Coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during physiological activation and deactivation measured with fMRI
The physiological basis of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal and its dependence on baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF) were investigated by comparing responses to a visual stimulus after physiological changes of the baseline. Eight human subjects were imaged with 3 and 4 T MRI scann...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2004-09, Vol.23 (1), p.148-155 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 155 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 148 |
container_title | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Uludağ, Kâmil Dubowitz, David J. Yoder, Elizabeth J. Restom, Khaled Liu, Thomas T. Buxton, Richard B. |
description | The physiological basis of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal and its dependence on baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF) were investigated by comparing responses to a visual stimulus after physiological changes of the baseline. Eight human subjects were imaged with 3 and 4 T MRI scanners, and both BOLD signal and CBF were simultaneously measured. Subjects viewed a flickering radial checkerboard in a block design experiment, alternating between eyes open or closed during the off periods. Compared to a baseline state with eyes open in a darkened room, substantial deactivation (average change: 2.9 ± 0.3% BOLD, 22 ± 2.1% CBF) in the occipital cortex was observed when the eyes were closed. The absolute response during stimulation (average change: 4.4 ± 0.4% BOLD, 36.3 ± 3.1% CBF) was independent of the preceding resting condition. We estimated the fractional change in CBF to be approximately 2.2 ± 0.15 times greater than the fractional change in metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO
2). The changes in CBF and CMRO
2 were consistently linearly coupled during activation and deactivation with CBF changes being between approximately 60% and 150% compared to baseline with eyes open. Relative to an assumed baseline oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) of 40%, the estimated OEF decreased to 33 ± 1.4% during activation and increased to 46 ± 1.2% during rest with eyes closed. In conclusion, we found that simply closing the eyes creates a large physiological deactivation in the visual cortex, and provides a robust paradigm for studying baseline effects in fMRI. In addition, we propose a
feed-forward model for neurovascular coupling which accounts for the changes in OEF seen following baseline changes, including both the current physiological perturbations as well as previously reported pharmacologically induced changes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66806999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811904002903</els_id><sourcerecordid>3244256331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c6cb3ac4917b283965738e1fc5d7aa31c78782e98abf5ac565736af4e69ae09d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2P1CAUhhujcdfVv2BITLxrhVIoXOrEj03WmBi9JhROZ5m0UKHsOv56qTPJGm-8gnCel3NynqpCBDcEE_7m0HjIMbhZ76FpMe4azBpM6KPqkmDJasn69vF2Z7QWhMiL6llKB4yxJJ14Wl0QRltGObmsfu1CXibn9yiMyECEIeoJDVMIFo1TuEfaWxR-HvfgkQk-5XlZXfDI5riFlttjcmEKe2dKTJvV3ek_9S1m4a-HGXTKESy6d-stGj9_vX5ePRn1lODF-byqvn94_233qb758vF69_amNlSKtTbcDFSbTpJ-aAWVnPVUABkNs73WlJhe9KIFKfQwMm3YVud67IBLDVhaelW9Pv27xPAjQ1rV7JKBadIeQk6Kc4G5lLKAr_4BDyFHX2ZThGHOScu6rlDiRJkYUoowqiUWEfGoCFabHXVQD3bUZkdhpoqdEn15bpCHGexD8KyjAO9OAJR93DmIKhkH3oB1EcyqbHD_7_Ib--KoTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506612544</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during physiological activation and deactivation measured with fMRI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Uludağ, Kâmil ; Dubowitz, David J. ; Yoder, Elizabeth J. ; Restom, Khaled ; Liu, Thomas T. ; Buxton, Richard B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Uludağ, Kâmil ; Dubowitz, David J. ; Yoder, Elizabeth J. ; Restom, Khaled ; Liu, Thomas T. ; Buxton, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><description>The physiological basis of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal and its dependence on baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF) were investigated by comparing responses to a visual stimulus after physiological changes of the baseline. Eight human subjects were imaged with 3 and 4 T MRI scanners, and both BOLD signal and CBF were simultaneously measured. Subjects viewed a flickering radial checkerboard in a block design experiment, alternating between eyes open or closed during the off periods. Compared to a baseline state with eyes open in a darkened room, substantial deactivation (average change: 2.9 ± 0.3% BOLD, 22 ± 2.1% CBF) in the occipital cortex was observed when the eyes were closed. The absolute response during stimulation (average change: 4.4 ± 0.4% BOLD, 36.3 ± 3.1% CBF) was independent of the preceding resting condition. We estimated the fractional change in CBF to be approximately 2.2 ± 0.15 times greater than the fractional change in metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO
2). The changes in CBF and CMRO
2 were consistently linearly coupled during activation and deactivation with CBF changes being between approximately 60% and 150% compared to baseline with eyes open. Relative to an assumed baseline oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) of 40%, the estimated OEF decreased to 33 ± 1.4% during activation and increased to 46 ± 1.2% during rest with eyes closed. In conclusion, we found that simply closing the eyes creates a large physiological deactivation in the visual cortex, and provides a robust paradigm for studying baseline effects in fMRI. In addition, we propose a
feed-forward model for neurovascular coupling which accounts for the changes in OEF seen following baseline changes, including both the current physiological perturbations as well as previously reported pharmacologically induced changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15325361</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood ; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology ; Brain ; Cerebral blood flow ; Consumption ; Deactivation ; Experiments ; Flicker Fusion - physiology ; fMRI ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Measurement techniques ; Nerve Net - blood supply ; Nerve Net - physiology ; Neural Pathways - blood supply ; Neural Pathways - physiology ; Neurovascular coupling ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Occipital Lobe - blood supply ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Oxygen metabolism ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Reference Values ; Regional Blood Flow - physiology ; Sensory Thresholds - physiology ; Studies ; Visual Cortex - blood supply ; Visual Cortex - physiology ; Visual stimulation</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2004-09, Vol.23 (1), p.148-155</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 1, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c6cb3ac4917b283965738e1fc5d7aa31c78782e98abf5ac565736af4e69ae09d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c6cb3ac4917b283965738e1fc5d7aa31c78782e98abf5ac565736af4e69ae09d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1506612544?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002,64392,64394,64396,72476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15325361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uludağ, Kâmil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubowitz, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoder, Elizabeth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restom, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Thomas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buxton, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><title>Coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during physiological activation and deactivation measured with fMRI</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>The physiological basis of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal and its dependence on baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF) were investigated by comparing responses to a visual stimulus after physiological changes of the baseline. Eight human subjects were imaged with 3 and 4 T MRI scanners, and both BOLD signal and CBF were simultaneously measured. Subjects viewed a flickering radial checkerboard in a block design experiment, alternating between eyes open or closed during the off periods. Compared to a baseline state with eyes open in a darkened room, substantial deactivation (average change: 2.9 ± 0.3% BOLD, 22 ± 2.1% CBF) in the occipital cortex was observed when the eyes were closed. The absolute response during stimulation (average change: 4.4 ± 0.4% BOLD, 36.3 ± 3.1% CBF) was independent of the preceding resting condition. We estimated the fractional change in CBF to be approximately 2.2 ± 0.15 times greater than the fractional change in metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO
2). The changes in CBF and CMRO
2 were consistently linearly coupled during activation and deactivation with CBF changes being between approximately 60% and 150% compared to baseline with eyes open. Relative to an assumed baseline oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) of 40%, the estimated OEF decreased to 33 ± 1.4% during activation and increased to 46 ± 1.2% during rest with eyes closed. In conclusion, we found that simply closing the eyes creates a large physiological deactivation in the visual cortex, and provides a robust paradigm for studying baseline effects in fMRI. In addition, we propose a
feed-forward model for neurovascular coupling which accounts for the changes in OEF seen following baseline changes, including both the current physiological perturbations as well as previously reported pharmacologically induced changes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Cerebral blood flow</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Deactivation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Flicker Fusion - physiology</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Nerve Net - blood supply</subject><subject>Nerve Net - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - blood supply</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Neurovascular coupling</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Occipital Lobe - blood supply</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Oxygen metabolism</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow - physiology</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds - physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - blood supply</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Visual stimulation</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2P1CAUhhujcdfVv2BITLxrhVIoXOrEj03WmBi9JhROZ5m0UKHsOv56qTPJGm-8gnCel3NynqpCBDcEE_7m0HjIMbhZ76FpMe4azBpM6KPqkmDJasn69vF2Z7QWhMiL6llKB4yxJJ14Wl0QRltGObmsfu1CXibn9yiMyECEIeoJDVMIFo1TuEfaWxR-HvfgkQk-5XlZXfDI5riFlttjcmEKe2dKTJvV3ek_9S1m4a-HGXTKESy6d-stGj9_vX5ePRn1lODF-byqvn94_233qb758vF69_amNlSKtTbcDFSbTpJ-aAWVnPVUABkNs73WlJhe9KIFKfQwMm3YVud67IBLDVhaelW9Pv27xPAjQ1rV7JKBadIeQk6Kc4G5lLKAr_4BDyFHX2ZThGHOScu6rlDiRJkYUoowqiUWEfGoCFabHXVQD3bUZkdhpoqdEn15bpCHGexD8KyjAO9OAJR93DmIKhkH3oB1EcyqbHD_7_Ib--KoTg</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Uludağ, Kâmil</creator><creator>Dubowitz, David J.</creator><creator>Yoder, Elizabeth J.</creator><creator>Restom, Khaled</creator><creator>Liu, Thomas T.</creator><creator>Buxton, Richard B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during physiological activation and deactivation measured with fMRI</title><author>Uludağ, Kâmil ; Dubowitz, David J. ; Yoder, Elizabeth J. ; Restom, Khaled ; Liu, Thomas T. ; Buxton, Richard B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c6cb3ac4917b283965738e1fc5d7aa31c78782e98abf5ac565736af4e69ae09d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Cerebral blood flow</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Deactivation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Flicker Fusion - physiology</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Nerve Net - blood supply</topic><topic>Nerve Net - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - blood supply</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Neurovascular coupling</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Occipital Lobe - blood supply</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Oxygen metabolism</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow - physiology</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds - physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - blood supply</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Visual stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uludağ, Kâmil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubowitz, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoder, Elizabeth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restom, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Thomas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buxton, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uludağ, Kâmil</au><au>Dubowitz, David J.</au><au>Yoder, Elizabeth J.</au><au>Restom, Khaled</au><au>Liu, Thomas T.</au><au>Buxton, Richard B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during physiological activation and deactivation measured with fMRI</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>148-155</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>The physiological basis of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal and its dependence on baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF) were investigated by comparing responses to a visual stimulus after physiological changes of the baseline. Eight human subjects were imaged with 3 and 4 T MRI scanners, and both BOLD signal and CBF were simultaneously measured. Subjects viewed a flickering radial checkerboard in a block design experiment, alternating between eyes open or closed during the off periods. Compared to a baseline state with eyes open in a darkened room, substantial deactivation (average change: 2.9 ± 0.3% BOLD, 22 ± 2.1% CBF) in the occipital cortex was observed when the eyes were closed. The absolute response during stimulation (average change: 4.4 ± 0.4% BOLD, 36.3 ± 3.1% CBF) was independent of the preceding resting condition. We estimated the fractional change in CBF to be approximately 2.2 ± 0.15 times greater than the fractional change in metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO
2). The changes in CBF and CMRO
2 were consistently linearly coupled during activation and deactivation with CBF changes being between approximately 60% and 150% compared to baseline with eyes open. Relative to an assumed baseline oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) of 40%, the estimated OEF decreased to 33 ± 1.4% during activation and increased to 46 ± 1.2% during rest with eyes closed. In conclusion, we found that simply closing the eyes creates a large physiological deactivation in the visual cortex, and provides a robust paradigm for studying baseline effects in fMRI. In addition, we propose a
feed-forward model for neurovascular coupling which accounts for the changes in OEF seen following baseline changes, including both the current physiological perturbations as well as previously reported pharmacologically induced changes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15325361</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.013</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8119 |
ispartof | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2004-09, Vol.23 (1), p.148-155 |
issn | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66806999 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adult Blood Blood Flow Velocity - physiology Brain Cerebral blood flow Consumption Deactivation Experiments Flicker Fusion - physiology fMRI Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement techniques Nerve Net - blood supply Nerve Net - physiology Neural Pathways - blood supply Neural Pathways - physiology Neurovascular coupling NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Occipital Lobe - blood supply Oxygen Consumption - physiology Oxygen metabolism Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Photic Stimulation Reference Values Regional Blood Flow - physiology Sensory Thresholds - physiology Studies Visual Cortex - blood supply Visual Cortex - physiology Visual stimulation |
title | Coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during physiological activation and deactivation measured with fMRI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T20%3A41%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coupling%20of%20cerebral%20blood%20flow%20and%20oxygen%20consumption%20during%20physiological%20activation%20and%20deactivation%20measured%20with%20fMRI&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Uluda%C4%9F,%20K%C3%A2mil&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=148-155&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3244256331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506612544&rft_id=info:pmid/15325361&rft_els_id=S1053811904002903&rfr_iscdi=true |