Perceived social support in a large community sample: Age and sex differences

The positive health and wellbeing effects of social support have been consistently demonstrated in the literature since the late 1970s. However, a better understanding of the effects of age and sex is required. We examined the factor structure and reliability of Kessler's Perceived Social Suppo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2004-08, Vol.39 (8), p.625-636
Hauptverfasser: COVENTRY, W. L, GILLESPIE, N. A, HEATH, A. C, MARTIN, N. G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 636
container_issue 8
container_start_page 625
container_title Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
container_volume 39
creator COVENTRY, W. L
GILLESPIE, N. A
HEATH, A. C
MARTIN, N. G
description The positive health and wellbeing effects of social support have been consistently demonstrated in the literature since the late 1970s. However, a better understanding of the effects of age and sex is required. We examined the factor structure and reliability of Kessler's Perceived Social Support (KPSS) measure in a community-based sample that comprised younger and older adult cohorts from the Australian Twin Registry (ATR), totalling 11,389 males and females aged 18-95, of whom 887 were retested 25 months later. Factor analysis consistently identified seven factors: support from spouse, twin, children, parents, relatives, friends and helping support. Internal reliability for the seven dimensions ranged from 0.87 to 0.71 and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.75 to 0.48. Perceived support was only marginally higher in females. Age dependencies were explored. Across the age range, there was a slight decline (more marked in females) in the perceived support from spouse, parent and friend, a slight increase in perceived relative and helping support for males but none for females, a substantial increase in the perceived support from children for males and females and a negligible decline in total KPSS for females against a negligible increase for males. The perceived support from twin remained constant. Females were more likely to have a confidant, although this declined with age whilst increasing with age for males. Total scores for perceived social support conflate heterogeneous patterns on sub-scales that differ markedly by age and sex. Our paper describes these relationships in detail in a very large Australian sample.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00127-004-0795-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66773520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>960213151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-4d8a05fe97bc90f7282ed018de203ebe50c93b6ecd334870417e6a8101e531ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIEPRWnTRtk3hbFr9gRQ96Dmk6lUq_TFpx_71ZtqB4mmHyvC_hIeSUwRUDENcegMUiAkgiECqN5B6Zs4TzSMUy3SdzUGEPD8mMHHn_AQBcCX5IZizlYRd8Tp5e0FmsvrCgvrOVqakf-75zA61aamht3DtS2zXN2FbDhnrT9DXe0GW4mjZk8JsWVVmiw9aiPyYHpak9nkxzQd7ubl9XD9H6-f5xtVxHlkM2REkhDaQlKpFbBaWIZYwFMFlgDBxzTMEqnmdoC84TKSBhAjMjGTBMOUPkC3K56-1d9zmiH3RTeYt1bVrsRq-zTAiehrIFOf8HfnSja8PfdMwzppJYsQCxHWRd573DUveuaozbaAZ6K1rvROsgWm9FaxkyZ1PxmDdY_CYmswG4mADjralLZ1pb-T-ckkLEGf8B9bCEeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236194291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived social support in a large community sample: Age and sex differences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>COVENTRY, W. L ; GILLESPIE, N. A ; HEATH, A. C ; MARTIN, N. G</creator><creatorcontrib>COVENTRY, W. L ; GILLESPIE, N. A ; HEATH, A. C ; MARTIN, N. G</creatorcontrib><description>The positive health and wellbeing effects of social support have been consistently demonstrated in the literature since the late 1970s. However, a better understanding of the effects of age and sex is required. We examined the factor structure and reliability of Kessler's Perceived Social Support (KPSS) measure in a community-based sample that comprised younger and older adult cohorts from the Australian Twin Registry (ATR), totalling 11,389 males and females aged 18-95, of whom 887 were retested 25 months later. Factor analysis consistently identified seven factors: support from spouse, twin, children, parents, relatives, friends and helping support. Internal reliability for the seven dimensions ranged from 0.87 to 0.71 and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.75 to 0.48. Perceived support was only marginally higher in females. Age dependencies were explored. Across the age range, there was a slight decline (more marked in females) in the perceived support from spouse, parent and friend, a slight increase in perceived relative and helping support for males but none for females, a substantial increase in the perceived support from children for males and females and a negligible decline in total KPSS for females against a negligible increase for males. The perceived support from twin remained constant. Females were more likely to have a confidant, although this declined with age whilst increasing with age for males. Total scores for perceived social support conflate heterogeneous patterns on sub-scales that differ markedly by age and sex. Our paper describes these relationships in detail in a very large Australian sample.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0933-7954</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-9285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00127-004-0795-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15300373</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPPEEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Australia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Family - psychology ; Female ; Friends ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sex Factors ; Social networks ; Social Support ; Techniques and methods ; Twins - psychology</subject><ispartof>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2004-08, Vol.39 (8), p.625-636</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Steinkopff Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15987726$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15300373$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>COVENTRY, W. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLESPIE, N. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEATH, A. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARTIN, N. G</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived social support in a large community sample: Age and sex differences</title><title>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</title><addtitle>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol</addtitle><description>The positive health and wellbeing effects of social support have been consistently demonstrated in the literature since the late 1970s. However, a better understanding of the effects of age and sex is required. We examined the factor structure and reliability of Kessler's Perceived Social Support (KPSS) measure in a community-based sample that comprised younger and older adult cohorts from the Australian Twin Registry (ATR), totalling 11,389 males and females aged 18-95, of whom 887 were retested 25 months later. Factor analysis consistently identified seven factors: support from spouse, twin, children, parents, relatives, friends and helping support. Internal reliability for the seven dimensions ranged from 0.87 to 0.71 and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.75 to 0.48. Perceived support was only marginally higher in females. Age dependencies were explored. Across the age range, there was a slight decline (more marked in females) in the perceived support from spouse, parent and friend, a slight increase in perceived relative and helping support for males but none for females, a substantial increase in the perceived support from children for males and females and a negligible decline in total KPSS for females against a negligible increase for males. The perceived support from twin remained constant. Females were more likely to have a confidant, although this declined with age whilst increasing with age for males. Total scores for perceived social support conflate heterogeneous patterns on sub-scales that differ markedly by age and sex. Our paper describes these relationships in detail in a very large Australian sample.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Friends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Twins - psychology</subject><issn>0933-7954</issn><issn>1433-9285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIEPRWnTRtk3hbFr9gRQ96Dmk6lUq_TFpx_71ZtqB4mmHyvC_hIeSUwRUDENcegMUiAkgiECqN5B6Zs4TzSMUy3SdzUGEPD8mMHHn_AQBcCX5IZizlYRd8Tp5e0FmsvrCgvrOVqakf-75zA61aamht3DtS2zXN2FbDhnrT9DXe0GW4mjZk8JsWVVmiw9aiPyYHpak9nkxzQd7ubl9XD9H6-f5xtVxHlkM2REkhDaQlKpFbBaWIZYwFMFlgDBxzTMEqnmdoC84TKSBhAjMjGTBMOUPkC3K56-1d9zmiH3RTeYt1bVrsRq-zTAiehrIFOf8HfnSja8PfdMwzppJYsQCxHWRd573DUveuaozbaAZ6K1rvROsgWm9FaxkyZ1PxmDdY_CYmswG4mADjralLZ1pb-T-ckkLEGf8B9bCEeA</recordid><startdate>20040801</startdate><enddate>20040801</enddate><creator>COVENTRY, W. L</creator><creator>GILLESPIE, N. A</creator><creator>HEATH, A. C</creator><creator>MARTIN, N. G</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040801</creationdate><title>Perceived social support in a large community sample: Age and sex differences</title><author>COVENTRY, W. L ; GILLESPIE, N. A ; HEATH, A. C ; MARTIN, N. G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-4d8a05fe97bc90f7282ed018de203ebe50c93b6ecd334870417e6a8101e531ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Friends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Twins - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>COVENTRY, W. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLESPIE, N. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEATH, A. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARTIN, N. G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>COVENTRY, W. L</au><au>GILLESPIE, N. A</au><au>HEATH, A. C</au><au>MARTIN, N. G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived social support in a large community sample: Age and sex differences</atitle><jtitle>Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2004-08-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>625-636</pages><issn>0933-7954</issn><eissn>1433-9285</eissn><coden>SPPEEM</coden><abstract>The positive health and wellbeing effects of social support have been consistently demonstrated in the literature since the late 1970s. However, a better understanding of the effects of age and sex is required. We examined the factor structure and reliability of Kessler's Perceived Social Support (KPSS) measure in a community-based sample that comprised younger and older adult cohorts from the Australian Twin Registry (ATR), totalling 11,389 males and females aged 18-95, of whom 887 were retested 25 months later. Factor analysis consistently identified seven factors: support from spouse, twin, children, parents, relatives, friends and helping support. Internal reliability for the seven dimensions ranged from 0.87 to 0.71 and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.75 to 0.48. Perceived support was only marginally higher in females. Age dependencies were explored. Across the age range, there was a slight decline (more marked in females) in the perceived support from spouse, parent and friend, a slight increase in perceived relative and helping support for males but none for females, a substantial increase in the perceived support from children for males and females and a negligible decline in total KPSS for females against a negligible increase for males. The perceived support from twin remained constant. Females were more likely to have a confidant, although this declined with age whilst increasing with age for males. Total scores for perceived social support conflate heterogeneous patterns on sub-scales that differ markedly by age and sex. Our paper describes these relationships in detail in a very large Australian sample.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>15300373</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00127-004-0795-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0933-7954
ispartof Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2004-08, Vol.39 (8), p.625-636
issn 0933-7954
1433-9285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66773520
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Australia
Biological and medical sciences
Family - psychology
Female
Friends
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data
Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Reproducibility of Results
Sex Factors
Social networks
Social Support
Techniques and methods
Twins - psychology
title Perceived social support in a large community sample: Age and sex differences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A16%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20social%20support%20in%20a%20large%20community%20sample:%20Age%20and%20sex%20differences&rft.jtitle=Social%20Psychiatry%20and%20Psychiatric%20Epidemiology&rft.au=COVENTRY,%20W.%20L&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=625-636&rft.issn=0933-7954&rft.eissn=1433-9285&rft.coden=SPPEEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00127-004-0795-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E960213151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236194291&rft_id=info:pmid/15300373&rfr_iscdi=true