Impact of interventionalist volume, experience, and board certification on coronary angioplasty outcomes in the era of stenting
It has been suggested that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by high-volume operators may be associated with better outcomes. However, the relation between operator and outcome is confounded by hospital caseloads of PCI, with busier hospitals generally having better outcomes. We assessed the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 2004-08, Vol.94 (4), p.421-426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 426 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 421 |
container_title | The American journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Harjai, Kishore J. Berman, Aaron D. Grines, Cindy L. Kahn, Joel Marsalese, Dominic Mehta, Rajendra H. Schreiber, Theodore Boura, Judith A. O'Neill, William W. |
description | It has been suggested that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by high-volume operators may be associated with better outcomes. However, the relation between operator and outcome is confounded by hospital caseloads of PCI, with busier hospitals generally having better outcomes. We assessed the effect of operator characteristics (volume of PCI, years in practice, and board certification status) on contemporary outcomes of PCI in a busy center with high-volume operators. Between 1999 and 2001, 12,293 PCIs were performed at our center by 28 interventionalists. Patients' clinical risk was assessed with the previously validated Beaumont PCI Risk Score. Operators were classified as producing low, medium, or high volume (tertiles of annual PCI volume ≤92, 93 to 140, or >140, respectively), as less, medium, or great experience (tertiles of years in practice ≤8, 9 to 14, or >14 years, respectively), and board certified (68%) or not. In-hospital death rate and a composite end point (death, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarction, or stroke) occurred in 0.99% and 2.59% of patients, respectively. Operator volume, experience, and board certification showed no univariate or multivariate relation with the study end points. The Beaumont PCI Risk Score showed a strong independent relation with in-hospital death rate (adjusted odds ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 1.43, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66808136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914904007027</els_id><sourcerecordid>741952191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-116a6606cf39ada24951a551aae67a746eb61c0e96e40f1c7ea0a1aa6d88cf043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhoMo7nH1JyhB0Ct7zLRNTnu1yOLHwoI3eh3mpNM1pW1qkh7cK_-6iaew4I0wIRPyzDvJvIy9BLEHAer9sMdpMOi7fSlEvc8h1SO2g-bQFtBC9ZjthBBl0ULdXrBnIQzpCCDVU3YBsiplW5Y79vtmWtBE7npu50j-RHO0bsbRhshPblwnesfp10Le0mxSjnPHjy715YZ8tL01mAt4CuN8qvT3ibmzbhkxxHvu1mjcRCHJ8_iDOHnMzULMjea75-xJj2OgF9t-yb5_-vjt-ktx-_XzzfWH28LU0MQCQKFSQpm-arHDsm4loEwLSR3wUCs6KjCCWkW16MEcCAWmW9U1jelFXV2yt2fdxbufK4WoJxsMjSPO5NaglWpEA5VK4Ot_wMGtPg0k6LISlZS1ggTJM2S8C8FTrxdvp_R1DUJne_SgN3t0tkfnkFn81Sa-HifqHqo2PxLwZgMwGBx7j7Ox4YFLI5CtykJXZ47SzE6WvA7mr0Gd9WSi7pz9z1P-AMy7so0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230355461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of interventionalist volume, experience, and board certification on coronary angioplasty outcomes in the era of stenting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Harjai, Kishore J. ; Berman, Aaron D. ; Grines, Cindy L. ; Kahn, Joel ; Marsalese, Dominic ; Mehta, Rajendra H. ; Schreiber, Theodore ; Boura, Judith A. ; O'Neill, William W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harjai, Kishore J. ; Berman, Aaron D. ; Grines, Cindy L. ; Kahn, Joel ; Marsalese, Dominic ; Mehta, Rajendra H. ; Schreiber, Theodore ; Boura, Judith A. ; O'Neill, William W.</creatorcontrib><description>It has been suggested that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by high-volume operators may be associated with better outcomes. However, the relation between operator and outcome is confounded by hospital caseloads of PCI, with busier hospitals generally having better outcomes. We assessed the effect of operator characteristics (volume of PCI, years in practice, and board certification status) on contemporary outcomes of PCI in a busy center with high-volume operators. Between 1999 and 2001, 12,293 PCIs were performed at our center by 28 interventionalists. Patients' clinical risk was assessed with the previously validated Beaumont PCI Risk Score. Operators were classified as producing low, medium, or high volume (tertiles of annual PCI volume ≤92, 93 to 140, or >140, respectively), as less, medium, or great experience (tertiles of years in practice ≤8, 9 to 14, or >14 years, respectively), and board certified (68%) or not. In-hospital death rate and a composite end point (death, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarction, or stroke) occurred in 0.99% and 2.59% of patients, respectively. Operator volume, experience, and board certification showed no univariate or multivariate relation with the study end points. The Beaumont PCI Risk Score showed a strong independent relation with in-hospital death rate (adjusted odds ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 1.43, p <0.0001) and composite end point (odds ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.22, p <0.0001). We conclude that, in contemporary PCI practice at a large center with high-volume operators, in-hospital outcomes are not affected by operator volume, experience, or board certification. Rather, patients' clinical risk score is the overriding determinant of clinical outcomes. Our findings emphasize the power of a well-organized high-volume system to minimize the impact of operator factors on outcomes of PCI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15325922</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCDAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - education ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - statistics & numerical data ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Certification ; Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data ; Clinical outcomes ; Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics & numerical data ; Coronary heart disease ; Coronary Stenosis - mortality ; Coronary Stenosis - therapy ; Female ; Health Facility Size - statistics & numerical data ; Heart ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Michigan ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Myocardial Infarction - mortality ; Myocardial Infarction - therapy ; Odds Ratio ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data ; Risk Assessment ; Specialty Boards ; Statistics as Topic ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2004-08, Vol.94 (4), p.421-426</ispartof><rights>2004 Excerpta Medica Inc.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Aug 15, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-116a6606cf39ada24951a551aae67a746eb61c0e96e40f1c7ea0a1aa6d88cf043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-116a6606cf39ada24951a551aae67a746eb61c0e96e40f1c7ea0a1aa6d88cf043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914904007027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16065966$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15325922$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harjai, Kishore J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Aaron D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grines, Cindy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsalese, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Rajendra H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boura, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, William W.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of interventionalist volume, experience, and board certification on coronary angioplasty outcomes in the era of stenting</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>It has been suggested that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by high-volume operators may be associated with better outcomes. However, the relation between operator and outcome is confounded by hospital caseloads of PCI, with busier hospitals generally having better outcomes. We assessed the effect of operator characteristics (volume of PCI, years in practice, and board certification status) on contemporary outcomes of PCI in a busy center with high-volume operators. Between 1999 and 2001, 12,293 PCIs were performed at our center by 28 interventionalists. Patients' clinical risk was assessed with the previously validated Beaumont PCI Risk Score. Operators were classified as producing low, medium, or high volume (tertiles of annual PCI volume ≤92, 93 to 140, or >140, respectively), as less, medium, or great experience (tertiles of years in practice ≤8, 9 to 14, or >14 years, respectively), and board certified (68%) or not. In-hospital death rate and a composite end point (death, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarction, or stroke) occurred in 0.99% and 2.59% of patients, respectively. Operator volume, experience, and board certification showed no univariate or multivariate relation with the study end points. The Beaumont PCI Risk Score showed a strong independent relation with in-hospital death rate (adjusted odds ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 1.43, p <0.0001) and composite end point (odds ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.22, p <0.0001). We conclude that, in contemporary PCI practice at a large center with high-volume operators, in-hospital outcomes are not affected by operator volume, experience, or board certification. Rather, patients' clinical risk score is the overriding determinant of clinical outcomes. Our findings emphasize the power of a well-organized high-volume system to minimize the impact of operator factors on outcomes of PCI.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - education</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Coronary heart disease</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - mortality</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Facility Size - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Specialty Boards</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhoMo7nH1JyhB0Ct7zLRNTnu1yOLHwoI3eh3mpNM1pW1qkh7cK_-6iaew4I0wIRPyzDvJvIy9BLEHAer9sMdpMOi7fSlEvc8h1SO2g-bQFtBC9ZjthBBl0ULdXrBnIQzpCCDVU3YBsiplW5Y79vtmWtBE7npu50j-RHO0bsbRhshPblwnesfp10Le0mxSjnPHjy715YZ8tL01mAt4CuN8qvT3ibmzbhkxxHvu1mjcRCHJ8_iDOHnMzULMjea75-xJj2OgF9t-yb5_-vjt-ktx-_XzzfWH28LU0MQCQKFSQpm-arHDsm4loEwLSR3wUCs6KjCCWkW16MEcCAWmW9U1jelFXV2yt2fdxbufK4WoJxsMjSPO5NaglWpEA5VK4Ot_wMGtPg0k6LISlZS1ggTJM2S8C8FTrxdvp_R1DUJne_SgN3t0tkfnkFn81Sa-HifqHqo2PxLwZgMwGBx7j7Ox4YFLI5CtykJXZ47SzE6WvA7mr0Gd9WSi7pz9z1P-AMy7so0</recordid><startdate>20040815</startdate><enddate>20040815</enddate><creator>Harjai, Kishore J.</creator><creator>Berman, Aaron D.</creator><creator>Grines, Cindy L.</creator><creator>Kahn, Joel</creator><creator>Marsalese, Dominic</creator><creator>Mehta, Rajendra H.</creator><creator>Schreiber, Theodore</creator><creator>Boura, Judith A.</creator><creator>O'Neill, William W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040815</creationdate><title>Impact of interventionalist volume, experience, and board certification on coronary angioplasty outcomes in the era of stenting</title><author>Harjai, Kishore J. ; Berman, Aaron D. ; Grines, Cindy L. ; Kahn, Joel ; Marsalese, Dominic ; Mehta, Rajendra H. ; Schreiber, Theodore ; Boura, Judith A. ; O'Neill, William W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-116a6606cf39ada24951a551aae67a746eb61c0e96e40f1c7ea0a1aa6d88cf043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - education</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Coronary heart disease</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - mortality</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Facility Size - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Specialty Boards</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harjai, Kishore J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Aaron D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grines, Cindy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsalese, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Rajendra H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boura, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, William W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harjai, Kishore J.</au><au>Berman, Aaron D.</au><au>Grines, Cindy L.</au><au>Kahn, Joel</au><au>Marsalese, Dominic</au><au>Mehta, Rajendra H.</au><au>Schreiber, Theodore</au><au>Boura, Judith A.</au><au>O'Neill, William W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of interventionalist volume, experience, and board certification on coronary angioplasty outcomes in the era of stenting</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2004-08-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>421-426</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><coden>AJCDAG</coden><abstract>It has been suggested that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by high-volume operators may be associated with better outcomes. However, the relation between operator and outcome is confounded by hospital caseloads of PCI, with busier hospitals generally having better outcomes. We assessed the effect of operator characteristics (volume of PCI, years in practice, and board certification status) on contemporary outcomes of PCI in a busy center with high-volume operators. Between 1999 and 2001, 12,293 PCIs were performed at our center by 28 interventionalists. Patients' clinical risk was assessed with the previously validated Beaumont PCI Risk Score. Operators were classified as producing low, medium, or high volume (tertiles of annual PCI volume ≤92, 93 to 140, or >140, respectively), as less, medium, or great experience (tertiles of years in practice ≤8, 9 to 14, or >14 years, respectively), and board certified (68%) or not. In-hospital death rate and a composite end point (death, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarction, or stroke) occurred in 0.99% and 2.59% of patients, respectively. Operator volume, experience, and board certification showed no univariate or multivariate relation with the study end points. The Beaumont PCI Risk Score showed a strong independent relation with in-hospital death rate (adjusted odds ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 1.43, p <0.0001) and composite end point (odds ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.22, p <0.0001). We conclude that, in contemporary PCI practice at a large center with high-volume operators, in-hospital outcomes are not affected by operator volume, experience, or board certification. Rather, patients' clinical risk score is the overriding determinant of clinical outcomes. Our findings emphasize the power of a well-organized high-volume system to minimize the impact of operator factors on outcomes of PCI.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15325922</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.056</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9149 |
ispartof | The American journal of cardiology, 2004-08, Vol.94 (4), p.421-426 |
issn | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66808136 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Analysis of Variance Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - education Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - statistics & numerical data Biological and medical sciences Cardiology Cardiology. Vascular system Certification Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data Clinical outcomes Coronary Artery Bypass - statistics & numerical data Coronary heart disease Coronary Stenosis - mortality Coronary Stenosis - therapy Female Health Facility Size - statistics & numerical data Heart Hospital Mortality Humans Male Medical sciences Medical treatment Michigan Middle Aged Multivariate analysis Myocardial Infarction - mortality Myocardial Infarction - therapy Odds Ratio Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data Risk Assessment Specialty Boards Statistics as Topic Survival Rate |
title | Impact of interventionalist volume, experience, and board certification on coronary angioplasty outcomes in the era of stenting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A25%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20interventionalist%20volume,%20experience,%20and%20board%20certification%20on%20coronary%20angioplasty%20outcomes%20in%20the%20era%20of%20stenting&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Harjai,%20Kishore%20J.&rft.date=2004-08-15&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=421-426&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft.coden=AJCDAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E741952191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230355461&rft_id=info:pmid/15325922&rft_els_id=S0002914904007027&rfr_iscdi=true |