On the substantial variation in serological responses in pigs to Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis using different commercially available indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays
Two trials were carried out to compare the use of different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of antibodies against Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis. In the first trial, we employed four tests and 70 selected sera from a closed pig farm with sarcoptic mange. The sera were take...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Parasitology research (1987) 2004-09, Vol.94 (1), p.24-30 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Parasitology research (1987) |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | LÖWENSTEIN, M KAHLBACHER, H PESCHKE, R |
description | Two trials were carried out to compare the use of different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of antibodies against Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis. In the first trial, we employed four tests and 70 selected sera from a closed pig farm with sarcoptic mange. The sera were taken from the breeding area as well as from the finishing unit and compared with skin scrapings. The SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001 yielded the most positive results (88.58%), followed by the ELISA of the National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala (70%), the Acar-Test P-ELISA (52.86%), skin scrapings (48.57%), and the CHEKIT Sarcoptest (30%). In the second trial, eight litters from infected sows were examined from weeks 1–12 of life using the CHEKIT Sarcoptest and the SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001. The presence of maternal antibodies was highest on day 7 in both ELISAs and could be detected until weeks 5–9 of life. Antibodies increased as a result of an active immune response between days 56 and 63 in the SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001 and between days 70 and 77 of life in the CHEKIT Sarcoptest. Significant differences between the first and second litters were observed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00436-004-1168-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66829372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66829372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-1a9bcf768daf9a570520e0d262412b5fad5e99d4b1b952c4cbf5501cc0b0f72a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkc1u1DAUhSMEokPhAdiAN7BLsZ04P0tUlR-pUhela-vauR4Mjj34JpWGl-IVcTQjdXNt-XznXMmnqt4KfiU47z8R523T1WXWQnRD3T-rdqJtZC1GpZ5XOz6WOxeiuaheEf3iXPRd276sLoRqmkEOw676dxfZ8hMZrYYWiIuHwB4he1h8isxHRphTSHtvi5CRDikS0iYc_J7Yktg9ZJsOS3kkC8aj3_xXJdATW8nHPZu8c5gxLsymecZsy5JwZPAIPoAJWNImn9EuDOPf44x18PE3TszP8xoTpWw2LxDBkV5XLxwEwjfn87J6-HLz4_pbfXv39fv159vaNkostYDRWNd3wwRuBNVzJTnySXayFdIoB5PCcZxaI8yopG2tcUpxYS033PUSmsvq4yn3kNOfFWnRsyeLIUDEtJLuukGOTS8LKE6gzYkoo9OH7GfIRy243lrSp5Z0mXprSffF8-4cvpoZpyfHuZYCfDgDUD41uAzRenriOj70rdq49yfOQdKwz4V5uJe86FwoLgfV_AdEuqki</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66829372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the substantial variation in serological responses in pigs to Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis using different commercially available indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>LÖWENSTEIN, M ; KAHLBACHER, H ; PESCHKE, R</creator><creatorcontrib>LÖWENSTEIN, M ; KAHLBACHER, H ; PESCHKE, R</creatorcontrib><description>Two trials were carried out to compare the use of different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of antibodies against Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis. In the first trial, we employed four tests and 70 selected sera from a closed pig farm with sarcoptic mange. The sera were taken from the breeding area as well as from the finishing unit and compared with skin scrapings. The SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001 yielded the most positive results (88.58%), followed by the ELISA of the National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala (70%), the Acar-Test P-ELISA (52.86%), skin scrapings (48.57%), and the CHEKIT Sarcoptest (30%). In the second trial, eight litters from infected sows were examined from weeks 1–12 of life using the CHEKIT Sarcoptest and the SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001. The presence of maternal antibodies was highest on day 7 in both ELISAs and could be detected until weeks 5–9 of life. Antibodies increased as a result of an active immune response between days 56 and 63 in the SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001 and between days 70 and 77 of life in the CHEKIT Sarcoptest. Significant differences between the first and second litters were observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00436-004-1168-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15338288</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PARREZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies - blood ; Biological and medical sciences ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; General aspects and techniques. Study of several systematic groups. Models ; Invertebrates ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Sarcoptes scabiei - immunology ; Scabies - immunology ; Scabies - parasitology ; Scabies - veterinary ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Swine ; Swine Diseases - diagnosis ; Swine Diseases - immunology ; Swine Diseases - parasitology</subject><ispartof>Parasitology research (1987), 2004-09, Vol.94 (1), p.24-30</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-1a9bcf768daf9a570520e0d262412b5fad5e99d4b1b952c4cbf5501cc0b0f72a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16087458$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15338288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LÖWENSTEIN, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAHLBACHER, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PESCHKE, R</creatorcontrib><title>On the substantial variation in serological responses in pigs to Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis using different commercially available indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays</title><title>Parasitology research (1987)</title><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><description>Two trials were carried out to compare the use of different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of antibodies against Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis. In the first trial, we employed four tests and 70 selected sera from a closed pig farm with sarcoptic mange. The sera were taken from the breeding area as well as from the finishing unit and compared with skin scrapings. The SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001 yielded the most positive results (88.58%), followed by the ELISA of the National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala (70%), the Acar-Test P-ELISA (52.86%), skin scrapings (48.57%), and the CHEKIT Sarcoptest (30%). In the second trial, eight litters from infected sows were examined from weeks 1–12 of life using the CHEKIT Sarcoptest and the SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001. The presence of maternal antibodies was highest on day 7 in both ELISAs and could be detected until weeks 5–9 of life. Antibodies increased as a result of an active immune response between days 56 and 63 in the SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001 and between days 70 and 77 of life in the CHEKIT Sarcoptest. Significant differences between the first and second litters were observed.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General aspects and techniques. Study of several systematic groups. Models</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Sarcoptes scabiei - immunology</subject><subject>Scabies - immunology</subject><subject>Scabies - parasitology</subject><subject>Scabies - veterinary</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - parasitology</subject><issn>0932-0113</issn><issn>1432-1955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkc1u1DAUhSMEokPhAdiAN7BLsZ04P0tUlR-pUhela-vauR4Mjj34JpWGl-IVcTQjdXNt-XznXMmnqt4KfiU47z8R523T1WXWQnRD3T-rdqJtZC1GpZ5XOz6WOxeiuaheEf3iXPRd276sLoRqmkEOw676dxfZ8hMZrYYWiIuHwB4he1h8isxHRphTSHtvi5CRDikS0iYc_J7Yktg9ZJsOS3kkC8aj3_xXJdATW8nHPZu8c5gxLsymecZsy5JwZPAIPoAJWNImn9EuDOPf44x18PE3TszP8xoTpWw2LxDBkV5XLxwEwjfn87J6-HLz4_pbfXv39fv159vaNkostYDRWNd3wwRuBNVzJTnySXayFdIoB5PCcZxaI8yopG2tcUpxYS033PUSmsvq4yn3kNOfFWnRsyeLIUDEtJLuukGOTS8LKE6gzYkoo9OH7GfIRy243lrSp5Z0mXprSffF8-4cvpoZpyfHuZYCfDgDUD41uAzRenriOj70rdq49yfOQdKwz4V5uJe86FwoLgfV_AdEuqki</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>LÖWENSTEIN, M</creator><creator>KAHLBACHER, H</creator><creator>PESCHKE, R</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>On the substantial variation in serological responses in pigs to Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis using different commercially available indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays</title><author>LÖWENSTEIN, M ; KAHLBACHER, H ; PESCHKE, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-1a9bcf768daf9a570520e0d262412b5fad5e99d4b1b952c4cbf5501cc0b0f72a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General aspects and techniques. Study of several systematic groups. Models</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Sarcoptes scabiei - immunology</topic><topic>Scabies - immunology</topic><topic>Scabies - parasitology</topic><topic>Scabies - veterinary</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - parasitology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LÖWENSTEIN, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAHLBACHER, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PESCHKE, R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Parasitology research (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LÖWENSTEIN, M</au><au>KAHLBACHER, H</au><au>PESCHKE, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the substantial variation in serological responses in pigs to Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis using different commercially available indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays</atitle><jtitle>Parasitology research (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>24-30</pages><issn>0932-0113</issn><eissn>1432-1955</eissn><coden>PARREZ</coden><abstract>Two trials were carried out to compare the use of different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of antibodies against Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis. In the first trial, we employed four tests and 70 selected sera from a closed pig farm with sarcoptic mange. The sera were taken from the breeding area as well as from the finishing unit and compared with skin scrapings. The SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001 yielded the most positive results (88.58%), followed by the ELISA of the National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala (70%), the Acar-Test P-ELISA (52.86%), skin scrapings (48.57%), and the CHEKIT Sarcoptest (30%). In the second trial, eight litters from infected sows were examined from weeks 1–12 of life using the CHEKIT Sarcoptest and the SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001. The presence of maternal antibodies was highest on day 7 in both ELISAs and could be detected until weeks 5–9 of life. Antibodies increased as a result of an active immune response between days 56 and 63 in the SARCOPTES-ELISA 2001 and between days 70 and 77 of life in the CHEKIT Sarcoptest. Significant differences between the first and second litters were observed.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>15338288</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00436-004-1168-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0932-0113 |
ispartof | Parasitology research (1987), 2004-09, Vol.94 (1), p.24-30 |
issn | 0932-0113 1432-1955 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66829372 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animals Antibodies - blood Biological and medical sciences Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects General aspects and techniques. Study of several systematic groups. Models Invertebrates Reagent Kits, Diagnostic Sarcoptes scabiei - immunology Scabies - immunology Scabies - parasitology Scabies - veterinary Sensitivity and Specificity Swine Swine Diseases - diagnosis Swine Diseases - immunology Swine Diseases - parasitology |
title | On the substantial variation in serological responses in pigs to Sarcoptes scabiei var. suis using different commercially available indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A25%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20substantial%20variation%20in%20serological%20responses%20in%20pigs%20to%20Sarcoptes%20scabiei%20var.%20suis%20using%20different%20commercially%20available%20indirect%20enzyme-linked%20immunosorbent%20assays&rft.jtitle=Parasitology%20research%20(1987)&rft.au=L%C3%96WENSTEIN,%20M&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=24-30&rft.issn=0932-0113&rft.eissn=1432-1955&rft.coden=PARREZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00436-004-1168-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66829372%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66829372&rft_id=info:pmid/15338288&rfr_iscdi=true |