Generic Scheme for Independent Performance Assessment in the Molecular Biology Laboratory
A variety of proficiency testing schemes are available for specific molecular analyses, but there is an acute need for more widely accessible schemes to assess and demonstrate general competence in DNA analysis. Fifteen laboratories, including academic, clinical, and commercial organizations, were r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2004-09, Vol.50 (9), p.1553-1559 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1559 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1553 |
container_title | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Birch, Lyndsey English, Claire A Burns, Malcolm Keer, Jacquie T |
description | A variety of proficiency testing schemes are available for specific molecular analyses, but there is an acute need for more widely accessible schemes to assess and demonstrate general competence in DNA analysis.
Fifteen laboratories, including academic, clinical, and commercial organizations, were recruited into the prototype assessment exercise. A range of test samples were provided, and participants were required to extract DNA from simple matrices, perform PCR amplification, and score the samples as positive or negative by electrophoretic analysis of the amplification products. Results were requested as both gel images and a completed results table, and the performance of each laboratory was then scored on the submitted analytical results.
Overall, laboratories performed the analysis successfully, with participants scoring a high proportion of the samples correctly in the two rounds of the scheme. However, not all of the laboratories were able to achieve amplification for all samples, and the performance of some laboratories was not consistent in the two rounds. In addition, several analytical problems were encountered at all stages of the process, including DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and correct recording of results.
The generic approach described here has enabled effective cross-sectoral benchmarking of laboratories from a variety of analytical sectors. The problems encountered by some participating laboratories highlight the need for quality control and checks at all stages of the process to ensure accuracy of results. A statistical analysis of the results (ANOVA) allowed meaningful comparison of the consistency and sensitivity achieved by laboratories, demonstrating that an effective balance was achieved between the level of data obtained from laboratories and the time expenditure required from participants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1373/clinchem.2003.029454 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66815825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>690874781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-b3bac546fd1d3896adfd39933c740d31f3afe1d00cfc55282ce8788ea6320f863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpaDZp_0EpppDevNVYH5aPSUjTwJYW2h56Elp5lHWQra1ks-y_r8xuWOgllxEzPPPC6CHkPdAlsJp9tr4b7Ab7ZUUpW9Kq4YK_IgsQjJZKSHhNFpTSpmyA1-fkIqWn3PJayTfkHETFQCq-IH_uccDY2eLnnIWFC7F4GFrcYi7DWPzAmEe9GSwW1ylhSv087oZi3GDxLXi0kzexuOmCD4_7YmXWIZoxxP1bcuaMT_ju-F6S31_uft1-LVff7x9ur1el5VKN5ZqtjRVcuhZaphppWteypmHM1py2DBwzDqGl1DorRKUqi6pWCo1kFXVKskvy6ZC7jeHvhGnUfZcsem8GDFPSUioQqhIvgqAoyFpCBj_-Bz6FKQ75CF0Bp5mCGeIHyMaQUkSnt7HrTdxroHoWpJ8F6VmQPgjKax-O2dO6x_a0dDSSgasjYJI13sX89V06cZJyoDU7XbPpHje7LqJOvfE-x4Le7XaC6iaHCsb-AQxBqA0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214001611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Generic Scheme for Independent Performance Assessment in the Molecular Biology Laboratory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Birch, Lyndsey ; English, Claire A ; Burns, Malcolm ; Keer, Jacquie T</creator><creatorcontrib>Birch, Lyndsey ; English, Claire A ; Burns, Malcolm ; Keer, Jacquie T</creatorcontrib><description>A variety of proficiency testing schemes are available for specific molecular analyses, but there is an acute need for more widely accessible schemes to assess and demonstrate general competence in DNA analysis.
Fifteen laboratories, including academic, clinical, and commercial organizations, were recruited into the prototype assessment exercise. A range of test samples were provided, and participants were required to extract DNA from simple matrices, perform PCR amplification, and score the samples as positive or negative by electrophoretic analysis of the amplification products. Results were requested as both gel images and a completed results table, and the performance of each laboratory was then scored on the submitted analytical results.
Overall, laboratories performed the analysis successfully, with participants scoring a high proportion of the samples correctly in the two rounds of the scheme. However, not all of the laboratories were able to achieve amplification for all samples, and the performance of some laboratories was not consistent in the two rounds. In addition, several analytical problems were encountered at all stages of the process, including DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and correct recording of results.
The generic approach described here has enabled effective cross-sectoral benchmarking of laboratories from a variety of analytical sectors. The problems encountered by some participating laboratories highlight the need for quality control and checks at all stages of the process to ensure accuracy of results. A statistical analysis of the results (ANOVA) allowed meaningful comparison of the consistency and sensitivity achieved by laboratories, demonstrating that an effective balance was achieved between the level of data obtained from laboratories and the time expenditure required from participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.029454</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15231684</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLCHAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Am Assoc Clin Chem</publisher><subject>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemistry, Clinical - standards ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA, Bacterial - chemistry ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification ; Escherichia coli - genetics ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laboratories - standards ; Medical sciences ; Molecular biology ; Molecular biophysics ; Performance assessment ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards ; Quality Control ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistical analysis ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2004-09, Vol.50 (9), p.1553-1559</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Association for Clinical Chemistry Sep 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-b3bac546fd1d3896adfd39933c740d31f3afe1d00cfc55282ce8788ea6320f863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-b3bac546fd1d3896adfd39933c740d31f3afe1d00cfc55282ce8788ea6320f863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16041073$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15231684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Birch, Lyndsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>English, Claire A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keer, Jacquie T</creatorcontrib><title>Generic Scheme for Independent Performance Assessment in the Molecular Biology Laboratory</title><title>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><description>A variety of proficiency testing schemes are available for specific molecular analyses, but there is an acute need for more widely accessible schemes to assess and demonstrate general competence in DNA analysis.
Fifteen laboratories, including academic, clinical, and commercial organizations, were recruited into the prototype assessment exercise. A range of test samples were provided, and participants were required to extract DNA from simple matrices, perform PCR amplification, and score the samples as positive or negative by electrophoretic analysis of the amplification products. Results were requested as both gel images and a completed results table, and the performance of each laboratory was then scored on the submitted analytical results.
Overall, laboratories performed the analysis successfully, with participants scoring a high proportion of the samples correctly in the two rounds of the scheme. However, not all of the laboratories were able to achieve amplification for all samples, and the performance of some laboratories was not consistent in the two rounds. In addition, several analytical problems were encountered at all stages of the process, including DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and correct recording of results.
The generic approach described here has enabled effective cross-sectoral benchmarking of laboratories from a variety of analytical sectors. The problems encountered by some participating laboratories highlight the need for quality control and checks at all stages of the process to ensure accuracy of results. A statistical analysis of the results (ANOVA) allowed meaningful comparison of the consistency and sensitivity achieved by laboratories, demonstrating that an effective balance was achieved between the level of data obtained from laboratories and the time expenditure required from participants.</description><subject>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry, Clinical - standards</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - genetics</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laboratories - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Molecular biophysics</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0009-9147</issn><issn>1530-8561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpaDZp_0EpppDevNVYH5aPSUjTwJYW2h56Elp5lHWQra1ks-y_r8xuWOgllxEzPPPC6CHkPdAlsJp9tr4b7Ab7ZUUpW9Kq4YK_IgsQjJZKSHhNFpTSpmyA1-fkIqWn3PJayTfkHETFQCq-IH_uccDY2eLnnIWFC7F4GFrcYi7DWPzAmEe9GSwW1ylhSv087oZi3GDxLXi0kzexuOmCD4_7YmXWIZoxxP1bcuaMT_ju-F6S31_uft1-LVff7x9ur1el5VKN5ZqtjRVcuhZaphppWteypmHM1py2DBwzDqGl1DorRKUqi6pWCo1kFXVKskvy6ZC7jeHvhGnUfZcsem8GDFPSUioQqhIvgqAoyFpCBj_-Bz6FKQ75CF0Bp5mCGeIHyMaQUkSnt7HrTdxroHoWpJ8F6VmQPgjKax-O2dO6x_a0dDSSgasjYJI13sX89V06cZJyoDU7XbPpHje7LqJOvfE-x4Le7XaC6iaHCsb-AQxBqA0</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Birch, Lyndsey</creator><creator>English, Claire A</creator><creator>Burns, Malcolm</creator><creator>Keer, Jacquie T</creator><general>Am Assoc Clin Chem</general><general>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Generic Scheme for Independent Performance Assessment in the Molecular Biology Laboratory</title><author>Birch, Lyndsey ; English, Claire A ; Burns, Malcolm ; Keer, Jacquie T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-b3bac546fd1d3896adfd39933c740d31f3afe1d00cfc55282ce8788ea6320f863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry, Clinical - standards</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - genetics</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laboratories - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Molecular biophysics</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Birch, Lyndsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>English, Claire A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keer, Jacquie T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Birch, Lyndsey</au><au>English, Claire A</au><au>Burns, Malcolm</au><au>Keer, Jacquie T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Generic Scheme for Independent Performance Assessment in the Molecular Biology Laboratory</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1553</spage><epage>1559</epage><pages>1553-1559</pages><issn>0009-9147</issn><eissn>1530-8561</eissn><coden>CLCHAU</coden><abstract>A variety of proficiency testing schemes are available for specific molecular analyses, but there is an acute need for more widely accessible schemes to assess and demonstrate general competence in DNA analysis.
Fifteen laboratories, including academic, clinical, and commercial organizations, were recruited into the prototype assessment exercise. A range of test samples were provided, and participants were required to extract DNA from simple matrices, perform PCR amplification, and score the samples as positive or negative by electrophoretic analysis of the amplification products. Results were requested as both gel images and a completed results table, and the performance of each laboratory was then scored on the submitted analytical results.
Overall, laboratories performed the analysis successfully, with participants scoring a high proportion of the samples correctly in the two rounds of the scheme. However, not all of the laboratories were able to achieve amplification for all samples, and the performance of some laboratories was not consistent in the two rounds. In addition, several analytical problems were encountered at all stages of the process, including DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and correct recording of results.
The generic approach described here has enabled effective cross-sectoral benchmarking of laboratories from a variety of analytical sectors. The problems encountered by some participating laboratories highlight the need for quality control and checks at all stages of the process to ensure accuracy of results. A statistical analysis of the results (ANOVA) allowed meaningful comparison of the consistency and sensitivity achieved by laboratories, demonstrating that an effective balance was achieved between the level of data obtained from laboratories and the time expenditure required from participants.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Am Assoc Clin Chem</pub><pmid>15231684</pmid><doi>10.1373/clinchem.2003.029454</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-9147 |
ispartof | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2004-09, Vol.50 (9), p.1553-1559 |
issn | 0009-9147 1530-8561 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66815825 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry Biological and medical sciences Chemistry, Clinical - standards Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA, Bacterial - chemistry DNA, Bacterial - genetics DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification Escherichia coli - genetics Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Laboratories - standards Medical sciences Molecular biology Molecular biophysics Performance assessment Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards Quality Control Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Statistical analysis Variance analysis |
title | Generic Scheme for Independent Performance Assessment in the Molecular Biology Laboratory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A20%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Generic%20Scheme%20for%20Independent%20Performance%20Assessment%20in%20the%20Molecular%20Biology%20Laboratory&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Birch,%20Lyndsey&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1553&rft.epage=1559&rft.pages=1553-1559&rft.issn=0009-9147&rft.eissn=1530-8561&rft.coden=CLCHAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2003.029454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E690874781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214001611&rft_id=info:pmid/15231684&rfr_iscdi=true |