A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States

A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI) guidelines on bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease were recently published. Despite limited evidence of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kidney international 2004-09, Vol.66 (3), p.1239-1247
Hauptverfasser: Manns, Braden, Stevens, Lesley, Miskulin, Dana, Owen, William F., Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C., Tonelli, Marcello
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1247
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1239
container_title Kidney international
container_volume 66
creator Manns, Braden
Stevens, Lesley
Miskulin, Dana
Owen, William F.
Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
Tonelli, Marcello
description A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI) guidelines on bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease were recently published. Despite limited evidence of clinical effectiveness and without detailed consideration of cost, these guidelines recommend the use of a nonmineral-containing phosphate binder (i.e., sevelamer) in several common clinical situations. The objective of this study is to use the example of sevelamer to outline the information that is needed to assist health care payers with the decision to fund a new and expensive therapy. We assessed the clinical benefit of sevelamer by performing a systematic review of all randomized trials evaluating its use. To estimate the direct budget impact associated with implementation of the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines, we used laboratory and medication data available from two cohorts of dialysis patients (one treated in Canada and one in the United States) to determine the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for the use of sevelamer as described in the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines. No randomized trials document the impact of sevelamer on survival, hospitalization, or quality of life. However, at least 51% and 64% of dialysis patients in the Canadian and American cohorts, respectively, would meet K/DOQI criteria for use of sevelamer. Extrapolating to the United States dialysis population, adoption of the K/DOQI bone guidelines would result in expenditures of approximately $781 million annually on sevelamer alone. Given their potential budgetary impact, future nephrology clinical practice guidelines should consider resource use, in addition to clinical data.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00877.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66814915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0085253815501798</els_id><sourcerecordid>1012100761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-557396e81d56ca9e801c2bc03dd6a667ecaab9e712328eea79d251ae9835eb6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCTwBZHLgl-CN2kmNZyodUCYnSszVrzwqvknixndL99zjdVZG4YNka2fO8o_G8hFDOal7W-33NlZAVb5WqBWNNzVjXtvX9E7J6TDwlq_KqKqFkd0FepLRn5d5L9pxccCVF2wi5IsdLmo4p4wjZWxrxzuNvGnY04R0OMGKkfqJXN98_UphcOWXDcEw-LZDPiR5Cxil7GCjaMIWxVPHjAWxehJtCO3iQ5p9Ibyef0dGbDBnTS_JsB0PCV-e4Jrefrn5svlTX3z5_3VxeV1bpJldKtbLX2HGntIUeO8at2FomndOgdYsWYNtjy4UUHSK0vROKA_adVLjVINfk3anuIYZfM6ZsRp8sDgNMGOZktO5405eJrMnbf8B9mGP5bjKCM84bybsCdSfIxpBSxJ05RD9CPBrOzOKN2ZvFArNYYBZvzIM35r5I35zrz9sR3V_h2YwCvD4BE-Q54iPQNH3TyqXBD6c8lnEVo6JJ1uNk0fmINhsX_P-7-APlv6oA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210114318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Manns, Braden ; Stevens, Lesley ; Miskulin, Dana ; Owen, William F. ; Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. ; Tonelli, Marcello</creator><creatorcontrib>Manns, Braden ; Stevens, Lesley ; Miskulin, Dana ; Owen, William F. ; Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. ; Tonelli, Marcello</creatorcontrib><description>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI) guidelines on bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease were recently published. Despite limited evidence of clinical effectiveness and without detailed consideration of cost, these guidelines recommend the use of a nonmineral-containing phosphate binder (i.e., sevelamer) in several common clinical situations. The objective of this study is to use the example of sevelamer to outline the information that is needed to assist health care payers with the decision to fund a new and expensive therapy. We assessed the clinical benefit of sevelamer by performing a systematic review of all randomized trials evaluating its use. To estimate the direct budget impact associated with implementation of the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines, we used laboratory and medication data available from two cohorts of dialysis patients (one treated in Canada and one in the United States) to determine the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for the use of sevelamer as described in the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines. No randomized trials document the impact of sevelamer on survival, hospitalization, or quality of life. However, at least 51% and 64% of dialysis patients in the Canadian and American cohorts, respectively, would meet K/DOQI criteria for use of sevelamer. Extrapolating to the United States dialysis population, adoption of the K/DOQI bone guidelines would result in expenditures of approximately $781 million annually on sevelamer alone. Given their potential budgetary impact, future nephrology clinical practice guidelines should consider resource use, in addition to clinical data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0085-2538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00877.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15327423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Canada ; cost ; cost-effectiveness ; dialysis ; economic evaluation ; Epoxy Compounds - economics ; Epoxy Compounds - therapeutic use ; Humans ; hyperphosphatemia ; kidney failure ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - economics ; Polyamines ; Polyethylenes - economics ; Polyethylenes - therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Sevelamer ; United States</subject><ispartof>Kidney international, 2004-09, Vol.66 (3), p.1239-1247</ispartof><rights>2004 International Society of Nephrology</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-557396e81d56ca9e801c2bc03dd6a667ecaab9e712328eea79d251ae9835eb6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-557396e81d56ca9e801c2bc03dd6a667ecaab9e712328eea79d251ae9835eb6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/210114318?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,64392,64394,64396,72476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15327423$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manns, Braden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miskulin, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonelli, Marcello</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States</title><title>Kidney international</title><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><description>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI) guidelines on bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease were recently published. Despite limited evidence of clinical effectiveness and without detailed consideration of cost, these guidelines recommend the use of a nonmineral-containing phosphate binder (i.e., sevelamer) in several common clinical situations. The objective of this study is to use the example of sevelamer to outline the information that is needed to assist health care payers with the decision to fund a new and expensive therapy. We assessed the clinical benefit of sevelamer by performing a systematic review of all randomized trials evaluating its use. To estimate the direct budget impact associated with implementation of the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines, we used laboratory and medication data available from two cohorts of dialysis patients (one treated in Canada and one in the United States) to determine the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for the use of sevelamer as described in the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines. No randomized trials document the impact of sevelamer on survival, hospitalization, or quality of life. However, at least 51% and 64% of dialysis patients in the Canadian and American cohorts, respectively, would meet K/DOQI criteria for use of sevelamer. Extrapolating to the United States dialysis population, adoption of the K/DOQI bone guidelines would result in expenditures of approximately $781 million annually on sevelamer alone. Given their potential budgetary impact, future nephrology clinical practice guidelines should consider resource use, in addition to clinical data.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>cost</subject><subject>cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>dialysis</subject><subject>economic evaluation</subject><subject>Epoxy Compounds - economics</subject><subject>Epoxy Compounds - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hyperphosphatemia</subject><subject>kidney failure</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - economics</subject><subject>Polyamines</subject><subject>Polyethylenes - economics</subject><subject>Polyethylenes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Sevelamer</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>1523-1755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCTwBZHLgl-CN2kmNZyodUCYnSszVrzwqvknixndL99zjdVZG4YNka2fO8o_G8hFDOal7W-33NlZAVb5WqBWNNzVjXtvX9E7J6TDwlq_KqKqFkd0FepLRn5d5L9pxccCVF2wi5IsdLmo4p4wjZWxrxzuNvGnY04R0OMGKkfqJXN98_UphcOWXDcEw-LZDPiR5Cxil7GCjaMIWxVPHjAWxehJtCO3iQ5p9Ibyef0dGbDBnTS_JsB0PCV-e4Jrefrn5svlTX3z5_3VxeV1bpJldKtbLX2HGntIUeO8at2FomndOgdYsWYNtjy4UUHSK0vROKA_adVLjVINfk3anuIYZfM6ZsRp8sDgNMGOZktO5405eJrMnbf8B9mGP5bjKCM84bybsCdSfIxpBSxJ05RD9CPBrOzOKN2ZvFArNYYBZvzIM35r5I35zrz9sR3V_h2YwCvD4BE-Q54iPQNH3TyqXBD6c8lnEVo6JJ1uNk0fmINhsX_P-7-APlv6oA</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Manns, Braden</creator><creator>Stevens, Lesley</creator><creator>Miskulin, Dana</creator><creator>Owen, William F.</creator><creator>Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.</creator><creator>Tonelli, Marcello</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States</title><author>Manns, Braden ; Stevens, Lesley ; Miskulin, Dana ; Owen, William F. ; Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. ; Tonelli, Marcello</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-557396e81d56ca9e801c2bc03dd6a667ecaab9e712328eea79d251ae9835eb6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>cost</topic><topic>cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>dialysis</topic><topic>economic evaluation</topic><topic>Epoxy Compounds - economics</topic><topic>Epoxy Compounds - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hyperphosphatemia</topic><topic>kidney failure</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - economics</topic><topic>Polyamines</topic><topic>Polyethylenes - economics</topic><topic>Polyethylenes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Sevelamer</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manns, Braden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miskulin, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonelli, Marcello</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manns, Braden</au><au>Stevens, Lesley</au><au>Miskulin, Dana</au><au>Owen, William F.</au><au>Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.</au><au>Tonelli, Marcello</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States</atitle><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1239</spage><epage>1247</epage><pages>1239-1247</pages><issn>0085-2538</issn><eissn>1523-1755</eissn><abstract>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI) guidelines on bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease were recently published. Despite limited evidence of clinical effectiveness and without detailed consideration of cost, these guidelines recommend the use of a nonmineral-containing phosphate binder (i.e., sevelamer) in several common clinical situations. The objective of this study is to use the example of sevelamer to outline the information that is needed to assist health care payers with the decision to fund a new and expensive therapy. We assessed the clinical benefit of sevelamer by performing a systematic review of all randomized trials evaluating its use. To estimate the direct budget impact associated with implementation of the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines, we used laboratory and medication data available from two cohorts of dialysis patients (one treated in Canada and one in the United States) to determine the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for the use of sevelamer as described in the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines. No randomized trials document the impact of sevelamer on survival, hospitalization, or quality of life. However, at least 51% and 64% of dialysis patients in the Canadian and American cohorts, respectively, would meet K/DOQI criteria for use of sevelamer. Extrapolating to the United States dialysis population, adoption of the K/DOQI bone guidelines would result in expenditures of approximately $781 million annually on sevelamer alone. Given their potential budgetary impact, future nephrology clinical practice guidelines should consider resource use, in addition to clinical data.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15327423</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00877.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0085-2538
ispartof Kidney international, 2004-09, Vol.66 (3), p.1239-1247
issn 0085-2538
1523-1755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66814915
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Canada
cost
cost-effectiveness
dialysis
economic evaluation
Epoxy Compounds - economics
Epoxy Compounds - therapeutic use
Humans
hyperphosphatemia
kidney failure
Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy
Kidney Failure, Chronic - economics
Polyamines
Polyethylenes - economics
Polyethylenes - therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Sevelamer
United States
title A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T21%3A20%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20sevelamer%20in%20ESRD%20and%20an%20analysis%20of%20its%20potential%20economic%20impact%20in%20Canada%20and%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20international&rft.au=Manns,%20Braden&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1239&rft.epage=1247&rft.pages=1239-1247&rft.issn=0085-2538&rft.eissn=1523-1755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00877.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1012100761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210114318&rft_id=info:pmid/15327423&rft_els_id=S0085253815501798&rfr_iscdi=true