Evaluation of staging chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase for localized melanoma

Radiographic and laboratory evaluations are often routinely used in the initial work-up for melanoma. To examine the yield of a chest radiograph and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), in the work-up for newly diagnosed localized melanoma. Patients with a new diagnosis of localized invasive melanoma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2004-09, Vol.51 (3), p.399-405
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Timothy S., Johnson, Timothy M., Cascade, Phillip N., Redman, Bruce G., Sondak, Vernon K., Schwartz, Jennifer L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 405
container_issue 3
container_start_page 399
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
container_volume 51
creator Wang, Timothy S.
Johnson, Timothy M.
Cascade, Phillip N.
Redman, Bruce G.
Sondak, Vernon K.
Schwartz, Jennifer L.
description Radiographic and laboratory evaluations are often routinely used in the initial work-up for melanoma. To examine the yield of a chest radiograph and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), in the work-up for newly diagnosed localized melanoma. Patients with a new diagnosis of localized invasive melanoma were entered into a prospective database. The status of the chest radiograph, LDH, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) was assessed. Two-hundred-twenty-four patients were entered into the study and 210 had chest radiograph data for analysis. The true positive chest radiograph rate, defined as the percent of chest radiographs interpreted as “positive or equivocal possibly melanoma related” with subsequent confirmed melanoma metastases, was 0%. The false positive chest radiograph rate, defined as the percent of chest radiographs interpreted as “positive or equivocal possibly melanoma related” with melanoma metastases excluded based on previous or subsequent studies or other known medical conditions, was 7%. Ninety-six patients (melanoma≥1 mm) had LDH results for analysis. Elevations in LDH were found in 15% and did not lead to detection of occult disease in any patients. Seventy-seven patients underwent SLN biopsy. A positive SLN did not correlate with abnormal chest radiograph or LDH. Low yield, high rate of false-positive tests and lack of significant impact of early detection of metastases on survival argue that chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase should probably not be accepted into routine clinical practice in patients with clinically localized melanoma in the absence of data supporting their use.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.02.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66828565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0190962204007339</els_id><sourcerecordid>66828565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-41022620b1613ade4c3bb03a18b3a00d210bd13241d062c8a5e4a6a88250ef793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAURUVpaCZpf6CLok27s_Mk2bIN3ZSQNoVAN8024ll6ntFgW1PJDqRfXw0zkF1Xd3Pu5XIY-yigFCD0zb7cI7pSAlQlyBJE84ZtBHRNoZu2ecs2IDooOi3lJbtKaQ8AXaWad-xS1Eo1Xas27OnuGccVFx9mHgaeFtz6ecvtjtLCIzofthEPu8RxdjxRXCc-ol1wIe5o9-Ji2NKMifgQIh-DxdH_JccnGnEOE75nFwOOiT6c85o9fr_7fXtfPPz68fP220NhVSuXohIgpZbQCy0UOqqs6ntQKNpeIYCTAnonlKyEAy1tizVVqLFtZQ00NJ26Zl9Ou4cY_qz5u5l8sjTmFxTWZLRuZVvrOoPyBNoYUoo0mEP0E8YXI8AcrZq9OVo1R6sGpMlWc-nTeX3tJ3KvlbPGDHw-A5iygiHibH165TR0HdQic19PHGUXz56iSdbTbMn5SHYxLvj__fgHmqaV0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66828565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of staging chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase for localized melanoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wang, Timothy S. ; Johnson, Timothy M. ; Cascade, Phillip N. ; Redman, Bruce G. ; Sondak, Vernon K. ; Schwartz, Jennifer L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Timothy S. ; Johnson, Timothy M. ; Cascade, Phillip N. ; Redman, Bruce G. ; Sondak, Vernon K. ; Schwartz, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><description>Radiographic and laboratory evaluations are often routinely used in the initial work-up for melanoma. To examine the yield of a chest radiograph and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), in the work-up for newly diagnosed localized melanoma. Patients with a new diagnosis of localized invasive melanoma were entered into a prospective database. The status of the chest radiograph, LDH, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) was assessed. Two-hundred-twenty-four patients were entered into the study and 210 had chest radiograph data for analysis. The true positive chest radiograph rate, defined as the percent of chest radiographs interpreted as “positive or equivocal possibly melanoma related” with subsequent confirmed melanoma metastases, was 0%. The false positive chest radiograph rate, defined as the percent of chest radiographs interpreted as “positive or equivocal possibly melanoma related” with melanoma metastases excluded based on previous or subsequent studies or other known medical conditions, was 7%. Ninety-six patients (melanoma≥1 mm) had LDH results for analysis. Elevations in LDH were found in 15% and did not lead to detection of occult disease in any patients. Seventy-seven patients underwent SLN biopsy. A positive SLN did not correlate with abnormal chest radiograph or LDH. Low yield, high rate of false-positive tests and lack of significant impact of early detection of metastases on survival argue that chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase should probably not be accepted into routine clinical practice in patients with clinically localized melanoma in the absence of data supporting their use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.02.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15337983</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAADDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; Databases, Factual ; Dermatology ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - blood ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Neoplasms - secondary ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma - blood ; Melanoma - diagnostic imaging ; Melanoma - pathology ; Melanoma - secondary ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Proteins - blood ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - blood ; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - pathology ; Observer Variation ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography, Thoracic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Skin Neoplasms - blood ; Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Skin Neoplasms - pathology ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2004-09, Vol.51 (3), p.399-405</ispartof><rights>2004 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-41022620b1613ade4c3bb03a18b3a00d210bd13241d062c8a5e4a6a88250ef793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-41022620b1613ade4c3bb03a18b3a00d210bd13241d062c8a5e4a6a88250ef793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.02.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16099051$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15337983$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Timothy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cascade, Phillip N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redman, Bruce G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sondak, Vernon K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of staging chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase for localized melanoma</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Radiographic and laboratory evaluations are often routinely used in the initial work-up for melanoma. To examine the yield of a chest radiograph and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), in the work-up for newly diagnosed localized melanoma. Patients with a new diagnosis of localized invasive melanoma were entered into a prospective database. The status of the chest radiograph, LDH, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) was assessed. Two-hundred-twenty-four patients were entered into the study and 210 had chest radiograph data for analysis. The true positive chest radiograph rate, defined as the percent of chest radiographs interpreted as “positive or equivocal possibly melanoma related” with subsequent confirmed melanoma metastases, was 0%. The false positive chest radiograph rate, defined as the percent of chest radiographs interpreted as “positive or equivocal possibly melanoma related” with melanoma metastases excluded based on previous or subsequent studies or other known medical conditions, was 7%. Ninety-six patients (melanoma≥1 mm) had LDH results for analysis. Elevations in LDH were found in 15% and did not lead to detection of occult disease in any patients. Seventy-seven patients underwent SLN biopsy. A positive SLN did not correlate with abnormal chest radiograph or LDH. Low yield, high rate of false-positive tests and lack of significant impact of early detection of metastases on survival argue that chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase should probably not be accepted into routine clinical practice in patients with clinically localized melanoma in the absence of data supporting their use.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - blood</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma - blood</subject><subject>Melanoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Melanoma - pathology</subject><subject>Melanoma - secondary</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - blood</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - pathology</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAURUVpaCZpf6CLok27s_Mk2bIN3ZSQNoVAN8024ll6ntFgW1PJDqRfXw0zkF1Xd3Pu5XIY-yigFCD0zb7cI7pSAlQlyBJE84ZtBHRNoZu2ecs2IDooOi3lJbtKaQ8AXaWad-xS1Eo1Xas27OnuGccVFx9mHgaeFtz6ecvtjtLCIzofthEPu8RxdjxRXCc-ol1wIe5o9-Ji2NKMifgQIh-DxdH_JccnGnEOE75nFwOOiT6c85o9fr_7fXtfPPz68fP220NhVSuXohIgpZbQCy0UOqqs6ntQKNpeIYCTAnonlKyEAy1tizVVqLFtZQ00NJ26Zl9Ou4cY_qz5u5l8sjTmFxTWZLRuZVvrOoPyBNoYUoo0mEP0E8YXI8AcrZq9OVo1R6sGpMlWc-nTeX3tJ3KvlbPGDHw-A5iygiHibH165TR0HdQic19PHGUXz56iSdbTbMn5SHYxLvj__fgHmqaV0g</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Wang, Timothy S.</creator><creator>Johnson, Timothy M.</creator><creator>Cascade, Phillip N.</creator><creator>Redman, Bruce G.</creator><creator>Sondak, Vernon K.</creator><creator>Schwartz, Jennifer L.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of staging chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase for localized melanoma</title><author>Wang, Timothy S. ; Johnson, Timothy M. ; Cascade, Phillip N. ; Redman, Bruce G. ; Sondak, Vernon K. ; Schwartz, Jennifer L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-41022620b1613ade4c3bb03a18b3a00d210bd13241d062c8a5e4a6a88250ef793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - blood</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma - blood</topic><topic>Melanoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Melanoma - pathology</topic><topic>Melanoma - secondary</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - blood</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - pathology</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Timothy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cascade, Phillip N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redman, Bruce G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sondak, Vernon K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Timothy S.</au><au>Johnson, Timothy M.</au><au>Cascade, Phillip N.</au><au>Redman, Bruce G.</au><au>Sondak, Vernon K.</au><au>Schwartz, Jennifer L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of staging chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase for localized melanoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>399-405</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><coden>JAADDB</coden><abstract>Radiographic and laboratory evaluations are often routinely used in the initial work-up for melanoma. To examine the yield of a chest radiograph and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), in the work-up for newly diagnosed localized melanoma. Patients with a new diagnosis of localized invasive melanoma were entered into a prospective database. The status of the chest radiograph, LDH, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) was assessed. Two-hundred-twenty-four patients were entered into the study and 210 had chest radiograph data for analysis. The true positive chest radiograph rate, defined as the percent of chest radiographs interpreted as “positive or equivocal possibly melanoma related” with subsequent confirmed melanoma metastases, was 0%. The false positive chest radiograph rate, defined as the percent of chest radiographs interpreted as “positive or equivocal possibly melanoma related” with melanoma metastases excluded based on previous or subsequent studies or other known medical conditions, was 7%. Ninety-six patients (melanoma≥1 mm) had LDH results for analysis. Elevations in LDH were found in 15% and did not lead to detection of occult disease in any patients. Seventy-seven patients underwent SLN biopsy. A positive SLN did not correlate with abnormal chest radiograph or LDH. Low yield, high rate of false-positive tests and lack of significant impact of early detection of metastases on survival argue that chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase should probably not be accepted into routine clinical practice in patients with clinically localized melanoma in the absence of data supporting their use.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>15337983</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaad.2004.02.017</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-9622
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2004-09, Vol.51 (3), p.399-405
issn 0190-9622
1097-6787
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66828565
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor - blood
Databases, Factual
Dermatology
False Positive Reactions
Female
Humans
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - blood
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Lung Neoplasms - secondary
Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology
Male
Medical sciences
Melanoma - blood
Melanoma - diagnostic imaging
Melanoma - pathology
Melanoma - secondary
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Proteins - blood
Neoplasm Staging - methods
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - blood
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - pathology
Observer Variation
Prospective Studies
Radiography, Thoracic - statistics & numerical data
Reproducibility of Results
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Skin Neoplasms - blood
Skin Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Skin Neoplasms - pathology
Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions
title Evaluation of staging chest radiographs and serum lactate dehydrogenase for localized melanoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A01%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20staging%20chest%20radiographs%20and%20serum%20lactate%20dehydrogenase%20for%20localized%20melanoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=Wang,%20Timothy%20S.&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=399-405&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft.coden=JAADDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.02.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66828565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66828565&rft_id=info:pmid/15337983&rft_els_id=S0190962204007339&rfr_iscdi=true