Early clinical pregnancy loss rate in poor responder patients does not change compared to age-matched normoresponders

Objective To investigate the early clinical pregnancy loss rate (ECPLR) of singleton gestations in poor responder (PR) patients. Design A retrospective study. Setting Private assisted reproductive technology center. Patient(s) A total of 2,157 singleton clinical pregnancies were identified, 195 from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2009, Vol.91 (1), p.106-109
Hauptverfasser: Kumbak, Banu, M.D, Ulug, Ulun, M.D, Erzik, Burcak, M.D, Akbas, Hande, M.D, Bahceci, Mustafa, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109
container_issue 1
container_start_page 106
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 91
creator Kumbak, Banu, M.D
Ulug, Ulun, M.D
Erzik, Burcak, M.D
Akbas, Hande, M.D
Bahceci, Mustafa, M.D
description Objective To investigate the early clinical pregnancy loss rate (ECPLR) of singleton gestations in poor responder (PR) patients. Design A retrospective study. Setting Private assisted reproductive technology center. Patient(s) A total of 2,157 singleton clinical pregnancies were identified, 195 from PR and 1,962 from normoresponder (NR) patients. Poor response was accepted as retrieval of four or fewer oocytes. Patients who yielded more than five oocytes were accepted as NR control group. Intervention(s) Patients were age stratified as ≤35, 36–39, and ≥40 years. Main Outcome Measure(s) Comparative evaluation of ECPLR in PR and NR patients according to age. Results Out of 195 singleton clinical pregnancies achieved in poor responders, 31% resulted in early clinical pregnancy loss; ECPLR were 22%, 32%, and 59% in the ≤35, 36–39, and ≥40 year age groups, respectively. When ECPLR in singleton gestations of PR patients was compared with that of NR patients according to age, no significant differences were found for all age groups. Conclusion(s) Early clinical pregnancy loss rate was not found to differ significantly between PR and NR patients at all age groups. Therefore, PR patients should be counseled about their lower probability of clinical pregnancy but similar ECPLR compared with their age-matched NR counterparts.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66777701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001502820703974X</els_id><sourcerecordid>66777701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c00667ba448426296874cb2a6317fc4435941d980e3b0ffb67eda78fb61a7c6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQQC0Eokvbv4B8gVvC2Ens5IIEVaGVKnFokbhZjjPZeknsYDtI--_xapdW4oQP_pDejMdvTAhlUDJg4sOuHDEkF1OeSw4gS8ZKgO4F2bCmEUUjmuol2QCwpgDe8jPyJsYdAAgm-Wtyxlped1XbbMh6rcO0p2ayzho90SXg1mln9nTyMdKgE1Lr6OJ9oAHj4t2AgS46WXQp0sFjpM4nah612yI1fl50wIEmT_UWi1kn85iPzofZP8XHC_Jq1FPEy9N6Tr5_uX64uinuvn29vfp0V5gGZCpMLljIXtd1W3PBO9HK2vRci4rJ0dR11XQ1G7oWsOphHHshcdCyzRumpRFYnZP3x7xL8L9WjEnNNhqcJu3Qr1Hl7HkAy2B7BE3Izw44qiXYWYe9YqAOytVOPStXB-WKMZWV59C3pzvWfsbhOfDkOAPvToCOWfEYsl4bnzjOAHhuS-Y-HznMRn5bDCqabNngYAOapAZv_6eaj_8k-dvan7jHuPNrcNm4YipyBer-8EUOPwQkVJ2sf1R_AExEu-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66777701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early clinical pregnancy loss rate in poor responder patients does not change compared to age-matched normoresponders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Kumbak, Banu, M.D ; Ulug, Ulun, M.D ; Erzik, Burcak, M.D ; Akbas, Hande, M.D ; Bahceci, Mustafa, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumbak, Banu, M.D ; Ulug, Ulun, M.D ; Erzik, Burcak, M.D ; Akbas, Hande, M.D ; Bahceci, Mustafa, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To investigate the early clinical pregnancy loss rate (ECPLR) of singleton gestations in poor responder (PR) patients. Design A retrospective study. Setting Private assisted reproductive technology center. Patient(s) A total of 2,157 singleton clinical pregnancies were identified, 195 from PR and 1,962 from normoresponder (NR) patients. Poor response was accepted as retrieval of four or fewer oocytes. Patients who yielded more than five oocytes were accepted as NR control group. Intervention(s) Patients were age stratified as ≤35, 36–39, and ≥40 years. Main Outcome Measure(s) Comparative evaluation of ECPLR in PR and NR patients according to age. Results Out of 195 singleton clinical pregnancies achieved in poor responders, 31% resulted in early clinical pregnancy loss; ECPLR were 22%, 32%, and 59% in the ≤35, 36–39, and ≥40 year age groups, respectively. When ECPLR in singleton gestations of PR patients was compared with that of NR patients according to age, no significant differences were found for all age groups. Conclusion(s) Early clinical pregnancy loss rate was not found to differ significantly between PR and NR patients at all age groups. Therefore, PR patients should be counseled about their lower probability of clinical pregnancy but similar ECPLR compared with their age-matched NR counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18249385</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology ; Abortion, Spontaneous - genetics ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aneuploidy ; Biological and medical sciences ; clinical abortion ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; early pregnancy loss ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - methods ; Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; ICSI ; Internal Medicine ; IVF ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Oocyte Retrieval - methods ; Poor responder ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Prognosis ; Turkey ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2009, Vol.91 (1), p.106-109</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2009 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c00667ba448426296874cb2a6317fc4435941d980e3b0ffb67eda78fb61a7c6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c00667ba448426296874cb2a6317fc4435941d980e3b0ffb67eda78fb61a7c6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001502820703974X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,4009,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21002172$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18249385$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumbak, Banu, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulug, Ulun, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erzik, Burcak, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akbas, Hande, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahceci, Mustafa, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Early clinical pregnancy loss rate in poor responder patients does not change compared to age-matched normoresponders</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To investigate the early clinical pregnancy loss rate (ECPLR) of singleton gestations in poor responder (PR) patients. Design A retrospective study. Setting Private assisted reproductive technology center. Patient(s) A total of 2,157 singleton clinical pregnancies were identified, 195 from PR and 1,962 from normoresponder (NR) patients. Poor response was accepted as retrieval of four or fewer oocytes. Patients who yielded more than five oocytes were accepted as NR control group. Intervention(s) Patients were age stratified as ≤35, 36–39, and ≥40 years. Main Outcome Measure(s) Comparative evaluation of ECPLR in PR and NR patients according to age. Results Out of 195 singleton clinical pregnancies achieved in poor responders, 31% resulted in early clinical pregnancy loss; ECPLR were 22%, 32%, and 59% in the ≤35, 36–39, and ≥40 year age groups, respectively. When ECPLR in singleton gestations of PR patients was compared with that of NR patients according to age, no significant differences were found for all age groups. Conclusion(s) Early clinical pregnancy loss rate was not found to differ significantly between PR and NR patients at all age groups. Therefore, PR patients should be counseled about their lower probability of clinical pregnancy but similar ECPLR compared with their age-matched NR counterparts.</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology</subject><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - genetics</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aneuploidy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>clinical abortion</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>early pregnancy loss</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ICSI</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>IVF</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval - methods</subject><subject>Poor responder</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQQC0Eokvbv4B8gVvC2Ens5IIEVaGVKnFokbhZjjPZeknsYDtI--_xapdW4oQP_pDejMdvTAhlUDJg4sOuHDEkF1OeSw4gS8ZKgO4F2bCmEUUjmuol2QCwpgDe8jPyJsYdAAgm-Wtyxlped1XbbMh6rcO0p2ayzho90SXg1mln9nTyMdKgE1Lr6OJ9oAHj4t2AgS46WXQp0sFjpM4nah612yI1fl50wIEmT_UWi1kn85iPzofZP8XHC_Jq1FPEy9N6Tr5_uX64uinuvn29vfp0V5gGZCpMLljIXtd1W3PBO9HK2vRci4rJ0dR11XQ1G7oWsOphHHshcdCyzRumpRFYnZP3x7xL8L9WjEnNNhqcJu3Qr1Hl7HkAy2B7BE3Izw44qiXYWYe9YqAOytVOPStXB-WKMZWV59C3pzvWfsbhOfDkOAPvToCOWfEYsl4bnzjOAHhuS-Y-HznMRn5bDCqabNngYAOapAZv_6eaj_8k-dvan7jHuPNrcNm4YipyBer-8EUOPwQkVJ2sf1R_AExEu-w</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Kumbak, Banu, M.D</creator><creator>Ulug, Ulun, M.D</creator><creator>Erzik, Burcak, M.D</creator><creator>Akbas, Hande, M.D</creator><creator>Bahceci, Mustafa, M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Early clinical pregnancy loss rate in poor responder patients does not change compared to age-matched normoresponders</title><author>Kumbak, Banu, M.D ; Ulug, Ulun, M.D ; Erzik, Burcak, M.D ; Akbas, Hande, M.D ; Bahceci, Mustafa, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c00667ba448426296874cb2a6317fc4435941d980e3b0ffb67eda78fb61a7c6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology</topic><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - genetics</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aneuploidy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>clinical abortion</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>early pregnancy loss</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ICSI</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>IVF</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval - methods</topic><topic>Poor responder</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumbak, Banu, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulug, Ulun, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erzik, Burcak, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akbas, Hande, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahceci, Mustafa, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumbak, Banu, M.D</au><au>Ulug, Ulun, M.D</au><au>Erzik, Burcak, M.D</au><au>Akbas, Hande, M.D</au><au>Bahceci, Mustafa, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early clinical pregnancy loss rate in poor responder patients does not change compared to age-matched normoresponders</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>106-109</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To investigate the early clinical pregnancy loss rate (ECPLR) of singleton gestations in poor responder (PR) patients. Design A retrospective study. Setting Private assisted reproductive technology center. Patient(s) A total of 2,157 singleton clinical pregnancies were identified, 195 from PR and 1,962 from normoresponder (NR) patients. Poor response was accepted as retrieval of four or fewer oocytes. Patients who yielded more than five oocytes were accepted as NR control group. Intervention(s) Patients were age stratified as ≤35, 36–39, and ≥40 years. Main Outcome Measure(s) Comparative evaluation of ECPLR in PR and NR patients according to age. Results Out of 195 singleton clinical pregnancies achieved in poor responders, 31% resulted in early clinical pregnancy loss; ECPLR were 22%, 32%, and 59% in the ≤35, 36–39, and ≥40 year age groups, respectively. When ECPLR in singleton gestations of PR patients was compared with that of NR patients according to age, no significant differences were found for all age groups. Conclusion(s) Early clinical pregnancy loss rate was not found to differ significantly between PR and NR patients at all age groups. Therefore, PR patients should be counseled about their lower probability of clinical pregnancy but similar ECPLR compared with their age-matched NR counterparts.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18249385</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.009</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2009, Vol.91 (1), p.106-109
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66777701
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology
Abortion, Spontaneous - genetics
Adult
Age Factors
Aneuploidy
Biological and medical sciences
clinical abortion
Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy
early pregnancy loss
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - methods
Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
ICSI
Internal Medicine
IVF
Male
Medical sciences
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Oocyte Retrieval - methods
Poor responder
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Prognosis
Turkey
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
title Early clinical pregnancy loss rate in poor responder patients does not change compared to age-matched normoresponders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20clinical%20pregnancy%20loss%20rate%20in%20poor%20responder%20patients%20does%20not%20change%20compared%20to%20age-matched%20normoresponders&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Kumbak,%20Banu,%20M.D&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=106-109&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66777701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66777701&rft_id=info:pmid/18249385&rft_els_id=S001502820703974X&rfr_iscdi=true