Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation
Cut-out of the lag screw is the commonest cause of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation of extracapsular hip fracture. A number of technical aspects of surgery have been used to asses the risk of cut-out. This study was to determine which of these indicators was the most reliable predic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2004-10, Vol.35 (10), p.994-998 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 998 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 994 |
container_title | Injury |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Pervez, Humayon Parker, Martyn J. Vowler, Sarah |
description | Cut-out of the lag screw is the commonest cause of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation of extracapsular hip fracture. A number of technical aspects of surgery have been used to asses the risk of cut-out. This study was to determine which of these indicators was the most reliable predictor of cut-out.
The anterior–posterior and lateral post-operative radiographs of 23 cases of cut-out were compared with those of 77 cases of uneventful fracture healing. The tip–apex distance with correction for magnification was found to show the most significant difference between patients with cut-out against those without (
P = 0.001), followed by the lag screw position on the lateral radiographs (
P=0.0095 and 0.014), reduction of the fracture on the anterior–posterior radiograph (
P=0.011 and 0.016) and the uncorrected tip–apex distance (
P=0.019).
We recommend that for audit and research purposes the corrected tip–apex distance, fracture reduction and implant positioning methods should be used. For routine clinical practice, the uncorrected tip to apex distance, which is sum of the distance from the tip of the lag screw to the apex of the femoral head on anterior–posterior and lateral radiograph, and fracture reduction angle on the anterior–posterior radiograph are recommended. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66848852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020138303004674</els_id><sourcerecordid>66848852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-1b58400270b38a0dacfdd15049a3302119e186ef4f57ced460f712fb3c9cfeb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEYuPjHyDUC9w67KZNswsITXxJSHDYPUpTBzJ17UhaPv49GZvgxsmW9fiV_TB2gjBBQHGxmLh2MfivSQbA42gCmdxhY5TlNIVMlLtsDJBBilzyETsIYQGAJXC-z0ZY8AKFKMbs6tlT7UzvujbpbGLdp_7prXbN4CnRtiefhMbVrn1JXt0qCcbTxy94xPasbgIdb-shm9_ezGf36ePT3cPs-jE1ueR9ilUh83hOCRWXGmptbF1jAflUcw4Z4pRQCrK5LUpDdS7AlpjZipupsVTxQ3a-iV357m2g0KulC4aaRrfUDUEJIXMpiyyC-QY0vgvBk1Ur75bafykEtfamFmrjTa29rafRW1w73eYP1ZLqv6WtqAicbQEdjG6s161x4Y8TGFFcB11uOIoy3h15FYyjNv7kPJle1Z37_5JvP46NoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66848852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pervez, Humayon ; Parker, Martyn J. ; Vowler, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Pervez, Humayon ; Parker, Martyn J. ; Vowler, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>Cut-out of the lag screw is the commonest cause of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation of extracapsular hip fracture. A number of technical aspects of surgery have been used to asses the risk of cut-out. This study was to determine which of these indicators was the most reliable predictor of cut-out.
The anterior–posterior and lateral post-operative radiographs of 23 cases of cut-out were compared with those of 77 cases of uneventful fracture healing. The tip–apex distance with correction for magnification was found to show the most significant difference between patients with cut-out against those without (
P = 0.001), followed by the lag screw position on the lateral radiographs (
P=0.0095 and 0.014), reduction of the fracture on the anterior–posterior radiograph (
P=0.011 and 0.016) and the uncorrected tip–apex distance (
P=0.019).
We recommend that for audit and research purposes the corrected tip–apex distance, fracture reduction and implant positioning methods should be used. For routine clinical practice, the uncorrected tip to apex distance, which is sum of the distance from the tip of the lag screw to the apex of the femoral head on anterior–posterior and lateral radiograph, and fracture reduction angle on the anterior–posterior radiograph are recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15351665</identifier><identifier>CODEN: INJUBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Screws ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Extracapsular fractures ; Female ; Femur Head - pathology ; Femur Head - surgery ; Fixation failure ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fracture Healing - physiology ; Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Fractures - surgery ; Humans ; Internal Fixators ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Prediction ; Prosthesis Failure ; Radiography ; Sliding hip screw ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2004-10, Vol.35 (10), p.994-998</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-1b58400270b38a0dacfdd15049a3302119e186ef4f57ced460f712fb3c9cfeb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-1b58400270b38a0dacfdd15049a3302119e186ef4f57ced460f712fb3c9cfeb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138303004674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16115318$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15351665$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pervez, Humayon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Martyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vowler, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Cut-out of the lag screw is the commonest cause of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation of extracapsular hip fracture. A number of technical aspects of surgery have been used to asses the risk of cut-out. This study was to determine which of these indicators was the most reliable predictor of cut-out.
The anterior–posterior and lateral post-operative radiographs of 23 cases of cut-out were compared with those of 77 cases of uneventful fracture healing. The tip–apex distance with correction for magnification was found to show the most significant difference between patients with cut-out against those without (
P = 0.001), followed by the lag screw position on the lateral radiographs (
P=0.0095 and 0.014), reduction of the fracture on the anterior–posterior radiograph (
P=0.011 and 0.016) and the uncorrected tip–apex distance (
P=0.019).
We recommend that for audit and research purposes the corrected tip–apex distance, fracture reduction and implant positioning methods should be used. For routine clinical practice, the uncorrected tip to apex distance, which is sum of the distance from the tip of the lag screw to the apex of the femoral head on anterior–posterior and lateral radiograph, and fracture reduction angle on the anterior–posterior radiograph are recommended.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Extracapsular fractures</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur Head - pathology</subject><subject>Femur Head - surgery</subject><subject>Fixation failure</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fracture Healing - physiology</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Fixators</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Sliding hip screw</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEYuPjHyDUC9w67KZNswsITXxJSHDYPUpTBzJ17UhaPv49GZvgxsmW9fiV_TB2gjBBQHGxmLh2MfivSQbA42gCmdxhY5TlNIVMlLtsDJBBilzyETsIYQGAJXC-z0ZY8AKFKMbs6tlT7UzvujbpbGLdp_7prXbN4CnRtiefhMbVrn1JXt0qCcbTxy94xPasbgIdb-shm9_ezGf36ePT3cPs-jE1ueR9ilUh83hOCRWXGmptbF1jAflUcw4Z4pRQCrK5LUpDdS7AlpjZipupsVTxQ3a-iV357m2g0KulC4aaRrfUDUEJIXMpiyyC-QY0vgvBk1Ur75bafykEtfamFmrjTa29rafRW1w73eYP1ZLqv6WtqAicbQEdjG6s161x4Y8TGFFcB11uOIoy3h15FYyjNv7kPJle1Z37_5JvP46NoQ</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Pervez, Humayon</creator><creator>Parker, Martyn J.</creator><creator>Vowler, Sarah</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation</title><author>Pervez, Humayon ; Parker, Martyn J. ; Vowler, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-1b58400270b38a0dacfdd15049a3302119e186ef4f57ced460f712fb3c9cfeb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Extracapsular fractures</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur Head - pathology</topic><topic>Femur Head - surgery</topic><topic>Fixation failure</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fracture Healing - physiology</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Fixators</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Sliding hip screw</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pervez, Humayon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Martyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vowler, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pervez, Humayon</au><au>Parker, Martyn J.</au><au>Vowler, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>994</spage><epage>998</epage><pages>994-998</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><coden>INJUBF</coden><abstract>Cut-out of the lag screw is the commonest cause of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation of extracapsular hip fracture. A number of technical aspects of surgery have been used to asses the risk of cut-out. This study was to determine which of these indicators was the most reliable predictor of cut-out.
The anterior–posterior and lateral post-operative radiographs of 23 cases of cut-out were compared with those of 77 cases of uneventful fracture healing. The tip–apex distance with correction for magnification was found to show the most significant difference between patients with cut-out against those without (
P = 0.001), followed by the lag screw position on the lateral radiographs (
P=0.0095 and 0.014), reduction of the fracture on the anterior–posterior radiograph (
P=0.011 and 0.016) and the uncorrected tip–apex distance (
P=0.019).
We recommend that for audit and research purposes the corrected tip–apex distance, fracture reduction and implant positioning methods should be used. For routine clinical practice, the uncorrected tip to apex distance, which is sum of the distance from the tip of the lag screw to the apex of the femoral head on anterior–posterior and lateral radiograph, and fracture reduction angle on the anterior–posterior radiograph are recommended.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15351665</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.028</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-1383 |
ispartof | Injury, 2004-10, Vol.35 (10), p.994-998 |
issn | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66848852 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Bone Screws Diseases of the osteoarticular system Extracapsular fractures Female Femur Head - pathology Femur Head - surgery Fixation failure Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods Fracture Healing - physiology Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging Hip Fractures - surgery Humans Internal Fixators Male Medical sciences Prediction Prosthesis Failure Radiography Sliding hip screw Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents Treatment Failure |
title | Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A59%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20fixation%20failure%20after%20sliding%20hip%20screw%20fixation&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Pervez,%20Humayon&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=994&rft.epage=998&rft.pages=994-998&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft.coden=INJUBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66848852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66848852&rft_id=info:pmid/15351665&rft_els_id=S0020138303004674&rfr_iscdi=true |