Select corn coproducts from the ethanol industry and their potential as ingredients in pet foods
The objectives of this study were to determine the chemical composition and nutritive value of corn protein product 1 (CPP 1), corn protein product 2 (CPP 2), and corn fiber (CF), novel coproducts of the ethanol industry, and compare these feed ingredients with standard plant protein ingredients [so...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2009, Vol.87 (1), p.189-199 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 199 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 189 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | De Godoy, M.R.C Bauer, L.L Parsons, C.M Fahey, G.C. Jr |
description | The objectives of this study were to determine the chemical composition and nutritive value of corn protein product 1 (CPP 1), corn protein product 2 (CPP 2), and corn fiber (CF), novel coproducts of the ethanol industry, and compare these feed ingredients with standard plant protein ingredients [soybean meal (SBM), distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), corn gluten meal (CGlM), and corn germ meal (CGeM)], and to compare CF sources (CF control 1 and control 2) with standard fiber sources (peanut hulls, Solka-Floc, and beet pulp) commonly used in pet foods. Corn fiber, CPP 1, and CPP 2 were produced at a pilot-scale modified dry-grind plant, with CPP 2 having a greater degree of purification than CPP 1. Crude protein values for CPP 2 and CPP 1 were 57.3 and 49.7%, respectively. Total dietary fiber concentration was 29% for CPP 2 and 23.5% for CPP 1. Acid-hydrolyzed fat and GE concentrations were similar for these ingredients. In a protein efficiency ratio assay, no differences (P > 0.05) in feed intake, BW gain, or CP intake were noted for CPP 2, CPP 1, or CGlM. However, feeding CPP 2 resulted in a greater (P < 0.05) G:F ratio and protein efficiency ratio than CPP 1 and CGlM. In a cecectomized rooster assay, CGlM had numerically the greatest standardized total AA, total essential AA, and total nonessential AA digestibilities, but they were not different (P > 0.05) from CPP 1 or SBM values. Corn germ meal resulted in the least values, but they were not different from those for DDGS and CPP 1. The greatest values for true nitrogen-corrected ME were obtained with CGlM, followed by CPP 2, DDGS, CPP 1, SBM, and CGeM. Distillers dried grains with solubles and CPP 1 had similar true nitrogen-corrected ME values, and they were not different from values for CPP 2 and SBM. In vitro CP disappearance was greatest (P < 0.05) for CGlM (94.1%), intermediate for DDGS (76.8%) and CPP 1 (77.5%), and least for CPP 2 (74.1%) and CGeM (67.7%). Corn fibers contained predominantly insoluble dietary fiber (1% or less of soluble dietary fiber), with a moderate CP concentration. In vitro OM disappearance for the fiber sources, when using inoculum from dog feces, revealed that with the exception of beet pulp, which had a moderate disappearance value after 16 h of fermentation (17.7%), all fiber substrates had a nonsignificant extent of fermentation. In conclusion, novel corn coproducts had properties comparable with the standard protein and fiber sources used in animal nutriti |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas.2007-0596 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66807929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1629410371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b3b0311ba226b54511e34f5c04659ec2d5802001ceee64f7b6987f06e7b3b5083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFvFCEUh4mxsdvq0auSJnqbymOGGTiaptYmTTzUnpFhHruzYYYVmJj-9zLZjU28AOF9fI_3I-Q9sGsuePdlb9I1Z6yrmFDtK7IBwUVVQ1u_JhvGOFRSAj8nFyntGQMulHhDzkF2CkCoDfn1iB5tpjbEuSyHGIbF5kRdDBPNO6SYd2YOno7zsKQcn6mZh7UwRnoIGec8Gk9NKvVtxGEsF-uZHjBTF8KQ3pIzZ3zCd6f9kjx9u_158716-HF3f_P1obJNA7nq657VAL3hvO1FIwCwbpywrGmFQssHIVkZEywito3r-lbJzrEWu_JSMFlfks9Hbxnh94Ip62lMFr03M4Yl6baVrFNcFfDqP3AfljiXv2kOsoTS1VCg6gjZGFKK6PQhjpOJzxqYXnPXJXe95q7X3Av_4SRd-gmHF_oUdAE-nQCTrPEumtmO6R_HgYFUgr9wu3G7-zNG1Gky3hctrC1lp6FIV9_HI-dM0GYbi-vpkTOoGYh1CFn_BRkOoLo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218159731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Select corn coproducts from the ethanol industry and their potential as ingredients in pet foods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>De Godoy, M.R.C ; Bauer, L.L ; Parsons, C.M ; Fahey, G.C. Jr</creator><creatorcontrib>De Godoy, M.R.C ; Bauer, L.L ; Parsons, C.M ; Fahey, G.C. Jr</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to determine the chemical composition and nutritive value of corn protein product 1 (CPP 1), corn protein product 2 (CPP 2), and corn fiber (CF), novel coproducts of the ethanol industry, and compare these feed ingredients with standard plant protein ingredients [soybean meal (SBM), distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), corn gluten meal (CGlM), and corn germ meal (CGeM)], and to compare CF sources (CF control 1 and control 2) with standard fiber sources (peanut hulls, Solka-Floc, and beet pulp) commonly used in pet foods. Corn fiber, CPP 1, and CPP 2 were produced at a pilot-scale modified dry-grind plant, with CPP 2 having a greater degree of purification than CPP 1. Crude protein values for CPP 2 and CPP 1 were 57.3 and 49.7%, respectively. Total dietary fiber concentration was 29% for CPP 2 and 23.5% for CPP 1. Acid-hydrolyzed fat and GE concentrations were similar for these ingredients. In a protein efficiency ratio assay, no differences (P > 0.05) in feed intake, BW gain, or CP intake were noted for CPP 2, CPP 1, or CGlM. However, feeding CPP 2 resulted in a greater (P < 0.05) G:F ratio and protein efficiency ratio than CPP 1 and CGlM. In a cecectomized rooster assay, CGlM had numerically the greatest standardized total AA, total essential AA, and total nonessential AA digestibilities, but they were not different (P > 0.05) from CPP 1 or SBM values. Corn germ meal resulted in the least values, but they were not different from those for DDGS and CPP 1. The greatest values for true nitrogen-corrected ME were obtained with CGlM, followed by CPP 2, DDGS, CPP 1, SBM, and CGeM. Distillers dried grains with solubles and CPP 1 had similar true nitrogen-corrected ME values, and they were not different from values for CPP 2 and SBM. In vitro CP disappearance was greatest (P < 0.05) for CGlM (94.1%), intermediate for DDGS (76.8%) and CPP 1 (77.5%), and least for CPP 2 (74.1%) and CGeM (67.7%). Corn fibers contained predominantly insoluble dietary fiber (1% or less of soluble dietary fiber), with a moderate CP concentration. In vitro OM disappearance for the fiber sources, when using inoculum from dog feces, revealed that with the exception of beet pulp, which had a moderate disappearance value after 16 h of fermentation (17.7%), all fiber substrates had a nonsignificant extent of fermentation. In conclusion, novel corn coproducts had properties comparable with the standard protein and fiber sources used in animal nutrition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0596</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18791159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign, IL: American Society of Animal Science</publisher><subject>amino acids ; Amino Acids - analysis ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; chemical composition ; Chickens - metabolism ; coproducts ; Corn ; corn fiber ; corn products ; corn protein ; corn protein product 1 ; corn protein product 2 ; crude fiber ; crude protein ; Dietary fiber ; Dietary Fiber - analysis ; Dietary Proteins - analysis ; Dietary Proteins - standards ; digestibility ; Dogs ; Eating - physiology ; ethanol production ; feed conversion ; feed grains ; feed intake ; fermentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; ingredients ; lipid content ; liveweight gain ; Male ; metabolizable energy ; Minerals - analysis ; Nutrition ; nutritive value ; Pet food ; pet foods ; pets ; plant byproducts ; plant source protein ; protein efficiency ratio ; Proteins ; Random Allocation ; roosters ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; Weight Gain - physiology ; Zea mays - chemistry ; Zea mays - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2009, Vol.87 (1), p.189-199</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Jan 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b3b0311ba226b54511e34f5c04659ec2d5802001ceee64f7b6987f06e7b3b5083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b3b0311ba226b54511e34f5c04659ec2d5802001ceee64f7b6987f06e7b3b5083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21018952$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18791159$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Godoy, M.R.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, L.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, C.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahey, G.C. Jr</creatorcontrib><title>Select corn coproducts from the ethanol industry and their potential as ingredients in pet foods</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were to determine the chemical composition and nutritive value of corn protein product 1 (CPP 1), corn protein product 2 (CPP 2), and corn fiber (CF), novel coproducts of the ethanol industry, and compare these feed ingredients with standard plant protein ingredients [soybean meal (SBM), distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), corn gluten meal (CGlM), and corn germ meal (CGeM)], and to compare CF sources (CF control 1 and control 2) with standard fiber sources (peanut hulls, Solka-Floc, and beet pulp) commonly used in pet foods. Corn fiber, CPP 1, and CPP 2 were produced at a pilot-scale modified dry-grind plant, with CPP 2 having a greater degree of purification than CPP 1. Crude protein values for CPP 2 and CPP 1 were 57.3 and 49.7%, respectively. Total dietary fiber concentration was 29% for CPP 2 and 23.5% for CPP 1. Acid-hydrolyzed fat and GE concentrations were similar for these ingredients. In a protein efficiency ratio assay, no differences (P > 0.05) in feed intake, BW gain, or CP intake were noted for CPP 2, CPP 1, or CGlM. However, feeding CPP 2 resulted in a greater (P < 0.05) G:F ratio and protein efficiency ratio than CPP 1 and CGlM. In a cecectomized rooster assay, CGlM had numerically the greatest standardized total AA, total essential AA, and total nonessential AA digestibilities, but they were not different (P > 0.05) from CPP 1 or SBM values. Corn germ meal resulted in the least values, but they were not different from those for DDGS and CPP 1. The greatest values for true nitrogen-corrected ME were obtained with CGlM, followed by CPP 2, DDGS, CPP 1, SBM, and CGeM. Distillers dried grains with solubles and CPP 1 had similar true nitrogen-corrected ME values, and they were not different from values for CPP 2 and SBM. In vitro CP disappearance was greatest (P < 0.05) for CGlM (94.1%), intermediate for DDGS (76.8%) and CPP 1 (77.5%), and least for CPP 2 (74.1%) and CGeM (67.7%). Corn fibers contained predominantly insoluble dietary fiber (1% or less of soluble dietary fiber), with a moderate CP concentration. In vitro OM disappearance for the fiber sources, when using inoculum from dog feces, revealed that with the exception of beet pulp, which had a moderate disappearance value after 16 h of fermentation (17.7%), all fiber substrates had a nonsignificant extent of fermentation. In conclusion, novel corn coproducts had properties comparable with the standard protein and fiber sources used in animal nutrition.</description><subject>amino acids</subject><subject>Amino Acids - analysis</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>chemical composition</subject><subject>Chickens - metabolism</subject><subject>coproducts</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>corn fiber</subject><subject>corn products</subject><subject>corn protein</subject><subject>corn protein product 1</subject><subject>corn protein product 2</subject><subject>crude fiber</subject><subject>crude protein</subject><subject>Dietary fiber</subject><subject>Dietary Fiber - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - standards</subject><subject>digestibility</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Eating - physiology</subject><subject>ethanol production</subject><subject>feed conversion</subject><subject>feed grains</subject><subject>feed intake</subject><subject>fermentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>ingredients</subject><subject>lipid content</subject><subject>liveweight gain</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>metabolizable energy</subject><subject>Minerals - analysis</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>nutritive value</subject><subject>Pet food</subject><subject>pet foods</subject><subject>pets</subject><subject>plant byproducts</subject><subject>plant source protein</subject><subject>protein efficiency ratio</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>roosters</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Weight Gain - physiology</subject><subject>Zea mays - chemistry</subject><subject>Zea mays - metabolism</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMFvFCEUh4mxsdvq0auSJnqbymOGGTiaptYmTTzUnpFhHruzYYYVmJj-9zLZjU28AOF9fI_3I-Q9sGsuePdlb9I1Z6yrmFDtK7IBwUVVQ1u_JhvGOFRSAj8nFyntGQMulHhDzkF2CkCoDfn1iB5tpjbEuSyHGIbF5kRdDBPNO6SYd2YOno7zsKQcn6mZh7UwRnoIGec8Gk9NKvVtxGEsF-uZHjBTF8KQ3pIzZ3zCd6f9kjx9u_158716-HF3f_P1obJNA7nq657VAL3hvO1FIwCwbpywrGmFQssHIVkZEywito3r-lbJzrEWu_JSMFlfks9Hbxnh94Ip62lMFr03M4Yl6baVrFNcFfDqP3AfljiXv2kOsoTS1VCg6gjZGFKK6PQhjpOJzxqYXnPXJXe95q7X3Av_4SRd-gmHF_oUdAE-nQCTrPEumtmO6R_HgYFUgr9wu3G7-zNG1Gky3hctrC1lp6FIV9_HI-dM0GYbi-vpkTOoGYh1CFn_BRkOoLo</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>De Godoy, M.R.C</creator><creator>Bauer, L.L</creator><creator>Parsons, C.M</creator><creator>Fahey, G.C. Jr</creator><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Select corn coproducts from the ethanol industry and their potential as ingredients in pet foods</title><author>De Godoy, M.R.C ; Bauer, L.L ; Parsons, C.M ; Fahey, G.C. Jr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b3b0311ba226b54511e34f5c04659ec2d5802001ceee64f7b6987f06e7b3b5083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>amino acids</topic><topic>Amino Acids - analysis</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>chemical composition</topic><topic>Chickens - metabolism</topic><topic>coproducts</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>corn fiber</topic><topic>corn products</topic><topic>corn protein</topic><topic>corn protein product 1</topic><topic>corn protein product 2</topic><topic>crude fiber</topic><topic>crude protein</topic><topic>Dietary fiber</topic><topic>Dietary Fiber - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - standards</topic><topic>digestibility</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Eating - physiology</topic><topic>ethanol production</topic><topic>feed conversion</topic><topic>feed grains</topic><topic>feed intake</topic><topic>fermentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>ingredients</topic><topic>lipid content</topic><topic>liveweight gain</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>metabolizable energy</topic><topic>Minerals - analysis</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>nutritive value</topic><topic>Pet food</topic><topic>pet foods</topic><topic>pets</topic><topic>plant byproducts</topic><topic>plant source protein</topic><topic>protein efficiency ratio</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>roosters</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Weight Gain - physiology</topic><topic>Zea mays - chemistry</topic><topic>Zea mays - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Godoy, M.R.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, L.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, C.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahey, G.C. Jr</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Godoy, M.R.C</au><au>Bauer, L.L</au><au>Parsons, C.M</au><au>Fahey, G.C. Jr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Select corn coproducts from the ethanol industry and their potential as ingredients in pet foods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>189-199</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this study were to determine the chemical composition and nutritive value of corn protein product 1 (CPP 1), corn protein product 2 (CPP 2), and corn fiber (CF), novel coproducts of the ethanol industry, and compare these feed ingredients with standard plant protein ingredients [soybean meal (SBM), distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), corn gluten meal (CGlM), and corn germ meal (CGeM)], and to compare CF sources (CF control 1 and control 2) with standard fiber sources (peanut hulls, Solka-Floc, and beet pulp) commonly used in pet foods. Corn fiber, CPP 1, and CPP 2 were produced at a pilot-scale modified dry-grind plant, with CPP 2 having a greater degree of purification than CPP 1. Crude protein values for CPP 2 and CPP 1 were 57.3 and 49.7%, respectively. Total dietary fiber concentration was 29% for CPP 2 and 23.5% for CPP 1. Acid-hydrolyzed fat and GE concentrations were similar for these ingredients. In a protein efficiency ratio assay, no differences (P > 0.05) in feed intake, BW gain, or CP intake were noted for CPP 2, CPP 1, or CGlM. However, feeding CPP 2 resulted in a greater (P < 0.05) G:F ratio and protein efficiency ratio than CPP 1 and CGlM. In a cecectomized rooster assay, CGlM had numerically the greatest standardized total AA, total essential AA, and total nonessential AA digestibilities, but they were not different (P > 0.05) from CPP 1 or SBM values. Corn germ meal resulted in the least values, but they were not different from those for DDGS and CPP 1. The greatest values for true nitrogen-corrected ME were obtained with CGlM, followed by CPP 2, DDGS, CPP 1, SBM, and CGeM. Distillers dried grains with solubles and CPP 1 had similar true nitrogen-corrected ME values, and they were not different from values for CPP 2 and SBM. In vitro CP disappearance was greatest (P < 0.05) for CGlM (94.1%), intermediate for DDGS (76.8%) and CPP 1 (77.5%), and least for CPP 2 (74.1%) and CGeM (67.7%). Corn fibers contained predominantly insoluble dietary fiber (1% or less of soluble dietary fiber), with a moderate CP concentration. In vitro OM disappearance for the fiber sources, when using inoculum from dog feces, revealed that with the exception of beet pulp, which had a moderate disappearance value after 16 h of fermentation (17.7%), all fiber substrates had a nonsignificant extent of fermentation. In conclusion, novel corn coproducts had properties comparable with the standard protein and fiber sources used in animal nutrition.</abstract><cop>Champaign, IL</cop><pub>American Society of Animal Science</pub><pmid>18791159</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas.2007-0596</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2009, Vol.87 (1), p.189-199 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66807929 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | amino acids Amino Acids - analysis Animal Feed - analysis Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animal productions Animals Biological and medical sciences chemical composition Chickens - metabolism coproducts Corn corn fiber corn products corn protein corn protein product 1 corn protein product 2 crude fiber crude protein Dietary fiber Dietary Fiber - analysis Dietary Proteins - analysis Dietary Proteins - standards digestibility Dogs Eating - physiology ethanol production feed conversion feed grains feed intake fermentation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ingredients lipid content liveweight gain Male metabolizable energy Minerals - analysis Nutrition nutritive value Pet food pet foods pets plant byproducts plant source protein protein efficiency ratio Proteins Random Allocation roosters Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates Weight Gain - physiology Zea mays - chemistry Zea mays - metabolism |
title | Select corn coproducts from the ethanol industry and their potential as ingredients in pet foods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A09%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Select%20corn%20coproducts%20from%20the%20ethanol%20industry%20and%20their%20potential%20as%20ingredients%20in%20pet%20foods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=De%20Godoy,%20M.R.C&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=189-199&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2007-0596&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1629410371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218159731&rft_id=info:pmid/18791159&rfr_iscdi=true |