Portosystemic shunts in a large cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis: detection rate and clinical relevance

Background This study aimed to determine the detection rate and clinical relevance of portosystemic collaterals. Methods We studied 326 cirrhotics. Portosystemic collaterals, portal vein diameter, and splenic area were evaluated by color Doppler sonography; esophageal varices were detected by endosc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology 2009, Vol.44 (1), p.76-83
Hauptverfasser: Zardi, Enrico Maria, Uwechie, Valentina, Caccavo, Domenico, Pellegrino, Nelly Maria, Cacciapaglia, Fabio, Di Matteo, Francesco, Dobrina, Aldo, Laghi, Vittorio, Afeltra, Antonella
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 83
container_issue 1
container_start_page 76
container_title Journal of gastroenterology
container_volume 44
creator Zardi, Enrico Maria
Uwechie, Valentina
Caccavo, Domenico
Pellegrino, Nelly Maria
Cacciapaglia, Fabio
Di Matteo, Francesco
Dobrina, Aldo
Laghi, Vittorio
Afeltra, Antonella
description Background This study aimed to determine the detection rate and clinical relevance of portosystemic collaterals. Methods We studied 326 cirrhotics. Portosystemic collaterals, portal vein diameter, and splenic area were evaluated by color Doppler sonography; esophageal varices were detected by endoscopy. Results Of the cirrhotics, 130 had portosystemic collaterals (39.9% total, left gastric vein 11%, paraumbilical vein 7.4%, splenorenal shunts 13.8%, and combined shunts 7.7%). Cirrhotics without portosystemic collaterals or with a paraumbilical vein had a significantly narrower portal vein diameter than cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (P < 0.001). Cirrhotics with a paraumbilical vein had a significantly smaller splenic area than cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (P < 0.001), splenorenal shunts (P < 0.001), combined shunts (P < 0.001), or without portosystemic collaterals (P < 0.05). A significant association between portosystemic collaterals and Child's classes or presence and type of esophageal varices was found (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively). The highest prevalence of Child's class C and large (F-3) esophageal varices was found in cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (41.7% and 36.1%, respectively), whereas esophageal varices were absent in 47.4% of cirrhotics without portosystemic collaterals and in 58.3% of cirrhotics with a paraumbilical vein. Conclusions The left gastric vein is associated with some sonographic and clinical markers of disease severity, whereas the absence of portosystemic collaterals or the presence of paraumbilical veins seems to identify cirrhotics with markers predictive of a more favorable clinical course.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00535-008-2279-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66840612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66840612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-2ba73fe49e504f565c234a1cbb97a118d7574791d89a7ee689f25d6d78f657033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTjv6AG40uHBXmpvKT8WdDP7BgILOOqRTt7ozVCdtkhqZtzdNNQy4cBXI_c7JJR8hL4G9A8b0-8KY7GXH2NBxrk0Hj8gGRLuRhvPHZMOMEB2AFhfkWSm3jEHP5PCUXIABaZhWGxJ_pFxTuS8VD8HTsl9iLTRE6ujs8g6pT_tG0DTRo6sBT9M_oe7pHO4wUx9y3qcSygc6YkVfQ4o0u4rUxZH6OcTg3Uwzznjnosfn5Mnk5oIvzuclufn86dfV1-76-5dvVx-vOy-Eqh3fOt1PKAxKJiappOe9cOC3W6MdwDBqqYU2MA7GaUQ1mInLUY16mJTUrO8vydu195jT7wVLtYdQPM6zi5iWYpUaBFPAG_jmH_A2LTm23SwHDYpzNjQIVsjnVErGyR5zOLh8b4HZkwm7mrDNhD2ZsNAyr87Fy_aA40Pi_PUN4CtQ2ijuMD-8_L_W12tocsm6XQ7F3vzkJ68gByl71f8FugydSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217162208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Portosystemic shunts in a large cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis: detection rate and clinical relevance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Zardi, Enrico Maria ; Uwechie, Valentina ; Caccavo, Domenico ; Pellegrino, Nelly Maria ; Cacciapaglia, Fabio ; Di Matteo, Francesco ; Dobrina, Aldo ; Laghi, Vittorio ; Afeltra, Antonella</creator><creatorcontrib>Zardi, Enrico Maria ; Uwechie, Valentina ; Caccavo, Domenico ; Pellegrino, Nelly Maria ; Cacciapaglia, Fabio ; Di Matteo, Francesco ; Dobrina, Aldo ; Laghi, Vittorio ; Afeltra, Antonella</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Background This study aimed to determine the detection rate and clinical relevance of portosystemic collaterals. Methods We studied 326 cirrhotics. Portosystemic collaterals, portal vein diameter, and splenic area were evaluated by color Doppler sonography; esophageal varices were detected by endoscopy. Results Of the cirrhotics, 130 had portosystemic collaterals (39.9% total, left gastric vein 11%, paraumbilical vein 7.4%, splenorenal shunts 13.8%, and combined shunts 7.7%). Cirrhotics without portosystemic collaterals or with a paraumbilical vein had a significantly narrower portal vein diameter than cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (P < 0.001). Cirrhotics with a paraumbilical vein had a significantly smaller splenic area than cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (P < 0.001), splenorenal shunts (P < 0.001), combined shunts (P < 0.001), or without portosystemic collaterals (P < 0.05). A significant association between portosystemic collaterals and Child's classes or presence and type of esophageal varices was found (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively). The highest prevalence of Child's class C and large (F-3) esophageal varices was found in cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (41.7% and 36.1%, respectively), whereas esophageal varices were absent in 47.4% of cirrhotics without portosystemic collaterals and in 58.3% of cirrhotics with a paraumbilical vein. Conclusions The left gastric vein is associated with some sonographic and clinical markers of disease severity, whereas the absence of portosystemic collaterals or the presence of paraumbilical veins seems to identify cirrhotics with markers predictive of a more favorable clinical course.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-5922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00535-008-2279-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19159076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Japan : Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Aged ; Biliary Tract ; Cohort Studies ; Collateral Circulation ; color Doppler sonography ; Colorectal Surgery ; Endoscopy, Digestive System - methods ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices - diagnosis ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices - pathology ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal - diagnostic imaging ; Hypertension, Portal - etiology ; Liver ; Liver - blood supply ; Liver - physiopathology ; liver cirrhosis ; Liver Cirrhosis - complications ; Liver Cirrhosis - physiopathology ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Pancreas ; Portal Vein - diagnostic imaging ; Portal Vein - pathology ; portal vein diameter ; portosystemic shunts ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spleen - diagnostic imaging ; Spleen - pathology ; splenic area ; Surgical Oncology ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color ; Umbilical Veins - diagnostic imaging ; Umbilical Veins - pathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology, 2009, Vol.44 (1), p.76-83</ispartof><rights>Springer Japan 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-2ba73fe49e504f565c234a1cbb97a118d7574791d89a7ee689f25d6d78f657033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-2ba73fe49e504f565c234a1cbb97a118d7574791d89a7ee689f25d6d78f657033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00535-008-2279-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00535-008-2279-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19159076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zardi, Enrico Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uwechie, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caccavo, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellegrino, Nelly Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciapaglia, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Matteo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobrina, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laghi, Vittorio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afeltra, Antonella</creatorcontrib><title>Portosystemic shunts in a large cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis: detection rate and clinical relevance</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol</addtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Background This study aimed to determine the detection rate and clinical relevance of portosystemic collaterals. Methods We studied 326 cirrhotics. Portosystemic collaterals, portal vein diameter, and splenic area were evaluated by color Doppler sonography; esophageal varices were detected by endoscopy. Results Of the cirrhotics, 130 had portosystemic collaterals (39.9% total, left gastric vein 11%, paraumbilical vein 7.4%, splenorenal shunts 13.8%, and combined shunts 7.7%). Cirrhotics without portosystemic collaterals or with a paraumbilical vein had a significantly narrower portal vein diameter than cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (P < 0.001). Cirrhotics with a paraumbilical vein had a significantly smaller splenic area than cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (P < 0.001), splenorenal shunts (P < 0.001), combined shunts (P < 0.001), or without portosystemic collaterals (P < 0.05). A significant association between portosystemic collaterals and Child's classes or presence and type of esophageal varices was found (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively). The highest prevalence of Child's class C and large (F-3) esophageal varices was found in cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (41.7% and 36.1%, respectively), whereas esophageal varices were absent in 47.4% of cirrhotics without portosystemic collaterals and in 58.3% of cirrhotics with a paraumbilical vein. Conclusions The left gastric vein is associated with some sonographic and clinical markers of disease severity, whereas the absence of portosystemic collaterals or the presence of paraumbilical veins seems to identify cirrhotics with markers predictive of a more favorable clinical course.]]></description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biliary Tract</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Collateral Circulation</subject><subject>color Doppler sonography</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Digestive System - methods</subject><subject>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - diagnosis</subject><subject>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension, Portal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hypertension, Portal - etiology</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver - blood supply</subject><subject>Liver - physiopathology</subject><subject>liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - complications</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Portal Vein - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Portal Vein - pathology</subject><subject>portal vein diameter</subject><subject>portosystemic shunts</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spleen - pathology</subject><subject>splenic area</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color</subject><subject>Umbilical Veins - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Umbilical Veins - pathology</subject><issn>0944-1174</issn><issn>1435-5922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTjv6AG40uHBXmpvKT8WdDP7BgILOOqRTt7ozVCdtkhqZtzdNNQy4cBXI_c7JJR8hL4G9A8b0-8KY7GXH2NBxrk0Hj8gGRLuRhvPHZMOMEB2AFhfkWSm3jEHP5PCUXIABaZhWGxJ_pFxTuS8VD8HTsl9iLTRE6ujs8g6pT_tG0DTRo6sBT9M_oe7pHO4wUx9y3qcSygc6YkVfQ4o0u4rUxZH6OcTg3Uwzznjnosfn5Mnk5oIvzuclufn86dfV1-76-5dvVx-vOy-Eqh3fOt1PKAxKJiappOe9cOC3W6MdwDBqqYU2MA7GaUQ1mInLUY16mJTUrO8vydu195jT7wVLtYdQPM6zi5iWYpUaBFPAG_jmH_A2LTm23SwHDYpzNjQIVsjnVErGyR5zOLh8b4HZkwm7mrDNhD2ZsNAyr87Fy_aA40Pi_PUN4CtQ2ijuMD-8_L_W12tocsm6XQ7F3vzkJ68gByl71f8FugydSQ</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Zardi, Enrico Maria</creator><creator>Uwechie, Valentina</creator><creator>Caccavo, Domenico</creator><creator>Pellegrino, Nelly Maria</creator><creator>Cacciapaglia, Fabio</creator><creator>Di Matteo, Francesco</creator><creator>Dobrina, Aldo</creator><creator>Laghi, Vittorio</creator><creator>Afeltra, Antonella</creator><general>Japan : Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Portosystemic shunts in a large cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis: detection rate and clinical relevance</title><author>Zardi, Enrico Maria ; Uwechie, Valentina ; Caccavo, Domenico ; Pellegrino, Nelly Maria ; Cacciapaglia, Fabio ; Di Matteo, Francesco ; Dobrina, Aldo ; Laghi, Vittorio ; Afeltra, Antonella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-2ba73fe49e504f565c234a1cbb97a118d7574791d89a7ee689f25d6d78f657033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biliary Tract</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Collateral Circulation</topic><topic>color Doppler sonography</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Digestive System - methods</topic><topic>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - diagnosis</topic><topic>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension, Portal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hypertension, Portal - etiology</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver - blood supply</topic><topic>Liver - physiopathology</topic><topic>liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - complications</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Portal Vein - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Portal Vein - pathology</topic><topic>portal vein diameter</topic><topic>portosystemic shunts</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spleen - pathology</topic><topic>splenic area</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color</topic><topic>Umbilical Veins - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Umbilical Veins - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zardi, Enrico Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uwechie, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caccavo, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellegrino, Nelly Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciapaglia, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Matteo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobrina, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laghi, Vittorio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afeltra, Antonella</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zardi, Enrico Maria</au><au>Uwechie, Valentina</au><au>Caccavo, Domenico</au><au>Pellegrino, Nelly Maria</au><au>Cacciapaglia, Fabio</au><au>Di Matteo, Francesco</au><au>Dobrina, Aldo</au><au>Laghi, Vittorio</au><au>Afeltra, Antonella</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Portosystemic shunts in a large cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis: detection rate and clinical relevance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology</jtitle><stitle>J Gastroenterol</stitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>76</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>76-83</pages><issn>0944-1174</issn><eissn>1435-5922</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Background This study aimed to determine the detection rate and clinical relevance of portosystemic collaterals. Methods We studied 326 cirrhotics. Portosystemic collaterals, portal vein diameter, and splenic area were evaluated by color Doppler sonography; esophageal varices were detected by endoscopy. Results Of the cirrhotics, 130 had portosystemic collaterals (39.9% total, left gastric vein 11%, paraumbilical vein 7.4%, splenorenal shunts 13.8%, and combined shunts 7.7%). Cirrhotics without portosystemic collaterals or with a paraumbilical vein had a significantly narrower portal vein diameter than cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (P < 0.001). Cirrhotics with a paraumbilical vein had a significantly smaller splenic area than cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (P < 0.001), splenorenal shunts (P < 0.001), combined shunts (P < 0.001), or without portosystemic collaterals (P < 0.05). A significant association between portosystemic collaterals and Child's classes or presence and type of esophageal varices was found (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively). The highest prevalence of Child's class C and large (F-3) esophageal varices was found in cirrhotics with a left gastric vein (41.7% and 36.1%, respectively), whereas esophageal varices were absent in 47.4% of cirrhotics without portosystemic collaterals and in 58.3% of cirrhotics with a paraumbilical vein. Conclusions The left gastric vein is associated with some sonographic and clinical markers of disease severity, whereas the absence of portosystemic collaterals or the presence of paraumbilical veins seems to identify cirrhotics with markers predictive of a more favorable clinical course.]]></abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Japan : Springer Japan</pub><pmid>19159076</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00535-008-2279-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0944-1174
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology, 2009, Vol.44 (1), p.76-83
issn 0944-1174
1435-5922
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66840612
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Aged
Biliary Tract
Cohort Studies
Collateral Circulation
color Doppler sonography
Colorectal Surgery
Endoscopy, Digestive System - methods
Esophageal and Gastric Varices - diagnosis
Esophageal and Gastric Varices - pathology
Female
Gastroenterology
Hepatology
Humans
Hypertension, Portal - diagnostic imaging
Hypertension, Portal - etiology
Liver
Liver - blood supply
Liver - physiopathology
liver cirrhosis
Liver Cirrhosis - complications
Liver Cirrhosis - physiopathology
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Pancreas
Portal Vein - diagnostic imaging
Portal Vein - pathology
portal vein diameter
portosystemic shunts
Predictive Value of Tests
Severity of Illness Index
Spleen - diagnostic imaging
Spleen - pathology
splenic area
Surgical Oncology
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
Umbilical Veins - diagnostic imaging
Umbilical Veins - pathology
title Portosystemic shunts in a large cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis: detection rate and clinical relevance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A13%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Portosystemic%20shunts%20in%20a%20large%20cohort%20of%20patients%20with%20liver%20cirrhosis:%20detection%20rate%20and%20clinical%20relevance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Zardi,%20Enrico%20Maria&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=76&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=76-83&rft.issn=0944-1174&rft.eissn=1435-5922&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00535-008-2279-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66840612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217162208&rft_id=info:pmid/19159076&rfr_iscdi=true