CNS mastitis: Nothing to worry about?

In this paper, we analyzed a very large field data set on intramammary infections (IMI) and the associated somatic cell count (SCC) in dairy cows. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) IMI on cow SCC, both mean and variability, and on the pote...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary microbiology 2009-02, Vol.134 (1), p.9-14
Hauptverfasser: Schukken, Ynte H., González, Ruben N., Tikofsky, Linda L., Schulte, Hal F., Santisteban, Carlos G., Welcome, Frank L., Bennett, Gary J., Zurakowski, Michael J., Zadoks, Ruth N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
container_title Veterinary microbiology
container_volume 134
creator Schukken, Ynte H.
González, Ruben N.
Tikofsky, Linda L.
Schulte, Hal F.
Santisteban, Carlos G.
Welcome, Frank L.
Bennett, Gary J.
Zurakowski, Michael J.
Zadoks, Ruth N.
description In this paper, we analyzed a very large field data set on intramammary infections (IMI) and the associated somatic cell count (SCC) in dairy cows. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) IMI on cow SCC, both mean and variability, and on the potential of these infections to have a major impact on the bulk milk SCC (BMSCC). Data and milk samples for bacterial culture were collected by Quality Milk Production Services (QMPS) between 1992 and March of 2007. The QMPS program services dairy farms in New York State and other states in the Northeastern USA and operates in conjunction with Cornell University. Only records from cows where SCC and milk production data were available, and where only one organism was isolated from bacterial cultures of milk samples (or where culture was negative) were used for this analysis. A total of 352,614 records from 4200 whole herd mastitis screening sampling qualified for this study. Within herds an average of 15% (S.D. 12%) of cows sampled were infected with CNS, ranging between 0 and 100%. Average within herd prevalence of cows with a CNS IMI and an SCC over 200,000 cells/ml was 2% (S.D. 4%) with a minimum of 0% and a maximum of 50%. Results of linear mixed models showed three distinct populations of IMI statuses: negative cultures with the lowest SCC; CNS and Corynebacterium bovis with a moderate increase in SCC, and Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus aureus showing an important increase in SCC. Surprisingly, milk production was slightly but significantly higher in CNS infected cows compared to culture-negative cows, whereas it was strongly reduced in cows with a major pathogen IMI. The percentage contribution of CNS infections to the BMSCC was 17.9% in herds with a BMSCC less than 200,000 cells/ml. This value decreased to 11.9 and 7.9% in herds with bulk milk SCC between 200,000 and 400,000 and over 400,000 cells/ml, respectively. We concluded that very few herds with milk quality problems would have an important increase in BMSCC that could be mostly attributed to CNS infections. On the other hand, in herds with low BMSCC, CNS infections may be an important contributor to the total number of somatic cells in the bulk milk.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66842874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378113508003581</els_id><sourcerecordid>66842874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-fc7f8af99bffe40c466d900cf6b302ade7f6db76b391a90d9991b8545e9b9c2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1LHDEYwPEgLXXVfgNp56K3GZ-8TCbpwVIWXwqLHtRzyGQSm2VnY5Os4rc3yyztTU8h8Hsewj8IHWNoMGB-tmyebR69aQiAaEA2gNkemmHR0Zq0jHxCM6CdqDGm7T46SGkJAExy-IL2sRCMUE5m6GR-c1eNOmWfffpR3YT8x68fqxyqlxDja6X7sMk_j9Bnp1fJft2dh-jh8uJ-fl0vbq9-z38tasNYm2tnOie0k7J3zjIwjPNBAhjHewpED7ZzfOi7cpNYSxiklLgXLWut7KUhAz1Ep9Pepxj-bmzKavTJ2NVKr23YJMV5ebfo2IeQAJW8w7RANkETQ0rROvUU_ajjq8Kgth3VUk0d1bajAqlKxzL2bbd_0492-D-0C1fAyQ7oZPTKRb02Pv1zBBNGKYfivk_O6aD0Yyzm4Y4ApoBbUX4GF3E-CVvCPnsbVTLero0dfLQmqyH499_6Buq0mjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20396713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CNS mastitis: Nothing to worry about?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schukken, Ynte H. ; González, Ruben N. ; Tikofsky, Linda L. ; Schulte, Hal F. ; Santisteban, Carlos G. ; Welcome, Frank L. ; Bennett, Gary J. ; Zurakowski, Michael J. ; Zadoks, Ruth N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schukken, Ynte H. ; González, Ruben N. ; Tikofsky, Linda L. ; Schulte, Hal F. ; Santisteban, Carlos G. ; Welcome, Frank L. ; Bennett, Gary J. ; Zurakowski, Michael J. ; Zadoks, Ruth N.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we analyzed a very large field data set on intramammary infections (IMI) and the associated somatic cell count (SCC) in dairy cows. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) IMI on cow SCC, both mean and variability, and on the potential of these infections to have a major impact on the bulk milk SCC (BMSCC). Data and milk samples for bacterial culture were collected by Quality Milk Production Services (QMPS) between 1992 and March of 2007. The QMPS program services dairy farms in New York State and other states in the Northeastern USA and operates in conjunction with Cornell University. Only records from cows where SCC and milk production data were available, and where only one organism was isolated from bacterial cultures of milk samples (or where culture was negative) were used for this analysis. A total of 352,614 records from 4200 whole herd mastitis screening sampling qualified for this study. Within herds an average of 15% (S.D. 12%) of cows sampled were infected with CNS, ranging between 0 and 100%. Average within herd prevalence of cows with a CNS IMI and an SCC over 200,000 cells/ml was 2% (S.D. 4%) with a minimum of 0% and a maximum of 50%. Results of linear mixed models showed three distinct populations of IMI statuses: negative cultures with the lowest SCC; CNS and Corynebacterium bovis with a moderate increase in SCC, and Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus aureus showing an important increase in SCC. Surprisingly, milk production was slightly but significantly higher in CNS infected cows compared to culture-negative cows, whereas it was strongly reduced in cows with a major pathogen IMI. The percentage contribution of CNS infections to the BMSCC was 17.9% in herds with a BMSCC less than 200,000 cells/ml. This value decreased to 11.9 and 7.9% in herds with bulk milk SCC between 200,000 and 400,000 and over 400,000 cells/ml, respectively. We concluded that very few herds with milk quality problems would have an important increase in BMSCC that could be mostly attributed to CNS infections. On the other hand, in herds with low BMSCC, CNS infections may be an important contributor to the total number of somatic cells in the bulk milk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18842362</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VMICDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>animal pathogenic bacteria ; Animals ; bacterial infections ; Biological and medical sciences ; bovine mastitis ; bulk milk ; Cattle ; Coagulase - genetics ; Coagulase-negative staphylococci ; Corynebacterium bovis ; dairy cows ; dairy herds ; disease prevalence ; disease surveillance ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Heifer mastitis ; Lactation - physiology ; Mastitis ; Mastitis, Bovine - epidemiology ; Mastitis, Bovine - prevention &amp; control ; Microbiology ; Milk - cytology ; Milk production ; Prevalence ; SCC ; somatic cell count ; Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology ; Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Staphylococcal Infections - veterinary ; Staphylococcus - enzymology ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Streptococcus ; Streptococcus agalactiae</subject><ispartof>Veterinary microbiology, 2009-02, Vol.134 (1), p.9-14</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-fc7f8af99bffe40c466d900cf6b302ade7f6db76b391a90d9991b8545e9b9c2d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378113508003581$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21243360$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18842362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schukken, Ynte H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Ruben N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikofsky, Linda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Hal F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santisteban, Carlos G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welcome, Frank L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Gary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zurakowski, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zadoks, Ruth N.</creatorcontrib><title>CNS mastitis: Nothing to worry about?</title><title>Veterinary microbiology</title><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><description>In this paper, we analyzed a very large field data set on intramammary infections (IMI) and the associated somatic cell count (SCC) in dairy cows. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) IMI on cow SCC, both mean and variability, and on the potential of these infections to have a major impact on the bulk milk SCC (BMSCC). Data and milk samples for bacterial culture were collected by Quality Milk Production Services (QMPS) between 1992 and March of 2007. The QMPS program services dairy farms in New York State and other states in the Northeastern USA and operates in conjunction with Cornell University. Only records from cows where SCC and milk production data were available, and where only one organism was isolated from bacterial cultures of milk samples (or where culture was negative) were used for this analysis. A total of 352,614 records from 4200 whole herd mastitis screening sampling qualified for this study. Within herds an average of 15% (S.D. 12%) of cows sampled were infected with CNS, ranging between 0 and 100%. Average within herd prevalence of cows with a CNS IMI and an SCC over 200,000 cells/ml was 2% (S.D. 4%) with a minimum of 0% and a maximum of 50%. Results of linear mixed models showed three distinct populations of IMI statuses: negative cultures with the lowest SCC; CNS and Corynebacterium bovis with a moderate increase in SCC, and Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus aureus showing an important increase in SCC. Surprisingly, milk production was slightly but significantly higher in CNS infected cows compared to culture-negative cows, whereas it was strongly reduced in cows with a major pathogen IMI. The percentage contribution of CNS infections to the BMSCC was 17.9% in herds with a BMSCC less than 200,000 cells/ml. This value decreased to 11.9 and 7.9% in herds with bulk milk SCC between 200,000 and 400,000 and over 400,000 cells/ml, respectively. We concluded that very few herds with milk quality problems would have an important increase in BMSCC that could be mostly attributed to CNS infections. On the other hand, in herds with low BMSCC, CNS infections may be an important contributor to the total number of somatic cells in the bulk milk.</description><subject>animal pathogenic bacteria</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bacterial infections</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>bovine mastitis</subject><subject>bulk milk</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Coagulase - genetics</subject><subject>Coagulase-negative staphylococci</subject><subject>Corynebacterium bovis</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>dairy herds</subject><subject>disease prevalence</subject><subject>disease surveillance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Heifer mastitis</subject><subject>Lactation - physiology</subject><subject>Mastitis</subject><subject>Mastitis, Bovine - epidemiology</subject><subject>Mastitis, Bovine - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Milk - cytology</subject><subject>Milk production</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>SCC</subject><subject>somatic cell count</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Staphylococcus - enzymology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Streptococcus</subject><subject>Streptococcus agalactiae</subject><issn>0378-1135</issn><issn>1873-2542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1LHDEYwPEgLXXVfgNp56K3GZ-8TCbpwVIWXwqLHtRzyGQSm2VnY5Os4rc3yyztTU8h8Hsewj8IHWNoMGB-tmyebR69aQiAaEA2gNkemmHR0Zq0jHxCM6CdqDGm7T46SGkJAExy-IL2sRCMUE5m6GR-c1eNOmWfffpR3YT8x68fqxyqlxDja6X7sMk_j9Bnp1fJft2dh-jh8uJ-fl0vbq9-z38tasNYm2tnOie0k7J3zjIwjPNBAhjHewpED7ZzfOi7cpNYSxiklLgXLWut7KUhAz1Ep9Pepxj-bmzKavTJ2NVKr23YJMV5ebfo2IeQAJW8w7RANkETQ0rROvUU_ajjq8Kgth3VUk0d1bajAqlKxzL2bbd_0492-D-0C1fAyQ7oZPTKRb02Pv1zBBNGKYfivk_O6aD0Yyzm4Y4ApoBbUX4GF3E-CVvCPnsbVTLero0dfLQmqyH499_6Buq0mjg</recordid><startdate>20090216</startdate><enddate>20090216</enddate><creator>Schukken, Ynte H.</creator><creator>González, Ruben N.</creator><creator>Tikofsky, Linda L.</creator><creator>Schulte, Hal F.</creator><creator>Santisteban, Carlos G.</creator><creator>Welcome, Frank L.</creator><creator>Bennett, Gary J.</creator><creator>Zurakowski, Michael J.</creator><creator>Zadoks, Ruth N.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090216</creationdate><title>CNS mastitis: Nothing to worry about?</title><author>Schukken, Ynte H. ; González, Ruben N. ; Tikofsky, Linda L. ; Schulte, Hal F. ; Santisteban, Carlos G. ; Welcome, Frank L. ; Bennett, Gary J. ; Zurakowski, Michael J. ; Zadoks, Ruth N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-fc7f8af99bffe40c466d900cf6b302ade7f6db76b391a90d9991b8545e9b9c2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>animal pathogenic bacteria</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bacterial infections</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>bovine mastitis</topic><topic>bulk milk</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Coagulase - genetics</topic><topic>Coagulase-negative staphylococci</topic><topic>Corynebacterium bovis</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>dairy herds</topic><topic>disease prevalence</topic><topic>disease surveillance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Heifer mastitis</topic><topic>Lactation - physiology</topic><topic>Mastitis</topic><topic>Mastitis, Bovine - epidemiology</topic><topic>Mastitis, Bovine - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Milk - cytology</topic><topic>Milk production</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>SCC</topic><topic>somatic cell count</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Staphylococcus - enzymology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Streptococcus</topic><topic>Streptococcus agalactiae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schukken, Ynte H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Ruben N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikofsky, Linda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Hal F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santisteban, Carlos G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welcome, Frank L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Gary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zurakowski, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zadoks, Ruth N.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schukken, Ynte H.</au><au>González, Ruben N.</au><au>Tikofsky, Linda L.</au><au>Schulte, Hal F.</au><au>Santisteban, Carlos G.</au><au>Welcome, Frank L.</au><au>Bennett, Gary J.</au><au>Zurakowski, Michael J.</au><au>Zadoks, Ruth N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CNS mastitis: Nothing to worry about?</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><date>2009-02-16</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>9-14</pages><issn>0378-1135</issn><eissn>1873-2542</eissn><coden>VMICDQ</coden><abstract>In this paper, we analyzed a very large field data set on intramammary infections (IMI) and the associated somatic cell count (SCC) in dairy cows. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) IMI on cow SCC, both mean and variability, and on the potential of these infections to have a major impact on the bulk milk SCC (BMSCC). Data and milk samples for bacterial culture were collected by Quality Milk Production Services (QMPS) between 1992 and March of 2007. The QMPS program services dairy farms in New York State and other states in the Northeastern USA and operates in conjunction with Cornell University. Only records from cows where SCC and milk production data were available, and where only one organism was isolated from bacterial cultures of milk samples (or where culture was negative) were used for this analysis. A total of 352,614 records from 4200 whole herd mastitis screening sampling qualified for this study. Within herds an average of 15% (S.D. 12%) of cows sampled were infected with CNS, ranging between 0 and 100%. Average within herd prevalence of cows with a CNS IMI and an SCC over 200,000 cells/ml was 2% (S.D. 4%) with a minimum of 0% and a maximum of 50%. Results of linear mixed models showed three distinct populations of IMI statuses: negative cultures with the lowest SCC; CNS and Corynebacterium bovis with a moderate increase in SCC, and Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus aureus showing an important increase in SCC. Surprisingly, milk production was slightly but significantly higher in CNS infected cows compared to culture-negative cows, whereas it was strongly reduced in cows with a major pathogen IMI. The percentage contribution of CNS infections to the BMSCC was 17.9% in herds with a BMSCC less than 200,000 cells/ml. This value decreased to 11.9 and 7.9% in herds with bulk milk SCC between 200,000 and 400,000 and over 400,000 cells/ml, respectively. We concluded that very few herds with milk quality problems would have an important increase in BMSCC that could be mostly attributed to CNS infections. On the other hand, in herds with low BMSCC, CNS infections may be an important contributor to the total number of somatic cells in the bulk milk.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>18842362</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.014</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-1135
ispartof Veterinary microbiology, 2009-02, Vol.134 (1), p.9-14
issn 0378-1135
1873-2542
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66842874
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects animal pathogenic bacteria
Animals
bacterial infections
Biological and medical sciences
bovine mastitis
bulk milk
Cattle
Coagulase - genetics
Coagulase-negative staphylococci
Corynebacterium bovis
dairy cows
dairy herds
disease prevalence
disease surveillance
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Heifer mastitis
Lactation - physiology
Mastitis
Mastitis, Bovine - epidemiology
Mastitis, Bovine - prevention & control
Microbiology
Milk - cytology
Milk production
Prevalence
SCC
somatic cell count
Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology
Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology
Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control
Staphylococcal Infections - veterinary
Staphylococcus - enzymology
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus
Streptococcus agalactiae
title CNS mastitis: Nothing to worry about?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T20%3A34%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CNS%20mastitis:%20Nothing%20to%20worry%20about?&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20microbiology&rft.au=Schukken,%20Ynte%20H.&rft.date=2009-02-16&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=9-14&rft.issn=0378-1135&rft.eissn=1873-2542&rft.coden=VMICDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66842874%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20396713&rft_id=info:pmid/18842362&rft_els_id=S0378113508003581&rfr_iscdi=true