Detection and Management of Falls and Instability in Vulnerable Elders by Community Physicians
Objectives: To investigate quality of care for falls and instability provided to vulnerable elders. Design: Six process of care quality indicators (QIs) for falls and instability were developed and applied to community‐living persons aged 65 and older who were at increased risk of death or decline....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2004-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1527-1531 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1531 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1527 |
container_title | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Rubenstein, Laurence Z. Solomon, David H. Roth, Carol P. Young, Roy T. Shekelle, Paul G. Chang, John T. MacLean, Catherine H. Kamberg, Caren J. Saliba, Debra Wenger, Neil S. |
description | Objectives: To investigate quality of care for falls and instability provided to vulnerable elders.
Design: Six process of care quality indicators (QIs) for falls and instability were developed and applied to community‐living persons aged 65 and older who were at increased risk of death or decline. QIs were implemented using medical records and patient interviews.
Setting: Northeastern and southwestern United States.
Participants: Three hundred seventy‐two vulnerable elders enrolled in two senior managed care plans.
Measurements: Percentage of QIs satisfied concerning falls or mobility disorders.
Results: Of the 372 consenting vulnerable elders with complete medical records, 57 had documentation of 69 episodes of two or more falls or fall with injury during the 13‐month study period (14% of patients fell per year, 18% incidence). Double this frequency was reported at interview. An additional 22 patients had documented mobility problems. Clinical history of fall circumstances, comorbidity, medications, and mobility was documented from 47% of fallers and two or more of these four elements from 85%. Documented physical examination was less complete, with only 6% of fallers examined for orthostatic blood pressure, 7% for gait or balance, 25% for vision, and 28% for neurological findings. The evaluation led to specific recommendations in only 26% of cases, but when present they usually led to appropriate treatment modalities. Mobility problems without falls were evaluated with gait or balance examination in 23% of cases and neurological examination in 55%.
Conclusion: Community physicians appear to underdetect falls and gait disorders. Detected falls often receive inadequate evaluation, leading to a paucity of recommendations and treatments. Adhering to guidelines may improve outcomes in community‐dwelling older adults. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52417.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66839224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66839224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4927-f8dc5b149750b4c9a57c3cfaf593e2cafdf03a7b1e61655e7f61ae99c836c0aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURiMEokPhL6AICXYJfjvZIKFpOy2Uh1SgO6wbjw0eHKfEiZj8-zozo1ZiA97Yuj7307VPluUYlTit15sSc0oKzjAvCUKs5IRhWW4fZIu7i4fZAiFEikpgdpQ9iXGDECaoqh5nRwlKBBeL7PuJGYweXBdyCOv8AwT4YVoThryz-Rl4H3f1ixAHaJx3w5S7kH8bfTA9NN7kp35t-pg3U77s2nYMM_H55xSddhDi0-yRBR_Ns8N-nH09O_2yPC8uP60ulm8vC81qIgtbrTVvMKslRw3TNXCpqbZgeU0N0WDXFlGQDTYCC86NtAKDqWtdUaERAD3OXu1zb_ru92jioFoXtfEegunGqISoaE0I-yfIJU6fhFACX_wFbrqxD-kRimBEpUCUJKjaQ7rvYuyNVTe9a6GfFEZqNqU2ahaiZiFqNqV2ptQ2tT4_5I9Na9b3jQc1CXh5ACBq8LaHoF285wSmnLF5hjd77o_zZvrvAdS71dXumAKKfYCLg9neBUD_SwlJJVfXH1cKXxPG3l-dKElvAcdjvW4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210376032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection and Management of Falls and Instability in Vulnerable Elders by Community Physicians</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Rubenstein, Laurence Z. ; Solomon, David H. ; Roth, Carol P. ; Young, Roy T. ; Shekelle, Paul G. ; Chang, John T. ; MacLean, Catherine H. ; Kamberg, Caren J. ; Saliba, Debra ; Wenger, Neil S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rubenstein, Laurence Z. ; Solomon, David H. ; Roth, Carol P. ; Young, Roy T. ; Shekelle, Paul G. ; Chang, John T. ; MacLean, Catherine H. ; Kamberg, Caren J. ; Saliba, Debra ; Wenger, Neil S.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To investigate quality of care for falls and instability provided to vulnerable elders.
Design: Six process of care quality indicators (QIs) for falls and instability were developed and applied to community‐living persons aged 65 and older who were at increased risk of death or decline. QIs were implemented using medical records and patient interviews.
Setting: Northeastern and southwestern United States.
Participants: Three hundred seventy‐two vulnerable elders enrolled in two senior managed care plans.
Measurements: Percentage of QIs satisfied concerning falls or mobility disorders.
Results: Of the 372 consenting vulnerable elders with complete medical records, 57 had documentation of 69 episodes of two or more falls or fall with injury during the 13‐month study period (14% of patients fell per year, 18% incidence). Double this frequency was reported at interview. An additional 22 patients had documented mobility problems. Clinical history of fall circumstances, comorbidity, medications, and mobility was documented from 47% of fallers and two or more of these four elements from 85%. Documented physical examination was less complete, with only 6% of fallers examined for orthostatic blood pressure, 7% for gait or balance, 25% for vision, and 28% for neurological findings. The evaluation led to specific recommendations in only 26% of cases, but when present they usually led to appropriate treatment modalities. Mobility problems without falls were evaluated with gait or balance examination in 23% of cases and neurological examination in 55%.
Conclusion: Community physicians appear to underdetect falls and gait disorders. Detected falls often receive inadequate evaluation, leading to a paucity of recommendations and treatments. Adhering to guidelines may improve outcomes in community‐dwelling older adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52417.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15341556</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAGSAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention & control ; Accidental Falls - statistics & numerical data ; Activities of Daily Living ; Aged ; At risk ; Balance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Community living ; Community Medicine - standards ; Elderly people ; Falls ; Female ; Frail Elderly ; Gait ; General aspects ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Geriatrics ; Guideline Adherence - standards ; Health care ; Health Care Surveys ; Health professionals ; Humans ; instability ; Intervention ; Male ; Managed Care Programs - standards ; Mass Screening - standards ; Medical Audit ; Medical sciences ; Mobility ; New England - epidemiology ; Older people ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Physical Examination - standards ; Postural Balance ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards ; Quality of care ; Risk assessment ; Risk Assessment - standards ; Sensation Disorders - diagnosis ; Sensation Disorders - prevention & control ; Southwestern United States - epidemiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; USA ; vulnerable elders ; Vulnerable Populations</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2004-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1527-1531</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 American Geriatrics Society</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Sep 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4927-f8dc5b149750b4c9a57c3cfaf593e2cafdf03a7b1e61655e7f61ae99c836c0aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4927-f8dc5b149750b4c9a57c3cfaf593e2cafdf03a7b1e61655e7f61ae99c836c0aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1532-5415.2004.52417.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1532-5415.2004.52417.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,30981,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16135442$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15341556$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rubenstein, Laurence Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Carol P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Roy T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shekelle, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLean, Catherine H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamberg, Caren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saliba, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenger, Neil S.</creatorcontrib><title>Detection and Management of Falls and Instability in Vulnerable Elders by Community Physicians</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>Objectives: To investigate quality of care for falls and instability provided to vulnerable elders.
Design: Six process of care quality indicators (QIs) for falls and instability were developed and applied to community‐living persons aged 65 and older who were at increased risk of death or decline. QIs were implemented using medical records and patient interviews.
Setting: Northeastern and southwestern United States.
Participants: Three hundred seventy‐two vulnerable elders enrolled in two senior managed care plans.
Measurements: Percentage of QIs satisfied concerning falls or mobility disorders.
Results: Of the 372 consenting vulnerable elders with complete medical records, 57 had documentation of 69 episodes of two or more falls or fall with injury during the 13‐month study period (14% of patients fell per year, 18% incidence). Double this frequency was reported at interview. An additional 22 patients had documented mobility problems. Clinical history of fall circumstances, comorbidity, medications, and mobility was documented from 47% of fallers and two or more of these four elements from 85%. Documented physical examination was less complete, with only 6% of fallers examined for orthostatic blood pressure, 7% for gait or balance, 25% for vision, and 28% for neurological findings. The evaluation led to specific recommendations in only 26% of cases, but when present they usually led to appropriate treatment modalities. Mobility problems without falls were evaluated with gait or balance examination in 23% of cases and neurological examination in 55%.
Conclusion: Community physicians appear to underdetect falls and gait disorders. Detected falls often receive inadequate evaluation, leading to a paucity of recommendations and treatments. Adhering to guidelines may improve outcomes in community‐dwelling older adults.</description><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention & control</subject><subject>Accidental Falls - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>At risk</subject><subject>Balance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Community living</subject><subject>Community Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Elderly people</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frail Elderly</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - standards</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Health professionals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>instability</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - standards</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>New England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Physical Examination - standards</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - standards</subject><subject>Sensation Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sensation Disorders - prevention & control</subject><subject>Southwestern United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>vulnerable elders</subject><subject>Vulnerable Populations</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURiMEokPhL6AICXYJfjvZIKFpOy2Uh1SgO6wbjw0eHKfEiZj8-zozo1ZiA97Yuj7307VPluUYlTit15sSc0oKzjAvCUKs5IRhWW4fZIu7i4fZAiFEikpgdpQ9iXGDECaoqh5nRwlKBBeL7PuJGYweXBdyCOv8AwT4YVoThryz-Rl4H3f1ixAHaJx3w5S7kH8bfTA9NN7kp35t-pg3U77s2nYMM_H55xSddhDi0-yRBR_Ns8N-nH09O_2yPC8uP60ulm8vC81qIgtbrTVvMKslRw3TNXCpqbZgeU0N0WDXFlGQDTYCC86NtAKDqWtdUaERAD3OXu1zb_ru92jioFoXtfEegunGqISoaE0I-yfIJU6fhFACX_wFbrqxD-kRimBEpUCUJKjaQ7rvYuyNVTe9a6GfFEZqNqU2ahaiZiFqNqV2ptQ2tT4_5I9Na9b3jQc1CXh5ACBq8LaHoF285wSmnLF5hjd77o_zZvrvAdS71dXumAKKfYCLg9neBUD_SwlJJVfXH1cKXxPG3l-dKElvAcdjvW4</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>Rubenstein, Laurence Z.</creator><creator>Solomon, David H.</creator><creator>Roth, Carol P.</creator><creator>Young, Roy T.</creator><creator>Shekelle, Paul G.</creator><creator>Chang, John T.</creator><creator>MacLean, Catherine H.</creator><creator>Kamberg, Caren J.</creator><creator>Saliba, Debra</creator><creator>Wenger, Neil S.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>Detection and Management of Falls and Instability in Vulnerable Elders by Community Physicians</title><author>Rubenstein, Laurence Z. ; Solomon, David H. ; Roth, Carol P. ; Young, Roy T. ; Shekelle, Paul G. ; Chang, John T. ; MacLean, Catherine H. ; Kamberg, Caren J. ; Saliba, Debra ; Wenger, Neil S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4927-f8dc5b149750b4c9a57c3cfaf593e2cafdf03a7b1e61655e7f61ae99c836c0aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls - prevention & control</topic><topic>Accidental Falls - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>At risk</topic><topic>Balance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Community living</topic><topic>Community Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Elderly people</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frail Elderly</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - standards</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Health professionals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>instability</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - standards</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>New England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Physical Examination - standards</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - standards</topic><topic>Sensation Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sensation Disorders - prevention & control</topic><topic>Southwestern United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>vulnerable elders</topic><topic>Vulnerable Populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rubenstein, Laurence Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Carol P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Roy T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shekelle, Paul G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLean, Catherine H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamberg, Caren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saliba, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenger, Neil S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rubenstein, Laurence Z.</au><au>Solomon, David H.</au><au>Roth, Carol P.</au><au>Young, Roy T.</au><au>Shekelle, Paul G.</au><au>Chang, John T.</au><au>MacLean, Catherine H.</au><au>Kamberg, Caren J.</au><au>Saliba, Debra</au><au>Wenger, Neil S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection and Management of Falls and Instability in Vulnerable Elders by Community Physicians</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1527</spage><epage>1531</epage><pages>1527-1531</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><coden>JAGSAF</coden><abstract>Objectives: To investigate quality of care for falls and instability provided to vulnerable elders.
Design: Six process of care quality indicators (QIs) for falls and instability were developed and applied to community‐living persons aged 65 and older who were at increased risk of death or decline. QIs were implemented using medical records and patient interviews.
Setting: Northeastern and southwestern United States.
Participants: Three hundred seventy‐two vulnerable elders enrolled in two senior managed care plans.
Measurements: Percentage of QIs satisfied concerning falls or mobility disorders.
Results: Of the 372 consenting vulnerable elders with complete medical records, 57 had documentation of 69 episodes of two or more falls or fall with injury during the 13‐month study period (14% of patients fell per year, 18% incidence). Double this frequency was reported at interview. An additional 22 patients had documented mobility problems. Clinical history of fall circumstances, comorbidity, medications, and mobility was documented from 47% of fallers and two or more of these four elements from 85%. Documented physical examination was less complete, with only 6% of fallers examined for orthostatic blood pressure, 7% for gait or balance, 25% for vision, and 28% for neurological findings. The evaluation led to specific recommendations in only 26% of cases, but when present they usually led to appropriate treatment modalities. Mobility problems without falls were evaluated with gait or balance examination in 23% of cases and neurological examination in 55%.
Conclusion: Community physicians appear to underdetect falls and gait disorders. Detected falls often receive inadequate evaluation, leading to a paucity of recommendations and treatments. Adhering to guidelines may improve outcomes in community‐dwelling older adults.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><pmid>15341556</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52417.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8614 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2004-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1527-1531 |
issn | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66839224 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Accidental Falls - prevention & control Accidental Falls - statistics & numerical data Activities of Daily Living Aged At risk Balance Biological and medical sciences Community living Community Medicine - standards Elderly people Falls Female Frail Elderly Gait General aspects Geriatric Assessment - methods Geriatrics Guideline Adherence - standards Health care Health Care Surveys Health professionals Humans instability Intervention Male Managed Care Programs - standards Mass Screening - standards Medical Audit Medical sciences Mobility New England - epidemiology Older people Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) Physical Examination - standards Postural Balance Practice Guidelines as Topic Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards Quality of care Risk assessment Risk Assessment - standards Sensation Disorders - diagnosis Sensation Disorders - prevention & control Southwestern United States - epidemiology Surveys and Questionnaires USA vulnerable elders Vulnerable Populations |
title | Detection and Management of Falls and Instability in Vulnerable Elders by Community Physicians |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T00%3A23%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20and%20Management%20of%20Falls%20and%20Instability%20in%20Vulnerable%20Elders%20by%20Community%20Physicians&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Rubenstein,%20Laurence%20Z.&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1527&rft.epage=1531&rft.pages=1527-1531&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft.coden=JAGSAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52417.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66839224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210376032&rft_id=info:pmid/15341556&rfr_iscdi=true |