The comparative evaluation of expanded national immunization policies in Korea using an analytic hierarchy process
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to propose new evaluation criteria and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model to assess the expanded national immunization programs (ENIPs) and to evaluate two alternative health care policies. One of the alternative policies is that private clinics and hospi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2009-01, Vol.27 (5), p.792-802 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 802 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 792 |
| container_title | Vaccine |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Shin, Taeksoo Kim, Chun-Bae Ahn, Yang-Heui Kim, Hyo-Youl Cha, Byung Ho Uh, Young Lee, Joo-Heon Hyun, Sook-Jung Lee, Dong-Han Go, Un-Yeong |
| description | Abstract The purpose of this paper is to propose new evaluation criteria and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model to assess the expanded national immunization programs (ENIPs) and to evaluate two alternative health care policies. One of the alternative policies is that private clinics and hospitals would offer free vaccination services to children and the other of them is that public health centers would offer these free vaccination services. Our model to evaluate the ENIPs was developed using brainstorming, Delphi techniques, and the AHP model. We first used the brainstorming and Delphi techniques, as well as literature reviews, to determine 25 criteria with which to evaluate the national immunization policy; we then proposed a hierarchical structure of the AHP model to assess ENIPs. By applying the proposed AHP model to the assessment of ENIPs for Korean immunization policies, we show that free vaccination services should be provided by private clinics and hospitals rather than public health centers. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.075 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66844036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X08014540</els_id><sourcerecordid>3476750851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-aa49e7d42a2ada211865374db3cae2e384cf77e96dd53045aa49fdd5ad2b8a123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt-L1DAQx4so3t7pn6AExHvrmqRpm74ocvgLD3zwBN_CbDJ1s7bpmrSL61_v1C0e3MtBIMPwmZnM95sseyb4WnBRvdqtD2CtD7iWnGvKrXldPshWQtdFLkuhH2YrLiuVK8G_n2XnKe0452UhmsfZmWi4UE3DV1m82SKzQ7-HCKM_IMMDdBOFQ2BDy_D3HoJDx8K_FHTM9_0U_J8TsR86bz0m5gP7PEQENiUffjAIdKA7jt6yrccI0W6PbB8Hiyk9yR610CV8utwX2bf3726uPubXXz58unp7nduS12MOoBqsnZIgwYEUQldlUSu3KSygxEIr29Y1NpVzZcFVOfMtxeDkRoOQxUV2eepLc39NmEbT-2Sx6yDgMCVTVVopXlT3gpIXDa-EIvDFHXA3TJEWTUZUQmuSvdZElSfKxiGliK3ZR99DPBrBzeyd2ZnFOzN7N6fJO6p7vnSfNj2626rFLAJeLgAkC10bIVif_nMkEW1T1cS9OXFI6h5IfpPIpGDR-Yh2NG7w9z7l9Z0OtvPB09CfeMR0u7VJ0nDzdf5o8z_jmp5akqh_AT9M0ME</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1618825178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The comparative evaluation of expanded national immunization policies in Korea using an analytic hierarchy process</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Shin, Taeksoo ; Kim, Chun-Bae ; Ahn, Yang-Heui ; Kim, Hyo-Youl ; Cha, Byung Ho ; Uh, Young ; Lee, Joo-Heon ; Hyun, Sook-Jung ; Lee, Dong-Han ; Go, Un-Yeong</creator><creatorcontrib>Shin, Taeksoo ; Kim, Chun-Bae ; Ahn, Yang-Heui ; Kim, Hyo-Youl ; Cha, Byung Ho ; Uh, Young ; Lee, Joo-Heon ; Hyun, Sook-Jung ; Lee, Dong-Han ; Go, Un-Yeong</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The purpose of this paper is to propose new evaluation criteria and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model to assess the expanded national immunization programs (ENIPs) and to evaluate two alternative health care policies. One of the alternative policies is that private clinics and hospitals would offer free vaccination services to children and the other of them is that public health centers would offer these free vaccination services. Our model to evaluate the ENIPs was developed using brainstorming, Delphi techniques, and the AHP model. We first used the brainstorming and Delphi techniques, as well as literature reviews, to determine 25 criteria with which to evaluate the national immunization policy; we then proposed a hierarchical structure of the AHP model to assess ENIPs. By applying the proposed AHP model to the assessment of ENIPs for Korean immunization policies, we show that free vaccination services should be provided by private clinics and hospitals rather than public health centers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19014990</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VACCDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergy and Immunology ; Analytic hierarchy process model ; Applied microbiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain storming ; Communicable Disease Control ; Delphi method ; Fever ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health care ; Health Policy ; Health Services Research ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immunization ; Influenza ; Intervention ; Korea ; Microbiology ; National immunization program ; Preferences ; Public health ; Typhoid ; Vaccination - methods ; Vaccines ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2009-01, Vol.27 (5), p.792-802</ispartof><rights>2008</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 29, 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-aa49e7d42a2ada211865374db3cae2e384cf77e96dd53045aa49fdd5ad2b8a123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-aa49e7d42a2ada211865374db3cae2e384cf77e96dd53045aa49fdd5ad2b8a123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1618825178?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21103667$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19014990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shin, Taeksoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chun-Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Yang-Heui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyo-Youl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Byung Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uh, Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joo-Heon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Sook-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Go, Un-Yeong</creatorcontrib><title>The comparative evaluation of expanded national immunization policies in Korea using an analytic hierarchy process</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Abstract The purpose of this paper is to propose new evaluation criteria and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model to assess the expanded national immunization programs (ENIPs) and to evaluate two alternative health care policies. One of the alternative policies is that private clinics and hospitals would offer free vaccination services to children and the other of them is that public health centers would offer these free vaccination services. Our model to evaluate the ENIPs was developed using brainstorming, Delphi techniques, and the AHP model. We first used the brainstorming and Delphi techniques, as well as literature reviews, to determine 25 criteria with which to evaluate the national immunization policy; we then proposed a hierarchical structure of the AHP model to assess ENIPs. By applying the proposed AHP model to the assessment of ENIPs for Korean immunization policies, we show that free vaccination services should be provided by private clinics and hospitals rather than public health centers.</description><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>Analytic hierarchy process model</subject><subject>Applied microbiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain storming</subject><subject>Communicable Disease Control</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>National immunization program</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Typhoid</subject><subject>Vaccination - methods</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt-L1DAQx4so3t7pn6AExHvrmqRpm74ocvgLD3zwBN_CbDJ1s7bpmrSL61_v1C0e3MtBIMPwmZnM95sseyb4WnBRvdqtD2CtD7iWnGvKrXldPshWQtdFLkuhH2YrLiuVK8G_n2XnKe0452UhmsfZmWi4UE3DV1m82SKzQ7-HCKM_IMMDdBOFQ2BDy_D3HoJDx8K_FHTM9_0U_J8TsR86bz0m5gP7PEQENiUffjAIdKA7jt6yrccI0W6PbB8Hiyk9yR610CV8utwX2bf3726uPubXXz58unp7nduS12MOoBqsnZIgwYEUQldlUSu3KSygxEIr29Y1NpVzZcFVOfMtxeDkRoOQxUV2eepLc39NmEbT-2Sx6yDgMCVTVVopXlT3gpIXDa-EIvDFHXA3TJEWTUZUQmuSvdZElSfKxiGliK3ZR99DPBrBzeyd2ZnFOzN7N6fJO6p7vnSfNj2626rFLAJeLgAkC10bIVif_nMkEW1T1cS9OXFI6h5IfpPIpGDR-Yh2NG7w9z7l9Z0OtvPB09CfeMR0u7VJ0nDzdf5o8z_jmp5akqh_AT9M0ME</recordid><startdate>20090129</startdate><enddate>20090129</enddate><creator>Shin, Taeksoo</creator><creator>Kim, Chun-Bae</creator><creator>Ahn, Yang-Heui</creator><creator>Kim, Hyo-Youl</creator><creator>Cha, Byung Ho</creator><creator>Uh, Young</creator><creator>Lee, Joo-Heon</creator><creator>Hyun, Sook-Jung</creator><creator>Lee, Dong-Han</creator><creator>Go, Un-Yeong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090129</creationdate><title>The comparative evaluation of expanded national immunization policies in Korea using an analytic hierarchy process</title><author>Shin, Taeksoo ; Kim, Chun-Bae ; Ahn, Yang-Heui ; Kim, Hyo-Youl ; Cha, Byung Ho ; Uh, Young ; Lee, Joo-Heon ; Hyun, Sook-Jung ; Lee, Dong-Han ; Go, Un-Yeong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-aa49e7d42a2ada211865374db3cae2e384cf77e96dd53045aa49fdd5ad2b8a123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>Analytic hierarchy process model</topic><topic>Applied microbiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain storming</topic><topic>Communicable Disease Control</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>National immunization program</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Typhoid</topic><topic>Vaccination - methods</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shin, Taeksoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chun-Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Yang-Heui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyo-Youl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Byung Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uh, Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joo-Heon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Sook-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Go, Un-Yeong</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shin, Taeksoo</au><au>Kim, Chun-Bae</au><au>Ahn, Yang-Heui</au><au>Kim, Hyo-Youl</au><au>Cha, Byung Ho</au><au>Uh, Young</au><au>Lee, Joo-Heon</au><au>Hyun, Sook-Jung</au><au>Lee, Dong-Han</au><au>Go, Un-Yeong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The comparative evaluation of expanded national immunization policies in Korea using an analytic hierarchy process</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2009-01-29</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>792</spage><epage>802</epage><pages>792-802</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><coden>VACCDE</coden><abstract>Abstract The purpose of this paper is to propose new evaluation criteria and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model to assess the expanded national immunization programs (ENIPs) and to evaluate two alternative health care policies. One of the alternative policies is that private clinics and hospitals would offer free vaccination services to children and the other of them is that public health centers would offer these free vaccination services. Our model to evaluate the ENIPs was developed using brainstorming, Delphi techniques, and the AHP model. We first used the brainstorming and Delphi techniques, as well as literature reviews, to determine 25 criteria with which to evaluate the national immunization policy; we then proposed a hierarchical structure of the AHP model to assess ENIPs. By applying the proposed AHP model to the assessment of ENIPs for Korean immunization policies, we show that free vaccination services should be provided by private clinics and hospitals rather than public health centers.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19014990</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.075</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
| ispartof | Vaccine, 2009-01, Vol.27 (5), p.792-802 |
| issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66844036 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Allergy and Immunology Analytic hierarchy process model Applied microbiology Biological and medical sciences Brain storming Communicable Disease Control Delphi method Fever Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Health care Health Policy Health Services Research Hospitals Humans Immunization Influenza Intervention Korea Microbiology National immunization program Preferences Public health Typhoid Vaccination - methods Vaccines Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects) |
| title | The comparative evaluation of expanded national immunization policies in Korea using an analytic hierarchy process |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T08%3A12%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20expanded%20national%20immunization%20policies%20in%20Korea%20using%20an%20analytic%20hierarchy%20process&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Shin,%20Taeksoo&rft.date=2009-01-29&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=792&rft.epage=802&rft.pages=792-802&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft.coden=VACCDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3476750851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1618825178&rft_id=info:pmid/19014990&rft_els_id=S0264410X08014540&rfr_iscdi=true |