Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate
To determine whether end-fire probes increase the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. Enhancing the PCa detection rate is the main goal of biopsy protocols. Prostate biopsy is limited by side-fire probes to a longitudinal axis, but end-fire probes allow biopsy cores to also be taken in the transve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2004-09, Vol.64 (3), p.532-536 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 536 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 532 |
container_title | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Paul, Roger Korzinek, Christian Necknig, Ulrike Niesel, Thomas Alschibaja, Michael Leyh, Herbert Hartung, Rudolf |
description | To determine whether end-fire probes increase the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. Enhancing the PCa detection rate is the main goal of biopsy protocols. Prostate biopsy is limited by side-fire probes to a longitudinal axis, but end-fire probes allow biopsy cores to also be taken in the transverse section.
A total of 2625 patients underwent systematic sextant biopsy in three institutions using the same protocol. Three different ultrasound probes were used—the Kretz Combisone and Bruel & Kjaer side-fire probes and the ATL HDI end-fire probe. We retrospectively evaluated the influence of the probe on the PCa detection rate.
The Kretz probe was used in 384 men, the Bruel & Kjaer probe in 598 men, and the ATL probe in 1643 men. Overall, 35.2% had PCa detected. Analyzing all patients, no statistically significant difference (
P = 0.73) was found for the probes, but the subgroup with a prostate-specific antigen level of 4 to 10 ng/mL demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the detection rate using the end-fire probe (31.3% versus 24.5% and 21.5% for the side-fire probes,
P = 0.01). Patients with nonpalpable PCa also demonstrated a statistically significant increase in detection with the end-fire probe (
P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the ultrasound probe is an independent parameter to enhance the PCa detection rate.
Our results showed that end-fire probes provide a statistically significant improvement in the PCa detection rate compared with side-fire probes in patients with a prostate-specific antigen level of 4 to 10 ng/mL and nonpalpable disease. The reason could be the facilitated sampling in the most lateral part of the peripheral zone. Our results suggest that the widespread use of end-fire probes for prostate biopsy could enhance the PCa detection rate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66849267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429504004285</els_id><sourcerecordid>66849267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-3a521e1607603b3fe1680231b5c99fe0e3a7788ab55ea2c518bd6fcc4c5511193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQhkVJaDZpH6HFl_TmzYy8I1unEkKbBgK5JGchy-OgxWtvLbl0r3nyyKxLTqEwoBHz_TOjX0J8QVgjoLrarqdx6Ibnw1oCbNZzAH0QKyRZ5lprOhErAA35Rmo6E-chbAFAKVV-FGdIBSFVtBIvd33bTdw7zoY2i6Ptw8gu2i6bunQLw9Q32X4c6lTv5yREGzlzNinGrOGYYJ8qvn9HnD9PvuEmC_w32j5mtR_24TAP-9fskzhtbRf483JeiKefPx5vfuX3D7d3N9f3uSs0xrywJJFRQamgqIs2pRXIAmtyWrcMXNiyrCpbE7GVjrCqG9U6t3FEiKiLC_Ht2DcN_j1xiGbng-Ousz0PUzBKVRstVZlAOoIubZhe1Jr96Hd2PBgEM5tvtmYx38zmmzmAku7rMmCqd9y8qRa3E3C5ADY427XJMOfDG6cQlSxl4r4fOU52_PE8muD8_EeNn_01zeD_s8orriupLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66849267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Paul, Roger ; Korzinek, Christian ; Necknig, Ulrike ; Niesel, Thomas ; Alschibaja, Michael ; Leyh, Herbert ; Hartung, Rudolf</creator><creatorcontrib>Paul, Roger ; Korzinek, Christian ; Necknig, Ulrike ; Niesel, Thomas ; Alschibaja, Michael ; Leyh, Herbert ; Hartung, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether end-fire probes increase the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. Enhancing the PCa detection rate is the main goal of biopsy protocols. Prostate biopsy is limited by side-fire probes to a longitudinal axis, but end-fire probes allow biopsy cores to also be taken in the transverse section.
A total of 2625 patients underwent systematic sextant biopsy in three institutions using the same protocol. Three different ultrasound probes were used—the Kretz Combisone and Bruel & Kjaer side-fire probes and the ATL HDI end-fire probe. We retrospectively evaluated the influence of the probe on the PCa detection rate.
The Kretz probe was used in 384 men, the Bruel & Kjaer probe in 598 men, and the ATL probe in 1643 men. Overall, 35.2% had PCa detected. Analyzing all patients, no statistically significant difference (
P = 0.73) was found for the probes, but the subgroup with a prostate-specific antigen level of 4 to 10 ng/mL demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the detection rate using the end-fire probe (31.3% versus 24.5% and 21.5% for the side-fire probes,
P = 0.01). Patients with nonpalpable PCa also demonstrated a statistically significant increase in detection with the end-fire probe (
P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the ultrasound probe is an independent parameter to enhance the PCa detection rate.
Our results showed that end-fire probes provide a statistically significant improvement in the PCa detection rate compared with side-fire probes in patients with a prostate-specific antigen level of 4 to 10 ng/mL and nonpalpable disease. The reason could be the facilitated sampling in the most lateral part of the peripheral zone. Our results suggest that the widespread use of end-fire probes for prostate biopsy could enhance the PCa detection rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15351585</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; Biopsy, Needle ; Equipment Design ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Male ; Male genital diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Proteins - blood ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Palpation ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tumors ; Tumors of the urinary system ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - instrumentation ; Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2004-09, Vol.64 (3), p.532-536</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-3a521e1607603b3fe1680231b5c99fe0e3a7788ab55ea2c518bd6fcc4c5511193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-3a521e1607603b3fe1680231b5c99fe0e3a7788ab55ea2c518bd6fcc4c5511193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429504004285$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16116272$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15351585$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paul, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korzinek, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Necknig, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niesel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alschibaja, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyh, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartung, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>To determine whether end-fire probes increase the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. Enhancing the PCa detection rate is the main goal of biopsy protocols. Prostate biopsy is limited by side-fire probes to a longitudinal axis, but end-fire probes allow biopsy cores to also be taken in the transverse section.
A total of 2625 patients underwent systematic sextant biopsy in three institutions using the same protocol. Three different ultrasound probes were used—the Kretz Combisone and Bruel & Kjaer side-fire probes and the ATL HDI end-fire probe. We retrospectively evaluated the influence of the probe on the PCa detection rate.
The Kretz probe was used in 384 men, the Bruel & Kjaer probe in 598 men, and the ATL probe in 1643 men. Overall, 35.2% had PCa detected. Analyzing all patients, no statistically significant difference (
P = 0.73) was found for the probes, but the subgroup with a prostate-specific antigen level of 4 to 10 ng/mL demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the detection rate using the end-fire probe (31.3% versus 24.5% and 21.5% for the side-fire probes,
P = 0.01). Patients with nonpalpable PCa also demonstrated a statistically significant increase in detection with the end-fire probe (
P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the ultrasound probe is an independent parameter to enhance the PCa detection rate.
Our results showed that end-fire probes provide a statistically significant improvement in the PCa detection rate compared with side-fire probes in patients with a prostate-specific antigen level of 4 to 10 ng/mL and nonpalpable disease. The reason could be the facilitated sampling in the most lateral part of the peripheral zone. Our results suggest that the widespread use of end-fire probes for prostate biopsy could enhance the PCa detection rate.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male genital diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Palpation</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the urinary system</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - instrumentation</subject><subject>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQhkVJaDZpH6HFl_TmzYy8I1unEkKbBgK5JGchy-OgxWtvLbl0r3nyyKxLTqEwoBHz_TOjX0J8QVgjoLrarqdx6Ibnw1oCbNZzAH0QKyRZ5lprOhErAA35Rmo6E-chbAFAKVV-FGdIBSFVtBIvd33bTdw7zoY2i6Ptw8gu2i6bunQLw9Q32X4c6lTv5yREGzlzNinGrOGYYJ8qvn9HnD9PvuEmC_w32j5mtR_24TAP-9fskzhtbRf483JeiKefPx5vfuX3D7d3N9f3uSs0xrywJJFRQamgqIs2pRXIAmtyWrcMXNiyrCpbE7GVjrCqG9U6t3FEiKiLC_Ht2DcN_j1xiGbng-Ousz0PUzBKVRstVZlAOoIubZhe1Jr96Hd2PBgEM5tvtmYx38zmmzmAku7rMmCqd9y8qRa3E3C5ADY427XJMOfDG6cQlSxl4r4fOU52_PE8muD8_EeNn_01zeD_s8orriupLw</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Paul, Roger</creator><creator>Korzinek, Christian</creator><creator>Necknig, Ulrike</creator><creator>Niesel, Thomas</creator><creator>Alschibaja, Michael</creator><creator>Leyh, Herbert</creator><creator>Hartung, Rudolf</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate</title><author>Paul, Roger ; Korzinek, Christian ; Necknig, Ulrike ; Niesel, Thomas ; Alschibaja, Michael ; Leyh, Herbert ; Hartung, Rudolf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-3a521e1607603b3fe1680231b5c99fe0e3a7788ab55ea2c518bd6fcc4c5511193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male genital diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Palpation</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the urinary system</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - instrumentation</topic><topic>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paul, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korzinek, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Necknig, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niesel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alschibaja, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyh, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartung, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paul, Roger</au><au>Korzinek, Christian</au><au>Necknig, Ulrike</au><au>Niesel, Thomas</au><au>Alschibaja, Michael</au><au>Leyh, Herbert</au><au>Hartung, Rudolf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>532</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>532-536</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>To determine whether end-fire probes increase the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. Enhancing the PCa detection rate is the main goal of biopsy protocols. Prostate biopsy is limited by side-fire probes to a longitudinal axis, but end-fire probes allow biopsy cores to also be taken in the transverse section.
A total of 2625 patients underwent systematic sextant biopsy in three institutions using the same protocol. Three different ultrasound probes were used—the Kretz Combisone and Bruel & Kjaer side-fire probes and the ATL HDI end-fire probe. We retrospectively evaluated the influence of the probe on the PCa detection rate.
The Kretz probe was used in 384 men, the Bruel & Kjaer probe in 598 men, and the ATL probe in 1643 men. Overall, 35.2% had PCa detected. Analyzing all patients, no statistically significant difference (
P = 0.73) was found for the probes, but the subgroup with a prostate-specific antigen level of 4 to 10 ng/mL demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the detection rate using the end-fire probe (31.3% versus 24.5% and 21.5% for the side-fire probes,
P = 0.01). Patients with nonpalpable PCa also demonstrated a statistically significant increase in detection with the end-fire probe (
P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the ultrasound probe is an independent parameter to enhance the PCa detection rate.
Our results showed that end-fire probes provide a statistically significant improvement in the PCa detection rate compared with side-fire probes in patients with a prostate-specific antigen level of 4 to 10 ng/mL and nonpalpable disease. The reason could be the facilitated sampling in the most lateral part of the peripheral zone. Our results suggest that the widespread use of end-fire probes for prostate biopsy could enhance the PCa detection rate.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15351585</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-4295 |
ispartof | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2004-09, Vol.64 (3), p.532-536 |
issn | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66849267 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers, Tumor - blood Biopsy, Needle Equipment Design Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Male Male genital diseases Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasm Proteins - blood Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Palpation Prostate - diagnostic imaging Prostate - pathology Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood Prostatic Neoplasms - blood Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Tumors Tumors of the urinary system Ultrasonography, Interventional - instrumentation Urinary tract. Prostate gland |
title | Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A23%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20transrectal%20ultrasound%20probe%20on%20prostate%20cancer%20detection%20in%20transrectal%20ultrasound-guided%20sextant%20biopsy%20of%20prostate&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Paul,%20Roger&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=532&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=532-536&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66849267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66849267&rft_id=info:pmid/15351585&rft_els_id=S0090429504004285&rfr_iscdi=true |