At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics
English‐learning 7.5‐month‐olds are heavily biased to perceive stressed syllables as word onsets. By 11 months, however, infants begin segmenting non‐initially stressed words from speech. Using the same artificial language methodology as Johnson and Jusczyk (2001 ), we explored the possibility that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Developmental science 2009-01, Vol.12 (1), p.131-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Developmental science |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Johnson, Elizabeth K. Seidl, Amanda H. |
description | English‐learning 7.5‐month‐olds are heavily biased to perceive stressed syllables as word onsets. By 11 months, however, infants begin segmenting non‐initially stressed words from speech. Using the same artificial language methodology as
Johnson and Jusczyk (2001
), we explored the possibility that the emergence of this ability is linked to a decreased reliance on prosodic cues to word boundaries accompanied by an increased reliance on syllable distribution cues. In a baseline study, where only statistical cues to word boundaries were present, infants exhibited a familiarity preference for statistical words. When conflicting stress cues were added to the speech stream, infants exhibited a familiarity preference for stress as opposed to statistical words. This was interpreted as evidence that 11‐month‐olds weight stress cues to word boundaries more heavily than statistical cues. Experiment 2 further investigated these results with a language containing convergent cues to word boundaries. The results of Experiment 2 were not conclusive. A third experiment using new stimuli and a different experimental design supported the conclusion that 11‐month‐olds rely more heavily on prosodic than statistical cues to word boundaries. We conclude that the emergence of the ability to segment non‐initially stressed words from speech is not likely to be tied to an increased reliance on syllable distribution cues relative to stress cues, but instead may emerge due to an increased reliance on and integration of a broad array of segmentation cues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00740.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66803499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ849441</ericid><sourcerecordid>1617328071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5690-3ad5abef6819c6d8219d158ae90b4693d5a94e47abb59d16368596d6160905213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtP3DAUha0KVB7tP0BVxIIVCdfxe9HFMDMMVJRKfQh2V07iUTNkJhAnYubf45DRIHVVb3ztc8719UdIRCGhYV0sEsqlipXUKkkBdAKgOCTrD-RwJ-yFmkkWKyEeDsiR9wsA4AzoR3JADU2Bp_SQXIzaiNJoWa_av_48empqXxebyLdlVUV11zZ29ejD0bZluMv9J7I_t5V3n7f7MflzNf09vo5vf8xuxqPbOBfSQMxsIWzm5lJTk8tCp9QUVGjrDGRcGhZUwx1XNstEUCSTWhhZSCrBgEgpOyZnQ98w0XPnfIvL0ueuquzK1Z1HKTUwbkwwnv5jXNRdswqzYQpUBThvJj2Y8vA_37g5PjXl0jYbpIA9UVxgDw57cNgTxTeiuA7RL9v-XbZ0xXtwizAYTgaDa8p8J0-_aW447-Wvg_xSVm7z3-_iZPprHKqQj4d84O_Wu7xtHlEqpgTe383wWt3dX_78fokT9gqPDZoX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201700899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Johnson, Elizabeth K. ; Seidl, Amanda H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Elizabeth K. ; Seidl, Amanda H.</creatorcontrib><description>English‐learning 7.5‐month‐olds are heavily biased to perceive stressed syllables as word onsets. By 11 months, however, infants begin segmenting non‐initially stressed words from speech. Using the same artificial language methodology as
Johnson and Jusczyk (2001
), we explored the possibility that the emergence of this ability is linked to a decreased reliance on prosodic cues to word boundaries accompanied by an increased reliance on syllable distribution cues. In a baseline study, where only statistical cues to word boundaries were present, infants exhibited a familiarity preference for statistical words. When conflicting stress cues were added to the speech stream, infants exhibited a familiarity preference for stress as opposed to statistical words. This was interpreted as evidence that 11‐month‐olds weight stress cues to word boundaries more heavily than statistical cues. Experiment 2 further investigated these results with a language containing convergent cues to word boundaries. The results of Experiment 2 were not conclusive. A third experiment using new stimuli and a different experimental design supported the conclusion that 11‐month‐olds rely more heavily on prosodic than statistical cues to word boundaries. We conclude that the emergence of the ability to segment non‐initially stressed words from speech is not likely to be tied to an increased reliance on syllable distribution cues relative to stress cues, but instead may emerge due to an increased reliance on and integration of a broad array of segmentation cues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-755X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00740.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19120421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age differences ; Babies ; Bias ; Child Language ; Cues ; Developmental psychology ; Familiarity ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infants ; Language acquisition ; Language Development ; Language Research ; Male ; Phonetics ; Research Design ; Speech ; Speech Perception - physiology ; Suprasegmentals ; Syllables ; Verbal Learning - physiology</subject><ispartof>Developmental science, 2009-01, Vol.12 (1), p.131-141</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5690-3ad5abef6819c6d8219d158ae90b4693d5a94e47abb59d16368596d6160905213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5690-3ad5abef6819c6d8219d158ae90b4693d5a94e47abb59d16368596d6160905213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-7687.2008.00740.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-7687.2008.00740.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ849441$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19120421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Elizabeth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidl, Amanda H.</creatorcontrib><title>At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics</title><title>Developmental science</title><addtitle>Dev Sci</addtitle><description>English‐learning 7.5‐month‐olds are heavily biased to perceive stressed syllables as word onsets. By 11 months, however, infants begin segmenting non‐initially stressed words from speech. Using the same artificial language methodology as
Johnson and Jusczyk (2001
), we explored the possibility that the emergence of this ability is linked to a decreased reliance on prosodic cues to word boundaries accompanied by an increased reliance on syllable distribution cues. In a baseline study, where only statistical cues to word boundaries were present, infants exhibited a familiarity preference for statistical words. When conflicting stress cues were added to the speech stream, infants exhibited a familiarity preference for stress as opposed to statistical words. This was interpreted as evidence that 11‐month‐olds weight stress cues to word boundaries more heavily than statistical cues. Experiment 2 further investigated these results with a language containing convergent cues to word boundaries. The results of Experiment 2 were not conclusive. A third experiment using new stimuli and a different experimental design supported the conclusion that 11‐month‐olds rely more heavily on prosodic than statistical cues to word boundaries. We conclude that the emergence of the ability to segment non‐initially stressed words from speech is not likely to be tied to an increased reliance on syllable distribution cues relative to stress cues, but instead may emerge due to an increased reliance on and integration of a broad array of segmentation cues.</description><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Language Research</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Suprasegmentals</subject><subject>Syllables</subject><subject>Verbal Learning - physiology</subject><issn>1363-755X</issn><issn>1467-7687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtP3DAUha0KVB7tP0BVxIIVCdfxe9HFMDMMVJRKfQh2V07iUTNkJhAnYubf45DRIHVVb3ztc8719UdIRCGhYV0sEsqlipXUKkkBdAKgOCTrD-RwJ-yFmkkWKyEeDsiR9wsA4AzoR3JADU2Bp_SQXIzaiNJoWa_av_48empqXxebyLdlVUV11zZ29ejD0bZluMv9J7I_t5V3n7f7MflzNf09vo5vf8xuxqPbOBfSQMxsIWzm5lJTk8tCp9QUVGjrDGRcGhZUwx1XNstEUCSTWhhZSCrBgEgpOyZnQ98w0XPnfIvL0ueuquzK1Z1HKTUwbkwwnv5jXNRdswqzYQpUBThvJj2Y8vA_37g5PjXl0jYbpIA9UVxgDw57cNgTxTeiuA7RL9v-XbZ0xXtwizAYTgaDa8p8J0-_aW447-Wvg_xSVm7z3-_iZPprHKqQj4d84O_Wu7xtHlEqpgTe383wWt3dX_78fokT9gqPDZoX</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Johnson, Elizabeth K.</creator><creator>Seidl, Amanda H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics</title><author>Johnson, Elizabeth K. ; Seidl, Amanda H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5690-3ad5abef6819c6d8219d158ae90b4693d5a94e47abb59d16368596d6160905213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Language Research</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Suprasegmentals</topic><topic>Syllables</topic><topic>Verbal Learning - physiology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Elizabeth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidl, Amanda H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Developmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Elizabeth K.</au><au>Seidl, Amanda H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ849441</ericid><atitle>At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics</atitle><jtitle>Developmental science</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Sci</addtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>131-141</pages><issn>1363-755X</issn><eissn>1467-7687</eissn><abstract>English‐learning 7.5‐month‐olds are heavily biased to perceive stressed syllables as word onsets. By 11 months, however, infants begin segmenting non‐initially stressed words from speech. Using the same artificial language methodology as
Johnson and Jusczyk (2001
), we explored the possibility that the emergence of this ability is linked to a decreased reliance on prosodic cues to word boundaries accompanied by an increased reliance on syllable distribution cues. In a baseline study, where only statistical cues to word boundaries were present, infants exhibited a familiarity preference for statistical words. When conflicting stress cues were added to the speech stream, infants exhibited a familiarity preference for stress as opposed to statistical words. This was interpreted as evidence that 11‐month‐olds weight stress cues to word boundaries more heavily than statistical cues. Experiment 2 further investigated these results with a language containing convergent cues to word boundaries. The results of Experiment 2 were not conclusive. A third experiment using new stimuli and a different experimental design supported the conclusion that 11‐month‐olds rely more heavily on prosodic than statistical cues to word boundaries. We conclude that the emergence of the ability to segment non‐initially stressed words from speech is not likely to be tied to an increased reliance on syllable distribution cues relative to stress cues, but instead may emerge due to an increased reliance on and integration of a broad array of segmentation cues.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19120421</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00740.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1363-755X |
ispartof | Developmental science, 2009-01, Vol.12 (1), p.131-141 |
issn | 1363-755X 1467-7687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66803499 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Age differences Babies Bias Child Language Cues Developmental psychology Familiarity Female Humans Infant Infants Language acquisition Language Development Language Research Male Phonetics Research Design Speech Speech Perception - physiology Suprasegmentals Syllables Verbal Learning - physiology |
title | At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T17%3A03%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=At%2011%20months,%20prosody%20still%20outranks%20statistics&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20science&rft.au=Johnson,%20Elizabeth%20K.&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=131-141&rft.issn=1363-755X&rft.eissn=1467-7687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00740.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1617328071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201700899&rft_id=info:pmid/19120421&rft_ericid=EJ849441&rfr_iscdi=true |