A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States
A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI) guidelines on bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease were recently published. Despite limited evidence of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Kidney international 2004-09, Vol.66 (3), p.1239-1247 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1247 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1239 |
container_title | Kidney international |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Manns, Braden Stevens, Lesley Miskulin, Dana Owen, William F. Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. Tonelli, Marcello |
description | A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States.
The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI) guidelines on bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease were recently published. Despite limited evidence of clinical effectiveness and without detailed consideration of cost, these guidelines recommend the use of a nonmineral-containing phosphate binder (i.e., sevelamer) in several common clinical situations. The objective of this study is to use the example of sevelamer to outline the information that is needed to assist health care payers with the decision to fund a new and expensive therapy.
We assessed the clinical benefit of sevelamer by performing a systematic review of all randomized trials evaluating its use. To estimate the direct budget impact associated with implementation of the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines, we used laboratory and medication data available from two cohorts of dialysis patients (one treated in Canada and one in the United States) to determine the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for the use of sevelamer as described in the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines.
No randomized trials document the impact of sevelamer on survival, hospitalization, or quality of life. However, at least 51% and 64% of dialysis patients in the Canadian and American cohorts, respectively, would meet K/DOQI criteria for use of sevelamer. Extrapolating to the United States dialysis population, adoption of the K/DOQI bone guidelines would result in expenditures of approximately $781 million annually on sevelamer alone.
Given their potential budgetary impact, future nephrology clinical practice guidelines should consider resource use, in addition to clinical data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00877.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66814915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0085253815501798</els_id><sourcerecordid>1012100761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-557396e81d56ca9e801c2bc03dd6a667ecaab9e712328eea79d251ae9835eb6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCTwBZHLgl-CN2kmNZyodUCYnSszVrzwqvknixndL99zjdVZG4YNka2fO8o_G8hFDOal7W-33NlZAVb5WqBWNNzVjXtvX9E7J6TDwlq_KqKqFkd0FepLRn5d5L9pxccCVF2wi5IsdLmo4p4wjZWxrxzuNvGnY04R0OMGKkfqJXN98_UphcOWXDcEw-LZDPiR5Cxil7GCjaMIWxVPHjAWxehJtCO3iQ5p9Ibyef0dGbDBnTS_JsB0PCV-e4Jrefrn5svlTX3z5_3VxeV1bpJldKtbLX2HGntIUeO8at2FomndOgdYsWYNtjy4UUHSK0vROKA_adVLjVINfk3anuIYZfM6ZsRp8sDgNMGOZktO5405eJrMnbf8B9mGP5bjKCM84bybsCdSfIxpBSxJ05RD9CPBrOzOKN2ZvFArNYYBZvzIM35r5I35zrz9sR3V_h2YwCvD4BE-Q54iPQNH3TyqXBD6c8lnEVo6JJ1uNk0fmINhsX_P-7-APlv6oA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210114318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Manns, Braden ; Stevens, Lesley ; Miskulin, Dana ; Owen, William F. ; Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. ; Tonelli, Marcello</creator><creatorcontrib>Manns, Braden ; Stevens, Lesley ; Miskulin, Dana ; Owen, William F. ; Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. ; Tonelli, Marcello</creatorcontrib><description>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States.
The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI) guidelines on bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease were recently published. Despite limited evidence of clinical effectiveness and without detailed consideration of cost, these guidelines recommend the use of a nonmineral-containing phosphate binder (i.e., sevelamer) in several common clinical situations. The objective of this study is to use the example of sevelamer to outline the information that is needed to assist health care payers with the decision to fund a new and expensive therapy.
We assessed the clinical benefit of sevelamer by performing a systematic review of all randomized trials evaluating its use. To estimate the direct budget impact associated with implementation of the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines, we used laboratory and medication data available from two cohorts of dialysis patients (one treated in Canada and one in the United States) to determine the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for the use of sevelamer as described in the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines.
No randomized trials document the impact of sevelamer on survival, hospitalization, or quality of life. However, at least 51% and 64% of dialysis patients in the Canadian and American cohorts, respectively, would meet K/DOQI criteria for use of sevelamer. Extrapolating to the United States dialysis population, adoption of the K/DOQI bone guidelines would result in expenditures of approximately $781 million annually on sevelamer alone.
Given their potential budgetary impact, future nephrology clinical practice guidelines should consider resource use, in addition to clinical data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0085-2538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00877.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15327423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Canada ; cost ; cost-effectiveness ; dialysis ; economic evaluation ; Epoxy Compounds - economics ; Epoxy Compounds - therapeutic use ; Humans ; hyperphosphatemia ; kidney failure ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - economics ; Polyamines ; Polyethylenes - economics ; Polyethylenes - therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Sevelamer ; United States</subject><ispartof>Kidney international, 2004-09, Vol.66 (3), p.1239-1247</ispartof><rights>2004 International Society of Nephrology</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-557396e81d56ca9e801c2bc03dd6a667ecaab9e712328eea79d251ae9835eb6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-557396e81d56ca9e801c2bc03dd6a667ecaab9e712328eea79d251ae9835eb6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/210114318?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,64392,64394,64396,72476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15327423$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manns, Braden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miskulin, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonelli, Marcello</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States</title><title>Kidney international</title><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><description>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States.
The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI) guidelines on bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease were recently published. Despite limited evidence of clinical effectiveness and without detailed consideration of cost, these guidelines recommend the use of a nonmineral-containing phosphate binder (i.e., sevelamer) in several common clinical situations. The objective of this study is to use the example of sevelamer to outline the information that is needed to assist health care payers with the decision to fund a new and expensive therapy.
We assessed the clinical benefit of sevelamer by performing a systematic review of all randomized trials evaluating its use. To estimate the direct budget impact associated with implementation of the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines, we used laboratory and medication data available from two cohorts of dialysis patients (one treated in Canada and one in the United States) to determine the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for the use of sevelamer as described in the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines.
No randomized trials document the impact of sevelamer on survival, hospitalization, or quality of life. However, at least 51% and 64% of dialysis patients in the Canadian and American cohorts, respectively, would meet K/DOQI criteria for use of sevelamer. Extrapolating to the United States dialysis population, adoption of the K/DOQI bone guidelines would result in expenditures of approximately $781 million annually on sevelamer alone.
Given their potential budgetary impact, future nephrology clinical practice guidelines should consider resource use, in addition to clinical data.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>cost</subject><subject>cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>dialysis</subject><subject>economic evaluation</subject><subject>Epoxy Compounds - economics</subject><subject>Epoxy Compounds - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hyperphosphatemia</subject><subject>kidney failure</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - economics</subject><subject>Polyamines</subject><subject>Polyethylenes - economics</subject><subject>Polyethylenes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Sevelamer</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>1523-1755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCTwBZHLgl-CN2kmNZyodUCYnSszVrzwqvknixndL99zjdVZG4YNka2fO8o_G8hFDOal7W-33NlZAVb5WqBWNNzVjXtvX9E7J6TDwlq_KqKqFkd0FepLRn5d5L9pxccCVF2wi5IsdLmo4p4wjZWxrxzuNvGnY04R0OMGKkfqJXN98_UphcOWXDcEw-LZDPiR5Cxil7GCjaMIWxVPHjAWxehJtCO3iQ5p9Ibyef0dGbDBnTS_JsB0PCV-e4Jrefrn5svlTX3z5_3VxeV1bpJldKtbLX2HGntIUeO8at2FomndOgdYsWYNtjy4UUHSK0vROKA_adVLjVINfk3anuIYZfM6ZsRp8sDgNMGOZktO5405eJrMnbf8B9mGP5bjKCM84bybsCdSfIxpBSxJ05RD9CPBrOzOKN2ZvFArNYYBZvzIM35r5I35zrz9sR3V_h2YwCvD4BE-Q54iPQNH3TyqXBD6c8lnEVo6JJ1uNk0fmINhsX_P-7-APlv6oA</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Manns, Braden</creator><creator>Stevens, Lesley</creator><creator>Miskulin, Dana</creator><creator>Owen, William F.</creator><creator>Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.</creator><creator>Tonelli, Marcello</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States</title><author>Manns, Braden ; Stevens, Lesley ; Miskulin, Dana ; Owen, William F. ; Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. ; Tonelli, Marcello</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-557396e81d56ca9e801c2bc03dd6a667ecaab9e712328eea79d251ae9835eb6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>cost</topic><topic>cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>dialysis</topic><topic>economic evaluation</topic><topic>Epoxy Compounds - economics</topic><topic>Epoxy Compounds - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hyperphosphatemia</topic><topic>kidney failure</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - economics</topic><topic>Polyamines</topic><topic>Polyethylenes - economics</topic><topic>Polyethylenes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Sevelamer</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manns, Braden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miskulin, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonelli, Marcello</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manns, Braden</au><au>Stevens, Lesley</au><au>Miskulin, Dana</au><au>Owen, William F.</au><au>Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.</au><au>Tonelli, Marcello</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States</atitle><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1239</spage><epage>1247</epage><pages>1239-1247</pages><issn>0085-2538</issn><eissn>1523-1755</eissn><abstract>A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States.
The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI) guidelines on bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease were recently published. Despite limited evidence of clinical effectiveness and without detailed consideration of cost, these guidelines recommend the use of a nonmineral-containing phosphate binder (i.e., sevelamer) in several common clinical situations. The objective of this study is to use the example of sevelamer to outline the information that is needed to assist health care payers with the decision to fund a new and expensive therapy.
We assessed the clinical benefit of sevelamer by performing a systematic review of all randomized trials evaluating its use. To estimate the direct budget impact associated with implementation of the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines, we used laboratory and medication data available from two cohorts of dialysis patients (one treated in Canada and one in the United States) to determine the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for the use of sevelamer as described in the K/DOQI bone disease guidelines.
No randomized trials document the impact of sevelamer on survival, hospitalization, or quality of life. However, at least 51% and 64% of dialysis patients in the Canadian and American cohorts, respectively, would meet K/DOQI criteria for use of sevelamer. Extrapolating to the United States dialysis population, adoption of the K/DOQI bone guidelines would result in expenditures of approximately $781 million annually on sevelamer alone.
Given their potential budgetary impact, future nephrology clinical practice guidelines should consider resource use, in addition to clinical data.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15327423</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00877.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0085-2538 |
ispartof | Kidney international, 2004-09, Vol.66 (3), p.1239-1247 |
issn | 0085-2538 1523-1755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66814915 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Canada cost cost-effectiveness dialysis economic evaluation Epoxy Compounds - economics Epoxy Compounds - therapeutic use Humans hyperphosphatemia kidney failure Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy Kidney Failure, Chronic - economics Polyamines Polyethylenes - economics Polyethylenes - therapeutic use Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Sevelamer United States |
title | A systematic review of sevelamer in ESRD and an analysis of its potential economic impact in Canada and the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T21%3A20%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20sevelamer%20in%20ESRD%20and%20an%20analysis%20of%20its%20potential%20economic%20impact%20in%20Canada%20and%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20international&rft.au=Manns,%20Braden&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1239&rft.epage=1247&rft.pages=1239-1247&rft.issn=0085-2538&rft.eissn=1523-1755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00877.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1012100761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210114318&rft_id=info:pmid/15327423&rft_els_id=S0085253815501798&rfr_iscdi=true |