Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions
The effect of different processing conditions on the sensitometric characteristics of mammographic films was investigated and the implications of this effect on clinical practice are discussed. Three Agfa (MR5-II, HDR and HT), two Kodak (MinR-M, MinR-2000), one Fuji (AD-M) and one Konica (CM-H) sing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 2004-08, Vol.77 (920), p.666-671 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 671 |
---|---|
container_issue | 920 |
container_start_page | 666 |
container_title | British journal of radiology |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | TSALAFOUTAS, I. A DIMAKOPOULOU, A. D KOULENTIANOS, E. D SEREFOGLOU, A. N YAKOUMAKIS, E. N |
description | The effect of different processing conditions on the sensitometric characteristics of mammographic films was investigated and the implications of this effect on clinical practice are discussed. Three Agfa (MR5-II, HDR and HT), two Kodak (MinR-M, MinR-2000), one Fuji (AD-M) and one Konica (CM-H) single emulsion mammographic films were used. For each film type a 21-step sensitometric strip was developed in seven different processing conditions involving the use of four processors, five developing times and four chemistries. The different processing conditions produced a variable effect on the sensitometric characteristics of the mammographic films. While some films seemed relatively insensitive, others were greatly affected. Furthermore, not all the sensitometric parameters of a film were affected in the same way. For example, a change of processing conditions in some cases increased speed and decreased contrast but in some other cases increased both speed and contrast. Different mammographic films present different sensitometric characteristics that can be altered by processing conditions. Thus, in a mammographic facility any change in film processor/processing cycle or chemistry should be carefully investigated before mammograms of patients are acquired. Furthermore, the results of film comparisons under certain processing conditions should not be generalized to other processing conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/bjr/13566913 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66808897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66808897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-72627af65ef957dbf1f55c3a2e879b12fcf2b7ee368287f6fc1e70bdae04d5b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0EtLAzEUhuEgiq2XnWuZja4cTTLNbSniDQQ3Ku6GTOakTZlLzUkV_70ztNJVCDx8HF5Czhi9ZlyYm2oZb1ghpDSs2CNTpmY615p-7pMppVTljGsxIUeIy_ErDD0kEyYKLulMTAl82BhsCn2X9T5LC8gQOgypbyHF4DK3sNG6BDFgCg5HhPANXdbatu3n0a4Wg_KhaTH7CWmRrWLvADF088z1XR3GaTwhB942CKfb95i8P9y_3T3lL6-Pz3e3L7krmEq54pIr66UAb4SqK8-8EK6wHLQyFePeeV4pgEJqrpWX3jFQtKot0FktKl4ck8vN7nDF1xowlW1AB01jO-jXWEqpqdZGDfBqA13sESP4chVDa-NvyWg5Zi2HrOV_1oGfb3fXVQv1Dm87DuBiCyw62_hoOxdw5yRjxhhR_AH8UYNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66808897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>TSALAFOUTAS, I. A ; DIMAKOPOULOU, A. D ; KOULENTIANOS, E. D ; SEREFOGLOU, A. N ; YAKOUMAKIS, E. N</creator><creatorcontrib>TSALAFOUTAS, I. A ; DIMAKOPOULOU, A. D ; KOULENTIANOS, E. D ; SEREFOGLOU, A. N ; YAKOUMAKIS, E. N</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of different processing conditions on the sensitometric characteristics of mammographic films was investigated and the implications of this effect on clinical practice are discussed. Three Agfa (MR5-II, HDR and HT), two Kodak (MinR-M, MinR-2000), one Fuji (AD-M) and one Konica (CM-H) single emulsion mammographic films were used. For each film type a 21-step sensitometric strip was developed in seven different processing conditions involving the use of four processors, five developing times and four chemistries. The different processing conditions produced a variable effect on the sensitometric characteristics of the mammographic films. While some films seemed relatively insensitive, others were greatly affected. Furthermore, not all the sensitometric parameters of a film were affected in the same way. For example, a change of processing conditions in some cases increased speed and decreased contrast but in some other cases increased both speed and contrast. Different mammographic films present different sensitometric characteristics that can be altered by processing conditions. Thus, in a mammographic facility any change in film processor/processing cycle or chemistry should be carefully investigated before mammograms of patients are acquired. Furthermore, the results of film comparisons under certain processing conditions should not be generalized to other processing conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr/13566913</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15326045</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJRAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Mammography - instrumentation ; Mammography - standards ; Medical sciences ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Reproducibility of Results ; Technology, Radiologic ; X-Ray Film - standards</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2004-08, Vol.77 (920), p.666-671</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-72627af65ef957dbf1f55c3a2e879b12fcf2b7ee368287f6fc1e70bdae04d5b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-72627af65ef957dbf1f55c3a2e879b12fcf2b7ee368287f6fc1e70bdae04d5b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16119995$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15326045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TSALAFOUTAS, I. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DIMAKOPOULOU, A. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOULENTIANOS, E. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEREFOGLOU, A. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAKOUMAKIS, E. N</creatorcontrib><title>Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>The effect of different processing conditions on the sensitometric characteristics of mammographic films was investigated and the implications of this effect on clinical practice are discussed. Three Agfa (MR5-II, HDR and HT), two Kodak (MinR-M, MinR-2000), one Fuji (AD-M) and one Konica (CM-H) single emulsion mammographic films were used. For each film type a 21-step sensitometric strip was developed in seven different processing conditions involving the use of four processors, five developing times and four chemistries. The different processing conditions produced a variable effect on the sensitometric characteristics of the mammographic films. While some films seemed relatively insensitive, others were greatly affected. Furthermore, not all the sensitometric parameters of a film were affected in the same way. For example, a change of processing conditions in some cases increased speed and decreased contrast but in some other cases increased both speed and contrast. Different mammographic films present different sensitometric characteristics that can be altered by processing conditions. Thus, in a mammographic facility any change in film processor/processing cycle or chemistry should be carefully investigated before mammograms of patients are acquired. Furthermore, the results of film comparisons under certain processing conditions should not be generalized to other processing conditions.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Mammography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mammography - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Technology, Radiologic</subject><subject>X-Ray Film - standards</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0EtLAzEUhuEgiq2XnWuZja4cTTLNbSniDQQ3Ku6GTOakTZlLzUkV_70ztNJVCDx8HF5Czhi9ZlyYm2oZb1ghpDSs2CNTpmY615p-7pMppVTljGsxIUeIy_ErDD0kEyYKLulMTAl82BhsCn2X9T5LC8gQOgypbyHF4DK3sNG6BDFgCg5HhPANXdbatu3n0a4Wg_KhaTH7CWmRrWLvADF088z1XR3GaTwhB942CKfb95i8P9y_3T3lL6-Pz3e3L7krmEq54pIr66UAb4SqK8-8EK6wHLQyFePeeV4pgEJqrpWX3jFQtKot0FktKl4ck8vN7nDF1xowlW1AB01jO-jXWEqpqdZGDfBqA13sESP4chVDa-NvyWg5Zi2HrOV_1oGfb3fXVQv1Dm87DuBiCyw62_hoOxdw5yRjxhhR_AH8UYNQ</recordid><startdate>20040801</startdate><enddate>20040801</enddate><creator>TSALAFOUTAS, I. A</creator><creator>DIMAKOPOULOU, A. D</creator><creator>KOULENTIANOS, E. D</creator><creator>SEREFOGLOU, A. N</creator><creator>YAKOUMAKIS, E. N</creator><general>British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040801</creationdate><title>Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions</title><author>TSALAFOUTAS, I. A ; DIMAKOPOULOU, A. D ; KOULENTIANOS, E. D ; SEREFOGLOU, A. N ; YAKOUMAKIS, E. N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-72627af65ef957dbf1f55c3a2e879b12fcf2b7ee368287f6fc1e70bdae04d5b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Mammography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mammography - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Technology, Radiologic</topic><topic>X-Ray Film - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TSALAFOUTAS, I. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DIMAKOPOULOU, A. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOULENTIANOS, E. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEREFOGLOU, A. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAKOUMAKIS, E. N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TSALAFOUTAS, I. A</au><au>DIMAKOPOULOU, A. D</au><au>KOULENTIANOS, E. D</au><au>SEREFOGLOU, A. N</au><au>YAKOUMAKIS, E. N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2004-08-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>920</issue><spage>666</spage><epage>671</epage><pages>666-671</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><coden>BJRAAP</coden><abstract>The effect of different processing conditions on the sensitometric characteristics of mammographic films was investigated and the implications of this effect on clinical practice are discussed. Three Agfa (MR5-II, HDR and HT), two Kodak (MinR-M, MinR-2000), one Fuji (AD-M) and one Konica (CM-H) single emulsion mammographic films were used. For each film type a 21-step sensitometric strip was developed in seven different processing conditions involving the use of four processors, five developing times and four chemistries. The different processing conditions produced a variable effect on the sensitometric characteristics of the mammographic films. While some films seemed relatively insensitive, others were greatly affected. Furthermore, not all the sensitometric parameters of a film were affected in the same way. For example, a change of processing conditions in some cases increased speed and decreased contrast but in some other cases increased both speed and contrast. Different mammographic films present different sensitometric characteristics that can be altered by processing conditions. Thus, in a mammographic facility any change in film processor/processing cycle or chemistry should be carefully investigated before mammograms of patients are acquired. Furthermore, the results of film comparisons under certain processing conditions should not be generalized to other processing conditions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>15326045</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr/13566913</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
ispartof | British journal of radiology, 2004-08, Vol.77 (920), p.666-671 |
issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66808897 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Female Genital system. Mammary gland Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Mammography - instrumentation Mammography - standards Medical sciences Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Reproducibility of Results Technology, Radiologic X-Ray Film - standards |
title | Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A02%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20of%20the%20sensitometric%20characteristics%20of%20seven%20mammographic%20films%20with%20processing%20conditions&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=TSALAFOUTAS,%20I.%20A&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=920&rft.spage=666&rft.epage=671&rft.pages=666-671&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft.coden=BJRAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr/13566913&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66808897%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66808897&rft_id=info:pmid/15326045&rfr_iscdi=true |