66857296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pretreatment but not treatment with probiotics abolishes mouse intestinal barrier dysfunction in acute pancreatitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rychter, Jakub W., MSc ; van Minnen, L. Paul, MD, PhD ; Verheem, André, BSc ; Timmerman, Harro M., PhD ; Rijkers, Ger T., PhD ; Schipper, Marguerite E.I., MD ; Gooszen, Hein G., MD, PhD ; Akkermans, Louis M.A., PhD ; Kroese, Alfons B.A., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Rychter, Jakub W., MSc ; van Minnen, L. Paul, MD, PhD ; Verheem, André, BSc ; Timmerman, Harro M., PhD ; Rijkers, Ger T., PhD ; Schipper, Marguerite E.I., MD ; Gooszen, Hein G., MD, PhD ; Akkermans, Louis M.A., PhD ; Kroese, Alfons B.A., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Intestinal barrier failure during acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with translocation of luminal bacteria, resulting in infectious complications. We examined the effects of multispecies probiotics on the intestinal barrier impairment in a murine model of AP. Methods Mice were injected with cerulein to induce AP and were sacrificed 11 (early AP) or 72 hours (late AP) after start of induction. AP and associated systemic effects were confirmed by histology of pancreas and lung. Animals received daily probiotics starting 2 days prior to AP induction (pretreatment) or at the moment of AP induction (treatment). Mucosal barrier function of the distal ileum was assessed in Ussing chambers by measurement of the epithelial electrical resistance and the permeability to Na-fluorescein. Results Histological analysis revealed pancreatic injury in both phases of AP, and lung damage in the early phase. Epithelial resistance of the ileum was reduced and permeability increased in both phases of AP, indicating impairment of the intestinal barrier. Pretreatment had no effect on resistance or permeability in the early phase of AP. In the late phase of AP, pretreatment but not treatment abolished the AP induced resistance decrease and permeability increase. Administration of probiotics as such (ie, without induction of AP) had no effect on intestinal barrier function. Conclusion Pretreatment with multispecies probiotics for 2 days abolishes intestinal barrier dysfunction in the late phase of AP, while treatment does not. The effectiveness of probiotics in this model depends on the timing of administration. Clinical trials with probiotics should seek conditions where treatment can be started prior to onset of disease or elective surgical intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.09.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19167970</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SURGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacterial Translocation ; Bifidobacterium ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ceruletide ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; General aspects ; Ileal Diseases - etiology ; Ileal Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Lactobacillus acidophilus ; Lactobacillus casei ; Lactococcus lactis ; Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas ; Lung - pathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Pancreas - pathology ; Pancreatitis - complications ; Pancreatitis - pathology ; Probiotics - administration &amp; dosage ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2009-02, Vol.145 (2), p.157-167</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-916f738d4a3cdcbc871b6a10b5177a4ca9eefef0cbbf95760279f7f800f811be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-916f738d4a3cdcbc871b6a10b5177a4ca9eefef0cbbf95760279f7f800f811be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606008006107$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21123855$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19167970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rychter, Jakub W., MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Minnen, L. Paul, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheem, André, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmerman, Harro M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijkers, Ger T., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, Marguerite E.I., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooszen, Hein G., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkermans, Louis M.A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroese, Alfons B.A., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Pretreatment but not treatment with probiotics abolishes mouse intestinal barrier dysfunction in acute pancreatitis</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Background Intestinal barrier failure during acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with translocation of luminal bacteria, resulting in infectious complications. We examined the effects of multispecies probiotics on the intestinal barrier impairment in a murine model of AP. Methods Mice were injected with cerulein to induce AP and were sacrificed 11 (early AP) or 72 hours (late AP) after start of induction. AP and associated systemic effects were confirmed by histology of pancreas and lung. Animals received daily probiotics starting 2 days prior to AP induction (pretreatment) or at the moment of AP induction (treatment). Mucosal barrier function of the distal ileum was assessed in Ussing chambers by measurement of the epithelial electrical resistance and the permeability to Na-fluorescein. Results Histological analysis revealed pancreatic injury in both phases of AP, and lung damage in the early phase. Epithelial resistance of the ileum was reduced and permeability increased in both phases of AP, indicating impairment of the intestinal barrier. Pretreatment had no effect on resistance or permeability in the early phase of AP. In the late phase of AP, pretreatment but not treatment abolished the AP induced resistance decrease and permeability increase. Administration of probiotics as such (ie, without induction of AP) had no effect on intestinal barrier function. Conclusion Pretreatment with multispecies probiotics for 2 days abolishes intestinal barrier dysfunction in the late phase of AP, while treatment does not. The effectiveness of probiotics in this model depends on the timing of administration. Clinical trials with probiotics should seek conditions where treatment can be started prior to onset of disease or elective surgical intervention.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacterial Translocation</subject><subject>Bifidobacterium</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ceruletide</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Ileal Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Ileal Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Lactobacillus acidophilus</subject><subject>Lactobacillus casei</subject><subject>Lactococcus lactis</subject><subject>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</subject><subject>Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Pancreas - pathology</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - complications</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - pathology</subject><subject>Probiotics - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9klGL1DAQx4so3t7pF_BB8qJvrZN2mzQgghx6CgcK6nNI0omXtZuumVTZb2_KLh744FMg-c3kz2-mqp5xaDhw8WrX0JK-Ny3A0IBqgPMH1Yb3XVvLTvCH1QagU7UAARfVJdEOANSWD4-rC664kErCpqLPCXNCk_cYM7NLZnHO7P7md8h37JBmG-YcHDFj5ynQHRLbzwshCzEj5RDNxKxJKWBi45H8El0OcyzPzLglIzuY6NamIQd6Uj3yZiJ8ej6vqm_v3329_lDffrr5eP32tnbbTuW6ZPSyG8at6dzorBskt8JwsD2X0mydUYgePThrveqlgFYqL_0A4AfOLXZX1ctT35L_51Ji6n0gh9NkIpbwWoihl60SBWxPoEszUUKvDynsTTpqDnpVrXd6Va1X1RqULqpL0fNz98XucbwvObstwIszYMiZyaeiINBfruW87Ya-L9zrE4fFxa9iUJMLGB2OIaHLepzD_3O8-afcTSGG8uMPPCLt5iWV6ZDmmloN-su6FOtOQBElOMjuD-FatZc</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Rychter, Jakub W., MSc</creator><creator>van Minnen, L. Paul, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Verheem, André, BSc</creator><creator>Timmerman, Harro M., PhD</creator><creator>Rijkers, Ger T., PhD</creator><creator>Schipper, Marguerite E.I., MD</creator><creator>Gooszen, Hein G., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Akkermans, Louis M.A., PhD</creator><creator>Kroese, Alfons B.A., PhD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Pretreatment but not treatment with probiotics abolishes mouse intestinal barrier dysfunction in acute pancreatitis</title><author>Rychter, Jakub W., MSc ; van Minnen, L. Paul, MD, PhD ; Verheem, André, BSc ; Timmerman, Harro M., PhD ; Rijkers, Ger T., PhD ; Schipper, Marguerite E.I., MD ; Gooszen, Hein G., MD, PhD ; Akkermans, Louis M.A., PhD ; Kroese, Alfons B.A., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-916f738d4a3cdcbc871b6a10b5177a4ca9eefef0cbbf95760279f7f800f811be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacterial Translocation</topic><topic>Bifidobacterium</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ceruletide</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Ileal Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Ileal Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Lactobacillus acidophilus</topic><topic>Lactobacillus casei</topic><topic>Lactococcus lactis</topic><topic>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</topic><topic>Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Pancreas - pathology</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - complications</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - pathology</topic><topic>Probiotics - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rychter, Jakub W., MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Minnen, L. Paul, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheem, André, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmerman, Harro M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijkers, Ger T., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, Marguerite E.I., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooszen, Hein G., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkermans, Louis M.A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroese, Alfons B.A., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rychter, Jakub W., MSc</au><au>van Minnen, L. Paul, MD, PhD</au><au>Verheem, André, BSc</au><au>Timmerman, Harro M., PhD</au><au>Rijkers, Ger T., PhD</au><au>Schipper, Marguerite E.I., MD</au><au>Gooszen, Hein G., MD, PhD</au><au>Akkermans, Louis M.A., PhD</au><au>Kroese, Alfons B.A., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pretreatment but not treatment with probiotics abolishes mouse intestinal barrier dysfunction in acute pancreatitis</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>157-167</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><coden>SURGAZ</coden><abstract>Background Intestinal barrier failure during acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with translocation of luminal bacteria, resulting in infectious complications. We examined the effects of multispecies probiotics on the intestinal barrier impairment in a murine model of AP. Methods Mice were injected with cerulein to induce AP and were sacrificed 11 (early AP) or 72 hours (late AP) after start of induction. AP and associated systemic effects were confirmed by histology of pancreas and lung. Animals received daily probiotics starting 2 days prior to AP induction (pretreatment) or at the moment of AP induction (treatment). Mucosal barrier function of the distal ileum was assessed in Ussing chambers by measurement of the epithelial electrical resistance and the permeability to Na-fluorescein. Results Histological analysis revealed pancreatic injury in both phases of AP, and lung damage in the early phase. Epithelial resistance of the ileum was reduced and permeability increased in both phases of AP, indicating impairment of the intestinal barrier. Pretreatment had no effect on resistance or permeability in the early phase of AP. In the late phase of AP, pretreatment but not treatment abolished the AP induced resistance decrease and permeability increase. Administration of probiotics as such (ie, without induction of AP) had no effect on intestinal barrier function. Conclusion Pretreatment with multispecies probiotics for 2 days abolishes intestinal barrier dysfunction in the late phase of AP, while treatment does not. The effectiveness of probiotics in this model depends on the timing of administration. Clinical trials with probiotics should seek conditions where treatment can be started prior to onset of disease or elective surgical intervention.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>19167970</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2008.09.011</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2009-02, Vol.145 (2), p.157-167
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66857296
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Bacterial Translocation
Bifidobacterium
Biological and medical sciences
Ceruletide
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
General aspects
Ileal Diseases - etiology
Ileal Diseases - prevention & control
Lactobacillus acidophilus
Lactobacillus casei
Lactococcus lactis
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
Lung - pathology
Male
Medical sciences
Mice
Other diseases. Semiology
Pancreas - pathology
Pancreatitis - complications
Pancreatitis - pathology
Probiotics - administration & dosage
Surgery
title Pretreatment but not treatment with probiotics abolishes mouse intestinal barrier dysfunction in acute pancreatitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A43%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pretreatment%20but%20not%20treatment%20with%20probiotics%20abolishes%20mouse%20intestinal%20barrier%20dysfunction%20in%20acute%20pancreatitis&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Rychter,%20Jakub%20W.,%20MSc&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=157-167&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft.coden=SURGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2008.09.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66857296%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66857296&rft_id=info:pmid/19167970&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0039606008006107&rfr_iscdi=true