Comparison of Kinematics, Kinetics, and EMG Throughout Wheelchair Propulsion in Able-Bodied and Persons With Paraplegia: An Integrative Approach

A systematic integrated data collection and analysis of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography (EMG) data allow for the comparison of differences in wheelchair propulsion between able-bodied individuals and persons with paraplegia. Kinematic data from a motion analysis system, kinetic data from fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanical engineering 2009-02, Vol.131 (2), p.021015-8
Hauptverfasser: Dubowsky, Sarah R, Sisto, Sue Ann, Langrana, Noshir A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue 2
container_start_page 021015
container_title Journal of biomechanical engineering
container_volume 131
creator Dubowsky, Sarah R
Sisto, Sue Ann
Langrana, Noshir A
description A systematic integrated data collection and analysis of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography (EMG) data allow for the comparison of differences in wheelchair propulsion between able-bodied individuals and persons with paraplegia. Kinematic data from a motion analysis system, kinetic data from force-sensing push rims, and electromyography data from four upper-limb muscles were collected for ten push strokes. Results are as follows: Individuals with paraplegia use a greater percentage of their posterior deltoids, biceps, and triceps in relation to maximal voluntary contraction. These persons also reached peak anterior deltoid firing nearly 10 deg earlier on the push rim, while reaching peak posterior deltoid nearly 10 deg later on the push rim. Able-bodied individuals had no triceps activity in the initial stages of propulsion while their paraplegic groups had activity throughout. Able-bodied participants also had, on average, peak resultant, tangential, and radial forces occurring later on the push rim (in degrees). There are two main conclusions that can be drawn from this integrative investigation: (1) A greater “muscle energy,” as measured by the area under the curve of the percentage of EMG throughout propulsion, results in a greater resultant joint force in the shoulder and elbow, thus potentially resulting in shoulder pathology. (2) Similarly, a greater muscle energy may result in fatigue and play a factor in the development of shoulder pain and pathology over time; fatigue may compromise an effective propulsive stroke placing undue stresses on the joint capsule. Muscle activity differences may be responsible for the observed kinematic and kinetic differences between the two groups. The high incidence of shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users as compared to the general population may be the result of such differences, although the results from this biomedical investigation should be examined with caution. Future research into joint forces may shed light on this. Further investigation needs to focus on whether the pattern of kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity during wheelchair propulsion is compensatory or evolutionary by tracking individuals longitudinally.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.2900726
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66760832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20688708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-7e7badd4eca252509aef721705571284b9a62dfeda7e8057f2a0366aad40ff8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCgTMS8gkJiZSxE3-E27IqpaKIPRT1GM3Gk42rJE7tBIl_wU8mdFfi2NO8h2eekeZl7LWAcyGE-ijOZQlgpH7CVkJJm9lSiadsBaKwGZhcnLEXKd0BCGELeM7ORClAKlOs2J9t6EeMPoWBh4Z_8wP1OPk6fXjIx4SD4xffL_lNG8N8aMM88duWqKtb9JHvYhjnLvnF4Ae-2XeUfQ7Ok3vY21Fc3Inf-qnlO4w4dnTw-IlvBn41THSIy7lfxDfjGAPW7Uv2rMEu0avTXLOfXy5utl-z6x-XV9vNdYa5VlNmyOzRuYJqlEoqKJEaI4UBpYyQttiXqKVryKEhC8o0EiHXGtEV0DTW5Wv27uhdzt7PlKaq96mmrsOBwpwqrY0Gm8tHwbxQSoMRj4IStLVmca7Z-yNYx5BSpKYao-8x_q4EVP8KrUR1KnRh356k874n9588NbgAb44App6quzDHYXlblZdGlzr_CyaPpF0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20688708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Kinematics, Kinetics, and EMG Throughout Wheelchair Propulsion in Able-Bodied and Persons With Paraplegia: An Integrative Approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Dubowsky, Sarah R ; Sisto, Sue Ann ; Langrana, Noshir A</creator><creatorcontrib>Dubowsky, Sarah R ; Sisto, Sue Ann ; Langrana, Noshir A</creatorcontrib><description>A systematic integrated data collection and analysis of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography (EMG) data allow for the comparison of differences in wheelchair propulsion between able-bodied individuals and persons with paraplegia. Kinematic data from a motion analysis system, kinetic data from force-sensing push rims, and electromyography data from four upper-limb muscles were collected for ten push strokes. Results are as follows: Individuals with paraplegia use a greater percentage of their posterior deltoids, biceps, and triceps in relation to maximal voluntary contraction. These persons also reached peak anterior deltoid firing nearly 10 deg earlier on the push rim, while reaching peak posterior deltoid nearly 10 deg later on the push rim. Able-bodied individuals had no triceps activity in the initial stages of propulsion while their paraplegic groups had activity throughout. Able-bodied participants also had, on average, peak resultant, tangential, and radial forces occurring later on the push rim (in degrees). There are two main conclusions that can be drawn from this integrative investigation: (1) A greater “muscle energy,” as measured by the area under the curve of the percentage of EMG throughout propulsion, results in a greater resultant joint force in the shoulder and elbow, thus potentially resulting in shoulder pathology. (2) Similarly, a greater muscle energy may result in fatigue and play a factor in the development of shoulder pain and pathology over time; fatigue may compromise an effective propulsive stroke placing undue stresses on the joint capsule. Muscle activity differences may be responsible for the observed kinematic and kinetic differences between the two groups. The high incidence of shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users as compared to the general population may be the result of such differences, although the results from this biomedical investigation should be examined with caution. Future research into joint forces may shed light on this. Further investigation needs to focus on whether the pattern of kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity during wheelchair propulsion is compensatory or evolutionary by tracking individuals longitudinally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8951</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.2900726</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19102574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: ASME</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Electromyography ; Fatigue - physiopathology ; Humans ; Kinetics ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Paraplegia - physiopathology ; Shoulder Pain - physiopathology ; Wheelchairs</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2009-02, Vol.131 (2), p.021015-8</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-7e7badd4eca252509aef721705571284b9a62dfeda7e8057f2a0366aad40ff8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-7e7badd4eca252509aef721705571284b9a62dfeda7e8057f2a0366aad40ff8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,38519</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19102574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dubowsky, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sisto, Sue Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langrana, Noshir A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Kinematics, Kinetics, and EMG Throughout Wheelchair Propulsion in Able-Bodied and Persons With Paraplegia: An Integrative Approach</title><title>Journal of biomechanical engineering</title><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><description>A systematic integrated data collection and analysis of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography (EMG) data allow for the comparison of differences in wheelchair propulsion between able-bodied individuals and persons with paraplegia. Kinematic data from a motion analysis system, kinetic data from force-sensing push rims, and electromyography data from four upper-limb muscles were collected for ten push strokes. Results are as follows: Individuals with paraplegia use a greater percentage of their posterior deltoids, biceps, and triceps in relation to maximal voluntary contraction. These persons also reached peak anterior deltoid firing nearly 10 deg earlier on the push rim, while reaching peak posterior deltoid nearly 10 deg later on the push rim. Able-bodied individuals had no triceps activity in the initial stages of propulsion while their paraplegic groups had activity throughout. Able-bodied participants also had, on average, peak resultant, tangential, and radial forces occurring later on the push rim (in degrees). There are two main conclusions that can be drawn from this integrative investigation: (1) A greater “muscle energy,” as measured by the area under the curve of the percentage of EMG throughout propulsion, results in a greater resultant joint force in the shoulder and elbow, thus potentially resulting in shoulder pathology. (2) Similarly, a greater muscle energy may result in fatigue and play a factor in the development of shoulder pain and pathology over time; fatigue may compromise an effective propulsive stroke placing undue stresses on the joint capsule. Muscle activity differences may be responsible for the observed kinematic and kinetic differences between the two groups. The high incidence of shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users as compared to the general population may be the result of such differences, although the results from this biomedical investigation should be examined with caution. Future research into joint forces may shed light on this. Further investigation needs to focus on whether the pattern of kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity during wheelchair propulsion is compensatory or evolutionary by tracking individuals longitudinally.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Fatigue - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Paraplegia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Wheelchairs</subject><issn>0148-0731</issn><issn>1528-8951</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCgTMS8gkJiZSxE3-E27IqpaKIPRT1GM3Gk42rJE7tBIl_wU8mdFfi2NO8h2eekeZl7LWAcyGE-ijOZQlgpH7CVkJJm9lSiadsBaKwGZhcnLEXKd0BCGELeM7ORClAKlOs2J9t6EeMPoWBh4Z_8wP1OPk6fXjIx4SD4xffL_lNG8N8aMM88duWqKtb9JHvYhjnLvnF4Ae-2XeUfQ7Ok3vY21Fc3Inf-qnlO4w4dnTw-IlvBn41THSIy7lfxDfjGAPW7Uv2rMEu0avTXLOfXy5utl-z6x-XV9vNdYa5VlNmyOzRuYJqlEoqKJEaI4UBpYyQttiXqKVryKEhC8o0EiHXGtEV0DTW5Wv27uhdzt7PlKaq96mmrsOBwpwqrY0Gm8tHwbxQSoMRj4IStLVmca7Z-yNYx5BSpKYao-8x_q4EVP8KrUR1KnRh356k874n9588NbgAb44App6quzDHYXlblZdGlzr_CyaPpF0</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Dubowsky, Sarah R</creator><creator>Sisto, Sue Ann</creator><creator>Langrana, Noshir A</creator><general>ASME</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Kinematics, Kinetics, and EMG Throughout Wheelchair Propulsion in Able-Bodied and Persons With Paraplegia: An Integrative Approach</title><author>Dubowsky, Sarah R ; Sisto, Sue Ann ; Langrana, Noshir A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-7e7badd4eca252509aef721705571284b9a62dfeda7e8057f2a0366aad40ff8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Fatigue - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Paraplegia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Wheelchairs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dubowsky, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sisto, Sue Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langrana, Noshir A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dubowsky, Sarah R</au><au>Sisto, Sue Ann</au><au>Langrana, Noshir A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Kinematics, Kinetics, and EMG Throughout Wheelchair Propulsion in Able-Bodied and Persons With Paraplegia: An Integrative Approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanical engineering</jtitle><stitle>J Biomech Eng</stitle><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>021015</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>021015-8</pages><issn>0148-0731</issn><eissn>1528-8951</eissn><abstract>A systematic integrated data collection and analysis of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography (EMG) data allow for the comparison of differences in wheelchair propulsion between able-bodied individuals and persons with paraplegia. Kinematic data from a motion analysis system, kinetic data from force-sensing push rims, and electromyography data from four upper-limb muscles were collected for ten push strokes. Results are as follows: Individuals with paraplegia use a greater percentage of their posterior deltoids, biceps, and triceps in relation to maximal voluntary contraction. These persons also reached peak anterior deltoid firing nearly 10 deg earlier on the push rim, while reaching peak posterior deltoid nearly 10 deg later on the push rim. Able-bodied individuals had no triceps activity in the initial stages of propulsion while their paraplegic groups had activity throughout. Able-bodied participants also had, on average, peak resultant, tangential, and radial forces occurring later on the push rim (in degrees). There are two main conclusions that can be drawn from this integrative investigation: (1) A greater “muscle energy,” as measured by the area under the curve of the percentage of EMG throughout propulsion, results in a greater resultant joint force in the shoulder and elbow, thus potentially resulting in shoulder pathology. (2) Similarly, a greater muscle energy may result in fatigue and play a factor in the development of shoulder pain and pathology over time; fatigue may compromise an effective propulsive stroke placing undue stresses on the joint capsule. Muscle activity differences may be responsible for the observed kinematic and kinetic differences between the two groups. The high incidence of shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users as compared to the general population may be the result of such differences, although the results from this biomedical investigation should be examined with caution. Future research into joint forces may shed light on this. Further investigation needs to focus on whether the pattern of kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity during wheelchair propulsion is compensatory or evolutionary by tracking individuals longitudinally.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>ASME</pub><pmid>19102574</pmid><doi>10.1115/1.2900726</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0731
ispartof Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2009-02, Vol.131 (2), p.021015-8
issn 0148-0731
1528-8951
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66760832
source MEDLINE; ASME Transactions Journals (Current)
subjects Biomechanical Phenomena
Electromyography
Fatigue - physiopathology
Humans
Kinetics
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology
Paraplegia - physiopathology
Shoulder Pain - physiopathology
Wheelchairs
title Comparison of Kinematics, Kinetics, and EMG Throughout Wheelchair Propulsion in Able-Bodied and Persons With Paraplegia: An Integrative Approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A18%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Kinematics,%20Kinetics,%20and%20EMG%20Throughout%20Wheelchair%20Propulsion%20in%20Able-Bodied%20and%20Persons%20With%20Paraplegia:%20An%20Integrative%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanical%20engineering&rft.au=Dubowsky,%20Sarah%20R&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=021015&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=021015-8&rft.issn=0148-0731&rft.eissn=1528-8951&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.2900726&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20688708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20688708&rft_id=info:pmid/19102574&rfr_iscdi=true